I have finally figured out the key to understanding MGS4.

  • 118 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Megaman5364
Megaman5364

2912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Megaman5364
Member since 2009 • 2912 Posts

To understand MGS4 ( one of the very few games that has ever recieved 10/10 here ), you must have understood, all the other Metal Gear games.... I thought MGS4 was so bad for so long, but when you understand the whole story as a big unit, you will come to realise that it is truely the a game deserving of ten, and its also only on ps3 :P

Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

uhhh....well yea...the understanding of any MGS game is usually what turns most people off, but once you do understand it they are such amazing games

but no....it deserves a 9.0/10 and no higher...but that's just my opinion

and yes...we know, it's ONLY been on the PS3 for awhile now

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#3 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
t when you understand the whole story as a big unit, you will come to realise that it is truely the a game deserving of tenMegaman5364
A game should never deserve a ten for it's story alone. It shouldn't hardly even factor into the score.
Avatar image for metalgear-solid
metalgear-solid

7001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 metalgear-solid
Member since 2004 • 7001 Posts

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.

And MGS4 excels in pretty much every area, from graphics to gameplay to sound.

Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
The gameplay was terrible. It wasn't innovate. The story was a jungled, complicated mess. LBP was better. It was extremely innovative, charming. Demons Souls was also great. It was refreshing, had awesome gameplay. Uncharted 2 was more deserving of a 10. Objectively, it was a masterpiece. I personally would give it a 9.5, but if I had to say which game deserved a 10, this would be it. Honestly, GTA4 and MGS4 both only deserved a 9. LBP and Demons Souls deserved a 9.5
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#6 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.metalgear-solid

Which is why they've sold millions, have a consistent and loyal fanbase and have earned high scores?

Avatar image for jasonharris48
jasonharris48

21441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jasonharris48
Member since 2006 • 21441 Posts

I have to disagree with you TC. I have been a MGS fan since part 1 and always understood the overall story. With MGS4 the story was a mess. Kojima and Murata tired so hard to fix the story mistakes with MGS2 and the overall series with MGS4. It just seemed like an horribly written clip notes for the MGS series.

Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts

[QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.vashkey

Which is why they've sold millions, have a consistent and loyal fanbase and have earned high scores?

Yea. But doesn't change that the Halo story is poorly presented. Which is a pity. Because it has a rich background.
Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts

[QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.vashkey

Which is why they've sold millions and have a consistent and loyal fanbase?

To be honest, if we considered video games as art like we do literature. Halo would be your Dan Brown/John Grisham Book. Games like SOTC, Ico, Okami would be your more creative, artistic, books, like Shakespeare's* or George Orwells*. Halo sells lots because it's big budget, mass-marketed, with a massive fanbase. All Bungie really has to do is crank out some new maps, some new weapons, a new gameplay feature or two, and a cool trailer. It will sell. Halo, in my opinion, shouldn't be considered art. Other Games, like SOTC, Okami, Ico, Heavy Rain, Alan Wake. These should be considered art. Basically, selling a lot doesn't mean it has quality. Often more niche games are much more artistic, and are of a higher quality. For example, Demons Souls is a very niche game, and is of a very high quality. * Yes, somebody is probably going to reply saying that Shakespeare and George Orwell aren't the most technically brilliant or whatever writers. I know, I just couldn't think of anyone else.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#10 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.mgs_freak91

Which is why they've sold millions, have a consistent and loyal fanbase and have earned high scores?

Yea. But doesn't change that the Halo story is poorly presented. Which is a pity. Because it has a rich background.

How is it poorly presented. If anything I think it was poorly executed in 3.
Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
I was recommended to play the first 3 (not the original 2) before playing 4 and I'm so glad I did. I thought 4 ended on a really high note, but I don't how the game would have been had I not played the other 3. Btw, what is this, Metal gear week? There has been at least four threads about metal gear every day so far...
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#12 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.dkjestrup

Which is why they've sold millions and have a consistent and loyal fanbase?

To be honest, if we considered video games as art like we do literature. Halo would be your Dan Brown/John Grisham Book. Games like SOTC, Ico, Okami would be your more creative, artistic, books, like Shakespeare's* or George Orwells*. Halo sells lots because it's big budget, mass-marketed, with a massive fanbase. All Bungie really has to do is crank out some new maps, some new weapons, a new gameplay feature or two, and a cool trailer. It will sell. Halo, in my opinion, shouldn't be considered art. Other Games, like SOTC, Okami, Ico, Heavy Rain, Alan Wake. These should be considered art. Basically, selling a lot doesn't mean it has quality. Often more niche games are much more artistic, and are of a higher quality. For example, Demons Souls is a very niche game, and is of a very high quality. * Yes, somebody is probably going to reply saying that Shakespeare and George Orwell aren't the most technically brilliant or whatever writers. I know, I just couldn't think of anyone else.

Why so serious? Really, gaming is a hobby, mainly just for fun. Theres nothing wrong with Halo being popular for being fun well put together game series. Even if Halo doesn't aspire to break narative ground there are artists at work at Bungie that work hard to make an interesting beautiful game and if you can't see it thats a shame. It may seem flat on the surface but they put alot of care into every aspect of the game. It seems more like you just don't don't consider Halo art because it's main stream and accessible.
Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
I don't like Halo (or Cod) particularly much, because there are much better shooters out there, yet they have loads more players, due to marketing. Honestly, BFBC2, Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 were all much better than Halo or COD are. They have less players, because of marketing. I did enjoy the first Halo. However, they didn't add to the formula hardly at all. Reach is looking like it might.
Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
[QUOTE="Megaman5364"]t when you understand the whole story as a big unit, you will come to realise that it is truely the a game deserving of tenvashkey
A game should never deserve a ten for it's story alone. It shouldn't hardly even factor into the score.

...Disagree. Alot. Games don't have to have stories to be great but if one has an amazing story then It should definately be praised for it.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#15 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="Megaman5364"]t when you understand the whole story as a big unit, you will come to realise that it is truely the a game deserving of tenIndie_Hitman
A game should never deserve a ten for it's story alone. It shouldn't hardly even factor into the score.

...Disagree. Alot. Games don't have to have stories to be great but if one has an amazing story then It should definately be praised for it.

I agree it deserves some praise but I really don't think many games rely on it's plot for enjoyment. I haven't played MGS4 yet but I really enjoyed the other Metal Gear games and I can safely say even without it's story Metal Gear is a fun and fatastic game and with out the fun I wouldn't trudge on just for the plot.

Now I would be very disapointed if I played MGS4 and there happened to be no story but if the game provided with enough fun I could look past that. I can't the same if the game had terrible gameplay but a good story. I'd drop it in a few hours or less.

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

Story is very important. Which is why games like Halo and GeoW just aren't all that interesting.dkjestrup

Which is why they've sold millions and have a consistent and loyal fanbase?

To be honest, if we considered video games as art like we do literature. Halo would be your Dan Brown/John Grisham Book. Games like SOTC, Ico, Okami would be your more creative, artistic, books, like Shakespeare's* or George Orwells*. Halo sells lots because it's big budget, mass-marketed, with a massive fanbase. All Bungie really has to do is crank out some new maps, some new weapons, a new gameplay feature or two, and a cool trailer. It will sell. Halo, in my opinion, shouldn't be considered art. Other Games, like SOTC, Okami, Ico, Heavy Rain, Alan Wake. These should be considered art. Basically, selling a lot doesn't mean it has quality. Often more niche games are much more artistic, and are of a higher quality. For example, Demons Souls is a very niche game, and is of a very high quality. * Yes, somebody is probably going to reply saying that Shakespeare and George Orwell aren't the most technically brilliant or whatever writers. I know, I just couldn't think of anyone else.

I disagree, the primary reason that i'm a big fan of the Halo franchise is the story and the single player (coop), i've never once bought a Halo game for the multiplayer as my primary reason and there's alot of fans exactly like me in that regard.

Dont let Halo's popularity online tell you that fans are only fans due to the MP, if you check many of the fansites around the net you'll see a good percentage of them are more focused on the lore rather than what the new mappack is for MP.

As for MGS4 it was a great game, had decent gameplay, great production value and a pretty good story, i still dont think it deserved a 10 here as i didnt live up to the "prime" description, nor did GTAIV in fact.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common).

On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny.

