[QUOTE="santoron"][QUOTE="h575309"]
Dude, its not just cherry picking a number. Even if the 360 sold 0 units, and the PS3 sold 500k for the next 12 months, it still would be behind the 360. To put that in perspective, the Wii has only sold more than 500k in 7 out of 36 months in the last 3 years...
blue_hazy_basic
Of course it is! Your example of the Wii is a perfect example. Assuming your info is correct, and the Wii's worldwide sales number have only eclipsed 500k units in a month 7 times in three years (which is dubious since the Wii hasn't yet even completed 3 full years on the market, and the sales data from October is definitely not out yet) it's attempting to downplay the most important months of the Wii's sales. Lets say the Wii sold exactly 500,000 consoles for the other 29 months you mentioned. That would be 14.5 million consoles. Which means to reach the Wii's actual install base at this time of somewhere in the neighborhood of 54 million units, those 7 months would need to total about 40 million units. Now like I said, I kinda doubt the accuracy of your numbers, but it should be pretty clear exactly how important thos holiday months are, and how using projections based off of any other month isn't gonna give you anything like an accurate portrayal of the market.
Or your "360 stops selling" hypothesis. You initmate that 500k PS3s sold a month is a fair... if not optimistic projection. That would be 6 million units in a year, and we all know the PS3 sells considerably more than that in a year. The PS3 recently reached 27 million units sold, and in under 3 years, so you can see easily that the PS3 is selling better than your hypothesis.
And none of this even takes into account the fact that year on year sales of the consoles don't remain static. Take a look at the PS2. It sold a hair over 9 million consoles in 2001. It sold over 22 million consoles in 2003. If we were to assume all years would be just like 2001, we'd come up with a way deflated idea of the PS2's sales. If we used 2003, we'd way overinflate it.
My Point stands. You simply cannot take any one month and project that out to the life of the console accurately. You really can't even take one year.
Its not cherry picking a number. The PS3 is just over 6 million behind, therefore to catch up it must outsell the 360 but more than that number. 6million/12=500k. Does it make you feel better if they said "by an average of 500k/month"?It is the definition of cherry picking!
From Wikipedia:"Cherry picking is the act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position."
You've missed the point entirely. My point isn't to show that the PS3 can or will erase a 6 million console deficit (and I believe the actual gap is more like 7 million) in 12 months. It's merely to show that taking one month and projecting it out over the next year, which is what person after person keeps trying to do, doesn't work. Your PS3 analysis in the quote above would lead an uninformed reader to believe that it would take a herculean feat for the PS3 to average 500k units a month next year... I mean, that is why you put your Wii monthly sales figures in, right? But a simple look at the install base shows an obvious gap between that projection and what the PS3 has already done.
Theoretically, if the PS3 were to outsell the 360 by the same % of units over the next quarter as it did during the last, several million could be shaved off the 360's lead before 2010 arrives. Because that's how heavily backloaded console sales are during a calender year. Do I think that will happen? No. The past 3 months included a great deal of excitement over the new PS3 model and reduced price, and I don't believe that's a reliable set of data to project forward. In fact, my entire point is that there is no such thing as a reliable set of data to project forward with authority. You can look towards trends, but that's about it.
Log in to comment