This topic is locked from further discussion.
Exactly, it's pretty well known that Kevin-V is a terrible reviewer. :D ... :PI vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Exactly, it's pretty well known that Kevin-V is a terrible reviewer. :D ... :P hes more credible then you would ever be on here.[QUOTE="Kevin-V"]Exactly, it's pretty well known that Kevin-V is a terrible reviewer. :D ... :P:o Oh no you didn't.I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Stevo_the_gamer
hey in fairness assassin's creed was a much better game than mass effect. However it seems like Mass effect 2 is looking to be a better game than assassin's creed 2.I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
better than most reviews around here my regal sirI vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I think that's because you could look up when you ride a horse. :P I kid I kid.
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
For that alone he deserves to be unceremoniously sacked.
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I know! Finally someone else says it!
:P
As long as you give ME2 a better score than AC2, we shall forgive you :PI vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
This way users such as Stevo_the_gamer and other misinformed people or with different agendas or w.e the case may be dont need to defend themselves when they contradict themselves accidental or not.rock_steady_blalol. What? I just noticed this post.
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
I know! Finally someone else admits it! :P AC > ME.No.
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
Kevin. Can you tell us if there will ever be a Rune Factory Frontier review? Its been along time and quite alot of us are confused by GS decision to not review it whilst reviewing crap instead.
A simple yes or no answer will do.
[QUOTE="rock_steady_bla"]This way users such as Stevo_the_gamer and other misinformed people or with different agendas or w.e the case may be dont need to defend themselves when they contradict themselves accidental or not.Stevo_the_gamerlol. What? I just noticed this post.
You're a misinformed individual Stevo. It's high time you accept that fact.
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="Kevin-V"]I know! Finally someone else admits it! :P AC > ME. As far as I know, ME (PC version) > AC > ME (360 version)I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
rock_steady_bla
lol. What? I just noticed this post.[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="rock_steady_bla"]This way users such as Stevo_the_gamer and other misinformed people or with different agendas or w.e the case may be dont need to defend themselves when they contradict themselves accidental or not.Lionheart08
You're a misinformed individual Stevo. It's high time you accept that fact.
Not you too Lionheart, come back from the dark side. :cry:No.
[QUOTE="Kevin-V"]
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
shutdown_202
Kevin. Can you tell us if there will ever be a Rune Factory Frontier review? Its been along time and quite alot of us are confused by GS decision to not review it whilst reviewing crap instead.
A simple yes or no answer will do.
Kevin Van'Ord and JRPG reviews? This thread must die quickly...with fire.you wont be bothered much only on certain major issues that need resolving, for instance, wouldnt you say MLB The Show 09 is exclusive to the PS3 because the last gen versions just dont cut it?I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
What a douche:PI vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
No.
[QUOTE="Kevin-V"]
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
shutdown_202
Kevin. Can you tell us if there will ever be a Rune Factory Frontier review? Its been along time and quite alot of us are confused by GS decision to not review it whilst reviewing crap instead.
A simple yes or no answer will do.
have they... wait they have reviewed phantom brave, its just piss poreDepending on what Kevin V offers as a... friendship offering, I'll consider my vote ;) 8)
Oh, and also if he can raise the review score on Tomb Raider Underworld :P
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
you wont be bothered much only on certain major issues that need resolving, for instance, wouldnt you say MLB The Show 09 is exclusive to the PS3 because the last gen versions just dont cut it? we need to know this so we can put it on the spreadsheet for PS3 exclusives in yellow ink.[QUOTE="Kevin-V"]hey in fairness assassin's creed was a much better game than mass effect. However it seems like Mass effect 2 is looking to be a better game than assassin's creed 2. to each their own. I couldn't even finish AC due to the repetitive boredom of it.I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
ReaperV7
after i saw your pics i dont think anyone would want to be your friend :PDepending on what Kevin V offers as a... friendship offering, I'll consider my vote ;) 8)
AdobeArtist
[QUOTE="rock_steady_bla"]This way users such as Stevo_the_gamer and other misinformed people or with different agendas or w.e the case may be dont need to defend themselves when they contradict themselves accidental or not.Stevo_the_gamerlol. What? I just noticed this post.
IDK what he's even might be saying or whatever the case may be accidental or not.
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
you wont be bothered much only on certain major issues that need resolving, for instance, wouldnt you say MLB The Show 09 is exclusive to the PS3 because the last gen versions just dont cut it? we need to know this so we can put it on the spreadsheet for PS3 exclusives in yellow ink.:lol: I lol'd.[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]lol. What? I just noticed this post.Stevo_the_gamer
You're a misinformed individual Stevo. It's high time you accept that fact.
Not you too Lionheart, come back from the dark side. :cry:But cows have cookies. :P
There's a story behind that Mass Effect thing. For the record, the disputed sentence was meant to communicate that even when you can move the targeting reticle up or down, the Mako may not be able to hit the target. You can target an enemy when you're at a higher elevation but not hit it, because the Mako's turret may not allow it, though the placement of your reticle implies that you can.
The sentence in the review is a poor one; I've often wished I could replace it, but an edit--and an editor's note--seem pointless all this time later. I've taken a Roger Ebert-type stance: let my mistake persist as a reminder to myself that I am fallible. For the record, I am very aware that the Mako's turret moves up and down, but for whatever reason, my sentence doesn't communicate what I intended. Alas, all I can do is go with it and learn from it. Of course, in a world of insane fanboys, one sentence can invalidate an entire career of great and honest work. Such is the world of the console wars.
It was pretty obvious what you meant once the game was played.There's a story behind that Mass Effect thing. For the record, the disputed sentence was meant to communicate that even when you can move the targeting reticle up or down, the Mako may not be able to hit the target. You can target an enemy when you're at a higher elevation but not hit it, because the Mako's turret may not allow it, though the placement of your reticle implies that you can.
Kevin-V
Not to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
Edit:
Also, you forgot to mention that the mako turrent can actually "zoom in" making it exceedingly accurate; which was another one of your "complaints" (the accuracy).
There's a story behind that Mass Effect thing. For the record, the disputed sentence was meant to communicate that even when you can move the targeting reticle up or down, the Mako may not be able to hit the target. You can target an enemy when you're at a higher elevation but not hit it, because the Mako's turret may not allow it, though the placement of your reticle implies that you can.
The sentence in the review is a poor one; I've often wished I could replace it, but an edit--and an editor's note--seem pointless all this time later. I've taken a Roger Ebert-type stance: let my mistake persist as a reminder to myself that I am fallible. For the record, I am very aware that the Mako's turret moves up and down, but for whatever reason, my sentence doesn't communicate what I intended. Alas, all I can do is go with it and learn from it. Of course, in a world of insane fanboys, one sentence can invalidate an entire career of great and honest work. Such is the world of the console wars.
as long as you keep it real your work should do the talking for itself. so far so good and a reason why many join and trust this site.moments in that like games, can be completely opposite. its those rare moments that sometimes make or break the experience for you, and they are worth mentioning.Not to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
Stevo_the_gamer
this is true. I only saw like 2 or 3 the whole game and i got that thar completionist achievement so i must've explored durned well WITHOUT the dlc :xNot to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
Stevo_the_gamer
Not to mention you forgot to mention, Kevin-V, that the "thresher maul" encounters of the game were quite rare. Since, ya'know, you complained about the thresher maul. :)
this is true. I only saw like 2 or 3 the whole game and i got that thar completionist achievement so i must've explored durned well the game could have used that time, idea, or enemy or whatever to create something really enjoyable, even if its juts 2 or 3 times, this one didnt, and instead it gave a feeling of not such greatness. stuff like this is what a review is about.This!!! i lol'd btw, glad people can have a sense of humour! :DI vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
Kevin-V
I vote no. I mean, the guy gave Assassin's Creed a higher score than Mass Effect for crying out loud.
This!!! i lol'd btw, glad people can have a sense of humour! :D i lol'd too :PLOL, this thread is hilarious :lol: I also think rock_steady is a fakeboy :POdreci think he's the_core_gamer
Such is the world of the console wars.Kevin-VIt is a dark brutal place. Besides we all know you're paid off by microsoft/sony/EA/insert other here depending on review score.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment