I see no difference in multiplats on PS3 and 360

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC. I know that this had pissed off all the fanboys, but hey, the grpahics of COD MW3 is better on PS3/360/PC than the Wii. Dumb thread right? Posting Ponies

I don't know about PC but most of the time PS3 and 360 multiplats are roughly the same.

Yeah,they're the same.

Although there are exceptions,apparently,like Bayonetta and Red Dead Redemption.

They're small details on one and other that consolites love to argue. They should argue against PC vs consoles, but they would lose.

Yeah,they're the same.

Although there are exceptions,apparently,like Bayonetta and Red Dead Redemption.

freedomfreak

Well that's because of development.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

Yeah,they're the same.

Although there are exceptions,apparently,like Bayonetta and Red Dead Redemption.

sonic1564

Well that's because of development.

There are differences. No games will be identical. The extent to which they differ varies.

PC multiplats differ far more than PS3/360 versions of multiplats.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR2X6Wng2Tg

right there

There are differences. No games will be identical. The extent to which they differ varies.

PC multiplats differ far more than PS3/360 versions of multiplats.

lundy86_4

Comparing multiplats on consoles is pathetic and using youtube videos to compare things is even more pathetic.

[deleted]

You should see the comments on the videos. I agree, only nerds make a big deal out of this.

Youtube videos are heavily compressed and not an accurate representation of a games graphics if you want to see differences compare the same game running on the same t.v between systems the difference between ps3 and pc games is very noticeable. I don't have a 360 yet but I can't imagine there being much of a diffrence between the multiplatforms on the ps3 vs 360 the systems are more or less equal is power.

I don't see a difference either. People always claim that the 360 has superior multi-plats. Although I have both a 360 and PS3, I choose to get my multi-plats on the PS3 for a few reasons.

I don't subscribe to Xbox Live, so I like having the option to play the games online if they support online multi-player. I also like having all my games on 1 disc rather than multiple discs if I have the choice. Blu ray discs are also scratch resistant, and overall much more durable than DVDs are. I take great care of my discs and games, but it is just nice to know you have that extra durability. I tend to prefer the Dual Shock 3 over the 360 game pad. Neither controller really gives me hand cramps or anything, but I am just so used to using the Dual Shock design after all these years that it just feels so familiar. While sometimes people claim that the 360 versions of games have a better looking rock texture or 2, I honestly don't really care about that. Most of my friends are on PSN, and only a few of my friends have Xbox Live subscriptions, so I just prefer to be on PSN playing games. It doesn't even matter if the game is online or offline, I just like being on PSN so my friends can see what games I am playing and I can see what games they are playing. Xbox Live is just empty to me, and I only play on Xbox 360 if I have to.

While games like Skyrim are indeed far superior on the 360 than the PS3, a better looking texture here or there is not even close to substantial enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version after I take all of the things I mentioned earlier into consideration. Not to mention, a lot of the multi-platform games that I bought for the PS3 actually have significant improvements over the 360 version, features that are actually worth mentioning.

For example, Bioshock was released with an additional difficulty setting on the PS3 version, along with improved textures, but like I said, I don't really care about a few textures here and there, but the added difficulty option is nice. Eternal Sonata for the PS3 expands on the package as a whole with new cutscenes, characters, dungeons and what appears to be even more challenge when compared to the 360 version. Final Fantasy XIII is just a visual difference, along with the loading times, but I heard that the cutscenes on the 360 version aren't even in HD which is pretty significant if you ask me. Portal 2, along with all future Valve games, have Steam integration on the PS3, allowing PSN players to play with PC and Mac users as well as PSN users, while the 360 doesn't support Steam integration. I can't play fighting games on the 360 because of the D-pad, I just can't pull off moves like I can with the Dual Shock 3.

So I mean, a rock texture here and there is just not enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version. In order to really make a difference, I need additional content and features, or a complete performance upgrade like Skyrim. If you want to see real graphical differences on multi-platform games, don't compare the 360 and the PS3, compare the consoles to the PC. That's when you will see a real difference. With things like anti-aliasing, higher resolutions, antistropic filtering, v-sync, no screen tearing, solid 60 frames per second performance, improved lighting and shader technology, that's when you will see a real difference. It always makes me laugh when people compare 360 and PS3 multi-plats visually, it is such a waste of time. The only differences between console multi-plats worth mentioning are features and content.

If people want to see differences, they will buy it on PC, end of story.

Welcome to what people have known for years.

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

Yeah,they're the same.

Although there are exceptions,apparently,like Bayonetta and Red Dead Redemption.

sonic1564

Well that's because of development.

as opposed to differences that arent because of development???

You should see the comments on the videos. I agree, only nerds make a big deal out of this.sonic1564

I don't see a difference either. People always claim that the 360 has superior multi-plats. Although I have both a 360 and PS3, I choose to get my multi-plats on the PS3 for a few reasons.

I don't subscribe to Xbox Live, so I like having the option to play the games online if they support online multi-player. I also like having all my games on 1 disc rather than multiple discs if I have the choice. Blu ray discs are also scratch resistant, and overall much more durable than DVDs are. I take great care of my discs and games, but it is just nice to know you have that extra durability. I tend to prefer the Dual Shock 3 over the 360 game pad. Neither controller really gives me hand cramps or anything, but I am just so used to using the Dual Shock design after all these years that it just feels so familiar. While sometimes people claim that the 360 versions of games have a better looking rock texture or 2, I honestly don't really care about that. Most of my friends are on PSN, and only a few of my friends have Xbox Live subscriptions, so I just prefer to be on PSN playing games. It doesn't even matter if the game is online or offline, I just like being on PSN so my friends can see what games I am playing and I can see what games they are playing. Xbox Live is just empty to me, and I only play on Xbox 360 if I have to.

While games like Skyrim are indeed far superior on the 360 than the PS3, a better looking texture here or there is not even close to substantial enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version after I take all of the things I mentioned earlier into consideration. Not to mention, a lot of the multi-platform games that I bought for the PS3 actually have significant improvements over the 360 version, features that are actually worth mentioning.

For example, Bioshock was released with an additional difficulty setting on the PS3 version, along with improved textures, but like I said, I don't really care about a few textures here and there, but the added difficulty option is nice. Eternal Sonata for the PS3 expands on the package as a whole with new cutscenes, characters, dungeons and what appears to be even more challenge when compared to the 360 version. Final Fantasy XIII is just a visual difference, along with the loading times, but I heard that the cutscenes on the 360 version aren't even in HD which is pretty significant if you ask me. Portal 2, along with all future Valve games, have Steam integration on the PS3, allowing PSN players to play with PC and Mac users as well as PSN users, while the 360 doesn't support Steam integration. I can't play fighting games on the 360 because of the D-pad, I just can't pull off moves like I can with the Dual Shock 3.

So I mean, a rock texture here and there is just not enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version. In order to really make a difference, I need additional content and features, or a complete performance upgrade like Skyrim. If you want to see real graphical differences on multi-platform games, don't compare the 360 and the PS3, compare the consoles to the PC. That's when you will see a real difference. With things like anti-aliasing, higher resolutions, antistropic filtering, v-sync, no screen tearing, solid 60 frames per second performance, improved lighting and shader technology, that's when you will see a real difference. It always makes me laugh when people compare 360 and PS3 multi-plats visually, it is such a waste of time. The only differences between console multi-plats worth mentioning are features and content.

arkephonic

Most console games no, though there are some notable exceptions for each system. Moronic for the console fanboys to argue about though, because if either side actually wanted the best performance, they'd have stopped playing consoles long ago.

Multi-plat visual difference between 360/PS3 are minisclue, but there are differences you can see if you have a trained eye. Only big difference worth noting is content and performance. In video comparisons between all the platforms you'll notice the Consoles differ from the PC version which renders higher qaulity visuals with better performance, especially loading times though a video doesn't really show the PC versions differences. In person PC multi-plats look smooth and amazing compared to the Console version.

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]

I don't see a difference either. People always claim that the 360 has superior multi-plats. Although I have both a 360 and PS3, I choose to get my multi-plats on the PS3 for a few reasons.

I don't subscribe to Xbox Live, so I like having the option to play the games online if they support online multi-player. I also like having all my games on 1 disc rather than multiple discs if I have the choice. Blu ray discs are also scratch resistant, and overall much more durable than DVDs are. I take great care of my discs and games, but it is just nice to know you have that extra durability. I tend to prefer the Dual Shock 3 over the 360 game pad. Neither controller really gives me hand cramps or anything, but I am just so used to using the Dual Shock design after all these years that it just feels so familiar. While sometimes people claim that the 360 versions of games have a better looking rock texture or 2, I honestly don't really care about that. Most of my friends are on PSN, and only a few of my friends have Xbox Live subscriptions, so I just prefer to be on PSN playing games. It doesn't even matter if the game is online or offline, I just like being on PSN so my friends can see what games I am playing and I can see what games they are playing. Xbox Live is just empty to me, and I only play on Xbox 360 if I have to.

While games like Skyrim are indeed far superior on the 360 than the PS3, a better looking texture here or there is not even close to substantial enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version after I take all of the things I mentioned earlier into consideration. Not to mention, a lot of the multi-platform games that I bought for the PS3 actually have significant improvements over the 360 version, features that are actually worth mentioning.

For example, Bioshock was released with an additional difficulty setting on the PS3 version, along with improved textures, but like I said, I don't really care about a few textures here and there, but the added difficulty option is nice. Eternal Sonata for the PS3 expands on the package as a whole with new cutscenes, characters, dungeons and what appears to be even more challenge when compared to the 360 version. Final Fantasy XIII is just a visual difference, along with the loading times, but I heard that the cutscenes on the 360 version aren't even in HD which is pretty significant if you ask me. Portal 2, along with all future Valve games, have Steam integration on the PS3, allowing PSN players to play with PC and Mac users as well as PSN users, while the 360 doesn't support Steam integration. I can't play fighting games on the 360 because of the D-pad, I just can't pull off moves like I can with the Dual Shock 3.