MGS 3 was the most cohesive plot the series has put together and it was the best narrative experience the franchise has put out because of it.My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. a

Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. jg4xchamp
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#20 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. Indie_Hitman
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

The notion that anyone could relate any of the characters in Metal Gear is ridiculous.
Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. vashkey
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

The notion that anyone could relate any of the characters in Metal Gear is ridiculous.

lmao...that is pretty true

i'd like to meet a person who relates to psycho mantis....lol

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#22 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. Indie_Hitman
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

He was atleast a character, and far more compelling than the brick we got for MGS 4. In MGS 4 it wasn't like the whiney part was gone. His whole disregard for himself and willingness to embrace death made him even more annoying, and at the end of the day all he ever did in that game was be flashy. It's like Kojima threw everything but the kitchen sink at him to make him a badass and it came off as overkill. He was a poorer character in 4 as opposed to the one they had in 2.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#23 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. vashkey
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

The notion that anyone could relate any of the characters in Metal Gear is ridiculous.

poor wording on my part I guess :P I guess what I'm trying to say that he atleast was more of a character in MGS 2. In MGS 4 he's just all flashy and trying to be "cool".
Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. jg4xchamp
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

He was atleast a character, and far more compelling than the brick we got for MGS 4. In MGS 4 it wasn't like the whiney part was gone. His whole disregard for himself and willingness to embrace death made him even more annoying, and at the end of the day all he ever did in that game was be flashy. It's like Kojima threw everything but the kitchen sink at him to make him a badass and it came off as overkill. He was a poorer character in 4 as opposed to the one they had in 2.

I guess. I suppose I was just thrilled he wasn't the main character again XD.
Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"] I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.jg4xchamp
The notion that anyone could relate any of the characters in Metal Gear is ridiculous.

poor wording on my part I guess :P I guess what I'm trying to say that he atleast was more of a character in MGS 2. In MGS 4 he's just all flashy and trying to be "cool".

well obviously something happened to him in between 2 and 4 to make him the way he came to be......and since rising is raidens story and it's set between 2 and 4 i'm guessing rising is the story of his transformation of how he became the raiden in MGS4

Avatar image for Zerocrossings
Zerocrossings

7988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#26 Zerocrossings
Member since 2006 • 7988 Posts

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

I think by the end of MGS4 Raiden was missing both arms and fighting with a sword in his mouth, it was silly. I would have to say story wise MGS4 is the worst followed by MGS2. It's like someone has to tell Kojima to pull it back a little with the story cause if you don't keep him in check then he'll go over board. I think that's why MGS3 story was great and then when 4 came around he fell back into some old habits.

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]It wasn't really worthy of a 10, and as a MGS fan I wasn't too fond of the plot either. It's too much of a cluttered mess that never takes advantage of it's ambition or the message the game tries to deliver(which deserves praise because it is actually a game that tries to deliver a message, that's not common). On gameplay alone, MGO is just a sloppy addition for multiplayer and some boss fights are poorly done. Screaming Mantis was far too dull and tried too hard to be flashy. Raging Raven was a bit repetitive, and the chase sequence in act 3 was far too drawn out. Heavy reliance on plot devices, poor writing that led to some repetitive dialogue didn't help either. Not to mention the complete **** up that is the new Raiden. He went from a character the player could atleast somewhat connect to; to some wannabe badass ninja that just came off corny. My dislikes aside it was a great game and technically impressive, but I would highly disagree with the 10. jg4xchamp
I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

He was atleast a character, and far more compelling than the brick we got for MGS 4. In MGS 4 it wasn't like the whiney part was gone. His whole disregard for himself and willingness to embrace death made him even more annoying, and at the end of the day all he ever did in that game was be flashy. It's like Kojima threw everything but the kitchen sink at him to make him a badass and it came off as overkill. He was a poorer character in 4 as opposed to the one they had in 2.

i dont think it's humanly possible to relate to any of the characters in the MGS series. They're way over-the-top. Nonetheless, awesome series.
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
[QUOTE="Elian2530"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"] I disagree about Raiden. I do not relate to whiny ...whiners and, although I didn't relate to him in this game, at least he looked cool.

He was atleast a character, and far more compelling than the brick we got for MGS 4. In MGS 4 it wasn't like the whiney part was gone. His whole disregard for himself and willingness to embrace death made him even more annoying, and at the end of the day all he ever did in that game was be flashy. It's like Kojima threw everything but the kitchen sink at him to make him a badass and it came off as overkill. He was a poorer character in 4 as opposed to the one they had in 2.

i dont think it's humanly possible to relate to any of the characters in the MGS series. They're way over-the-top. Nonetheless, awesome series.

Heh you don't have to relate to every aspect of a character to relate to them. Plus there are a few characters that stay grounded like Myreal and Otakon.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Doesn't fix its design flaws, which are too prominent to brush under the carpet.
Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

Zerocrossings
MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.
Avatar image for ___gamemaster__
___gamemaster__

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ___gamemaster__
Member since 2009 • 3422 Posts

its still the best game this gen for me IMO. heck even my sister who havent played any MGS before loves it. And i feel MGO is a little underrated imo

Avatar image for bigboss1203
bigboss1203

1885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#33 bigboss1203
Member since 2009 • 1885 Posts

Exactly what I have been saying! 97% People who attack MGS4 have never played the previous games, it really is one of the very few games I can call perfect

Avatar image for KevinButlerVP
KevinButlerVP

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 KevinButlerVP
Member since 2010 • 2378 Posts
[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.

and giving the game a ten because they got emotionally attatched to the story is the part of the review, its why mario scores so high but in MGS4s case it was actually a good game and not just a nostalgic one
Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#35 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

Understand it, don't like a lot of it. A good game, a terrible Metal Gear Solid.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
MGS4 was the least deserving of a 10 if you ask me. KVO gushed like crazy over that game and lacked objectivity. If you're not an MGS fan you will absolutely hate it, and even for myself as a huge MGS fan i was a little let down by how contrived the whole thing was. That and the joke of a multiplayer mode sold as a 'whole separate game!' You can't have a laundry list of issues and score a ten if you ask me.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#37 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

KevinButlerVP

MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.

and giving the game a ten because they got emotionally attatched to the story is the part of the review, its why mario scores so high but in MGS4s case it was actually a good game and not just a nostalgic one

Except Super Mario Galaxy 2 is an exceptional platformer :|

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]MGS4 was the least deserving of a 10 if you ask me. KVO gushed like crazy over that game and lacked objectivity. If you're not an MGS fan you will absolutely hate it, and even for myself as a huge MGS fan i was a little let down by how contrived the whole thing was. That and the joke of a multiplayer mode sold as a 'whole separate game!' You can't have a laundry list of issues and score a ten if you ask me.

Couldn't agree more. MGO, just wow, that alone was a litany of problems.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts
Well .... I thought that was obvious?:| :P But if I could give any MGS game a 10, it would go to MGS3 instead imo. Love that game.
Avatar image for ItsBriskBaby
ItsBriskBaby

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 ItsBriskBaby
Member since 2007 • 1748 Posts
[QUOTE="Megaman5364"]t when you understand the whole story as a big unit, you will come to realise that it is truely the a game deserving of tenvashkey
A game should never deserve a ten for it's story alone. It shouldn't hardly even factor into the score.

Yes it should, what are you talking about? You can't have everything in the game be superb and then the story be trash and expect it to get a 10. In MGS4 the story was great, it filled a lot of gaps from the previous MGS games and concluded with a bang. If people didn't like the story or want to bash it then that tells me they obviously haven't played the whole series then. MGS4 deserves the 10 because it had great graphics, a great story, great sound, great replayability, great controls, etc..., but I guess if it where on the 360 then it would be a 10 all around the table and the most epic game ever.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#41 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="KevinButlerVP"][QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.

and giving the game a ten because they got emotionally attatched to the story is the part of the review, its why mario scores so high but in MGS4s case it was actually a good game and not just a nostalgic one

Galaxy 2 did not get a 10 for nostalgia. That doesn't even make sense seeing as it doesn't play like the Mario games of old. It got a 10 because it's awesome, and about as good as a platformer can possibly be.
Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#42 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]MGS4 was the least deserving of a 10 if you ask me. KVO gushed like crazy over that game and lacked objectivity. If you're not an MGS fan you will absolutely hate it, and even for myself as a huge MGS fan i was a little let down by how contrived the whole thing was. That and the joke of a multiplayer mode sold as a 'whole separate game!' You can't have a laundry list of issues and score a ten if you ask me.

Couldn't agree more. MGO, just wow, that alone was a litany of problems.

