IGN mad cause MAG is not MW2

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#51 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

[QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Hello casual gamer I was waiting for you. Let the hardcore gamers talk please. Go sit down at the noob table with the other kids.illegalimigrant

I wasn't aware being a "hardcore gamer" meant throwing out ridiculous insults and trying very, very hard to talk down to someone.

Face it: MW2 owns you. You sit around all day and whine and complain about how "casual" it is. You attack those who enjoy it. You think it has no power over you. But in reality, you spend time on the interent obsessing about it.

MW2 owns you.

Again common casual response. If you think MW2 is the best FPS out there then you probably haven't played many FPS games. Battlefield 2 for PC is my favorite. And this game has so much in common with that game.

I have played major fps games since doom 2, and mw2 so far has the best MP. BF2's MP is nothing in front of MW/MW2, you can own everyone if you know how to control aircraft, and in few maps, ppl do nothing but waitting to get on an aircraft, and i see ppl killing their teammates if they dont get a plane.

btw auto blood recovery and killing streak are invented by COD. Dont blame MW2 if you get owned hard on it.

anyway, it's just my opinion, however stats (sales and online population) tells who's real FPS king now.

Avatar image for LazerChachi
LazerChachi

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 LazerChachi
Member since 2006 • 345 Posts

And I'm glad its not cause Modern Warfare is too nob friendly.

illegalimigrant

That is gross, sir, I don't care to know how people choose to play call of duty. I assumed everyone used their hands.

Avatar image for stygiansanity
stygiansanity

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 stygiansanity
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

Those are some fricken' absurd complaints, especially the last one (assuming your paraphrasing is indeed acurate).

Avatar image for BlancoBX
BlancoBX

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 BlancoBX
Member since 2009 • 894 Posts

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

I wasn't aware being a "hardcore gamer" meant throwing out ridiculous insults and trying very, very hard to talk down to someone.

Face it: MW2 owns you. You sit around all day and whine and complain about how "casual" it is. You attack those who enjoy it. You think it has no power over you. But in reality, you spend time on the interent obsessing about it.

MW2 owns you.

oajlu

Again common casual response. If you think MW2 is the best FPS out there then you probably haven't played many FPS games. Battlefield 2 for PC is my favorite. And this game has so much in common with that game.

I have played major fps games since doom 2, and mw2 so far has the best MP. BF2's MP is nothing in front of MW/MW2, you can own everyone if you know how to control aircraft, and in few maps, ppl do nothing but waitting to get on an aircraft, and i see ppl killing their teammates if they dont get a plane.

btw auto blood recovery and killing streak are invented by COD. Dont blame MW2 if you get owned hard on it.

anyway, it's just my opinion, however stats (sales and online population) tells who's real FPS king now.

and the stats say wii fit and wii play are the kings of games too then...

Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]OK but what where you expecting that this game did not fulfill? Do not even talk about the 256 battles cause you can't play them till level 10. And if you played it in your friend's house you probably only played it for 10 minutes... Got owned and complained of how its not like MW2 where you can run and gun.gamefan67
I love how you try to put people down in defense of this game. Does this somehow make you feel better about yourself? And no I played the game at My house on My PS3.........I never really had high expectations for this game to begin with....sure there is a lot of teamwork involved, but the gunplay feels very last gen. I have stated before that the gunplay feels like I'm playing a free MMOFPS (Combat Arms comes to my mind), sniping is not that great, firing from the hip is just about as accurate as firing down the sights in my experience....as a matter of fact it is more accurate because when you aim down the sights your aim is effected by extreme recoil.The game did deliver on 256 players but the game just is not fun in my experience. I actually love team-based gameplay but M.A.G. just feels like it is missing something to me. Truthfully I would rather play Modern Warfare 2, BFBC2 (that beta owned), Battlefield 1943, KZ2, and God dare I say.....Halo 3:o games I have actually had fun playing:o

Sorry for that comment but that is the only way I though someone wouldn't like it. I at first fell for all the BS saying that the game was horrible. Gave it a try and I liked the game more every time I played it. I loved BFBC2 beta but this game for some reason I like better. Its like Battlefield 2 in my opinion. I just have to assume that there are a lot of fanboys and if this gameplay is not for you then ok. Have fun playing other games no problem. I just want people that would actually like this game to give it a try and then join Raven. Cause we need recruits.
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#56 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

How to play MAG

1. TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

If you don't have Teamwork. You're playing the game WRONG!

2. Listen to your Commanding Officer!

If you would listen and attack the base that you are assigned to then chances are you'll win. oh yeah you need more teamwork for this too.

3. NEVER LEAVE YOUR TEAM!

If you leave your Team you're like the animal that's away from the Herd that's being chased by lions. Remember TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

get the picture?

Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

heysharpshooter
Ehh its good but its also too noob friendly, All I want for them to do is to be able to Customize Armor, Turn Off Auto Aim, and Auto Knife Aim and Make It a little more realistic with limb damage cause I think its hilarious when in Hardcore or Regular someone hits you in the foot with a Knife and Boom youre Dead.
Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts

How to play MAG

1. TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

If you don't have Teamwork. You're playing the game WRONG!

2. Listen to your Commanding Officer!

If you would listen and attack the base that you are assigned to then chances are you'll win. oh yeah you need more teamwork for this too.

3. NEVER LEAVE YOUR TEAM!

If you leave your Team you're like the animal that's away from the Herd that's being chased by lions. Remember TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

get the picture?

LegatoSkyheart
Yeah I approve this message. I tried going to harass the enemy going commando and using stealth and my squad leader got pissed at me. At the end he was like some people are just full of themselves refering to me. Next game I played as a squad leader and stayed where I was supposed to with the squad giving constant orders and I guess after that I got some much needed respect.
Avatar image for Jettero-Heller
Jettero-Heller

4289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Jettero-Heller
Member since 2002 • 4289 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

How to play MAG

1. TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

If you don't have Teamwork. You're playing the game WRONG!

2. Listen to your Commanding Officer!

If you would listen and attack the base that you are assigned to then chances are you'll win. oh yeah you need more teamwork for this too.

3. NEVER LEAVE YOUR TEAM!

If you leave your Team you're like the animal that's away from the Herd that's being chased by lions. Remember TEAMWORK IS EVERYTHING!

get the picture?

illegalimigrant

Yeah I approve this message. I tried going to harass the enemy going commando and using stealth and my squad leader got pissed at me. At the end he was like some people are just full of themselves refering to me. Next game I played as a squad leader and stayed where I was supposed to with the squad giving constant orders and I guess after that I got some much needed respect.

Another six or seven hours & I'll have my copy. Probably see you guys there. I'll be zonking Raven.

Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]OK but what where you expecting that this game did not fulfill? Do not even talk about the 256 battles cause you can't play them till level 10. And if you played it in your friend's house you probably only played it for 10 minutes... Got owned and complained of how its not like MW2 where you can run and gun.gamefan67
I love how you try to put people down in defense of this game. Does this somehow make you feel better about yourself? And no I played the game at My house on My PS3.........I never really had high expectations for this game to begin with....sure there is a lot of teamwork involved, but the gunplay feels very last gen. I have stated before that the gunplay feels like I'm playing a free MMOFPS (Combat Arms comes to my mind), sniping is not that great, firing from the hip is just about as accurate as firing down the sights in my experience....as a matter of fact it is more accurate because when you aim down the sights your aim is effected by extreme recoil.The game did deliver on 256 players but the game just is not fun in my experience. I actually love team-based gameplay but M.A.G. just feels like it is missing something to me. Truthfully I would rather play Modern Warfare 2, BFBC2 (that beta owned), Battlefield 1943, KZ2, and God dare I say.....Halo 3:o games I have actually had fun playing:o

Firing down the sights, at a 20 yard range like in mw2 is suppose to be realistic? Have you ever tried to keep something in the scope that was moving at a close range lol. