The only other game to look forward to is Quantum Break which looks very interesting and promising but that's about it. The PS4 has nothing to show for right now but based on some of the announced games, its future is looking bright.
The only other game to look forward to is Quantum Break which looks very interesting and promising but that's about it. The PS4 has nothing to show for right now but based on some of the announced games, its future is looking bright.
What does the PS4 have? I don't care much for indie titles and JRPGs or weeabo games.
The only other game to look forward to is Quantum Break which looks very interesting and promising but that's about it. The PS4 has nothing to show for right now but based on some of the announced games, its future is looking bright.
What does the PS4 have? I don't care much for indie titles and JRPGs or weeabo games.
I can't recall the names but I watched their Paris game show yesterday and some of the games look pretty nice. That tribal game looks cool and Horizon looks intriguing
Not only is it game over for Xbone when it comes to sales but also when it comes to games.
Your in for a surprise mate, our local store is selling Xbox One Madden Bundles and copies of Halo 5 like crazy. I was just in there today to grab some Amiibo cards. And none of its on sale, its all regular price right now. Meanwhile, Uncharted Bundle isnt doing hardly anything, they need a different bundle fast.
@Suppaman100: true but sony is just as bad in my opinion because they often present games that are no where near completion then claim it as an exclusive like shenmue that's not coming out until holiday 2017 at the earliest, FF15, last guardian HA! plus most of you are placing indie games as exclusive with the consoles list to inflate the list
Halo 5 is not even that great of an offering. The rating is 3/5 by amazon customers and it's scoring a 7.2 on metacritics with the user score. Fans are a lot less happy about the game than the press.
Halo is not even that great of an offering. The rating is 3/5 by and customers and it's scoring a 7.2 on metacritics with the user score. Fans are a lot less happy about the game than the press.
Where are you getting this 'customer' rating? Also why on earth are you putting stock in Metacritic user ratings, ownership doesn't need to be verified...
What fans are a lot less happy? You're just making shit up at this point...
Halo 5 is not even that great of an offering. The rating is 3/5 by and customers and it's scoring a 7.2 on metacritics with the user score. Fans are a lot less happy about the game than the press.
Its got about 200 zero votes. Now im no detective, but something bout that seems a little fishy.
Where are you getting this 'customer' rating? Also why on earth are you putting stock in Metacritic user ratings, ownership doesn't need to be verified...
What fans are a lot less happy? You're just making shit up at this point...
Just because the score is low and you don't like it doesn't mean it should be discredited.
Scalebound and Tomb Raider are looking pretty dope. Quantum Break has be interested, as does Crackdown 3. I'll also enjoy Gears 4, though i'm not the biggest Gears fan.
Where are you getting this 'customer' rating? Also why on earth are you putting stock in Metacritic user ratings, ownership doesn't need to be verified...
What fans are a lot less happy? You're just making shit up at this point...
Just because the score is low and you don't like it doesn't mean it should be discredited.
You didn't answer the question, also are you really trying to back up user reviews with unverified ownership...
Forza 6 is the best racer since Turismo 3 or Forza 4, Halo 5 (and imo the best multiplayer shooter in ages) is amazing and you still have Tomb Raider dropping. Then next year you have Crackdown 3, Quantum, Fable Legends, Gears of war 4, Halo Wars and some great looking indie games.
Forza 6 is the best racer since Turismo 3 or Forza 4, Halo 5 (and imo the best multiplayer shooter in ages) is amazing and you still have Tomb Raider dropping. Then next year you have Crackdown 3, Quantum, Fable Legends, Gears of war 4, Halo Wars and some great looking indie games.
You didn't answer the question, also are you really trying to back up user reviews with unverified ownership...
Get out of town... Loser...
Why would it need to be verified?
Because anyone could rate a game.... a super cow such as yourself could go on there and rate the game as a zero. That alone makes the game user rating bunk but of course you're a cow and anything to discredit a game. BTW I'm in the middle of playing and so far it's a great game.
Because anyone could rate a game.... a super cow such as yourself could go on there and rate the game as a zero. That alone makes the game user rating bunk but of course you're a cow and anything to discredit a game. BTW I'm in the middle of playing and so far it's a great game.
And any lems could rate it a 10.
*Any I wouldn't consider myself a super cow. I'm more of a part cow, part sheep breed.
@Legend002: Same reasons as to why Amazon shows which reviews are from verified purchasers... Solely because they hold more weight. That's not to say that verified users can't post troll reviews, but it's a definite step in limiting the ability to do so. There's also the chance that someone has played the game, and did not purchase it, which would make it difficult for Metacritic to track such reviewers.
All-in-all, less incentive to be a trolling dick and write a legitimate review.
3 of my favorite studios are putting out another game, which is alright.
Crystal Dynamics Remedy Platinum Games (not to mention, it's a Kamiya project)
Besides that, I hope Sea of Thieves is good. People going "Rare needs to make another banjo". Get out. Let's see what these people can do with a new IP. ReCore.. dunno. Spring 2016. Nothing shown, except for a teaser. Mehlicious.
