I think the WiiU will be brilliant for hardcore gaming

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

Alot of people think the WiiU touch-screen controller is a gimmick that won't change gaming at all. I disagree. If you think that the WiiU touschscreen controller is useless, then you obviously haven't played Dragon Age: Origins, Fallout 3 or Oblivion on a standard PS3/360 controller. Trust me, I would absolutely love to use the WiiU controller as a full-sized map in any of these games (not a tiny map in the corner of the TV screen). Let's not forget how annoying it is to use the shoulder buttons to browse through your inventory or questlogs in these games. Pain in the neck, I say. I think the WiiU will make these games so much easier to play.

Oh yeah, you can use the WiiU touschscreen controller as a chatpad for multiplayer games like Call of Duty. Massive win right there

Of course, PC will always be the best when it comes inventory management, interfaces, typing etc. But as far as consoles go, I think Nintendo is right on the money.

Your thoughts? :)

Avatar image for Zurrur
Zurrur

1701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Zurrur
Member since 2009 • 1701 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

>WiiU

>hardcore

pick one

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

Zurrur
Hardcore gamers play farmville on their cell phones.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

Avatar image for St_muscat
St_muscat

4315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 St_muscat
Member since 2007 • 4315 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

Zurrur

And what game system isn't just a toy? I never knew gaming as hobby had become serious s*** and not just for fun anymore.

Avatar image for AzelKosMos
AzelKosMos

34194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#7 AzelKosMos
Member since 2005 • 34194 Posts
Oh yeah, you can use the WiiU touschscreen controller as a chatpad for multiplayer games like Call of Duty. Massive win right therePandaBear86
And that is more efficient then a headset how? :?
Avatar image for CaptainBeer
CaptainBeer

292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 CaptainBeer
Member since 2011 • 292 Posts

[QUOTE="Zurrur"]

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

St_muscat

And what game system isn't just a toy? I never knew gaming as hobby had become serious s*** and not just for fun anymore.

2011 is a weird time for video games, the industry is dividing casuals and hardcore like republicans and democrats.

It used to be a one party system, and even though Sega Genesis fans were against Nintendo fans back then, they both played each other's consoles; as long as the games were good. In other words, I've never met a Nintendo fan not play Sonic 2 because it was from Sega.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]Oh yeah, you can use the WiiU touschscreen controller as a chatpad for multiplayer games like Call of Duty. Massive win right thereAzelKosMos
And that is more efficient then a headset how? :?

Have you played on XBL with all those kids screaming in their mics? You'll wish headsets never existed, lol. At least with chatpads, it gives another way to communicate, and I believe we will be seeing less insults. I am not saying chatpads were better than mics, its just nice to have another option. Furthermore, mics are hard for people with poor bandwidth.
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

I do as well. The controller is just amazing. Although it looks quite awkward in your hands, I read reports of it being ergonomic, surprisingly lol.

What I'm not sure about is how much 3rd party support the Wii U will have. Nintendo mentioned they will focus on improving this, so I'm waiting to see. I'm interested, yet I'm not sure if I'll slap the cash down for a Wii U just yet.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

-Snooze-
Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.
Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

Wii U may offer a bit more than the 360/PS3 and has a neat gimmick that may actually improve games, but overall it's not something I can point to and say is worth a $300+ investment right now.

It won't revolutionize gaming, but it might make gaming a tad bit better on consoles. The big problem is all of us in System Wars already own PS3s, 360s, or PCs, so the Wii U is kindof a hard sell especially if we're not stoked about Nintendo first party software (of which none have been formally announced as launch games anyway).

Avatar image for AzelKosMos
AzelKosMos

34194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#13 AzelKosMos
Member since 2005 • 34194 Posts

[QUOTE="AzelKosMos"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]Oh yeah, you can use the WiiU touschscreen controller as a chatpad for multiplayer games like Call of Duty. Massive win right therePandaBear86
And that is more efficient then a headset how? :?

Have you played on XBL with all those kids screaming in their mics? You'll wish headsets never existed, lol. At least with chatpads, it gives another way to communicate, and I believe we will be seeing less insults. I am not saying chatpads were better than mics, its just nice to have another option. Furthermore, mics are hard for people with poor bandwidth.

If you are playing in a game that involves concentration the last thing you will want to do is type out a message when someone is shooting at you. If people are annoying mute them, writing is unpractical in a lot of games though yes it would work for some like MMO's I guess, I think COD may have been a bad example. As for less insults? I honestly doubt it, if there is a way to communicate, people will insult each other regardless of text or spoken, sadly the way of the world when they can hide behind the internet. :(

Avatar image for St_muscat
St_muscat

4315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 St_muscat
Member since 2007 • 4315 Posts

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

PandaBear86

Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.

Just like they did the Wii? I'm willing to bet that if WiiU's specs aren't roughly close to the PS4/X720's were gonna have a repeat of this gen all over again with Nintendo struggling for 3rd support. A shiny new traditional looking/playing controller or not it's specs need to be comparable to the competition imo.

Avatar image for CaptainBeer
CaptainBeer

292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CaptainBeer
Member since 2011 • 292 Posts

Wii U may offer a bit more than the 360/PS3 and has a neat gimmick that may actually improve games, but overall it's not something I can point to and say is worth a $300+ investment right now.

It won't revolutionize gaming, but it might make gaming a tad bit better on consoles. The big problem is all of us in System Wars already own PS3s, 360s, or PCs, so the Wii U is kindof a hard sell especially if we're not stoked about Nintendo first party software (of which none have been formally announced as launch games anyway).

SakusEnvoy

Handhelds are the rave now, with the Vita & 3DS. IMO, Nintendo should cancel the WiiU and focus all of their energy on the 3DS &/or existing Wii Titles.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

PandaBear86

Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.

Assuming the PS4 and 720 have a big leap in hardware, devs would make games for PS4, 720 and PC. Those three install bases combined will probably be more than enough to make up the cost of production, as they have been most of this generation. The formula worked and it could work again.

If they were going to scale back the hardware for Wii U, they might as well scale back for the 360 and PS3 too -- that would be somewhat odd, games coming out on both last-gen and current-gen hardware, although it did happen for many games inbetween 2005 and 2006. Ultimately, though, devs eventually settled on 360/PS3/PC.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="AzelKosMos"]And that is more efficient then a headset how? :?AzelKosMos
Have you played on XBL with all those kids screaming in their mics? You'll wish headsets never existed, lol. At least with chatpads, it gives another way to communicate, and I believe we will be seeing less insults. I am not saying chatpads were better than mics, its just nice to have another option. Furthermore, mics are hard for people with poor bandwidth.

If you are playing in a game that involves concentration the last thing you will want to do is type out a message when someone is shooting at you. If people are annoying mute them, not difficult, writing is unpractical in a lot of games though yes it would work for some like MMO's I guess, I think COD may have been a bad example. As for less insults? I honestly doubt it, if there is a way to communicate, people will insult each other regardless of text or spoken, sadly the way of the world when they can hide behind the internet. :(

I will admit that using Call of Duty was a bad example. I guess MMO-style games would have been a better fit for chatpads. Either way, its nice to choose between the two. I sometimes like to send messages to my friends who are offline, and I prefer chatpads for that.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

SakusEnvoy

Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.

Assuming the PS4 and 720 have a big leap in hardware, devs would make games for PS4, 720 and PC. Those three install bases combined will probably be more than enough to make up the cost of production, as they have been most of this generation. The formula worked and it could work again.

If they were going to scale back the hardware for Wii U, they might as well scale back for the 360 and PS3 too -- that would be somewhat odd, games coming out on both last-gen and current-gen hardware, although it did happen for many games inbetween 2005 and 2006. Ultimately, though, devs eventually settled on 360/PS3/PC.

I think the 360 and PS3 will continue to live a little while even after PS4 and Xbox 720 are released, depending on how far apart the pricetags are (hopefully not much). But the PSVita is the main attraction here imo. PS4, X720, and WiiU are not portable, so you cannot play Red Dead Redemption 3 on the train going to work. If publishers want to make sure they don't miss out on the portable market, they need to scale back to PSVita, and that might mean that the WiiU will benefit from this as well.
Avatar image for lordlors
lordlors

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 lordlors
Member since 2004 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

St_muscat

Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.

Just like they did the Wii? I'm willing to bet that if WiiU's specs aren't roughly close to the PS4/X720's were gonna have a repeat of this gen all over again with Nintendo struggling for 3rd support. A shiny new traditional looking/playing controller or not it's specs need to be comparable to the competition imo.

The problem is if Wii U performs so well in its first year, MS and Sony might want to reconsider not making their next gen consoles too powerful like the difference of Wii and PS3 because it becomes too risky. The Wii didn't came out first and had a head-start. With Wii U, it has months or 1 year to prove itself and if it becomes a success, devs won't be too sure anymore on vastly more powerful and expensive consoles.
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 ArchoNils2
Member since 2005 • 10534 Posts

If the controller makes a game easier to play it doesn't make the System hardcore oO Also it doesn't come close to a kb with mouse :S I'd like to see a console where every game has to support the controller and kb / mouse :S

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"] Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.PandaBear86

Assuming the PS4 and 720 have a big leap in hardware, devs would make games for PS4, 720 and PC. Those three install bases combined will probably be more than enough to make up the cost of production, as they have been most of this generation. The formula worked and it could work again.

If they were going to scale back the hardware for Wii U, they might as well scale back for the 360 and PS3 too -- that would be somewhat odd, games coming out on both last-gen and current-gen hardware, although it did happen for many games inbetween 2005 and 2006. Ultimately, though, devs eventually settled on 360/PS3/PC.

I think the 360 and PS3 will continue to live a little while even after PS4 and Xbox 720 are released, depending on how far apart the pricetags are (hopefully not much). But the PSVita is the main attraction here imo. PS4, X720, and WiiU are not portable, so you cannot play Red Dead Redemption 3 on the train going to work. If publishers want to make sure they don't miss out on the portable market, they need to scale back to PSVita, and that might mean that the WiiU will benefit from this as well.

Well, you know, sometimes history repeats itself... when the PSP was first released at the end of 2004, everyone raved about its near-PS2 levels of power. And, indeed, at first the PSP shared a lot of games with the PS2. But eventually the PS3 released, and the gap in power became too large.

The same will probably happen when the PS4 is released; I have no doubt it will make the Vita look downright weak, and the gap in power will be too large for devs to try and fill.

Avatar image for lordlors
lordlors

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 lordlors
Member since 2004 • 6128 Posts

If the controller makes a game easier to play it doesn't make the System hardcore oO Also it doesn't come close to a kb with mouse :S I'd like to see a console where every game has to support the controller and kb / mouse :S

ArchoNils2
If you want to use Kb/mouse controls for gaming, there's no point on getting a console when there's a PC. Kb/mouse belongs to PC.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#23 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="St_muscat"]

[QUOTE="Zurrur"]

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

CaptainBeer

And what game system isn't just a toy? I never knew gaming as hobby had become serious s*** and not just for fun anymore.

2011 is a weird time for video games, the industry is dividing casuals and hardcore like republicans and democrats.

It used to be a one party system, and even though Sega Genesis fans were against Nintendo fans back then, they both played each other's consoles; as long as the games were good. In other words, I've never met a Nintendo fan not play Sonic 2 because it was from Sega.

I am from that era and I play Bejeweled between rounds of BFBC2, Plants vs Zombies before and after Starcraft 2. I know what you mean and all I can say is stay smart. For yourself. Don't be llike them. And you can tell them what they are doing is silly or stupid or irrational etc. etc. and it won't change. That is still hard for me to grasp but you can compare it to the need for procreation in animals. Most people are on a kind of auto-pilot.

In a book I'm reading someone says this: "Perhaps most people in the world aren't trying to be free... They just think they are. It's all an illusion. If they really were set free, most people would be in a real pickle. You'd better remember that. People actually prefer not being free. I prefer being unfree too. Up to a point.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau defined civilisation as when people build fences. A very perceptive observation. And it's true - all civilisation is a product of a fenced-in lack of freedom.
The Australian Aborigines are the exception, though. They managed to maintain a fence-less civilisation until the seventeenth century. They were dyed-in-the-wool free. They could go where they wanted, when they wanted, doing what they wanted. Their lives were a literal journey. Walkabout is a perfect metaphor for their lives. When the British came and built fences to pen in their cattle, the Aborigines couldn't fathom it. And, ignorant to the end of the principal at work, they were ****fied as dangerous and anti-social and were driven away, to the outback. So I want you to be careful.
The people who built high strong fences are the ones who survive the best. You deny that reality only at the risk of being driven into the wilderness yourself..."

You are the aboriginal and the popularity brought the British to shore. You can't understand why, because there is no rationality involved. Just like procreation, building fences like that are probably a necessity to a species survival. It's programmed mass behaviour. That's just my theory on this though, I can't prove any of it.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"] Assuming the PS4 and 720 have a big leap in hardware, devs would make games for PS4, 720 and PC. Those three install bases combined will probably be more than enough to make up the cost of production, as they have been most of this generation. The formula worked and it could work again.

If they were going to scale back the hardware for Wii U, they might as well scale back for the 360 and PS3 too -- that would be somewhat odd, games coming out on both last-gen and current-gen hardware, although it did happen for many games inbetween 2005 and 2006. Ultimately, though, devs eventually settled on 360/PS3/PC.

SakusEnvoy

I think the 360 and PS3 will continue to live a little while even after PS4 and Xbox 720 are released, depending on how far apart the pricetags are (hopefully not much). But the PSVita is the main attraction here imo. PS4, X720, and WiiU are not portable, so you cannot play Red Dead Redemption 3 on the train going to work. If publishers want to make sure they don't miss out on the portable market, they need to scale back to PSVita, and that might mean that the WiiU will benefit from this as well.

Well, you know, sometimes history repeats itself... when the PSP was first released at the end of 2004, everyone raved about its near-PS2 levels of power. And, indeed, at first the PSP shared a lot of games with the PS2. But eventually the PS3 released, and the gap in power became too large.

The same will probably happen when the PS4 is released; I have no doubt it will make the Vita look downright weak, and the gap in power will be too large for devs to try and fill.

The Vita is 540p without 3D (most games might be 30fps), while the PS4 will likely be 1080p with 60fps and 3D as a standard feature. So that alone would require a large gap for games to even be similar beyond resolution, framerates and 3D imagery. On top of that, you can decrease draw distance, and other stuff for the Vita to handle it. Sure, Vita owners will get worse graphics, but still good enough to be impressive. I can definitely see it working without much sacrifice for PS4 graphics :)
Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="St_muscat"]

[QUOTE="PandaBear86"] Making a game only for PS4/X720 is bound to be expensive. I am sure that developers will allow their games to scale back for WiiU and PS Vita.lordlors

Just like they did the Wii? I'm willing to bet that if WiiU's specs aren't roughly close to the PS4/X720's were gonna have a repeat of this gen all over again with Nintendo struggling for 3rd support. A shiny new traditional looking/playing controller or not it's specs need to be comparable to the competition imo.

The problem is if Wii U performs so well in its first year, MS and Sony might want to reconsider not making their next gen consoles too powerful like the difference of Wii and PS3 because it becomes too risky. The Wii didn't came out first and had a head-start. With Wii U, it has months or 1 year to prove itself and if it becomes a success, devs won't be too sure anymore on vastly more powerful and expensive consoles.

The point is that Microsoft and Sony already have consoles that are in the Wii U's general power range: the 360 and PS3. They also already released controller peripherals for both devices, giving them new functionality via the Move and Kinect.

There's no way MS and Sony could just re-release the 360 and PS3 with a new gimmick and call it the PS4 (ala the Wii). It would make no sense given the fact that they already released new controller gimmicks for the 360/PS3.

I really don't think the Wii U's success or failure has any bearing on the PS4 or 720. The Wii U's competition is not the PS4 or 720 but the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. When the time comes that MS and Sony release new consoles, they will be aiming for a market beyond what the Wii U is capable of. And that's why they won't release those consoles anytime soon, and instead will compete with the Wii U through the 360 and PS3 until 2013/2014 or so.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

the tablet could be used as pip-boy in fallout , you wouold have it attached to your left hand while shooting with the wiimoeplus

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

the tablet could be used as pip-boy in fallout , you wouold have it attached to your left hand while shooting with the wiimoeplus

AmnesiaHaze
That sounds like a really cool idea :P
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

[I really don't think the Wii U's success or failure has any bearing on the PS4 or 720. The Wii U's competition is not the PS4 or 720 but the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. SakusEnvoy

If that's so then why buy it? We're coming to the end of a gen, why would anyone support a console battling it out with 6 year old hardware?

The Wii U is competing with the next gen of consoles, like it or not.

Avatar image for BIOKILLER123
BIOKILLER123

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 BIOKILLER123
Member since 2010 • 1093 Posts

I feel once the PS4 and Nextbox release with superior specs, the third party devs will switch their focus leaving the Wii U with the scraps, much like the Wii but to a lesser extent.

I won't be buying one for a long time, that's for sure.

-Snooze-

My thoughts exactly.

Avatar image for AzelKosMos
AzelKosMos

34194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#30 AzelKosMos
Member since 2005 • 34194 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="AzelKosMos"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"] Have you played on XBL with all those kids screaming in their mics? You'll wish headsets never existed, lol. At least with chatpads, it gives another way to communicate, and I believe we will be seeing less insults. I am not saying chatpads were better than mics, its just nice to have another option. Furthermore, mics are hard for people with poor bandwidth.

If you are playing in a game that involves concentration the last thing you will want to do is type out a message when someone is shooting at you. If people are annoying mute them, not difficult, writing is unpractical in a lot of games though yes it would work for some like MMO's I guess, I think COD may have been a bad example. As for less insults? I honestly doubt it, if there is a way to communicate, people will insult each other regardless of text or spoken, sadly the way of the world when they can hide behind the internet. :(

I will admit that using Call of Duty was a bad example. I guess MMO-style games would have been a better fit for chatpads. Either way, its nice to choose between the two. I sometimes like to send messages to my friends who are offline, and I prefer chatpads for that.

Agreed, trying to send a message over PSN without a keyboard is a pain in the....
Avatar image for lordlors
lordlors

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 lordlors
Member since 2004 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="lordlors"][QUOTE="St_muscat"] Just like they did the Wii? I'm willing to bet that if WiiU's specs aren't roughly close to the PS4/X720's were gonna have a repeat of this gen all over again with Nintendo struggling for 3rd support. A shiny new traditional looking/playing controller or not it's specs need to be comparable to the competition imo.

SakusEnvoy

The problem is if Wii U performs so well in its first year, MS and Sony might want to reconsider not making their next gen consoles too powerful like the difference of Wii and PS3 because it becomes too risky. The Wii didn't came out first and had a head-start. With Wii U, it has months or 1 year to prove itself and if it becomes a success, devs won't be too sure anymore on vastly more powerful and expensive consoles.

The point is that Microsoft and Sony already have consoles that are in the Wii U's general power range: the 360 and PS3. They also already released controller peripherals for both devices, giving them new functionality via the Move and Kinect.

There's no way MS and Sony could just re-release the 360 and PS3 with a new gimmick and call it the PS4 (ala the Wii). It would make no sense given the fact that they already released new controller gimmicks for the 360/PS3.

I really don't think the Wii U's success or failure has any bearing on the PS4 or 720. The Wii U's competition is not the PS4 or 720 but the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. When the time comes that MS and Sony release new consoles, they will be aiming for a market beyond what the Wii U is capable of. And that's why they won't release those consoles anytime soon, and instead will compete with the Wii U through the 360 and PS3 until 2013/2014 or so.

Jumping to conclusions eh? We still don't have concrete and accurate information pertaining to the power of the Wii U hardware. Of course, it's gonna get ports from PS3/X360 because it's a "testing ground". Once devs get confident on the platform they'll start pumping out new games on it. I'm not talking about re-release of PS3/X360 but PS4/Xbox720 having the same or just a little bit better hardware than the Wii U hardware. I'm talking about the PS2/GC era where the power of the consoles weren't too different from one another unlike the Wii's weak hardware compared to the HD twins.
Avatar image for loveless9
loveless9

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 loveless9
Member since 2011 • 167 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

Zurrur



Lol. Don't post if you're going to type nonsense.

Avatar image for yellonet
yellonet

7768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 yellonet
Member since 2004 • 7768 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCsZurrur

:lol:

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii wasZurrur
Guess what, all games are toys.

Avatar image for harshv82
harshv82

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#34 harshv82
Member since 2008 • 1120 Posts
huh? define hardcore. Last games I considered hardcore were UT99 and Quake 3 Arena. Yes, I live in past!
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Then microsoft and sony will announce consoles that will absolutly destroy the WiiU in terms of hardware capabilities and 3rd party developers will jump ship from the WiiU to the other consoles.

I keep saying this. The WiiU is coming out a year to soon. It needs to wait a year, launch around the time of the other big hitters with much more hardware than what has been predicted and leaked. That Zelda demo was impressive but if that's the best a tech demo is going to get on the WiiU, that's not looking that good for the future of that hardware. Current PC benchmarks are damn near photorealistic and even the 360 and PS3 benchmarks can match that Zelda demo.

I think it's to little to late to grab back the hardcore audience. Especially if this thing costs $400 (which with that controller it will be suprising to see it under $400).

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

sony does wii u then all the cows will moo how amazing sony is. But since nintendo is doing it its just a gimmick.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

The point is that Microsoft and Sony already have consoles that are in the Wii U's general power range: the 360 and PS3. They also already released controller peripherals for both devices, giving them new functionality via the Move and Kinect.

There's no way MS and Sony could just re-release the 360 and PS3 with a new gimmick and call it the PS4 (ala the Wii). It would make no sense given the fact that they already released new controller gimmicks for the 360/PS3.

I really don't think the Wii U's success or failure has any bearing on the PS4 or 720. The Wii U's competition is not the PS4 or 720 but the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. When the time comes that MS and Sony release new consoles, they will be aiming for a market beyond what the Wii U is capable of. And that's why they won't release those consoles anytime soon, and instead will compete with the Wii U through the 360 and PS3 until 2013/2014 or so.

lordlors

Jumping to conclusions eh? We still don't have concrete and accurate information pertaining to the power of the Wii U hardware. Of course, it's gonna get ports from PS3/X360 because it's a "testing ground". Once devs get confident on the platform they'll start pumping out new games on it. I'm not talking about re-release of PS3/X360 but PS4/Xbox720 having the same or just a little bit better hardware than the Wii U hardware. I'm talking about the PS2/GC era where the power of the consoles weren't too different from one another unlike the Wii's weak hardware compared to the HD twins.

I think there's basically zero chance that devs will start pumping out lots of Wii U-exclusive games (call it 'jumping to conclusions' if you will). The dev costs of game development are way too high to support 3rd party console exclusivity in this day and age.

The Wii U is competing against the 360/PS3 and will receive mostly the same games; not just in 2012, not just in 2013, but for the perpetual future until Microsoft and Sony decide to launch new consoles. Again, that is because third parties need/want to release on multiple systems to reach the largest install base, increase sales and make up for the high costs of modern day big-budget game development.

If and when Microsoft and Sony do launch new consoles, there is no guarantee that the hardware in those new systems won't completely blow away the Wii U's. You can hope that they won't blow away the Wii U's, but there's a very good that they will. Especially the longer Microsoft and Sony wait to launch them.

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]

[I really don't think the Wii U's success or failure has any bearing on the PS4 or 720. The Wii U's competition is not the PS4 or 720 but the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. -Snooze-

If that's so then why buy it? We're coming to the end of a gen, why would anyone support a console battling it out with 6 year old hardware?

The Wii U is competing with the next gen of consoles, like it or not.

Except that this gen isn't coming to an end, because only one console manufacturer has so far opted to release a new console. Now there are rumors that the other two manufacturers may launch something by 2013/2014, but those are still just rumors right now. When the Wii U launches in 2012, it is going against the 360/PS3 and that's just a fact.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#39 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Then microsoft and sony will announce consoles that will absolutly destroy the WiiU in terms of hardware capabilities and 3rd party developers will jump ship from the WiiU to the other consoles.

I keep saying this. The WiiU is coming out a year to soon. It needs to wait a year, launch around the time of the other big hitters with much more hardware than what has been predicted and leaked. That Zelda demo was impressive but if that's the best a tech demo is going to get on the WiiU, that's not looking that good for the future of that hardware. Current PC benchmarks are damn near photorealistic and even the 360 and PS3 benchmarks can match that Zelda demo.

I think it's to little to late to grab back the hardcore audience. Especially if this thing costs $400 (which with that controller it will be suprising to see it under $400).

Wasdie

Hmm I know why you say that but even if nintendo would have waited a year wouldn't 3rd party still jump ship? Maybe the WiiU would get next gen ports... but certainly not optimised for the WiiU as microsoft and sony are always capable of making a better 3rd party platform by throwing money at it. Gamers will want to have one non-nintendo platform so that they will have all those 3rd party games anyway.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
None of that has to do with hardcore gaming. But I do agree that the Wii U is being unfairly judged, considering what Nintendo is trying to do with it (appeal to everyone).
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60824 Posts
It will be interesting to see how the controller gets used.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d25ae64ef918
deactivated-5d25ae64ef918

8101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-5d25ae64ef918
Member since 2008 • 8101 Posts
Am I the only person that sees the Wii U as just a controller with a massive DC screen in the middle that happens to be a touch screen? Not saying it's bad or anything. Just don't see how people can find so much to talk about over it.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#44 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Am I the only person that sees the Wii U as just a controller with a massive DC screen in the middle that happens to be a touch screen? Not saying it's bad or anything. Just don't know how people can find so much to talk about over it.OICWUTUDIDTHAR
Am I the only person that sees Gears of War as just a game with a bunch of Kill.Switch gameplay elements? Not saying it's bad our anything. Just don't know how people can find so much to talk about over it. Being first isn't important. Utilising something in a creative way that becomes very popular is.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#45 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
You do realise a LOT(most) of the hardcore gamers are extremely loyal to PC, Xbox and Playstation... They won't suddenly switch to a Nintendo system just because Nintendo wants them to.
Avatar image for LaytonsCat
LaytonsCat

3652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 LaytonsCat
Member since 2010 • 3652 Posts

Thats really up to the third parties. Nintendo isn't going to start making M rated games but if the third parties love the system so much those hardcore games should show up

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#47 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I think there will be more of a focus on appealing to hardcore gamers from Nintendo and I can see the touchscreen being useful in a lot of genres but I still think that the next Sony/Microsoft consoles will still be better for the hardcore gamers. Still, this is just guesswork, who knows what will happen once all three consoles are released.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Chat pad? You mean what people use mics for?
Avatar image for sailor232
sailor232

6880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 sailor232
Member since 2003 • 6880 Posts

I see a repeat of the Wii, touting that 3rd parties are on board, the system is easy to program for, the new controller opens up unimaginable oportunites to devs. Then you dont really get any of that in the long run.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#50 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

Hardcore gamers play WRPGS on PCs

Wii U is just a toy just like Wii was

Zurrur

Isn't that exactly what video games are anyway?