If Killzone 2 were on the pc...

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] sure they can i believe you. NO. ppl with average specs cant even produce 360 graphics let alone ps3. you need higher end specs to get them.stylesPS3

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.

Oh gosh, this thread is turning into a troll cave.

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] sure they can i believe you. NO. ppl with average specs cant even produce 360 graphics let alone ps3. you need higher end specs to get them.stylesPS3

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.

What kinda mess did you do to your PC? Back before I upgraded mine, I could run most games maxed out(including 1080p resolution and 8xAA). Now that I have upgraded it, my PC can outshine both of the systems and it still doesn't have crazy high specs.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.

Yall hermits and fanboys in here never fail to surprise me. Oooh KZ2 doesn't have physics, oooh KZ2 wouldn't take much to run for a pc, oooh KZ2 isn't nothing but a corridor shooter. But yet when discussing its graphics the only pc game that comes to mind to compare it to is CRYSIS lol. Even Arma 2 one you get past the enviroment (like Crysis) KZ2 can hold its own. Remember when motion blur and lens flare was once praised in Crysis, well KZ2's use of it blows Crysis away. Also Particle effects, and animations kill Crysis. The amount of weather effects and enviromental effects in KZ2 kills Crysis.

If yall think yall are giving any where near the specs that a pc would have to have to play it, yall are crazy. Sorry but what was the last pc game that ran with 512meg of Ram, and have 256 meg video card? Bottom line is that its not even comparable to what most of you fanboys say. But I would definitly say pc wise you would need atleast 2gb of ram, and atleast a 8800 series card or a 4700 series ati to get everything rolling, maybe higher.

But the best part is for yall guys is that you will never have to worry about what specs you'll need for your pc to play KZ2.

Oh yea Bloom for the win in Arma 2 lol.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.

What kinda mess did you do to your PC? Back before I upgraded mine, I could run most games maxed out(including 1080p resolution and 8xAA). Now that I have upgraded it, my PC can outshine both of the systems and it still doesn't have crazy high specs.

Whatever the required specification would be it wouldn't reflect all gamers, they would be tweaking the config settings to improve the object popping distance.

Garbage on the floor shouldn't be distance popping in the same room the player is currently in.

look how gta4 turned out on pc, lol.

you would need the next-gen pc gpu/cpu in order to run KZ2. The only thing today's pc would be able to do with kz2 is display higher res and textures but it wont be able to run, maybe 3-6 frames per second.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] lol at changing from high end tech to "inexpensive". yes you could find alot of things cheap, that doesnt change the spec.stylesPS3

...I would mostcertainly not buy it or care about it. I've seen and played the game, and it is nothing special.

Crysis poor particle effects

Also somone tell me how to fix this lol. Somone said yesterday I was making things up. I wished I could remember who said that.

Also these were done on High setting at 1280X720 just for the fun of what the ps3 may could do. Also with out any AA.

Crysis poor particle effects

Also somone tell me how to fix this lol. Somone said yesterday I was making things up. I wished I could remember who said that.

Also these were done on High setting at 1280X720 just for the fun of what the ps3 may could do. Also with out any AA.

GreyFoXX4

Muzzle flash effects usually look like ass because you only seem them for a split second.

All the other particle effect in Crysis look great (especially explosions)

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Crysis poor particle effects

Also somone tell me how to fix this lol. Somone said yesterday I was making things up. I wished I could remember who said that.

Also these were done on High setting at 1280X720 just for the fun of what the ps3 may could do. Also with out any AA.

Muzzle flash effects usually look like ass because you only seem them for a split second.

All the other particle effect in Crysis look great (especially explosions)

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]

average gamer specheretrix

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] then im guessing we disagree about the average gamer spec, because i certainly dont think the average pc gamer has an 8600gt or higher. ALOT of pc gamers just play with whatever the graphic result is without caring. you need to realize this, not everyone upgrades.

stylesPS3

If you got a decent video card, it would run better than the PS3 version would. :|

Some more particle effect shots

Also the one with the humvee, it barely moves when the explosion takes place. And every spark you see and piece of the humvee in the air you see disappears prior to hitting the ground or just when fixing to hit the ground. Another words its clipping the effect.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]Whatever dude. The bottom line is any current videocard will Killzone 2 with no problem. You wouldnt need a high end card to run a game that already runs on a 3 year old GPU. This is pretty obvious. That is to everyone but you. But that's your problem.

If you got a decent video card, it would run better than the PS3 version would. :|

Now KZ2 has particle effects :)

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/multiplayer-gameplay-killzone-2/43369

Now KZ2 has particle effects :)

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/multiplayer-gameplay-killzone-2/43370

GreyFoXX4

KZ 2 would be very fun on PC. Stop acting like you don't care, it's a pretty good quality FPS. It's not incredibly different in many areas, but I like how it's a different style with the control, weight, and aiming of eveything.

Some more particle effect shots

Also the one with the humvee, it barely moves when the explosion takes place. And every spark you see and piece of the humvee in the air you see disappears prior to hitting the ground or just when fixing to hit the ground. Another words its clipping the effect.

GreyFoXX4

You will now be discredited. Thanks for trying.

First of all, Slow Mo Video of Warhead, you say it has bad particles? this is a custom config, you can see the sparks flying off the helmets of soldiers you shoot. You can see the explosion of the APC.

Particles Mod:

Provided they optimized the game for PC, any current gen rig would run it perfectly well on Max settings. I'd say 2GB of Ram recommended, an 8600 videocard or higher, and a Dual Core 2.5-2.8 ghz CPU to max it out.

Some more particle effect shots

Also the one with the humvee, it barely moves when the explosion takes place. And every spark you see and piece of the humvee in the air you see disappears prior to hitting the ground or just when fixing to hit the ground. Another words its clipping the effect.

GreyFoXX4

It's probably for performance reasons.

Everything else is effected by physics, and Crysis is on a much larger scale than most FPS's, so they figured that nobody would notice that some minor particle effects weren't effected by physics.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

Some more particle effect shots

Also the one with the humvee, it barely moves when the explosion takes place. And every spark you see and piece of the humvee in the air you see disappears prior to hitting the ground or just when fixing to hit the ground. Another words its clipping the effect.

GTR2addict

You will now be discredited. Thanks for trying.

First of all, Slow Mo Video of Warhead, you say it has bad particles? this is a custom config, you can see the sparks flying off the helmets of soldiers you shoot. You can see the explosion of the APC.

Particles Mod:

Edited: LOL, everyone of those effects was once again clipping out. Sorry but just watched your video and yes they are bouncing off of the helmets and then on in to eternity lol. Also a mass amounts of those particle are going through walls in that one section lol. And is that your vid? Do you know if that was a mod or not? That one big explosion he turns away prior to seeing if anything was actually bouncing off of the ground or just clipping out. Sparks is one thing, but to actually impliment physics with the particles bouncing around the floor is another story.

IF it were on PC, at least there'd be an option to disable motion blur. MB is the main reason I didn't like the demo.

To stay on-topic, I don't know what kind of requirements it'd have.

A blu-ray player... :P

So, Killzone 2 has better particle effects as shown in the gameplay trailer.
Uncharted 2 has better graphics. As shown here

and here

and also here



*whistles*

IF it were on PC, at least there'd be an option to disable motion blur. MB is the main reason I didn't like the demo.

To stay on-topic, I don't know what kind of requirements it'd have.

[QUOTE="Stinger78"]

IF it were on PC, at least there'd be an option to disable motion blur. MB is the main reason I didn't like the demo.

To stay on-topic, I don't know what kind of requirements it'd have.

GreyFoXX4

Both games have object motion blur, and with Crysis you can adjust the intensity, so I really don't see how it's in any way inferior to KZ2's blur.

I guess the game never ends. Guess what? The PS3 has crap hardware, end of story. You have nothing to say, just stop talking. Don't say anything, not even a word. No screens, nothing. Face the facts. If Killzone 2, or any game, can run on a PS3, then it WILL, beyond any reasonable doubt, run 10 times better on a decent PC. This is simply irrefutable, sorry.

If the graphics were to be the same as the ps3 version...

CPU - 2.4GHZ Dual Core

GPU - Maybe an 8800GT or something

2 gigs o ram

I gotta just laugh at people trying to compare Killzone 2 to Crysis. It's really embarrasing. First of all the only reason KZ2 can pull off those effects is because they use a small FOV. KZ 2 is rendering everything in a smaller space. AND at a lower resolution.

Crysis in DX10 mode with ultra settings obliterates everything right now. While it's true not many PCs can run it, the fact of the matter is Crysis can run at those resolutions and Killzone 2 cannot. End of story.

I guess the game never ends. Guess what? The PS3 has crap hardware, end of story. You have nothing to say, just stop talking. Don't say anything, not even a word. No screens, nothing. Face the facts. If Killzone 2, or any game, can run on a PS3, then it WILL, beyond any reasonable doubt, run 10 times better on a decent PC. This is simply irrefutable, sorry.

Hanass

If you noticed I was saying Crysis, Not Crysis Warhead. Also a custom config? You mean some high and some medium or something. Or a mod?

Edited: LOL, everyone of those effects was once again clipping out. Sorry but just watched your video and yes they are bouncing off of the helmets and then on in to eternity lol. Also a mass amounts of those particle are going through walls in that one section lol. And is that your vid? Do you know if that was a mod or not? That one big explosion he turns away prior to seeing if anything was actually bouncing off of the ground or just clipping out. Sparks is one thing, but to actually impliment physics with the particles bouncing around the floor is another story.

GreyFoXX4