[QUOTE="Jynxzor"]If I take two pictures of each game and hold them up infront of two different people and they each choose a different one....wich one of them is wrong? ...wait for it. Neither of them, because they have what we call opinions and outright stating one is better than the other in this case without any physical proof is just silly, and this thread has nothing but alot of opinion in it. [QUOTE="Jynxzor"]If I take two pictures of each game and hold them up infront of two different people and they each choose a different one....wich one of them is wrong? ...wait for it. Neither of them, because they have what we call opinions and outright stating one is better than the other in this case without any physical proof is just silly, and this thread has nothing but alot of opinion in it. [QUOTE="Jynxzor"]If I take two pictures of each game and hold them up infront of two different people and they each choose a different one....wich one of them is wrong? ...wait for it. Neither of them, because they have what we call opinions and outright stating one is better than the other in this case without any physical proof is just silly, and this thread has nothing but alot of opinion in it.Yeah imo Killzone 2 has better graphics then crysis, how dare hermits try to take away my right of free speech. Just an opinion.
If Gears 2 isn't better looking than a game that came out a year prior, that is sad. Its supposed to be one of those exclusives to show 360's current power.
Thats true. Apart Killzone2, Gears2 is the best looking game on consoles ;)
I would say GeoW2>>>>KZ2.I really don't know whats so special about that games graphics?
It uses a whole lot of smoke and mirrors to cover up its numerous graphical deficiencies.
Actually, i think they are about even graphically. Fanboys on both sides like to claim otherwise, but I don't see one shining over the other. The hard part about the comparison is the lack of daylight scenes in KZ2. To give us the best comparison, it would be nice to have like lighted scenes.
Thats true. Apart Killzone2, Gears2 is the best looking game on consoles ;)
I would say GeoW2>>>>KZ2.I really don't know whats so special about that games graphics?
It uses a whole lot of smoke and mirrors to cover up its numerous graphical deficiencies.
Actually, i think they are about even graphically. Fanboys on both sides like to claim otherwise, but I don't see one shining over the other. The hard part about the comparison is the lack of daylight scenes in KZ2. To give us the best comparison, it would be nice to have like lighted scenes. Come on. K2 has superior lighting, characters models that actually show light reflection on there skin, insane particle effects NOT seen in Gears 2. Gears 2 looks great, but if you want to talk SHORTCUTS and cover ups, thats what UE3 was designed to do. You only need to zoom up to a character model or texture in Gears 2 to see what i mean. While the difference isn't huge, its obvious.
According to this guys comparisons, Uncharted 1 actually holds up more impressive level of details in its character models, compared to Gears 2. Epic use a lot of shortcuts to achieve a great look, if you actually zoom up the character models they become ugly, while Uncharted still looks incredibly good. Take a look. http://kineticninja.blogspot.com/2009/01/naughty-dog-realtime-graphics-and.html Shots have been zoomed in to compared the level of detail. Of course some will say those are ugly and BS screens of Gears 2, but have you acutally zoomed in on a character to judge ?. Using a ghost cam in online is a great way to tell. Of course, you won't see this when playing it on your set because it all viewed from a distance. That being said, I still think Gears 2 overall visually, looks more impressive, even if technically doesn't hold up as well. Slambo86
From this post and your avatar, I'm thinking you used to post here previously. ;)
Anyways, Gears 2 looks better, but Gears 1 VS. Uncharted is about equal.
Log in to comment