I dont like PS3 games because they all have UGLY TEXTURES

I agree. Alot of lemmings still claim Gears to be the graphics king though thoughf50p90

I can't speak for AC on the 360 but Gears doesn't have half the texture pop-in or load-screens as Mass Effect. It's still a great game though, way better then Gears IMO.

[QUOTE="Dilrod"]

[QUOTE="PC_X360"][QUOTE="MasteRich"]Show me a 360 game that is not overrated or does not have horrible storylines and original gameplay. Or is it too much for MS?PC_X360

Two months later and your still jealous. Let it go man.

If you look through my posts, you wont see anything close to yours. Im not a one console only guy.I never said anything about games over rated. Quit trying to put words in my mouth.

[QUOTE="Erik_Lensherr"][QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]

[QUOTE="PC_X360"]Show me a ps3 game that has High-res textures or is it too much for 256MB VRAM?nervmeister

MGS 4 looks better then any 360 game and you have to look very hard to find a blurry texture once in a while there is one here and there but nothing major.

He's the same guy who said KZ2 looks better than Crysis.....and was serious :lol:

Ummm Crysis on low looks like Far Cry maxed and the Far Cry on 360 looks better then that so yeah. Killzone 2 ftw!

I don't like xbox 360 games b/c they all have UGLY TEXTURES.

See what I did there?

NinjaSkills247

Yeah, you LIED.

IMO

You guys are just gay You bunch of panzies stop fighting over what system is better its so stupid everyoe has their own opinion , get a life. >.>xhizors96

And you shouldn't make new accounts just to troll.

Oh and TC, exactly how many of these PS3 games have you played? Better yet, why not post some screens to back up your claims.

Ummm Crysis on low looks like Far Cry maxed and the Far Cry on 360 looks better then that so yeah. Killzone 2 ftw!

nVidiaGaMer

PS3 has a traditional fixed amount of memory split between Ram and Vram; while 360 has a single 512mb split between both.

Having shared memory enables the 360 to sacrifice ram for more vram and vice versa, so a scene can have decent textures by sacrificing the amount of a level that can be loaded at any one time for example. With dedicated amounts PS3 cannot distribute resources as efficiently as 360, which can result in a situation were ram is left unused while texture quality suffers because vram hit its 256mb limit.

However due to the much higher speed of PS3 ram; PS3 can run smoothly in scenes were 360 suffers from loading stutter. PS3 will always have 256mb dedicated to vram, leading to situations were PS3 textures could be better than 360 if it sacrifices memory for other requirements.

Both systems have their pros and cons, it is easy to focus on the negatives of one system and declare superiority; all while ignoring the limitations of your system.

AnnoyedDragon

This sums it up pretty well in simple terms. Nice post.

cows dont like text turesnaruto7777

:lol: that was actually funny....

*edit* I was expecting a "that's Great"