If Lemmings Care about graphics why dont they get a PS3 or PC?

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#51 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

I own an Xbox 360 & a PC. Most game I buy for 360 are multiplats & nearly all of those look better on Xbox 360 so why what I buy a PS3 for graphics?

Avatar image for Disturbed123
Disturbed123

1665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Disturbed123
Member since 2005 • 1665 Posts

[QUOTE="stayhigh1"]

There a lot of excluisve games that push the PS3 hardware power..I am getting tired of Lemmings talking about graphics when the 360 is on its third year and I don't see no games spectacular like Killzone 2. If you guys care so much get a PC or PS3 and stop being delusional and take of your goggles so you can see another PS3 games that will blow your mind away,,

obamanian

I have not seen a single PS3 game looking even remotly as amazing as Gears 2, Fable 2 and Banjo 3, with the vast detail and open worlds. PS3 games use tiny, linear and empty worlds, like in MGS4 and KZ2, some of the most boring visuals and level design i have ever seen personally

If i want amazing visuals in 2009, i can turn to 360 with the upcoming Alan Wake, KUF2, Two Wolrds Temptation etc that are a million times bigger, more detailed and amazing looking than anything coming to PS3 as i see it

GEOW2 - Killzone 2 beats it

Fable 2 - :lol: Demon Souls looks graphically better then that

Banjo 3 :o :lol: Err Ratchet and Clankk

Alan Awake is still vapour ware, and 2 Worlds wont be anything ground breaking compared to Killzone.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Cows care about graphics aswell...

According to them, a game with layers upon layers of motion blur and filters is "teh console graficks king".

Oh and MGS4>>>>Crysis

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
I already have both. I prefer the 360 because I'm a huge fan of Halo and Gears. Having said that, Killzone 2 looks great.
Avatar image for McdonaIdsGuy
McdonaIdsGuy

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 McdonaIdsGuy
Member since 2008 • 3046 Posts
Xbox 360 will prove itself once again when it comes to graphics and cows will still be in damage control no matter what.
Avatar image for mr_mozilla
mr_mozilla

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 mr_mozilla
Member since 2006 • 2381 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

killzone 2 had a 5 year, $21 budget and 120 development team. gears 2 took only 2 years and a $10 million (# of devs unknown.) yet still, killzone 2 only slightly edges out hears 2.

cowgriller

Killzone 2 cost 60million dollars :P http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-105092.aspx

ouch. even worse. gears 2 only had a $10 million budget with only a fraction of the dev team and kz2 looks only slightly better. damn.

Well to be fair they developed the engine too, second game is always quicker and easier to make like with Stalker Clear Sky or Crysis Warhead. More precise comparison would be Gears1+UE3 cost/time vs KZ2 ..not that I see the relevance.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
If Lems cared about graphics soo much then why is Halo 3 the most played game when CoD and Gears looks better?
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Making a thread trolling a fanboy group == moderation.