You could always look at it as an extra and superluous feature, so that its flaws don't detract from the single player experience or score... I know I did, I wanted to forget about it almost immediately after playing
Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

KevinButlerVP

MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.

and giving the game a ten because they got emotionally attatched to the story is the part of the review, its why mario scores so high but in MGS4s case it was actually a good game and not just a nostalgic one

well the MGS series isn't exactly the newest of games

nostalgia for the characters or not...i'm sorry but you're not gonna find just about ANYTHING in SMG or SMG2 that was in any of the other marios and THAT's why it got a 10...it's fresh and it's new

of course you would know this if you'd played either one of em and branch out from just only sony games and be an actual gamer instead of a fanboy

Avatar image for Indie_Hitman
Indie_Hitman

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Indie_Hitman
Member since 2008 • 2457 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]MGS4 was the least deserving of a 10 if you ask me. KVO gushed like crazy over that game and lacked objectivity. If you're not an MGS fan you will absolutely hate it, and even for myself as a huge MGS fan i was a little let down by how contrived the whole thing was. That and the joke of a multiplayer mode sold as a 'whole separate game!' You can't have a laundry list of issues and score a ten if you ask me. WAIW
Couldn't agree more. MGO, just wow, that alone was a litany of problems.

You could always look at it as an extra and superluous feature, so that its flaws don't detract from the single player experience or score... I know I did, I wanted to forget about it almost immediately after playing

I haven't even played MGO. the single player is what I got MGS4 for.
Avatar image for Zerocrossings
Zerocrossings

7988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#45 Zerocrossings
Member since 2006 • 7988 Posts

[QUOTE="Indie_Hitman"][QUOTE="Zerocrossings"]

The 10 is ridiculous imo. It should have gotten lower than Snake Eater. It seems to me that the reviewer got too emotionally attached to the characters and plot and gave it a ten just because.

KevinButlerVP

MGS3 should have gotten a 10. That doesn't mean MGS4 wasn't deserving of a 10..... IMO.

and giving the game a ten because they got emotionally attatched to the story is the part of the review, its why mario scores so high but in MGS4s case it was actually a good game and not just a nostalgic one

Thats ironic considering that MGS4 needed the aid of the other 3 games to be "perfect", and played most on nostalgia.(With the Shadow Moses stage and all)

Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts

Understand them all, I understood stuff like MGS2 on first playthrough, loved everything about each MGS, the ending to MGS4 was awesome to me, part fill in the gaps, part fan service. :D

Nothing is wrong with needing 3 other games to be perfect, it was a series with a generally overhead plot. Few game series try to have a single plot consistantly go that long, its not beneficial to have everyone play each, but to anyone who has, and enjoyed all the others, it is a 10/10 experiance.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#47 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="WAIW"] You could always look at it as an extra and superluous feature, so that its flaws don't detract from the single player experience or score... I know I did, I wanted to forget about it almost immediately after playing

Why did they put it on a separate disc and call it a different game when it clearly uses the same assets as MGS4? Why do other games not get a free pass because they take their multiplayer modes off the main menu and put it on a separate disc?
Avatar image for TheDrunkenLord
TheDrunkenLord

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 TheDrunkenLord
Member since 2010 • 367 Posts

this is an interesting thread. MGS4 was the first Metal Gear game I'd played since MGS2 first came out, and I really didn't like it. it's been said before, but the plot just seemed like a boring convoluted mess despite some fun gameplay, and I gave up on it.

now I'm thinking part of the problem was that I hadn't played the series for so long, and didn't play Snake Eater at all. so I think I'm gonna try playing the series from the very start, with MGS3, and seeing how I feel about the game then. Plus it'll be fun to go back to the old games. Be my guide, Hideo.

Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="WAIW"] You could always look at it as an extra and superluous feature, so that its flaws don't detract from the single player experience or score... I know I did, I wanted to forget about it almost immediately after playing

Why did they put it on a separate disc and call it a different game when it clearly uses the same assets as MGS4? Why do other games not get a free pass because they take their multiplayer modes off the main menu and put it on a separate disc?

MGS was never about multiplayer, it shoulden't have existed at all, I don't think its fair to take away from a game for optional additional content. I payed my $60 for MGS4, I got MGS4.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="WAIW"] You could always look at it as an extra and superluous feature, so that its flaws don't detract from the single player experience or score... I know I did, I wanted to forget about it almost immediately after playing

Why did they put it on a separate disc and call it a different game when it clearly uses the same assets as MGS4? Why do other games not get a free pass because they take their multiplayer modes off the main menu and put it on a separate disc?

Its on the same disc? I didn't think it was that bad, I had some fun with it.