If you think XBL Gold isn't worth it...

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

... one look at the Xbox Engineering Blog should (hopefully) change your mind. It'll give you a glimpse of just how complicated and feature-rich Xbox Live truly is.

Of course, some people will dismiss it out of hand. Those people are fanboys and should be ignored. ;)

Avatar image for Willy105
Willy105

26208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 Willy105
Member since 2005 • 26208 Posts
They better make it worth it.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
If you think XBL Gold isn't worth it... You have no friends! :P Seriously though, the fact that all my friends are on it is what makes it worth the money. The stuff like cross-party chat is nice, but easy to live without. If all my friends had PS3's I wouldn't lose any sleep over missing XBL.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

"Worth" is based on your personal preference and desires.


Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#5 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]If you think XBL Gold isn't worth it... You have no friends! :P

:lol: That's brilliant.
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#6 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

"Worth" is based on your personal preference and desires.


Blue-Sky

Yes.

Unfortunately, most of those features don't mean anything to me when I just want to play some online games.

Avatar image for jonesy1911
jonesy1911

3483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 jonesy1911
Member since 2003 • 3483 Posts
I dont think its worth it
Avatar image for Omzzz
Omzzz

1440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Omzzz
Member since 2010 • 1440 Posts
i still dont think its worth it
Avatar image for NemeSyS-1
NemeSyS-1

464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 NemeSyS-1
Member since 2009 • 464 Posts

As an owner of both a XBOX 360 and a PS3, I find it hard to accept that MS is charging $50 a year for basically the same thing Sony offers with PSN, but for FREE. I dont see any difference in quality of connection and honestly, the features of each service are pretty much a wash!!

Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts

If you think XBL Gold isn't worth it... You have no friends! :P Hahadouken

I have 15 friends that are always on PSN! What does that mean!? :o

Avatar image for KingTuttle
KingTuttle

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 KingTuttle
Member since 2006 • 2471 Posts

Golf club that's just a public field with holes - complete with aclubhouse that sells you the balls, clubs, booze etc. vs. a Golf club that charges you and it's groomed, manicured, has a nice bar, carts for rent etc - complete with a clubhouse that sells you the balls, clubs, booze etc...But SOMEHOW all the smacktards are still able to join both Golf Clubs.

This is why I hate Golf. :)

Avatar image for Nugtoka
Nugtoka

1812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Nugtoka
Member since 2003 • 1812 Posts

It would be worth $200 a year if they would raise the age cap to 21.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]If you think XBL Gold isn't worth it... You have no friends! :P SwagSurf

I have 15 friends that are always on PSN! What does that mean!? :o

Sheesh read the rest of the post. Also read my blog, I'm an admitted PS3 fanboy at the core. Chill out brethren. ;)
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#14 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
I don't like the idea of paying for play on Internet. NOW, if I had more money then perhaps I would give it a thought but I don't get alot of money and the few I have is for buy games.
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

"Worth" is based on your personal preference and desires.


SpinoRaptor24

Yes.

Unfortunately, most of those features don't mean anything to me when I just want to play some online games.

same here... i wish they had an option for cheaper xbl fees if you just wanna play online... not of that other stuff

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

I don't think XBOX LIVE is worth it. In fact I think Microsoft is slapping XBOX LIVE users in their face when they offer the same like services for free on the PC and then turn around and charge XBOX 360 users.

For that reason, I wouldn't buy XBOX LIVE on general principle.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
I haven't played every PS3 game ever played but I've played Marvel vs Capcom 2 and a demo for Battlefield Bad Company. There are major differences in how the OS works, but the actual online stuff is pretty much the same. You can click the equivalent of quick match and quickly get into a match. The only reason I'd consider paying $40 a year again is because I've got friends playing games that I already own and I can't play against them without it. For every future multiplat with online play, I'm buying it for PS3. Maybe when it first came out every PS3 game was like SOCOM and had some super archaic 1993-era PC gaming style multiplayer setup, but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore.
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

Seriously though, the fact that all my friends are on it is what makes it worth the money.Hahadouken

Strangely enough, this is why I DON'T want Xbox Live(and the fact that PSN is cheaper and has just as many features that actually matter to me)

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Seriously though, the fact that all my friends are on it is what makes it worth the money.Phoenix534

Strangely enough, this is why I DON'T want Xbox Live.

You hate playing games with your friends?
Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Seriously though, the fact that all my friends are on it is what makes it worth the money.Phoenix534

Strangely enough, this is why I DON'T want Xbox Live(and the fact that PSN is cheaper and has just as many features that actually matter to me)

Because you DON'T want to game with your friends? That makes a lot of sense...
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
yah but they ruined it with MS pointes, right now i'm sitting here looking at lost in nightmares for RE5, 400 ms points, i have 391... so thats about 4.87, the DLC cost 5.00, i need about 13 points which is 1.25 pennies per point so i need only 15 cents right??? WRONG!!! i need to spend $6.50 to get 13 points and have enough to buy this twice...
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Seriously though, the fact that all my friends are on it is what makes it worth the money.TBoogy

Strangely enough, this is why I DON'T want Xbox Live(and the fact that PSN is cheaper and has just as many features that actually matter to me)

Because you DON'T want to game with your friends? That makes a lot of sense...

If only you knew my friends.

Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

So I'm guessing none of you actually read the engineering blog.

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
its defiantly not worth it right now my 360 broke and im still paying for online lol
Avatar image for sky_rend
sky_rend

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 sky_rend
Member since 2005 • 207 Posts
yah but they ruined it with MS pointes, right now i'm sitting here looking at lost in nightmares for RE5, 400 ms points, i have 391... so thats about 4.87, the DLC cost 5.00, i need about 13 points which is 1.25 pennies per point so i need only 15 cents right??? WRONG!!! i need to spend $6.50 to get 13 points and have enough to buy this twice...savagetwinkie
The points concept was a real turn-off. I like that I can just charge whatever amount to my card off of PSN.
Avatar image for longtonguecat
longtonguecat

2558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 longtonguecat
Member since 2008 • 2558 Posts

It's cool and all, but that doesn't change the fact that you shouldn't be forced to pay to play with your friends online. I can understand charging for everything else, but I think the core online gaming should be free... Still, I've been subscribing. :P

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#27 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
Sorry but I would rather have Steam for free.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Xbox Live is my favorite 7th gen feature. I wouldnt even compare to the tab that is PSN. Xbox Live IS the Xbox.

Avatar image for Nerdja
Nerdja

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Nerdja
Member since 2010 • 123 Posts

It's well worth it but I wish they would charge me more, I feel I'm ripping them off.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

I had xbl for 2years a couple of months. I still dont think its worth my 50 bones. I dont care how much text you put in my face.

Avatar image for todd2r
todd2r

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 todd2r
Member since 2009 • 2615 Posts

i like both the PSN and Xbox Live. I think that online gaming should be free on Xbox Live likeon the PSN. However, Xbox Live is a much better experience IMO. They have a ton of features PSN doesnt have and that makes it worth the price IMO. A lot of times you can renew your Live membership from Amazon for like 35 bucks. I did and thats pretty cheap IMO. PSN is pretty bare bones, but you cant argue with free. It will be interesting to see what this new premium PSN service will be in the future and how it stacks up against Xbox Live.

Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

It would be worth it but PC offers better and for free so sorry

Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

KungfuKitten

It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done, not the half-baked way some services do it--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

UnnDunn

It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

No, actually I just want to play video games online.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

[QUOTE="UnnDunn"]

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

stiggy321

It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

No, actually I just want to play video games online.

So go hit up Nintendo Wi-Fi. You'll be quite happy there. I don't want to hear any complaints about friend codes or lack of voice chat either; you're playing games online, which is what you said you wanted.

Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts

It would be worth $200 a year if they would raise the age cap to 21.

Nugtoka
:lol: So much win in this comment.

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

UnnDunn

It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

It's not disingenuous- both PC gaming and PS3 offer online gaming without any of those hassles for free. You speak as if the choice is a paid service like Live or what you described. Beating up on a strawman is easy, but it doesn't win debates.
Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#38 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

... one look at the Xbox Engineering Blog should (hopefully) change your mind. It'll give you a glimpse of just how complicated and feature-rich Xbox Live truly is.

Of course, some people will dismiss it out of hand. Those people are fanboys and should be ignored. ;)

UnnDunn

why is it because i don't think it's worth $50 a year im a fanboy?

Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.

UnnDunn

It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

So how do PC gamers get all this and more for free? how do you justify a Live fee when there is something better for free. You say nobody believes in the "just want to play games" argument, sorry but thats BS, i personally have no interest in what Live offers over PSN and im a former Live Gold member. I put a game in and play multiplayer, as long as the games community is alive then im happy, i dont want or need online friends when i have real life ones and trying to use things you can do with online friends to justify why M$ have brainwashed you fools into giving them money for what can be done for free is lolworthy.

If the 1st thing you worry about when you start an online game is what your friends are doing then maybe go out more, i go online to play not to socialise with pre pubescent teens and people i'll never meet in my lifetime.

Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

[QUOTE="stiggy321"][QUOTE="UnnDunn"]It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.

People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.

UnnDunn

No, actually I just want to play video games online.

So go hit up Nintendo Wi-Fi. You'll be quite happy there. I don't want to hear any complaints about friend codes or lack of voice chat either; you're playing games online, which is what you said you wanted.

Or he can hit up PSN with voice chat and no need for friend codes, dont use the worst service to try and justify spending money on a free service.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Know what?

I'd rather have a free version that lets me play online and doesn't have all those cool features I won't be using anyway. I just want to do the thing every other platform does for free.

Avatar image for NinjaMonky
NinjaMonky

2937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 NinjaMonky
Member since 2004 • 2937 Posts

to bad most of the features are supported in Asia :( I'd love to rent movies and some tv shows that i loved back home to watch here. I know there are ways of doing so( :twisted: ) but it'd be cool if I can just click and watch them on my tv with the xbox. they need to get on that :evil:

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

... one look at the Xbox Engineering Blog should (hopefully) change your mind. It'll give you a glimpse of just how complicated and feature-rich Xbox Live truly is.

Of course, some people will dismiss it out of hand. Those people are fanboys and should be ignored. ;)

UnnDunn

why should an engineering blog change my mind on what its worth :S im being honest i base whats worth it in comparrasin to a massive amount of things if XBL integrated Spotify then i would be extremely intrigued as i mean they already have Last.FM but the kicker for that for me is i would expect them to give me Spotify ig then i would maybe just maybe think about it.I base what its worth off of things like how much will i use it,will i get bored of it,will i get my moneys worth out it etc.

On the other end XBL doesnt support a lot of countries for example i see they dont support poland, hell im sure Greece is still unsupported which is a shame imho.I mean they claim they are the most advanced in terms of features but the countries that support all of these are small so its a double edge.

Also kudo's to the golf course analogy, the PSN is like the cooncil course that offers you basic features but gets the job done :P

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
This thread changed nothing, people still think paying to play online isn't worth it.
Avatar image for abdelmessih101
abdelmessih101

5230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 abdelmessih101
Member since 2007 • 5230 Posts

So where exactly in those walls of text will I find something that differentiates XBL from PSN sufficiently enough to justify the $50 yearly fee? As a consumer, I experience no difference between the end products. When I compare XBL to PSN, I find that I get nothing more from XBL to justify the price I pay for it. The fact is that the only reason I would consider paying is to play with friends and family who game on XBL.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

"Worth" is based on your personal preference and desires.


SpinoRaptor24

Yes.

Unfortunately, most of those features don't mean anything to me when I just want to play some online games.

Exactly...How about MS throw out all the junk and offer just online play for free? Since giving my kids my 360 and me getting a PS3 they are jeleous of me getting to play for free when their GOLD runs out..I just sit and laugh at them lol...Yea, im a mean parent..:)

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#47 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
If someone feels that what XBL offers them isn't worth their money. That it isn't worth their money.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#48 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
ALso you're paying not for features. BUT TO PLAY THE GAMES ONLINE. That needs to be fixed. Give Live consumers a chance to play the game online, without any of the bells and whistles. Do that. Atleast that way you're paying for a service, not the right to play online.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Buy a PC game. Have complete access to my online features as part of the product. Buy a 360 game. Have online features locked out until I pay $99aud to access them for a year, despite paying full price for the game. - Yeah it is not worth it.
Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#50 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
I've always thought XBL was worth it, even to this day. PSN does the job just fine though.