[QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="jigglebilly1983"][QUOTE="Ninja-Vox"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] I fail to see how you do not see a connection to it.. Isn't it beneficial for Microsoft to give a good review to a highly acclaimed game that is being released for the Xbox360 the only console system that will have the game.. And being released on the PC which is for windows, a OS platform that is devolped by Microsoft.. Don't you think it would be beneficial for them to hype the game a bit to get sales in the system>?
jigglebilly1983
, Crackdown would not have received a mediocre score, or shadowrun a pretty bad score for that matter. That was a microsoft games studios game for crying out loud.
yeah, but sometimes you cant hide the mediocrity with a sugar coating.
Sorry, you're just wrong. You're accusing microsoft of paying off reviewers to give a higher score; and this isn't even a microsoft game. Two microsoft PUBLISHED games both scored 7.0 and 6.0 respectively; mediocre scores and lower than what any multi-format reviewers awarded. So you have no point. They are not paid by microsoft at all.
I never said Payed off. I said they were on the M$ payroll. one is underhanded, the other is not. any which way it works, does it really change the fact that OXM scores and OPM scores are universally pretty much not acknowledged here on SW for the core reason of them being the OFFICIAL magazines?
please give us a link to this underhanded payoff. I would love to read this. please don't give me the, its obvious excuse or the stop being a blind fanboy excuse. just show some proof.
Log in to comment