IGN E3 awards! 360 DOMINATES!!! (CAPS)

  • 133 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for s0ldier69
s0ldier69

2288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 s0ldier69
Member since 2005 • 2288 Posts

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

Avatar image for Squall_Griver
Squall_Griver

3607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Squall_Griver
Member since 2006 • 3607 Posts
Ammm LOL!?
Avatar image for Overthrow
Overthrow

7025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Overthrow
Member since 2004 • 7025 Posts

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Overthrow

you talking about the $600 one?

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
[QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

ItalStallion777

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Lazy_Boy88

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|

Avatar image for iMacBot
iMacBot

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 iMacBot
Member since 2007 • 947 Posts
You can't really say who dominated E3, it depends what console you ow when it comes down to it to decide who really dominated in your opinion.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

You can't really say who dominated E3, it depends what console you ow when it comes down to it to decide who really dominated in your opinion.iMacBot

I own a 360 and that's it... And I think Sony had the best showing PERIOD..

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

OhSnapitz

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|

hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

[QUOTE="iMacBot"]You can't really say who dominated E3, it depends what console you ow when it comes down to it to decide who really dominated in your opinion.OhSnapitz

I own a 360 and that's it... And I think Sony had the best showing PERIOD..

same here

Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Lazy_Boy88

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

woah don't get all defensive on me here. he just made it sound like "why would i want to play a game on a $400 system when i can play it on a $600 system"

lets be honest here, if a gamer just wants multiplat games he's more likely going to go with the 360 because it is cheaper, there's no denying that.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
It was far from domination in my book. If you look only at 2007 then it is domination, but if you look at the bigger picture then it is not so pretty.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

blues3531

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|

hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed

Honestly I think it's perfectly valid... Why else would you pay $600 (now $500) for a Video game console? :|

Avatar image for Tamarind_Face
Tamarind_Face

2270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Tamarind_Face
Member since 2007 • 2270 Posts

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

s0ldier69

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

Avatar image for krp008
krp008

4341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 krp008
Member since 2006 • 4341 Posts
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Lazy_Boy88

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now

Avatar image for krp008
krp008

4341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 krp008
Member since 2006 • 4341 Posts

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Overthrow

And its definitely not the PS3... The PS3 has no games

Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts
[QUOTE="s0ldier69"]

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

Tamarind_Face

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.

Avatar image for mazdaspeed-rx8
mazdaspeed-rx8

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 mazdaspeed-rx8
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts
typical lemming. most of those where multi plats lol.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

ItalStallion777

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.

I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..

Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:

Avatar image for InSaNeHbOy
InSaNeHbOy

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 InSaNeHbOy
Member since 2003 • 128 Posts
dude.. dont forget the wii fit!
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
I wouldnt put too much thought in E3, previous big winners included the sega dreamcast and nintendo gamecube...
Avatar image for InSaNeHbOy
InSaNeHbOy

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 InSaNeHbOy
Member since 2003 • 128 Posts
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

krp008

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now

and i just own a 360 for its dvd player.

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts
[QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

OhSnapitz

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|

hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed

Honestly I think it's perfectly valid... Why else would you pay $600 (now $500) for a Video game console? :|

because if u want live u have to pay, but u dont have to buy blu-ray movies to use the blu-ray drive, it plays the games too and 50gb is way better than 9 seriously i dont know why u would defend 360 that arguement when the disc space is hugely inferior

Avatar image for Tamarind_Face
Tamarind_Face

2270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Tamarind_Face
Member since 2007 • 2270 Posts
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

OhSnapitz

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.

I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..

Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:

LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
I do recall the ps2 outselling the xbox by a landslide, despite the xbox being much more powerful and similar in price. And not many played ps2 online. GTA won the console war, atleast in North America.
Avatar image for SergeantSnitch
SergeantSnitch

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 SergeantSnitch
Member since 2007 • 3692 Posts

I disagree with a lot of those.

Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.

Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS

Best Platformer...LBP takes that.

Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.

Horrible awards.

Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

Tamarind_Face

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.

I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..

Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:

LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.

i understand that but is that my fault or sony's? if they were smart they would have shown their "superior" version with better graphics to show up the 360 version.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#28 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
I hope u all realise that whole list is nothing but multiplats. the only true exclusives that won were Little big planet, Mario Galaxy, and Zelda phantom hourglass. So IGNs list stinks on so many levels IMO.

1st 360 did not dominate. Sony had the best overall showing because they generated more hype. Why because they showed08 with 07. 360 was all 07 this E3. And Wii was all sellout. So by default Sony won the E3 conference because they stayed aggressive, while Microsoft was cautious. and Nintendo was a sellout.

Personally this list only showed that there are really innovative multiplats out there(although Bioshock can only be played on 360 or PC, while PS3 or Wii owners need the either the 360 or PC to play it). No reason for anyone to hate or brag. So honestly all of u STFU.
Avatar image for Blanco98
Blanco98

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#29 Blanco98
Member since 2006 • 1118 Posts
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

krp008

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now

Actually the online system owns 360 IMHO, the only thing that its lacking its the store, other than that i find PSN more enjoyable, Ill tell you why its better and why i think its better, PSN has dedicated servers , You dont get disconnected like the 360 (my online owns and not once was i disconnected from Psn YET* unlike 360), Its open so actually mod can create their maps for ex Unreal tournament and then sell them throught PSN somehow which is cool becuase maybe this will be done for other games too, Also there isent little kids yelling and crying......So in 360 when u pay those 50 bucks your practically paying to be able to play the game online and better communication Etc but nothing that PSN doesent offer, if there something so unique tell me......nd with Ps3 line up and future line up (as far as we know 360 dosent have a big one) so quit yer yaping...
Avatar image for suckypc-ps360
suckypc-ps360

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 suckypc-ps360
Member since 2007 • 275 Posts
they may not be exculsive, but if rather play those games on a unreliable 400$ console that will have better graphics, controllers, and better online then a console where u have to spend about 800$ sititng in a chair playing or a 500 doller console with worser graphocs and and a worse controller
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]

http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html

Awesome!

Tamarind_Face

Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.

So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?

PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.

you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.

I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..

Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:

LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.

Dude I could care less about IGN awards.. I just think it's very hypocritical for cows to hang on the whole "exclusive" argument... Then when they finaly get a game/s worth playing, they freaking Multiplats!

Avatar image for da1on2
da1on2

4885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 da1on2
Member since 2006 • 4885 Posts
Their awards make no sense, how do some games win in the console catagories, then comete against the same game in the overal then lose to it?
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#33 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

I disagree with a lot of those.

Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.

Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS

Best Platformer...LBP takes that.

Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.

Horrible awards.

SergeantSnitch
Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.
What did Killzone 2 show, graphics and some great animations, nothing that said its the best shooter in gameplay.

And personally LBP is a creative game, but platformersI think Mario Galaxy, Ratchet are better for that award. Since they are traditional platformers. LBP is more like a giant user content built game.
Avatar image for Sir-Marwin105
Sir-Marwin105

3785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 Sir-Marwin105
Member since 2007 • 3785 Posts
Mass Effect was robbed.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#35 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="krp008"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

Blanco98

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now

Actually the online system owns 360 IMHO, the only thing that its lacking its the store, other than that i find PSN more enjoyable, Ill tell you why its better and why i think its better, PSN has dedicated servers , You dont get disconnected like the 360 (my online owns and not once was i disconnected from Psn YET* unlike 360), Its open so actually mod can create their maps for ex Unreal tournament and then sell them throught PSN somehow which is cool becuase maybe this will be done for other games too, Also there isent little kids yelling and crying......So in 360 when u pay those 50 bucks your practically paying to be able to play the game online and better communication Etc but nothing that PSN doesent offer, if there something so unique tell me......nd with Ps3 line up and future line up (as far as we know 360 dosent have a big one) so quit yer yaping...

Thats because most people dont have a headset. and when im playing gears and Halo or any other 360 online game im not playing kids and all that stuff. Also i rarely have lag or disconnected from a game. Sure when the host quits its a bummer, but overall the system is great and IMHO runs more smoothly than PS3s online. Its like playing with zombies on PSN really. Also Xbox live has proven itself in that your less likely for a games online service to end unlike PSN. MGS 3 would have been online still if it was xbox live IMO since MS covers that. ALso with all the updates xbox live, i think there is more stuff on the way. It allready has way more content, is way more organized, a unified friends list, all that stuff. I wouldnt be surprised if the whole online service is revamped to eventually include dedicated servers for some of the bigger games, most games, or eventually all games.

With 360 your almost guaranteed some kind of Xbox live contents. VF 5 is a great example of that. So is top spin.
Avatar image for da1on2
da1on2

4885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 da1on2
Member since 2006 • 4885 Posts
[QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]

I disagree with a lot of those.

Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.

Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS

Best Platformer...LBP takes that.

Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.

Horrible awards.

jg4xchamp

Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.
What did Killzone 2 show, graphics and some great animations, nothing that said its the best shooter in gameplay.

And personally LBP is a creative game, but platformersI think Mario Galaxy, Ratchet are better for that award. Since they are traditional platformers. LBP is more like a giant user content built game.

Lol they never played it

Avatar image for Sir-Marwin105
Sir-Marwin105

3785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 Sir-Marwin105
Member since 2007 • 3785 Posts

Once again, Mass Effect was robbed.:(

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

How did 360 dominate? Nice selections BTW, but Crysis has the best graphics. I guess they gave it to CoD 4 because it's fresher (not mad about that at all :D).

Fallout 3 must be amazing to win over Mass Effect and evey other console game.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

Once again, Mass Effect was robbed.:(

Sir-Marwin105

We really can't say because the general public didn't see the Fallout 3 presentation.

Avatar image for granadavictor
granadavictor

126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 granadavictor
Member since 2005 • 126 Posts
[QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

ItalStallion777

you talking about the $600 one?

Note the faulty console part, i rather spent $500(now) for a console that works perfectly fine than $400 for one that i constantly have to be exchanging.

Avatar image for Sir-Marwin105
Sir-Marwin105

3785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Sir-Marwin105
Member since 2007 • 3785 Posts
[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]

Once again, Mass Effect was robbed.:(

Episode_Eve

We really can't say because the general public didn't see the Fallout 3 presentation.

:(. Actually I love Fallout and Oblivion so I shouldn't be mad:).
Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts
IMO Killzone 2 stole the show in terms of surprise and amazement.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#43 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]

I disagree with a lot of those.

Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.

Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS

Best Platformer...LBP takes that.

Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.

Horrible awards.

da1on2

Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.
What did Killzone 2 show, graphics and some great animations, nothing that said its the best shooter in gameplay.

And personally LBP is a creative game, but platformersI think Mario Galaxy, Ratchet are better for that award. Since they are traditional platformers. LBP is more like a giant user content built game.

Lol they never played it

um thats the point. NObody played it. They saw it. But they didnt play it. 2 different things. IF killzone 2 was playable then ok, but all it was video footage of gameplay not actual in there hands they controlled everything gameplay. A game should not when best FPS on just graphics alone. Considering most critics were more amped after playing call of duty 4 i think its a legit win, while Killzone 2s win would be overrated since it only won on visuals not on proven gameplay or anything.
Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts

Wow, Crysis was stuttering on a brand new engine (while being the most technically advanced out there) and CoD 4 on a modified engine (which is behind considerably in technical aspects when compared to Crysis) runs butter smooth. Cookie for them (and GameTrailers).

Best FPS, CoD 4? This is why E3 awards mean nothing.

Avatar image for MronoC
MronoC

4113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 MronoC
Member since 2005 • 4113 Posts
IMO Killzone 2 stole the show in terms of surprise and amazement.Episode_Eve
I really don't think it's possible to say that any one game stole the show this year, there were really too many big games it to even come close, but I think the games that came closest were Call of Duty 4 and Little Big Planet.
Avatar image for djxaquaxblue
djxaquaxblue

2539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 djxaquaxblue
Member since 2004 • 2539 Posts
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

OhSnapitz

you talking about the $600 one?

No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.

Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|

dude you can get blu-ray movies for damn cheap now. i work at frys and we got some blu-ray movies on sale for $11.99

Avatar image for danielsmith2020
danielsmith2020

2244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 danielsmith2020
Member since 2003 • 2244 Posts
You'd have to be an absolute die hard hater of sony to say anything other than sony won this E3.
Avatar image for da1on2
da1on2

4885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 da1on2
Member since 2006 • 4885 Posts
[QUOTE="da1on2"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]

I disagree with a lot of those.

Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.

Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS

Best Platformer...LBP takes that.

Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.

Horrible awards.

jg4xchamp

Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.
What did Killzone 2 show, graphics and some great animations, nothing that said its the best shooter in gameplay.

And personally LBP is a creative game, but platformersI think Mario Galaxy, Ratchet are better for that award. Since they are traditional platformers. LBP is more like a giant user content built game.

Lol they never played it

um thats the point. NObody played it. They saw it. But they didnt play it. 2 different things. IF killzone 2 was playable then ok, but all it was video footage of gameplay not actual in there hands they controlled everything gameplay. A game should not when best FPS on just graphics alone. Considering most critics were more amped after playing call of duty 4 i think its a legit win, while Killzone 2s win would be overrated since it only won on visuals not on proven gameplay or anything.

N'gai played it.
Avatar image for MronoC
MronoC

4113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 MronoC
Member since 2005 • 4113 Posts
You'd have to be an absolute die hard hater of sony to say anything other than sony won this E3.danielsmith2020
agreed, before E3, I was just as down on sony as anyone else, but they totally turned me aroundthis E3
Avatar image for ItalStallion777
ItalStallion777

1953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 ItalStallion777
Member since 2005 • 1953 Posts
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]

Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.

I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.

granadavictor

you talking about the $600 one?

Note the faulty console part, i rather spent $500(now) for a console that works perfectly fine than $400 for one that i constantly have to be exchanging.

constantly have to be exchanging? if by that you mean possibly once or twice in the console's lifetime then i'd have to disagree.