http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
Overthrow
you talking about the $600 one?
[QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
ItalStallion777
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
Lazy_Boy88
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
OhSnapitz
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|
hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
Lazy_Boy88
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.woah don't get all defensive on me here. he just made it sound like "why would i want to play a game on a $400 system when i can play it on a $600 system"
lets be honest here, if a gamer just wants multiplat games he's more likely going to go with the 360 because it is cheaper, there's no denying that.
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
blues3531
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|
hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed
Honestly I think it's perfectly valid... Why else would you pay $600 (now $500) for a Video game console? :|
Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
s0ldier69
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
Lazy_Boy88
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now
[QUOTE="s0ldier69"]Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
Tamarind_Face
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.
[QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
ItalStallion777
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.
I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..
Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
krp008
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now
and i just own a 360 for its dvd player.
[QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
OhSnapitz
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|
hahaah did u seriously compare buying blu-ray movies to paying for xbox live lol that is a horrible comparison seriously i cant even explain why its so bad someone else explain it but i for sure LOL'ed
Honestly I think it's perfectly valid... Why else would you pay $600 (now $500) for a Video game console? :|
because if u want live u have to pay, but u dont have to buy blu-ray movies to use the blu-ray drive, it plays the games too and 50gb is way better than 9 seriously i dont know why u would defend 360 that arguement when the disc space is hugely inferior
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
OhSnapitz
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.
I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..
Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:
LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.I disagree with a lot of those.
Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.
Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS
Best Platformer...LBP takes that.
Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.
Horrible awards.
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
Tamarind_Face
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.
I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..
Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:
LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.i understand that but is that my fault or sony's? if they were smart they would have shown their "superior" version with better graphics to show up the 360 version.
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
krp008
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now
Actually the online system owns 360 IMHO, the only thing that its lacking its the store, other than that i find PSN more enjoyable, Ill tell you why its better and why i think its better, PSN has dedicated servers , You dont get disconnected like the 360 (my online owns and not once was i disconnected from Psn YET* unlike 360), Its open so actually mod can create their maps for ex Unreal tournament and then sell them throught PSN somehow which is cool becuase maybe this will be done for other games too, Also there isent little kids yelling and crying......So in 360 when u pay those 50 bucks your practically paying to be able to play the game online and better communication Etc but nothing that PSN doesent offer, if there something so unique tell me......nd with Ps3 line up and future line up (as far as we know 360 dosent have a big one) so quit yer yaping...[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Tamarind_Face"][QUOTE="s0ldier69"]Not ONE 360 game won an award. All of those were multiplats, nintendo exclusives and sony exclusives.http://games.ign.com/articles/806/806770p1.html
Awesome!
Tamarind_Face
So tell me again, how did 360 dominate?
PS: marathon isnt exclusive, its also on the macintosh.
you mean Not ONE exclusive 360 game won an award. even though the games were multiplats the 360 version won.
I Knoooooooooooooooooooooow cows aren't resorting back to the whole "exclusive" argument.. three words..
Ninja Gaiden Sigma... "it's teh exclusvie... it's teh exclusive.." :roll:
LOL you guys make me laugh! they chose the 360 version because it was the only playable version at e3. Seriously you guys should stop self-owning yourselves.Dude I could care less about IGN awards.. I just think it's very hypocritical for cows to hang on the whole "exclusive" argument... Then when they finaly get a game/s worth playing, they freaking Multiplats!
Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.I disagree with a lot of those.
Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.
Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS
Best Platformer...LBP takes that.
SergeantSnitch
Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.
Horrible awards.
[QUOTE="krp008"][QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
Blanco98
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.A sucky free online system, and the $500 console that nobody wants has no games.... I own one simply for the blu-ray player right now
Actually the online system owns 360 IMHO, the only thing that its lacking its the store, other than that i find PSN more enjoyable, Ill tell you why its better and why i think its better, PSN has dedicated servers , You dont get disconnected like the 360 (my online owns and not once was i disconnected from Psn YET* unlike 360), Its open so actually mod can create their maps for ex Unreal tournament and then sell them throught PSN somehow which is cool becuase maybe this will be done for other games too, Also there isent little kids yelling and crying......So in 360 when u pay those 50 bucks your practically paying to be able to play the game online and better communication Etc but nothing that PSN doesent offer, if there something so unique tell me......nd with Ps3 line up and future line up (as far as we know 360 dosent have a big one) so quit yer yaping... Thats because most people dont have a headset. and when im playing gears and Halo or any other 360 online game im not playing kids and all that stuff. Also i rarely have lag or disconnected from a game. Sure when the host quits its a bummer, but overall the system is great and IMHO runs more smoothly than PS3s online. Its like playing with zombies on PSN really. Also Xbox live has proven itself in that your less likely for a games online service to end unlike PSN. MGS 3 would have been online still if it was xbox live IMO since MS covers that. ALso with all the updates xbox live, i think there is more stuff on the way. It allready has way more content, is way more organized, a unified friends list, all that stuff. I wouldnt be surprised if the whole online service is revamped to eventually include dedicated servers for some of the bigger games, most games, or eventually all games.[QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.I disagree with a lot of those.
Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.
Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS
Best Platformer...LBP takes that.
Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.
Horrible awards.jg4xchamp
How did 360 dominate? Nice selections BTW, but Crysis has the best graphics. I guess they gave it to CoD 4 because it's fresher (not mad about that at all :D).
Fallout 3 must be amazing to win over Mass Effect and evey other console game.
Once again, Mass Effect was robbed.:(
Sir-Marwin105
We really can't say because the general public didn't see the Fallout 3 presentation.
[QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
ItalStallion777
you talking about the $600 one?
Note the faulty console part, i rather spent $500(now) for a console that works perfectly fine than $400 for one that i constantly have to be exchanging.
[QUOTE="Sir-Marwin105"]Once again, Mass Effect was robbed.:(
Episode_Eve
We really can't say because the general public didn't see the Fallout 3 presentation.
:(. Actually I love Fallout and Oblivion so I shouldn't be mad:).[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.I disagree with a lot of those.
Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.
Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS
Best Platformer...LBP takes that.
Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.
Horrible awards.da1on2
Wow, Crysis was stuttering on a brand new engine (while being the most technically advanced out there) and CoD 4 on a modified engine (which is behind considerably in technical aspects when compared to Crysis) runs butter smooth. Cookie for them (and GameTrailers).
Best FPS, CoD 4? This is why E3 awards mean nothing.
IMO Killzone 2 stole the show in terms of surprise and amazement.Episode_EveI really don't think it's possible to say that any one game stole the show this year, there were really too many big games it to even come close, but I think the games that came closest were Call of Duty 4 and Little Big Planet.
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"][QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
OhSnapitz
you talking about the $600 one?
No the $500 one that's reliable, has a lot more included features, and has a free open online system.Oh you mean like bluray?? Funny how cows want to include XBL costs but exclude Bluray movie costs, yet brag about the feature... :|
dude you can get blu-ray movies for damn cheap now. i work at frys and we got some blu-ray movies on sale for $11.99
[QUOTE="da1on2"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="SergeantSnitch"]Whoa no Killzone did not take that hands down for best FPS. maybe graphics but not gameplay. If anything that Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, Unreal 3, Crysis, etc would all be way better calls than Killzone. It wasnt like people saw that private demo of Halo 3 and hated it. In fact most have loved it. Call of Duty 4 has gotten critics all giddy as well.I disagree with a lot of those.
Best First-Person Shooter..COD4? Killzone 2 took E3 hands down. No one can deny this.
Best graphics...COD4 again? Sorry but that goes to a little game called CRYSIS
Best Platformer...LBP takes that.
Best Non-playable presentation..RE5? For the love of god, MGS4 puts RE5 to shame.
Horrible awards.jg4xchamp
[QUOTE="ItalStallion777"][QUOTE="Overthrow"]Yeah, and NOT ONE of them is exclusive.
I really need to spend $400 on a faulty console who's games I can play on another system.
granadavictor
you talking about the $600 one?
Note the faulty console part, i rather spent $500(now) for a console that works perfectly fine than $400 for one that i constantly have to be exchanging.
constantly have to be exchanging? if by that you mean possibly once or twice in the console's lifetime then i'd have to disagree.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment