[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="wii4panta"][QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="IgGy621985"][QUOTE="Erkidu"] What's hilarious to me is that you say "we invaded for oil" yet you can offer absolutely no proof. :) We call that "a lie". On another note, why are gas prices going up instead of down? Let me guess. Because Bush is putting all of it in his private gas station? :roll:wii4panta
Lemme guess. USA invaded Iraq 'cause you could save poor Iraqi people and kill that bad guy Saddam Hussein?
Small is the mind that thinks that a scenario like this is as simple as that. *sigh* There's no use in arguing with you. You base your entire opinion of the war off of assumptions - of which, you have no proof.Let us see your proof then. If you are brainwashed you can stay brainwashed and we will not care.Of course if you prove me wrong then I will accept my mistake happily, and thank you afterwards.
Why should I offer proof? I'm not the one making accusations. Get it? I see what we're doing in Iraq (my brother is a State Dept. contractor in Baghdad), and there is absolutely no evidence that our purpose there is oil. If you're making the accusations, then YOU offer the proof. It's not difficult to understand. If I go up to a random stranger and say, "You're a murderer". He'll say "Prove it". The equivalent to your response would be for me to say, "Prove that you're not" back to the stranger.No no, it is not the same. If 10 people walk to a randomn person and say "You are a murderer" Then one should think that there's something going on here. That's what is really going on.Eveyone except America claims that the war was for oil.
America says otherwise.
Something stinks if you know what I mean....
Firstly, not everyone claims that the war is for oil. That's simply incorrect. Secondly, just because everyone believes something - doesn't mean its true. You can still offer no proof that the US is there for oil - so its a moot point.
Log in to comment