I wonder how good killzone 2 looks now..

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="HappyAppe"]Probably looks about the same. I wouldn't get your hopes up too much.caseypayne69

That's funny. Who knows, but the dev's say the build at E307 is shameful compared to how it looks now.

where did they say that?

i think, and still think, it looks pretly meh, i also expect this to be a derivaitive shooter.

call me sinical but when was the last good PS3 exclusive shooter i mean it even miised out on one of the baest of last years shooters bioshock.

some of those shots look pre-rendred, especialy the bottom one

[QUOTE="darklord888"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="darklord888"][QUOTE="HappyAppe"][QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

[QUOTE="HappyAppe"]Probably looks about the same. I wouldn't get your hopes up too much.Khoaki

I wasn't really part of that group, but boy was that awful. I saw the first screens and knew what Bungie was going for, and knew it wasn't going to be a graphical powerhouse. Some people just expected Halo 3 to be the "end-all" video game or something.

not to mention that Heavenly Sword isnt dead. Sony owns the IP, and considering the game was a knockoff of God of War, i think giving it to Sony Santa Monica to develop can only help the game.

[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="High_Spy"]Think of it this way. Mass Effect looks HALF as good as KZ2, and lagged like a **** on the 512 mb RAM 360. So how do you think KZ is gonna run on the 256 mb RAM PS3?High_Spy

Um, these aren't final builds buddy. ME was pretty smooth in it's first gameplay video as well. Gameplay vids show software that is usually ran on CDs that only play a PORTION of the game, like a demo. Therefore the console doesnt load as much data and the game runs smoother. There's this little technique called "MARKETING" which fools people into believing certain things. Every single game in the biz has claimed to doing something it cant actually do. KZ2's 30 fps is probably gonna be that. And the PS3 does have 256 mb ram. Your reason for it having 512 didnt even make sense. Grammar bro.

The demo was of a full level, so the console wouldn't load anymore on the full game, it only loads one level at a time.

And the PS3 does have 512mb RAM, if you can't understand that don't make tehcnical comparisons.

[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="High_Spy"]Think of it this way. Mass Effect looks HALF as good as KZ2, and lagged like a **** on the 512 mb RAM 360. So how do you think KZ is gonna run on the 256 mb RAM PS3?High_Spy

Um, these aren't final builds buddy. ME was pretty smooth in it's first gameplay video as well. Gameplay vids show software that is usually ran on CDs that only play a PORTION of the game, like a demo. Therefore the console doesnt load as much data and the game runs smoother. There's this little technique called "MARKETING" which fools people into believing certain things. Every single game in the biz has claimed to doing something it cant actually do. KZ2's 30 fps is probably gonna be that. And the PS3 does have 256 mb ram. Your reason for it having 512 didnt even make sense. Grammar bro.

No he is right. PS3 does have 512MB RAM. It is just spilt between the RSX and GPU. and having a 30fps framrate isnt marketing, infact for a FPS its laughable really.

[QUOTE="High_Spy"]

[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="High_Spy"]Think of it this way. Mass Effect looks HALF as good as KZ2, and lagged like a **** on the 512 mb RAM 360. So how do you think KZ is gonna run on the 256 mb RAM PS3?HULKMANIA_001

Um, these aren't final builds buddy. ME was pretty smooth in it's first gameplay video as well. Gameplay vids show software that is usually ran on CDs that only play a PORTION of the game, like a demo. Therefore the console doesnt load as much data and the game runs smoother. There's this little technique called "MARKETING" which fools people into believing certain things. Every single game in the biz has claimed to doing something it cant actually do. KZ2's 30 fps is probably gonna be that. And the PS3 does have 256 mb ram. Your reason for it having 512 didnt even make sense. Grammar bro.

No he is right. PS3 does have 512MB RAM. It is just spilt between the RSX and GPU. and having a 30fps framrate isnt marketing, infact for a FPS its laughable really.

nah, depends on the pace of the game.. a run and gun shooter should have 60 fps (preferably).. but others with cover are fine with 30 FPS. as long as it's a steady 30fps.

Think of it this way. Mass Effect looks HALF as good as KZ2, and lagged like a **** on the 512 mb RAM 360. So how do you think KZ is gonna run on the 256 mb RAM PS3?High_Spy

It's 512mb RAM actually. And don't forget, you can optimise to fit certain amount of ram :P

Think of it this way. Mass Effect looks HALF as good as KZ2, and lagged like a **** on the 512 mb RAM 360. So how do you think KZ is gonna run on the 256 mb RAM PS3?High_Spy

So your implying that Mass Effect is using 512 mb on graphics? I don't even know why I posted a response, this is too funny.

In all honestly it could look worse we have no idea how much they had done at that point it could have been a small section of the game and they have been building the rest of the game in the meantime. Graphical touches could be sacrificed to ensure a good framerate etc.

But in all probability it probably looks about the same

mattacular

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYtdOZcrD7c

It's playing smooth here even though we can't accurately tell how the gfx are .. I think they look about the same as the pics.

Probably looks about the same. I wouldn't get your hopes up too much.HappyAppe

Yeah.

I would expect to see the graphics a bit tighter, higher res textures and some less jaggies, but nothing to different from what we see now.