How the hell is heavy rain better graphics than crysis

how can it be better than crysis it looks just a bit better than gta 4 which is still pretty good but not as good a crysis

cows are welcome to prove me wrong post screen shots if u want

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nzMdPwO2Qw

crysis gameplay

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMWbZIyqEfU

heavy rain gameplay trailer

now compare

how can it be better than crysis it looks just a bit better than gta 4 which is still pretty good but not as good a crysis

cows are welcome to prove me wrong post screen shots if u want

mikhail_tisoy

Its the magic of the fanboy goggles. They blur the textures and screen on every console but their own.

I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.SpruceCaboose

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.BudsMcGreen

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.linkin_guy109

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

Holy crap, that would be sooo bad azz!!

[QUOTE="linkin_guy109"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.BudsMcGreen

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

Holy crap, that would be sooo bad azz!!

yeah it would be insane, someone already rebuilt the whole oblivion world using the cryengine

Only a few Cows have gone about saying such silly things (Heavy Rain / GT5:P > Crysis ect.).

We all know Crysis/Warhead is the most visually impressive game this gen.

Dont worry about that.

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.linkin_guy109

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

Hmmm I could give it a go in Unreal ED 2 or 3 though (maybe a portion of an island) :P

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"][QUOTE="linkin_guy109"][QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.linkin_guy109

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

Holy crap, that would be sooo bad azz!!

yeah it would be insane, someone already rebuilt the whole oblivion world using the cryengine

No one ever said that. Cedmln

What the hell are you on about? Only one seriously offended fanboy made such a claim. I hate when people make threads about stuff that barely anybody says.StingerVXIII

The hell is heavy rain?SpinoRaptor

[QUOTE="Cedmln"]No one ever said that. Lto_thaG

Well, of course ignorant PlayStation 3 fanboys would vote for Heavy Rain, but in the end, they know that Crysis owns heavy Rain's soul, but they still vote for HR for their fanboysm to make people think it's got a chance. Crysis owns, though.

TC, you should stop talking to nvidiagamer.mo0ksi

i was thinking only this guy could have made such a statement

Most people don't even know what makes better graphics. ie most people couldn't tell the difference between AA and a screen thats just blurry, they don't know what Antiscopic filtering is or even what it does, most people wouldn't notice a compressed texture if you gave them a magnifying glass, or notice the difference between HDR or Bloom lighting. They will litterally look at the screen and give an unqualified value judgement. Why crap your pants over it.... I mean if hardly anyone has anything close to a clue of what they are talking about why would you care what they say in the first place?

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]TC, you should stop talking to nvidiagamer.naval

i was thinking only this guy could have made such a statement

Nvidiagamer is the same guy who says that Crysis looks outdated and is outdone graphically by Killzone 2, he's the same guy who thinks that Bioshock is a completely original FPS/RPG and has better RPG elements and atmosphere than STALKER, and he constantly trolls the PC gamer forums.

The only thing he's good for is providing lulz.

[QUOTE="naval"]

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]TC, you should stop talking to nvidiagamer.aliblabla2007

i was thinking only this guy could have made such a statement

Nvidiagamer is the same guy who says that Crysis looks outdated and is outdone graphically by Killzone 2, he's the same guy who thinks that Bioshock is a completely original FPS/RPG and has better RPG elements and atmosphere than STALKER, and he constantly trolls the PC gamer forums.

The only thing he's good for is providing lulz.

yeah , i remeber his quotes. He said best rpg is bioshock

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

how can it be better than crysis it looks just a bit better than gta 4 which is still pretty good but not as good a crysis

cows are welcome to prove me wrong post screen shots if u want

mikhail_tisoy

Teh Cell!1!!!1

TC, you should stop talking to nvidiagamer.mo0ksi

lol yeah

i wonder what would happen if they got into an argument over this...

yeah it would be insane, someone already rebuilt the whole oblivion world using the cryengine

linkin_guy109

EDIT:^^^^^ Are those your screens guy above me?Or scans?

