This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]Okami was the best game last year.Sonic_on_crack
Are you kidding , it didnt even have voice acting ........ get with the times
Your point being? Gears had voice acting, but possibly the worst script ever made. I'm Marcus and I'm ANGRY!!!
These are soldiers not scientist what did you expect . yes marcus flank them with your piex19 to the 13th power dived by the mass ?
have you ever freaking heard real life soldies coversating ?
The script was the best of the year IMO which is why it got nominated by GS .
As a former soldier, yes I heard RL conversations. And Gears script was cringeworthy.I see so many people saying Gears is the most overatted game this gen , I guess because of the 9.6 score it got
So if Gears is so overrated what deserved GOTY last year cause I have to hear this
Zelda :lol:
Okami :lol:
Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .
not to mention even on a objective level almost everyone should agree if it wasnt the best it was one of the best in Voice acting, Sound, Music, Weapons and Multiplayer .
Gears warrants is score last year easily , if it came out now a 9.0 in this scale , but it didnt . Get over you Prime 3 and Bioshock Woes and trying to pass this transgression onto a masterpiece. Standards go up after time
Sonic_on_crack
Gears multiplayer is absolute shyte. the P2P gives host a huge advantage, and it just devolves into people blasting shotguns and hoping that they get to kill the other first. Not fair and even at all.
Gears of War a masterpeice? ye.....uhhh... No.Meu2k7It was a masterpiece theres nothing really like Gears out there and nothing that beats it for graphics yet. But I think Oblivion or Company of Heros had a good chance.
Resistance
Zelda
Okami
Oblivion
All better then Gears.
butteater86
this is all a matter of your misguided opinion
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]Okami was the best game last year.Sir-Marwin105
Are you kidding , it didnt even have voice acting ........ get with the times
Your point being? Gears had voice acting, but possibly the worst script ever made. I'm Marcus and I'm ANGRY!!!
Lets see...Okami held my attention for 40+ hours, Gears of War did for almost 5. I vote for Okami.
[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]Okami was the best game last year.Sonic_on_crack
Are you kidding , it didnt even have voice acting ........ get with the times
So? Okami's story was a hell of alot better that Gears generic storyI actually loved both. Although Zelda has better dungeons and level designs...Okami's story and characters were far more memorable.Zelda:TP was so epic that it was not just a game but an experience. It perfected the style created by OOTto such a degree that they will have to completly change the entire series because no further improvementscan be made to the current formula.It was a game that deserved to be GOTY for 2006. However, if Zelda had lost to a game like Okami then I guess that would have been ok considering that Okami is an amazing experience as well.
Zelda and Okami both remind me of why I play games. Gears was ok as a FPS but one year later I find myself playing R6:LV way more.
genfactor
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .Zerostatic0People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.
Crysis much ?
Zelda was about ten times better than gears. Gears wasnt bad but it was no where near as good as people say it is.web966
Zelda didnt have next gen graphics, did nothing new for the series, had bad sound, no voice acting, and the music was subpar. thats GOTY roffles
People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .Sonic_on_crack
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .cobrax25
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Zaistev_basic
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Sonic_on_crack
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
TP alos got 95% on GR.Are they fanboys?
[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Sonic_on_crack
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
Yes, because reviewers are also hardcore gamers, just like us posting on system wars. Not fanboys of a console but rather FPS games. I mean I can understand why, because AMERICANS who are the reviewers of the gamerankings like FPS games just like Japan like RPGs and reviews FPS lower. At the end, it's about gaming culture.
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Shinobishyguy
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
TP alos got 95% on GR.Are they fanboys?
when sites blindly give it high scores but it losses out to other games in every major award yes.
[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .Sonic_on_crack
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
you cant even give me anything about Alan Wake that is better.....
There have been 2 massive threads on Crysis's gameplay by baddog clearly you failed to notice them.
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Shinobishyguy
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
TP alos got 95% on GR.Are they fanboys?
I think Company of hereos also got a 95% on GR.
which would make it the highest scoring RTS there.
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .cobrax25
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
you cant even give me anything about Alan Wake that is better.....
the lighting for one
[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .Sonic_on_crack
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
you cant even give me anything about Alan Wake that is better.....
the lighting for one
pic? the lighting in Alan Wake is nice...but all the in Crysis is natrual light....not artificial...which allows for things like light beams which Alan Wake does not have.
The best game this year is a DS game. I doubt it will win GOTY though, as not many people know about it.Sir-Marwin105
Hotel Dusk?
[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]The best game this year is a DS game. I doubt it will win GOTY though, as not many people know about it.BatmanBegins24
Hotel Dusk?
How did you know? Hotel Dusk is amazing.[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .cobrax25
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
you cant even give me anything about Alan Wake that is better.....
the lighting for one
pic? the lighting in Alan Wake is nice...but all the in Crysis is natrual light....not artificial...which allows for things like light beams which Alan Wake does not have.
Why post a pic when I can post gameplay ?
[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]Gears of War deserve to get GOTY during 2006. However, a 9.6 rating just makes gamespot more of a fanboy site than a credible video game site. The funny thing about gamespot is that they are have been reviewing XBox to X360 FPS way too high that it is becoming obvious their bias in favor of FPS games.Sonic_on_crack
its 94% on Gamerankings are they fanboys too ?
Gameranking is a joke. Where is Doom? Half-life? Duke Nukem? System Shock 2? Quake? Diablo? Starcraft? What kind of idiot would take gamerankings or metacritic seriously.[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]People play games for fun gameplay not to marvel at technical sophistication.[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]Get real , on a technical level Nothing last year could even come close to Gears of War .Sonic_on_crack
Crysis much ?
Farcry much?
clearly Crysis has good gameplay....but considering your the one that seemed so certain that Alan Wake Looked better then crysis I doubt that.
The gameplay isnt what people are bragging about, and yeah Wake is going to blow away Crysis, then you'll be saying but but teh more development time :(
you cant even give me anything about Alan Wake that is better.....
the lighting for one
pic? the lighting in Alan Wake is nice...but all the in Crysis is natrual light....not artificial...which allows for things like light beams which Alan Wake does not have.
Why post a pic when I can post gameplay ?
Go right ahead, I already posted two threads on Crysis' gameplay and can easily make two more now.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment