ign, gamespot, which to believe??????

they have different opinion about AC, ign said framerate xb360 better than ps3, GS said otherwise.

IGN:

"The cities, as I stated earlier, are truly remarkable pieces of art. These big open worlds, which are fully interactive, do come at a severe cost on PS3. There is considerable texture pop-in and noticeable framerate issues. Playing back-to-back with the 360 version, it's obvious that Ubisoft did not devote enough resources to the PS3 edition. The framerate is considerably worse, so much so that it begins to affect gameplay in the later levels. You can get through the first two-thirds of Assassin with the framerate being just an annoyance, but it becomes more of an issue for the final third of the missions"

gamespot:

"There are few differences between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions. PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate, although the 360 version features a little more contrast in the lighting, so it's pretty much a wash."

ps: kiding, cows may believe ign over uncharted review , but believe gamespot over ac review.:D

haha, cows don't know what to do. They want to say that GS is right about the framerate but they still hate GS for the R&C review.

haha, cows don't know what to do. They want to say that GS is right about the framerate but they still hate GS for the R&C review.

TheDarkDisciple

I guess when talking about lair, they believe none of them.:)

IGN reviews are superior in score and the way they are written.Bigboi500

Metacritic.xboxdevil

Did you even bother to read the OP? He isn't asking about the score, he asking about what was said in the review. One says the PS3 ver is better, the other says the 360 is better (Tech wise).

I don't know man. GT's review it totaly different than 1UP's which is totally different than IGN's which is totaly different than GS's.

It seems everyone played a different game.