This has a VERY low chance of happening but lets say it does, are you still buying one? Personally, its a no go. 720p as a standard in 2013 would be a fkin joke and i certainly do NOT want to spend another 5+ years playing blurry ass games.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This has a VERY low chance of happening but lets say it does, are you still buying one? Personally, its a no go. 720p as a standard in 2013 would be a fkin joke and i certainly do NOT want to spend another 5+ years playing blurry ass games.
I'll be getting all the consoles eventually unless they won't play used games.This has a VERY low chance of happening but lets say it does, are you still buying one? Personally, its a no go. 720p as a standard in 2013 would be a fkin joke and i certainly do NOT want to spend another 5+ years playing blurry ass games.
silversix_
Won't matter as much as how good are the games available for the system actually play - just sayin. :P
Yes im not a graphics whore neckbeard like most of the hermits here. 720p/60fps will do just fine.DepthsOfDreamsYou don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features.
You don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features. Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.[QUOTE="DepthsOfDreams"]Yes im not a graphics whore neckbeard like most of the hermits here. 720p/60fps will do just fine.silversix_
[QUOTE="silversix_"]You don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features. Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.[QUOTE="DepthsOfDreams"]Yes im not a graphics whore neckbeard like most of the hermits here. 720p/60fps will do just fine.lowe0
Most games will be 1080p on PS4 but... yeh i'll still buy it. I got no problem playing at 720p, specially if the framerate and gfx are good.
[QUOTE="silversix_"]You don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features. Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality.[QUOTE="DepthsOfDreams"]Yes im not a graphics whore neckbeard like most of the hermits here. 720p/60fps will do just fine.lowe0
If 360 was released with 480i rez, wouldn't it been bad for a console released in 05 and one we're still using today? Same goes to 720p with 60fps or not.You're asking as if that's a bad thing......720p60fps is absolutely fine. How much of a jump is 1080p compared to 720p? and is it even worth the performance hit?
Harisemo
If that included extremely high amounts and quality of AA and AF, yeah. Wii U games are going to be 720p afterall.
But it won't happen, there's just too much bandwidth for 720p on PS4. 1080p60fps games will still be more detailed than anything on Current generation consoles.
PS4 is way more powerful than that. Even the 720 is. 1080p/30fps will be the standard because 60fps is largely useless on big tv using a controller, and the average gamer would rather have the eye-candy than the framerate.
Sports, racing, and fighting titles are sure to go for 1080p/60fps. Can't wait to see next-gen Forza and Fight Night. Gonna blow the door off the hinges.
Well, i know it won't happen i just wanted to know if people cared about rez and from what i've seen something tells me the majority never even played a game in a native 1080p...If that included extremely high amounts and quality of AA and AF, yeah. Wii U games are going to be 720p afterall.
But it won't happen, there's just too much bandwidth for 720p on PS4. 1080p60fps games will still be more detailed than anything on Current generation consoles.
Chozofication
Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality. But all those frames above 60 are a waste and are not truely noticable on a 60hz display, the standard for consoles.[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="silversix_"]You don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features.
silversix_
Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality. Will they really be noticeably blurry? The resolving power of the human eye is one arc minute. I have a 55" display (a fairly large TV) at a distance of 9' (a fairly small room). Do the math, or refer to a chart or seating distance calculator.[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="silversix_"]You don't have to be a graphics whore to be bothered by 720p. Like are you saying you'd buy ps4 for 450-500$ if it was running in 480p/120fps? Resolution is more important than textures and all the other 'graphics whore' features.
silversix_
60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality. Will they really be noticeably blurry? The resolving power of the human eye is one arc minute. I have a 55" display (a fairly large TV) at a distance of 9' (a fairly small room). Do the math, or refer to a chart or seating distance calculator.[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="lowe0"] Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.lowe0
What if you sit closer to your monitor/tv
60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality. But all those frames above 60 are a waste and are not truely noticable on a 60hz display, the standard for consoles.True but the point being is, try to play a game in 480i/480p on your old tv's (if u still have one lol) it looks atrocious no matter what kind of fps you're running your games at. This is how everyone would feel about the 720p in couple of years if EVERYONE (not only hermits) had access to 1080p in every game.[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="lowe0"] Now you're getting into a question of diminishing returns. Does 120fps add more to the experience than going from 480p to 720p? What about 1080p vs. going from 30fps to 60fps? Considering that 60fps feels very smooth and that resolving more than 720p would require sitting uncomfortably close to even my 55" TV, 720p60 strikes an excellent balance.kidcool189
I for one don't think developers will be limited to 720p/60fps with the PS4. There's still 1080p/30fps (a consistent 30fps which I'm fine with) that shouldn't be a problem to the PS4. Plus, I think developers will be able to make use of 1600x900 and other oddball resolutions under 1080p. To be honet, I think there will be some shallow games that will be able to handle 1080/60fps just fine.
I mean my PC has inferior hardware. Yet, there are some games that run on it at or close to 1080p/60fps. The PS4 should do better.Â
The PS4 should have no trouble running current gen games at 1080p. Is that all you really expect out of next gen, though? It's hard to say how it will run next-gen games because we haven't really seen what one looks like yet.I for one don't think developers will be limited to 720p/60fps with the PS4. There's still 1080p/30fps (a consistent 30fps which I'm fine with) that shouldn't be a problem to the PS4. Plus, I think developers will be able to make use of 1600x900 and other oddball resolutions under 1080p. To be honet, I think there will be some shallow games that will be able to handle 1080/60fps just fine.
I mean my PC has inferior hardware. Yet, there are some games that run on it at or close to 1080p/60fps. The PS4 should do better.Â
jun_aka_pekto
But all those frames above 60 are a waste and are not truely noticable on a 60hz display, the standard for consoles.True but the point being is, try to play a game in 480i/480p on your old tv's (if u still have one lol) it looks atrocious no matter what kind of fps you're running your games at. This is how everyone would feel about the 720p in couple of years if EVERYONE (not only hermits) had access to 1080p in every game.But games&consoles that were made with 480i/p as the standard, look, play and feel fantastic on those tvs, especially on a nice sony wega xbr or something similar.[QUOTE="kidcool189"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality.
silversix_
[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]The PS4 should have no trouble running current gen games at 1080p. Is that all you really expect out of next gen, though? It's hard to say how it will run next-gen games because we haven't really seen what one looks like yet.I for one don't think developers will be limited to 720p/60fps with the PS4. There's still 1080p/30fps (a consistent 30fps which I'm fine with) that shouldn't be a problem to the PS4. Plus, I think developers will be able to make use of 1600x900 and other oddball resolutions under 1080p. To be honet, I think there will be some shallow games that will be able to handle 1080/60fps just fine.
I mean my PC has inferior hardware. Yet, there are some games that run on it at or close to 1080p/60fps. The PS4 should do better.Â
PurpleMan5000
I have no idea of what limits the developers for the PS4 will be able to achieve. But, if the next-gen games are as clean and clear as my PC games are now, I'm happy. That's all I ask.
Edit:
I mean I'm replaying KZ2 which is highly regarded graphicswise for consoles. I'm wondering what the hell they're talking about. The graphics suck, pure and simple. Â
That's why ammo boxes and guns color-cycle. They're often hard to make out because of the lower res and poor colors in the game.
[QUOTE="DepthsOfDreams"]Yes im not a graphics whore neckbeard like most of the hermits here. 720p/60fps will do just fine.Jankarcop
PC had more games than ps1,ps2,ps3 for each of those gens.
Â
And unlike the PS3, the games shared between the platforms was pretty small. PC and console were entirely different markets then.
After seeing the difference between BioShock Infinite on Consoles and PCs, I would prefer the new consoles be a higher resolution.
The PS4 should have no trouble running current gen games at 1080p. Is that all you really expect out of next gen, though? It's hard to say how it will run next-gen games because we haven't really seen what one looks like yet.[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]
I for one don't think developers will be limited to 720p/60fps with the PS4. There's still 1080p/30fps (a consistent 30fps which I'm fine with) that shouldn't be a problem to the PS4. Plus, I think developers will be able to make use of 1600x900 and other oddball resolutions under 1080p. To be honet, I think there will be some shallow games that will be able to handle 1080/60fps just fine.
I mean my PC has inferior hardware. Yet, there are some games that run on it at or close to 1080p/60fps. The PS4 should do better.Â
jun_aka_pekto
I have no idea of what limits the developers for the PS4 will be able to achieve. But, if the next-gen games are as clean and clear as my PC games are now, I'm happy. That's all I ask.
I think I would prefer next gen games that look like real life, only in blurry 720p. Then I could just pick them up on my PC, where they would look like real life in stunning 4k.Will they really be noticeably blurry? The resolving power of the human eye is one arc minute. I have a 55" display (a fairly large TV) at a distance of 9' (a fairly small room). Do the math, or refer to a chart or seating distance calculator.[QUOTE="lowe0"]
[QUOTE="silversix_"]60fps feels smooth n all but you can live with solid 30fps for one reason, slow ass sensitivity as a standard on a controller. With a kb/mouse the minimum 'i prefer' is like 43-45fps but with a controller im rarely bothered by 30. and yes, 120fps adds a noticeable amount of frames (those saying a human eye can't detect over 60fps never played a game in 120fps) but certainly not as much as going from 30 to 60. My point to the post i made was are you seriously considering spending 500$ just for 60fps? Even if textures are much improved over current gen, if its 720p it'll be blurry as hell and those good looking textures will be noticeable worst than on 1080p even though they're of the same quality.
lostrib
What if you sit closer to your monitor/tv
Then my couch would be in the middle of my living room, maybe even the front. Go look at your living room, grab a tape measure, and picture how it would work for you.True but the point being is, try to play a game in 480i/480p on your old tv's (if u still have one lol) it looks atrocious no matter what kind of fps you're running your games at. This is how everyone would feel about the 720p in couple of years if EVERYONE (not only hermits) had access to 1080p in every game.But games&consoles that were made with 480i/p as the standard, look, play and feel fantastic on those tvs, especially on a nice sony wega xbr or something similar.Fantastic for 90' and early 2000 standards, yes. Back then its all we had (i dunno at which rez hermits were playing back then), today the majority of hdtv's are 1080p. If ps4 is running games at 720p and here to stay for the next 5-7 years i bet it'll be close to impossible to even find a native 720p tv in the near future.[QUOTE="silversix_"]
[QUOTE="kidcool189"] But all those frames above 60 are a waste and are not truely noticable on a 60hz display, the standard for consoles.
kidcool189
i wanted to post some pics of this exact game because the difference is so big that even a blind fanboy will notice it (but will probably not admit it tho lol).After seeing the difference between BioShock Infinite on Consoles and PCs, I would prefer the new consoles be a higher resolution.
Minishdriveby
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment