I see no difference in multiplats on PS3 and 360

The differences are usually miniscule between the consoles, but you would easily tell the difference between the pc and console versions in real life. 1080p and 60 fps is how I play most my games, with more aa and af, and sometimes better textures too.

Hey wewantdoom4now, why do you spam post in threads instead of just consolidating all of your spam posts into 1 edited post?

arkephonic

I don't know about PC but most of the time PS3 and 360 multiplats are roughly the same.

Demonjoe93

it is funny to me that in sw even hardcore ms haters give xbl the edge with the caveat that ZOMG! YA GOTTA PAY! but then when a multiplat comes up it is always THEY ARE THE SAME!!!

geeze sw try to be a tiny bit consistent for once.

I'm going to put away my fanboy and be honest with you, I don't see a difference either. The differences between PS3 and 360mulitplats are so insignificalntly small that 99% of the time you can even tell the difference between the two versions of the game.

Even if you use sites like Digital Foundry which nit pick things, many of thier findings are invisible to the naked eye so it's just a pointless waste of time comparing them.

some multiplats I played on both systems:

RDR-Little difference between the two, and I did my own comparison with this one. The supposed "sub HD" isn't even really noticible, wasn't much of a difference between the two versions.

GTA4-Little to no difference

Oblivion-Cows say it's better on PS3, I hardly saw a difference other than the PS3 version seemed toload a little faster, that was it.

Bioshock-Couldn't tell a damn difference

Batman AA- Didn't see a difference

Every COD-Hardly saw a differnce, 360 version though I noticed seemed to have slightly better lighting, but that could have just been my friends TV

RE 5-No difference

Fallout 3 (after patch)-Very little difference between the two

Splinter Celll Double Agent-Only game I ever played where I saw a major difference, framerate was significialntly lower on PS3 and it had worse charecter designs, but the environement graphics looked more detailed than 360 and it had extra content

Skyrim-No lag for me so I didn't see a difference

[QUOTE="arkephonic"]Oh yeah, in the year 2007, multi-platform games were significantly better on 360 than PS3. For example, Orange box had framerate issues on the PS3, Madden 08 ran at like half the framerate of the 360 version, and Rainbow Six Vegas looked much better on 360 and at a faster framerate. In 2007, the differences were definitely noticable, but ever since 2008, it has been extremely negligible at best, with your rare exception of a botched port job like Bayonetta or Skyrim. Some 2007 games were actually better on PS3, though, so it wasn't universal. Oblivion on PS3 had the luxury of having an extra year of development time, so rather than a straight port, the developers had a chance to make significant improvements to the PS3 version. The graphics are slightly improved along with better draw distance and less texture pop-in, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on, which is available as a separate purchase on other platforms.Klopono

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Because there is no noticable difference in 99% of the games.

Jankarcop

Please stop using youtube.

1 game does not equal all games. Maybe you should look at bethesda games, FFXIII, Bayonetta and L.A. Noire. Fallout 3 has no AA and low framerate on PS3 version, Bayonetta runs like pure crap on the PS3 version, FFXIII runs in a much higher resolution and has a more stable frame rate on PS3, LA Noire PS3 version uses better Ambient Oclusion and runs better. Basically I gave you 2 examples on how the 360 version is superior and 2 games where the PS3 version is superior.

multiplats suck ass

wewantdoom4now

Yet most of the best games this gen are Multiplat.....

I see no difference in exclusives on PS3 and 360. This is why they are called HD twins.

This is system wars so it´s normal for ppl here to claim ownage over invisible things.

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC. I know that this had pissed off all the fanboys, but hey, the grpahics of COD MW3 is better on PS3/360/PC than the Wii. Dumb thread right? Posting Ponies

sonic1564

Aside from a few isolated cases, me neither.

very minor visually

There's a big difference between current PC's and consoles, but when you sit 20cm away from your screen, that difference is needed. That said, some modded games look fantastic on PC, if you have the high-end equipment to run it.

i see no difference in 1st party either what your point TC lol

The majority of people can tell no difference either.fabz_95

They're the same except for a few notable cases like Bayonetta, FO3, and Skyrim. Pretty much where the difference is game stability. -10 points to those who think that every or most multiplats are better on the 360 by any noticeable means, -10 to anyone denying that some multiplats do have noticeable edge on the 360 like the games I listed.

Was going to agree with you till you bought pc into......then i just realised your a retard OR blind :)

I have been watching graphics comparison videos on youtube and found no difference once so ever between two versions of one game on the PS3 and 360. Hell, even it looks the same on the PC. What I mean is that all multiplats are basically the same and are all playable, both consoles and PC. I know that this had pissed off all the fanboys, but hey, the grpahics of COD MW3 is better on PS3/360/PC than the Wii. Dumb thread right? Posting Ponies

sonic1564