Crackdown's cloud destruction looks insane, but it's Crackdown, so I'm not too hyped for that.
Because anyone could rate a game.... a super cow such as yourself could go on there and rate the game as a zero. That alone makes the game user rating bunk but of course you're a cow and anything to discredit a game. BTW I'm in the middle of playing and so far it's a great game.
And any lems could rate it a 10.
*Any I wouldn't consider myself a super cow. I'm more of a part cow, part sheep breed.
I've rated it a 10, because I actually believe it deserves it. I also saw reviews of users giving a 0, who were very obviously just cows. I would only trust the rating users give on XBL in this case.
At the moment it has 4.5/5 stars, rated by 13.169 people
Are you kidding me? Why would ownership on user reviews need to be verified.... I wonder...
You still didn't answer the question.
What question? Fans are a lot less happy? The low scores and reviews, duh. Now answer why scores need to be verified.
"Where are you getting this 'customer' rating?" That question, that "3/5" thing you said...
What fans? I'm happy, a hell of a lot of others seem to be as well, it's got the best gameplay mechanics of any Halo game, it's got arguably the best multiplayer of any Halo game, and opinions vary on the campaign...
Ownership needs to be verified to prove that the game is actually being judged by an owner of the product, not just some random people who feel like rating games up or down because they feel like it which is exactly what the metacritic user ratings are, unverified nonsense.
Because anyone could rate a game.... a super cow such as yourself could go on there and rate the game as a zero. That alone makes the game user rating bunk but of course you're a cow and anything to discredit a game. BTW I'm in the middle of playing and so far it's a great game.
And any lems could rate it a 10.
*Any I wouldn't consider myself a super cow. I'm more of a part cow, part sheep breed.
And how many zero's would actually be legit? There isn't a single Halo game that would be a zero and H5 is absolutely NO exception unless the user is biased. Yes some could rate the game a 10 and aside from a few super fanboys the others could actually believe it to be. The game is good and from what I'm hearing about MP it's the best it's been in a very very long time. No one could make the claim that game is a true zero and you know this. So the user scores are not a good measuring stick to go by.
Yes you're a cow because you're negative about everything when it comes to the X1. There might be some negative things with the X1 but it's far from how YOU cows describe it.
And how many zero's would actually be legit? There isn't a single Halo game that would be a zero and H5 is absolutely NO exception unless the user is biased. Yes some could rate the game a 10 and aside from a few super fanboys the others could actually believe it to be. The game is good and from what I'm hearing about MP it's the best it's been in a very very long time. No one could make the claim that game is a true zero and you know this. So the user scores are not a good measuring stick to go by.
Yes you're a cow because you're negative about everything when it comes to the X1. There might be some negative things with the X1 but it's far from how YOU cows describe it.
You don't know what a cow is and with that I'm done with you.
@nyadc said:
"Where are you getting this 'customer' rating?" That question, that "3/5" thing you said...
What fans? I'm happy, a hell of a lot of others seem to be as well, it's got the best gameplay mechanics of any Halo game, it's got arguably the best multiplayer of any Halo game, and opinions vary on the campaign...
Ownership needs to be verified to prove that the game is actually being judged by an owner of the product, not just some random people who feel like rating games up or down because they feel like it which is exactly what the metacritic user ratings are, unverified nonsense.
Amazon reviews.
On metacritics: Every game deals with unverified user scores like Bloodborne and Mario Maker but despite biased fanboys they still scored well because the game is actually good.
And how many zero's would actually be legit? There isn't a single Halo game that would be a zero and H5 is absolutely NO exception unless the user is biased. Yes some could rate the game a 10 and aside from a few super fanboys the others could actually believe it to be. The game is good and from what I'm hearing about MP it's the best it's been in a very very long time. No one could make the claim that game is a true zero and you know this. So the user scores are not a good measuring stick to go by.
Yes you're a cow because you're negative about everything when it comes to the X1. There might be some negative things with the X1 but it's far from how YOU cows describe it.
You don't know what a cow is and with that I'm done with you.
He's a raging hypocrite dude, I guarantee you a VERY pathetic lem could make a thread doing nothing but bashing the PS brand and he'd side with them the second a Sony fan appears.
He's one of the worst on this site and considering how bad some of the people here are, that's saying ALOT.
Where are you getting this 'customer' rating? Also why on earth are you putting stock in Metacritic user ratings, ownership doesn't need to be verified...
What fans are a lot less happy? You're just making shit up at this point...
Just because the score is low and you don't like it doesn't mean it should be discredited.
"Where are you getting this 'customer' rating?" That question, that "3/5" thing you said...
What fans? I'm happy, a hell of a lot of others seem to be as well, it's got the best gameplay mechanics of any Halo game, it's got arguably the best multiplayer of any Halo game, and opinions vary on the campaign...
Ownership needs to be verified to prove that the game is actually being judged by an owner of the product, not just some random people who feel like rating games up or down because they feel like it which is exactly what the metacritic user ratings are, unverified nonsense.
Amazon reviews.
On metacritics: Every game deals with unverified user scores like Bloodborne and Mario Maker but despite biased fanboys they still scored well because the game is actually good.
Amazon reviews are a mix of verified and unverified purchasers, not to mention as someone else said, even owners don't objectively review what they buy, that's why there are critics... People buy it bitching about no split-screen and give it 1 star when that's been known for god knows how long... People saying the game doesn't work when it clearly does giving it 1 star.... People freaking out about a day one patch giving it 1 star...
All in all there are some quality user reviews, but by and large a lot are just idiots who don't know what in the hell they're doing or talking about so they spam 1 star reviews. And you think that should be listened to also, that nonsense?
You are a lost cause man, flat out... You know exactly what kind of negative crowd Halo attracts and the lengths people will go to make it look bad, people like yourself, hell you probably wrote a user review on Metacritic... The point is absolute, this isn't an argument, and frankly you're annoying the shit out of me with your illogical, irrational bullshit.
Metacritic user ratings are worthless in every possible capacity, there's no evidence that they own the game, there's no evidence that the game was played, there's no evidence that the people know anything about the game, there's nothing. You simply make an account, say some shit and give it a score, if you actually want to quantify how that should be factored in as a valid judgement of a game, by all means try to logically rationalize that, I'll have the .gif's prepped for whatever stupid response you decide to conjure.
"Where are you getting this 'customer' rating?" That question, that "3/5" thing you said...
What fans? I'm happy, a hell of a lot of others seem to be as well, it's got the best gameplay mechanics of any Halo game, it's got arguably the best multiplayer of any Halo game, and opinions vary on the campaign...
Ownership needs to be verified to prove that the game is actually being judged by an owner of the product, not just some random people who feel like rating games up or down because they feel like it which is exactly what the metacritic user ratings are, unverified nonsense.
Amazon reviews.
On metacritics: Every game deals with unverified user scores like Bloodborne and Mario Maker but despite biased fanboys they still scored well because the game is actually good.
Amazon reviews are a mix of verified and unverified purchasers, not to mention as someone else said, even owners don't objectively review what they buy, that's why there are critics... People buy it bitching about no split-screen and give it 1 star when that's been known for god knows how long... People saying the game doesn't work when it clearly does giving it 1 star.... People freaking out about a day one patch giving it 1 star...
All in all there are some quality user reviews, but by and large a lot are just idiots who don't know what in the hell they're doing or talking about so they spam 1 star reviews. And you think that should be listened to also, that nonsense?
You are a lost cause man, flat out... You know exactly what kind of negative crowd Halo attracts and the lengths people will go to make it look bad, people like yourself, hell you probably wrote a user review on Metacritic... The point is absolute, this isn't an argument, and frankly you're annoying the shit out of me with your illogical, irrational bullshit.
Metacritic user ratings are worthless in every possible capacity, there's no evidence that they own the game, there's no evidence that the game was played, there's no evidence that the people know anything about the game, there's nothing. You simply make an account, say some shit and give it a score, if you actually want to quantify how that should be factored in as a valid judgement of a game, by all means try to logically rationalize that, I'll have the .gif's prepped for whatever stupid response you decide to conjure.
I assume your argument also applies for Uncharted?
"Where are you getting this 'customer' rating?" That question, that "3/5" thing you said...
What fans? I'm happy, a hell of a lot of others seem to be as well, it's got the best gameplay mechanics of any Halo game, it's got arguably the best multiplayer of any Halo game, and opinions vary on the campaign...
Ownership needs to be verified to prove that the game is actually being judged by an owner of the product, not just some random people who feel like rating games up or down because they feel like it which is exactly what the metacritic user ratings are, unverified nonsense.
Amazon reviews.
On metacritics: Every game deals with unverified user scores like Bloodborne and Mario Maker but despite biased fanboys they still scored well because the game is actually good.
Amazon reviews are a mix of verified and unverified purchasers, not to mention as someone else said, even owners don't objectively review what they buy, that's why there are critics... People buy it bitching about no split-screen and give it 1 star when that's been known for god knows how long... People saying the game doesn't work when it clearly does giving it 1 star.... People freaking out about a day one patch giving it 1 star...
All in all there are some quality user reviews, but by and large a lot are just idiots who don't know what in the hell they're doing or talking about so they spam 1 star reviews. And you think that should be listened to also, that nonsense?
You are a lost cause man, flat out... You know exactly what kind of negative crowd Halo attracts and the lengths people will go to make it look bad, people like yourself, hell you probably wrote a user review on Metacritic... The point is absolute, this isn't an argument, and frankly you're annoying the shit out of me with your illogical, irrational bullshit.
Metacritic user ratings are worthless in every possible capacity, there's no evidence that they own the game, there's no evidence that the game was played, there's no evidence that the people know anything about the game, there's nothing. You simply make an account, say some shit and give it a score, if you actually want to quantify how that should be factored in as a valid judgement of a game, by all means try to logically rationalize that, I'll have the .gif's prepped for whatever stupid response you decide to conjure.
I assume your argument also applies for Uncharted?
Log in to comment