[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]
"Just want to play games online." is a common argument. Still stands i believe.
UnnDunn
It's also a disingenuous argument. Nobody actually believes in that argument; they just say it as a justification for a "free" Xbox Live service. Nobody wants to type in IP Addresses for their friends, or deal with laggy connections, or negotiate VOIP connections. People like the convenience of the friends list, of being able to invite their friends to a room with one click, of automatic bandwidth monitoring, of automatic and seamless VOIP, and of a consistency across games that makes it easy to immediately figure out how a game's multiplayer matchmaking works and jump right with zero hassles.People don't "just want to play games online." If they did, well Nintendo Wi-Fi would satisfy them just fine. What people really want is to play games with rich online community and robust online features. They are just too cheap and/or whiny to accept that such things--when properly done--easily justify a modest subscription fee, so they latch onto any argument they can think of to avoid that fact.
So how do PC gamers get all this and more for free? how do you justify a Live fee when there is something better for free. You say nobody believes in the "just want to play games" argument, sorry but thats BS, i personally have no interest in what Live offers over PSN and im a former Live Gold member. I put a game in and play multiplayer, as long as the games community is alive then im happy, i dont want or need online friends when i have real life ones and trying to use things you can do with online friends to justify why M$ have brainwashed you fools into giving them money for what can be done for free is lolworthy.
If the 1st thing you worry about when you start an online game is what your friends are doing then maybe go out more, i go online to play not to socialise with pre pubescent teens and people i'll never meet in my lifetime.
Log in to comment