@notafanboy said:
ahahahahahaha...
Why even bother wasting brainpower thinking of nonsense?
Look, SONY had the genius Mark Cerny designing their PS4. Cerny has single-handedly outsmarted and humiliated Microsoft's army of engineers. What makes you think Nintendo can do any better except hiring Cerny themselves?
The next console to surpass the PS4 in power will be the PS5. Cerny is just a genius. Just incredible, and SONY is so smart to have hired him to design the PS4.
MS and Nintendo are both shitting bricks that they can't design a more powerful console because the PS4 was so greatly engineered and designed for perfection.
Not to be rude, but Mark Cerny just hired AMD... AMD created the Chip, not Mark Cerny. He pitched what they wanted and AMD came up with a design within the pricerage Sony wanted.
MS was more worried about kinect, wanted the APU design as well and were ok sacrificing other aspects so the kinect would work.
And really sorry to burst your fanboy bubble, but if Sony wanted actual power, they would have went Intel and Nvidia, not the cheapo poor person AMD. Sony did manage to get the most powerful console, but it's nothing more than a midgrade AMD gpu and low grade AMD CPU. I do know Nvidia screwed Microsoft with the original Xbox, but at the same time, if you want a console with pure power, Intel and Nvidia is where it's at and more than 600 bucks.
Keep in mind, cost vs performance. AMD is cost conscience and can't compete on a high end level. Intel and Nvidia beat AMD on benchmarks but also cost a prettier penny more. I like my PS4, but my PC destroys it. It cost more though too.
I guess what I'm trying to say, don't be blind, Sony didn't manufacture the CPU/GPU, they just gave AMD more money than MS did.
Log in to comment