So I mean, a rock texture here and there is just not enough to persuade me to get the 360 version over the PS3 version. In order to really make a difference, I need additional content and features, or a complete performance upgrade like Skyrim. If you want to see real graphical differences on multi-platform games, don't compare the 360 and the PS3, compare the consoles to the PC. That's when you will see a real difference. With things like anti-aliasing, higher resolutions, antistropic filtering, v-sync, no screen tearing, solid 60 frames per second performance, improved lighting and shader technology, that's when you will see a real difference. It always makes me laugh when people compare 360 and PS3 multi-plats visually, it is such a waste of time. The only differences between console multi-plats worth mentioning are features and content.

Klopono

Oh yeah, in the year 2007, multi-platform games were significantly better on 360 than PS3. For example, Orange box had framerate issues on the PS3, Madden 08 ran at like half the framerate of the 360 version, and Rainbow Six Vegas looked much better on 360 and at a faster framerate. In 2007, the differences were definitely noticable, but ever since 2008, it has been extremely negligible at best, with your rare exception of a botched port job like Bayonetta or Skyrim.

Some 2007 games were actually better on PS3, though, so it wasn't universal. Oblivion on PS3 had the luxury of having an extra year of development time, so rather than a straight port, the developers had a chance to make significant improvements to the PS3 version. The graphics are slightly improved along with better draw distance and less texture pop-in, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on, which is available as a separate purchase on other platforms.

Oh yeah, in the year 2007, multi-platform games were significantly better on 360 than PS3. For example, Orange box had framerate issues on the PS3, Madden 08 ran at like half the framerate of the 360 version, and Rainbow Six Vegas looked much better on 360 and at a faster framerate. In 2007, the differences were definitely noticable, but ever since 2008, it has been extremely negligible at best, with your rare exception of a botched port job like Bayonetta or Skyrim. Some 2007 games were actually better on PS3, though, so it wasn't universal. Oblivion on PS3 had the luxury of having an extra year of development time, so rather than a straight port, the developers had a chance to make significant improvements to the PS3 version. The graphics are slightly improved along with better draw distance and less texture pop-in, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on, which is available as a separate purchase on other platforms.arkephonic

Dumb thread right? Posting Ponies

sonic1564

...

[spoiler] [/spoiler]

On topic, yeah, they're exactly the same.

whenever there's a debate between ps3 and 360..... pc attempting to steal the limelight like macaque in the bush.hippiesanta

Someone read the title and not the first post. PC is included by the TC into the topic. -15 points

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC.

sonic1564

If you actually play the pc version of a game on max, then play the console version, they look noticably different. Youtube can't show you this, as its not fullscreen 1080p. Its compressed.

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC. I know that this had pissed off all the fanboys, but hey, the grpahics of COD MW3 is better on PS3/360/PC than the Wii. Dumb thread right? Posting Ponies

sonic1564

[QUOTE="sonic1564"]

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC.

Jankarcop

If you actually play the pc version of a game on max, then play the console version, they look noticably different. Youtube can't show you this, as its not fullscreen 1080p. Its compressed.

They're mostly the same. In the case where there is a difference the 360 usually has the upper hand.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="sonic1564"]

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC.

Shielder7

If you actually play the pc version of a game on max, then play the console version, they look noticably different. Youtube can't show you this, as its not fullscreen 1080p. Its compressed.

These are both lies, and I'm giong to assume you are trolling since you can't possibly be this stupid to actually beleive them.

Because there is no noticable difference in 99% of the games.

Because there is no noticable difference in 99% of the games.

Chutebox

Please stop using youtube.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

[QUOTE="sonic1564"]

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC.

Shielder7

If you actually play the pc version of a game on max, then play the console version, they look noticably different. Youtube can't show you this, as its not fullscreen 1080p. Its compressed.

Are you ignorant or you are trolling?

Pretty much, with a few exceptions where devs have actually bothered to utilize the extra power on PC.

i see a difference between pc and 360/ps3.

multiplats suck ass

duke nukem 3d pc game ported to consoles

duke nukem forever multiplat built for consoles released same day on all platforms except wii.

Now ask urself which one is more noobish?

Hey wewantdoom4now, why do you spam post in threads instead of just consolidating all of your spam posts into 1 edited post?

Hey wewantdoom4now, why do you spam post in threads instead of just consolidating all of your spam posts into 1 edited post?

arkephonic

spam is the same sentence over and over like yo whats up homie ....yo whats up homie ...yo whats up homie

Yeah,they're the same.

Although there are exceptions,apparently,like Bayonetta and Red Dead Redemption.

freedomfreak

multiplats suck ass

wewantdoom4now

Graphics comparisons between PS3 and 360 are nothing but a waste of time.

[QUOTE="wewantdoom4now"]

multiplats suck ass

Shielder7

I didnt buy xbox360 to play multiplats i got ripped off 400$

...

*Image*

On topic, yeah, they're exactly the same.meetroid8

No they're not, you dumb mother****er.

I didnt buy xbox360 to play multiplats i got ripped off 400$wewantdoom4now

I'm sure a good number of people chose the 360 for the exclusive support in the past. Fortunately, I waited long enough to realize that this wasn't continue and got an actually good system.