[QUOTE="linkin_guy109"]

yeah it would be insane, someone already rebuilt the whole oblivion world using the cryengine

killab2oo5

EDIT:^^^^^ Are those your screens guy above me?Or scans?

All mine except 2 promo screenshots used to show 'matching status'. All at native resolution, untouched 100% framebuffer grabs. The framerate is visible on them aswel las debug status.

I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.SpruceCaboose

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

lesner87

Operation Flashpoint (2001) did massive maps that dwarfed everything up until its follow up ArmA in 2006.

FC2s is petite.

ArmA is ahem

Over 400km square in size

All at once... streaming.

;)

Pretty OFP in 01 did more than 50....

I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.SpruceCaboose

It really isn't GTA IV's actual graphics that kill it, its the framerate. It was so bad, it was a mess and just not fun at all. Sold it as soon as I beat the story. Pc version, might be decent.

No one ever said that. Cedmln

Actually some cows did.

[QUOTE="lesner87"]

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

skrat_01

Operation Flashpoint (2001) did massive maps that dwarfed everything up until its follow up ArmA in 2006.

FC2s is petite.

ArmA is ahem

Over 400km square in size

All at once... streaming.

;)

Pretty OFP in 01 did more than 50....

Arma might have had big maps streaming at once but it didnt have ANY of the ADVANCE FEATURES of Far Cry 2.Which made it alot easier to stream at once.Far Cry 2 has ALL the ADVANCE features of Cryengine 2/Crysis and at the same time its HELL bigger than Crysis.Here are some comparisons :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okmdoesw0Qw&watch_response

Heres a tech demo of Dunia Engine (More realistic than anything i have seen):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEMaEGgBCNg&feature=related

A tech demo of Far Cry 2 :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdt7OcD2-Do

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

lesner87

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="lesner87"]

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

lesner87

Operation Flashpoint (2001) did massive maps that dwarfed everything up until its follow up ArmA in 2006.

FC2s is petite.

ArmA is ahem

Over 400km square in size

All at once... streaming.

;)

Pretty OFP in 01 did more than 50....

Arma might have had big maps streaming at once but it didnt have ANY of the ADVANCE FEATURES of Far Cry 2.Which made it alot easier to stream at once.Far Cry 2 has ALL the ADVANCE features of Cryengine 2/Crysis and at the same time its HELL bigger than Crysis.Here are some comparisons :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okmdoesw0Qw&watch_response

Heres a tech demo of Dunia Engine (More realistic than anything i have seen):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEMaEGgBCNg&feature=related

A tech demo of Far Cry 2 :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdt7OcD2-Do

Even so, its not going to be nearly as interactable and destructable as Crysis enviroments - never the less it looks good no doubt.

As I said its petite compared to OFP and ArmA.

I was never saying it wasent good.

And nah the Dunia engine is not advanced as the Cry engine 2. On release it'll be more apparant. What it does have up on the Cry Engine 2 is fire spreading and tree re growing (which has been done in other titles).

These help. There is no denying Crysis as the most technically advanced game available. To do so is lying.foxhound_fox

Ignorance is bliss for consolites.

I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.SpruceCaboose

Heavy Rain should look better than most PS3 games, since it seems to basically be one massive QTE (with, perhaps, a few adventure game elements thrown in.
GTA VI, on the other hand, actually needs processing power for the AI of large numbers of npcs, the physics engine, and everything else gameplay-related that Heavy Rain won't have/need.

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="lesner87"]

They both are completely different types of games and cant be compared.

You can compare any game visually with crysis but in the end Crysis comes out on the top and the most important reason for that is its setting i.e. An island with green lush forest,beaches,palm trees...etc..Alll of them are HEAVEN.

The only game and gaming engine,visually as good as Crysis and a little bit more realistic is Dunia engine (Far Cry 2).A 50 sqr km land ALL STREAMING AT ONCE WITHOUT any LOADING.Thats a major achievement.But once again,Crysis is still more beautiful only because of its setting :).

skrat_01

Operation Flashpoint (2001) did massive maps that dwarfed everything up until its follow up ArmA in 2006.

FC2s is petite.

ArmA is ahem

Over 400km square in size

All at once... streaming.

;)

Pretty OFP in 01 did more than 50....

Arma might have had big maps streaming at once but it didnt have ANY of the ADVANCE FEATURES of Far Cry 2.Which made it alot easier to stream at once.Far Cry 2 has ALL the ADVANCE features of Cryengine 2/Crysis and at the same time its HELL bigger than Crysis.Here are some comparisons :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPHZhDhKDU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okmdoesw0Qw&watch_response

Heres a tech demo of Dunia Engine (More realistic than anything i have seen):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEMaEGgBCNg&feature=related

A tech demo of Far Cry 2 :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pdt7OcD2-Do

Even so, its not going to be nearly as interactable and destructable as Crysis enviroments - never the less it looks good no doubt.

As I said its petite compared to OFP and ArmA.

I was never saying it wasent good.

And nah the Dunia engine is not advanced as the Cry engine 2. On release it'll be more apparant. What it does have up on the Cry Engine 2 is fire spreading and tree re growing (which has been done in other titles).

Well no dude your wrong.This is just a usual misconception amongst un-informed people (especially at SW).People over here dont know jack about both tht engines and always go on saying that Cryengine 2 is better.

As i said earlier that Far Cry 2 is more advance.Its has ALL those features of Crysis and alot more added to them example :

Fully destructable enviroments (Not just palms trees and sheds,trees break off properly where you shoot them even from the branches)

Day night cycles

Every thing (Even every single blade of grass) reacts dynamicly to the world and enviorment (weather,fire,player..etc..etc)example when a car passes over the grass it leaves a trail of dead grass and if the enemy notices that, they will investigate.

Full open streaming world WITHOUT any invisible walls(or loading times)

Far more advance AI (They actually have lunch,dinner,sleep...etc....They even try to trap you,they even try to rescue their injured buddies,they even chase you down if you run away) They even follow the tyre tracks or trails.

Its better optimized than Cryengine 2

These all are some of the features which are added to far cry 2(and can be added to Cryengine 2 but havent been)All the other important features of Cryengine 2 (motion blurr,depth of field,soft-self shadowing,advance dx10 bumpmaping,destructable trees and buildings) are all added in FC2.So that makes FC 2 no less than Cryengine 2.Heres a video proof :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMDH3LPJ7l0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU7lyFmgeFg&feature=related

As you can notice it has all those things i mentioned including more destructability of buildings.The trees just dont snap off,their branches break properly and dynimacilly depending on where you shoot.

In terms of beauty Crysis gets the upper hand.Thats what i mentioned in my VERY first post.The reason is very simple.The setting of Crysis is more appealing.With green lush jungles and beautiful islands its like a Heaven.I enjoyed Crysis on High-very high and it was visually one of the best games i ever played.In the end its all a matter of your taste.

Well no dude your wrong.This is just a usual misconception amongst un-informed people (especially at SW).People over here dont know jack about both tht engines and always go on saying that Cryengine 2 is better.

As i said earlier that Far Cry 2 is more advance.Its has ALL those features of Crysis and alot more added to them example :

Fully destructable enviroments (Not just palms trees and sheds,trees break off properly where you shoot them even from the branches)

Day night cycles

Every thing (Even every single blade of grass) reacts dynamicly to the world and enviorment (weather,fire,player..etc..etc)example when a car passes over the grass it leaves a trail of death grass and if the enemy notices that they will investigate.

Full open streaming world WITHOUT any invisible walls(or loading times)

Far more advance AI (They actually have lunch,dinner,sleep...etc....They even try to trap you,they even try to rescue their injured buddies,they even chase you down if you run away) They even follow the tyre tracks or trails.

Its better optimized than Cryengine 2

These all are some of the features which are added to far cry 2(and can be added to Cryengine 2 but havent been)All the other important features of Cryengine 2 (motion blurr,depth of field,soft-self shadowing,advance dx10 bumpmaping,destructable trees and buildings) are all added in FC2.So that makes FC 2 no less than Cryengine 2.Heres a video proof :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMDH3LPJ7l0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU7lyFmgeFg&feature=related

As you can notice it has all those things i mentioned including more destructability of buildings.The trees just dont snap off,their branches break properly and dynimacilly depending on where you shoot.

In terms of beauty Crysis gets the upper hand.Thats what i mentioned in my VERY first post.The reason is very simple.The setting of Crysis is more appealing.With green lush jungles and beautiful islands its like a Heaven.I enjoyed Crysis on High-very high and it was visually one of the best games i ever played.In the end its all a matter of your taste.

lesner87

The game isnt out yet.

Its all rah rah rah song and dance.

Lets wait until the game comes out before gushing all over it.

Im not saying it will be worse or better. Im saying your are determine everything off something that hasn't even been released.

Which undermines pretty much your entire 'facts facts facts' argument.

Who remembers Oblivion being advanced this, revolutionary that. Yes that radiant A.i. sure delivered what it promised.

When I get my hands on it and play it side by side with Crysis and Warhead on my computer. Then ill determine.

Quite frankly the biggest thing FC2 has going for it aside from the open world is the procedural story telling - which no one seems to give a toss about - rather wanting to post technical about the engine. Wonderful

we all know that crysis is lame and that heavy rain is win. NaiKoN9293

No, not really. Not quite. But what we all know is that Crysis is the better-looking game and those who disagree and state that heavy Rain looks better are simply crying fanboys who can't take the truth. That's what we know.

What you are forgetting

The game isnt out yet.

Its all rah rah rah song and dance.

Lets wait until the game comes out before gushing all over it.

Im not saying it will be worse or better. Im saying your are determine everything off something that hasn't even been released.

Which undermines pretty much your entire 'facts facts facts' argument.

Who remembers Oblivion being advanced this, revolutionary that. Yes that radiant A.i. sure delivered what it promised.

When I get my hands on it and play it side by side with Crysis and Warhead on my computer. Then ill determine.

Quite frankly the biggest thing FC2 has going for it aside from the open world is the procedural story telling - which no one seems to give a toss about - rather wanting to post technical about the engine. Wonderful

skrat_01

Yes i agree.Lets wait till the game releases.But i dont get one thing,why is every one saying that Crysis kills heavy rain ? Heavy rain has alot of way to go aswell..

[QUOTE="NaiKoN9293"]we all know that crysis is lame and that heavy rain is win. WhenTheTwoFace

No, not really. Not quite. But what we all know is that Crysis is the better-looking game and those who disagree and state that heavy Rain looks better are simply crying fanboys who can't take the truth. That's what we know.

What about Gears of War 2 ? Is it better than Crysis ?

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

[QUOTE="NaiKoN9293"]we all know that crysis is lame and that heavy rain is win. lesner87

No, not really. Not quite. But what we all know is that Crysis is the better-looking game and those who disagree and state that heavy Rain looks better are simply crying fanboys who can't take the truth. That's what we know.

What about Gears of War 2 ? Is it better than Crysis ?

Lol, no. you have gfot to be a fanboy to think that.

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I know its not up to Crysis, but it kills GTA IV. In fact, many games out do GTA IV.linkin_guy109

Yeah, with the GTA series fun factor>graphics. I just wish GTA could have graphics like Crysis though:(

somebody could rebuild liberty city in the cryengine if one wanted to, with a few mods im sure that someone could make a gta4 with crysis graphics

GTA IV with Crysis graphics:

Minimum system requirements: TBA in 4 years (and this is after the release).