This topic is locked from further discussion.
Saw that review when it hit and it looks just like some Halo fanboy's rant from SW. It made me lol when I read that a "professional" video game critic was whining about requirements. Where has this guy been? Of course a brand new PC game is going to push the current technology to its limits. Good PC games always do this. This is what moves new hardware.MadExponent
Half-life2 was programmed very well to run on less powerful systems- Crysis is quite the opposite.
I would have given it an 8.5 here. Had fun with the demo but it quickly got boring and a chore to play. Theres just nothing interesting about its setting, characters/creatures or story. The gameplay was great and the graphics were unrealised and out of reach.
To the hermits putting "9.5 /thread" Halo 3 got a 9.5 at Gamespot AND at IGN but you still fail to realise that. Hypocracy for the loss.
Remember when IGN AU gave Halo 3 a 8.9. A lot of people where angry (just look at there comment section). Remember people its there opinion(The Ratchet and Clank defense).cj2121Yes but Crysis without all the eye-candy is a little standard, you need all that atmosphere to fully enjoy it, without a killer machine, you simply cant. END OF STORY
BTW, i think the AU Halo 3 review was too generous
Makes a lot of sense. Great game, except that nobody can actually play it.
All gaming sites should review games on the same machines, and they should be upper-high end machines but not sli stuff.
Yes but Crysis without all the eye-candy is a little standard, you need all that atmosphere to fully enjoy it, without a killer machine, you simply cant. END OF STORY[QUOTE="cj2121"]Remember when IGN AU gave Halo 3 a 8.9. A lot of people where angry (just look at there comment section). Remember people its there opinion(The Ratchet and Clank defense).WuTangG
BTW, i think the AU Halo 3 review was too generous
That is not true, the gameplay of Crysis is amazing. Even on medium detail you get the open ended gameplay. My machine runs this on high and System requirments should never ever be in the equation when scoring a game.
Anyways, I thought IGN gave the game an 9.4? What is this AU? Australia? whocares? Lets face it, all this review does is complain about the system requirments...if you can't stand the heat than get out of the kitchen. The game is no standard shooter with out the eye candy it is a mind blowing open ended shooter. An absolutly amazing game. In-fact we can now pick out which game sites are fan boys simply by the score of Crysis because it is obvious that anyone who scores Crysis low is either one of these two people
A: A person who has not played the game
B: A person who is jealousy because his PC sucks.
This case with AU IGN it seems to be B. I can play the game fine and I am not running SLI....I must be part of the 0.2% :roll: lol
That reviewer should look for a new job. Maybe reviewing food recipes might be more up his alley.
Anyways, I thought IGN gave the game an 9.4? What is this AU? Australia? whocares? Lets face it, all this review does is complain about the system requirments...if you can't stand the heat than get out of the kitchen. The game is no standard shooter with out the eye candy it is a mind blowing open ended shooter. An absolutly amazing game. In-fact we can now pick out which game sites are fan boys simply by the score of Crysis because it is obvious that anyone who scores Crysis low is either one of these two people
A: A person who has not played the game
B: A person who is jealousy because his PC sucks.
This case with AU IGN it seems to be B. I can play the game fine and I am not running SLI....I must be part of the 0.2% :roll: lol
That reviewer should look for a new job. Maybe reviewing food recipes might be more up his alley.
whocares9
:lol: WTF
[QUOTE="whocares9"]Anyways, I thought IGN gave the game an 9.4? What is this AU? Australia? whocares? Lets face it, all this review does is complain about the system requirments...if you can't stand the heat than get out of the kitchen. The game is no standard shooter with out the eye candy it is a mind blowing open ended shooter. An absolutly amazing game. In-fact we can now pick out which game sites are fan boys simply by the score of Crysis because it is obvious that anyone who scores Crysis low is either one of these two people
A: A person who has not played the game
B: A person who is jealousy because his PC sucks.
This case with AU IGN it seems to be B. I can play the game fine and I am not running SLI....I must be part of the 0.2% :roll: lol
That reviewer should look for a new job. Maybe reviewing food recipes might be more up his alley.
Pro_wrestler
:lol: WTF
WTF what? It is actually very logical and reasonable what I wrote. Back to school with you.
Honestly, I would say that those are valid points.
I have an 8800 GTS, 2GB DDR2-800, Commando MB, 6600 Quad, and to get a decent framerate I have to run the game @ 1024, no AA (running at very high settings in Vista).
I compare this to running COD4 at everything maxed, getting atleast 30-40 fps, smooth gameplay. Now of course these are two different games, and yes Crysis does look better graphically, but its gameplay takes a hit because of the sluggish performance.
Until it improves, I will probably be playing more COD4 then Crysis.
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="MadExponent"][QUOTE="PS360Fanboy"]9.5[QUOTE="_CivilizationX_"][QUOTE="PS360Fanboy"]Now that'll show PC fanboy's :)skrat_01
8.3 :lol:
Crysis (GOTY SOTY 2007 Confirmed)
Halo 3 (Honorable Mention)
Hermits are just mad they didn't get one nomination for Shooter of the Year last year.And the reality is Halo 3 pales in comparison in many ways.This is why consoles are better. I use my PC for web-surfing, simple online games like backgammon, MS Word, listening to music, etc.
Consoles are way better for games. You can sit back on the couch with a beer instead of crouched over a keyboard like a hermit.
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="MadExponent"][QUOTE="PS360Fanboy"]9.5[QUOTE="_CivilizationX_"][QUOTE="PS360Fanboy"]Now that'll show PC fanboy's :)rexoverbey
8.3 :lol:
Crysis (GOTY SOTY 2007 Confirmed)
Halo 3 (Honorable Mention)
Hermits are just mad they didn't get one nomination for Shooter of the Year last year.And the reality is Halo 3 pales in comparison in many ways.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
cobrax75
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
rexoverbey
I should go up since people will get Pc that will be able to play very high settings.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
rexoverbey
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
cobrax75
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.You bring up forge and Crysis doesn't have team deathmatch, co-op, video playback, etc?
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
rexoverbey
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.its funny how you still think Halo 3 will be Goty despite none of the other Halo games being GOTY...and GS pretty much stating that Crysis is the best shooter out.
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
cobrax75
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.its funny how you still think Halo 3 will be Goty despite none of the other Halo games being GOTY...and GS pretty much stating that Crysis is the best shooter out.
What was the PCs GOTY for 2001 when Halo 1 came out? Oh yeah Serious Sam first encounter LMAO. Yes the PC standards were so high that year! I guess gamerankings was wrong also when that game was rated at 84%.Plus it's funny what year was Cryteks game of the year. Maybe you can fill me in on that one.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
rexoverbey
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.its funny how you still think Halo 3 will be Goty despite none of the other Halo games being GOTY...and GS pretty much stating that Crysis is the best shooter out.
What was the PCs GOTY for 2001 when Halo 1 came out. Oh year Serious Sam first encounter LMAO. Yes the PC standards were so high that year! I guess gamerankings was wrong also when that game was rated at 84%.Halo 1 didnt even get GOTY on consoles.....
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
cobrax75
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.its funny how you still think Halo 3 will be Goty despite none of the other Halo games being GOTY...and GS pretty much stating that Crysis is the best shooter out.
What was the PCs GOTY for 2001 when Halo 1 came out. Oh year Serious Sam first encounter LMAO. Yes the PC standards were so high that year! I guess gamerankings was wrong also when that game was rated at 84%.Halo 1 didnt even get GOTY on consoles.....
What year did Crytek win GOTY on PC?[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"]Gamespot or Ocampo? Ocampo is a big hermit/apple fanatic and anyone who has seen his E3 footage knows that. Ocampo overated Wic to 9.5 and it's not even a AAA game at gamerankings.He said the gamewas flawless yet that's not what most people thought. He had one of the highest Wic Reviews on gamerankings and same with Crysis.Plus Crysis is already ranked lower than Halo 3 at gamerankings and will continue to go lower reviews as time goes on.thats to bad...since Gamespot seems to consider one of the best shooters ever made.
rexoverbey
and?
Halo 3 would have never gotten the same score on the PC...having forge as the only way to edit a game would have brought the score way down...not up.
besides...look at all the Xbox magazines that scored the game AAAA...that didnt happen at all with crysis....
suck it up.
That higher PC standards on PC is bull crap. Why didn't one PC game get nominated for SOTY last year? Isn't the PC the king of the FPS? Yet it couldn't even get one nomination. Shouldn't a 9.0 rated PCshooter beat out and been atleast on the list last year? Believe what you want but don't come crying when Halo 3 is GOTY.its funny how you still think Halo 3 will be Goty despite none of the other Halo games being GOTY...and GS pretty much stating that Crysis is the best shooter out.
What was the PCs GOTY for 2001 when Halo 1 came out. Oh year Serious Sam first encounter LMAO. Yes the PC standards were so high that year! I guess gamerankings was wrong also when that game was rated at 84%.Halo 1 didnt even get GOTY on consoles.....
What year did Crytek win GOTY on PC?they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.
they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.cobrax75Serious sam was the GOTY 2001. How many GOTY awards did it win at other websites? Here is what Halo got
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/h/halo/awards.htm
What year did HL2 win GOTY?
Serious sam was the GOTY 2001. How many GOTY awards did it win at other websites? Here is what Halo got[QUOTE="cobrax75"]they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.rexoverbey
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/h/halo/awards.htm
the fact that most of those are specific to the Xbox platform doesnt help your argument at all....
and who gives a damn anyway...the point, is neither Halo games have gotten GOTY, gameplay wise, Halo 3 is an improvment, but isnt a completly new game...and with many other strong titles this year, the chance of Halo 3 getting GOTY here is slim to none...sure it will get GOTY on places like OXM...and will very likely be the best 360 game this year...but its not gonna get GOTY here.
Hey opinions opinion. Now if it were GS hermits would be runnig rampant with excuses and claims of bias much like cow's and cheep did when there heavy hitters flopped .Gh0st_Of_0nyx
... not really... hermits would take it like men. Specifically if the review actually had valid points. But... this review doesn't. Read the review and you will see him complaining that the game doesn't have any chainguns. It does, infact, they are focal point battles in addition to being in the MP game. He didn't even actually play the game. GS however did, and they spoke their opinion. If GS did have valid complaints, we would take it like men. Sort of like we did with Hellgate: London. I personally find Hellgate to be an 8.5 game but I can see why it got a 7.0
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"]Serious sam was the GOTY 2001. How many GOTY awards did it win at other websites? Here is what Halo got[QUOTE="cobrax75"]they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.cobrax75
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/h/halo/awards.htm
the fact that most of those are specific to the Xbox platform doesnt help your argument at all....
and who gives a damn anyway...the point, is neither Halo games have gotten GOTY, gameplay wise, Halo 3 is an improvment, but isnt a completly new game...and with many other strong titles this year, the chance of Halo 3 getting GOTY here is slim to none...sure it will get GOTY on places like OXM...and will very likely be the best 360 game this year...but its not gonna get GOTY here.
Half Life 2 never won GOTY and neither did Far Cry.[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"]Serious sam was the GOTY 2001. How many GOTY awards did it win at other websites? Here is what Halo got[QUOTE="cobrax75"]they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.rexoverbey
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/h/halo/awards.htm
the fact that most of those are specific to the Xbox platform doesnt help your argument at all....
and who gives a damn anyway...the point, is neither Halo games have gotten GOTY, gameplay wise, Halo 3 is an improvment, but isnt a completly new game...and with many other strong titles this year, the chance of Halo 3 getting GOTY here is slim to none...sure it will get GOTY on places like OXM...and will very likely be the best 360 game this year...but its not gonna get GOTY here.
Half Life 2 never won GOTY and neither did Far Cry.it won shooter GOTY...which Halo 2 didnt.
[QUOTE="rexoverbey"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="rexoverbey"]Serious sam was the GOTY 2001. How many GOTY awards did it win at other websites? Here is what Halo got[QUOTE="cobrax75"]they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.cobrax75
http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/h/halo/awards.htm
the fact that most of those are specific to the Xbox platform doesnt help your argument at all....
and who gives a damn anyway...the point, is neither Halo games have gotten GOTY, gameplay wise, Halo 3 is an improvment, but isnt a completly new game...and with many other strong titles this year, the chance of Halo 3 getting GOTY here is slim to none...sure it will get GOTY on places like OXM...and will very likely be the best 360 game this year...but its not gonna get GOTY here.
Half Life 2 never won GOTY and neither did Far Cry.it won shooter GOTY...which Halo 2 didnt.
this year even if crysis doesn't win goty its gonna win shooter goty unless they combine full orange box and gave it goty
they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.
cobrax75
maybe you should check gamerankings.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]they only made one game, other than crysis....and unfortunatly for them, it came out the same year as Half Life 2....and despite both getting the same score, Half Life 2 won GOTY...even though Halo 2 scored higher.
marklarmer
maybe you should check gamerankings.
But this is Systemwars these hermits have magic pc's that can run the game completely smooth on max settings for less then $1000. Polaris_choiceExactly so who cares what IGN au has to say?
Anyways, I thought IGN gave the game an 9.4? What is this AU? Australia? whocares? Lets face it, all this review does is complain about the system requirments...if you can't stand the heat than get out of the kitchen. The game is no standard shooter with out the eye candy it is a mind blowing open ended shooter. An absolutly amazing game. In-fact we can now pick out which game sites are fan boys simply by the score of Crysis because it is obvious that anyone who scores Crysis low is either one of these two people
A: A person who has not played the game
B: A person who is jealousy because his PC sucks.
This case with AU IGN it seems to be B. I can play the game fine and I am not running SLI....I must be part of the 0.2% :roll: lol
That reviewer should look for a new job. Maybe reviewing food recipes might be more up his alley.
whocares9
Um the reviewer had the best single GPU solution on the market and it ran like crap and yes it does ive seen it myself. If you need a top of the line SLI setup to play a game the way it should be played then yes thats a hinderance. And yes system settings should effect a games rating . Some people have better things to do then spend over 2 grand on a gaming pc.
[QUOTE="whocares9"]Anyways, I thought IGN gave the game an 9.4? What is this AU? Australia? whocares? Lets face it, all this review does is complain about the system requirments...if you can't stand the heat than get out of the kitchen. The game is no standard shooter with out the eye candy it is a mind blowing open ended shooter. An absolutly amazing game. In-fact we can now pick out which game sites are fan boys simply by the score of Crysis because it is obvious that anyone who scores Crysis low is either one of these two people
A: A person who has not played the game
B: A person who is jealousy because his PC sucks.
This case with AU IGN it seems to be B. I can play the game fine and I am not running SLI....I must be part of the 0.2% :roll: lol
That reviewer should look for a new job. Maybe reviewing food recipes might be more up his alley.
Polaris_choice
Um the reviewer had the best single GPU solution on the market and it ran like crap and yes it does ive seen it myself. If you need a top of the line SLI setup to play a game the way it should be played then yes thats a hinderance. And yes system settings should effect a games rating . Some people have better things to do then spend over 2 grand on a gaming pc.
what could possibly be better than buying a 2000 dollar gaming rig? Do you even like videogames? You must be a casual or something.Guys, this is IGN AU. Autralia. NOT IGN. IGN gave Crysis a 9.4.
Also, I do run this game nearly maxed. Everything on high except for physics on Very High, water on Very High, particles on Very High, and shadows on Medium (I don't care much for shadows) with 25-35fps, which is very smooth in Crysis. Here are some pictures of my comp playing Crysis, and it looks better then any game I've seen (except for Crysis).
http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/b63ea2eddb5a609966480159edf3c0c1/
[QUOTE="Cedmln"]LOl. Hermits whats going? Can't play the full experience of Crysis with spending tons, huh?rimnet00
Says the kid who's front runner games don't even run at 720p... where is the 1080p?? PC gamers have been playing in 1080p for ages, whats the deal? Please, it's like laughing at someone who owns a Ferrari taunting him that the race track is closed for the winter -- while you drive your Civic around town.
Lol, ages you say. Most of my pc games don't even support widescreen. Seems to me like you haven't been playing pc games for too long, especially if you consider that 1080p availible for pc games has been around for ages.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment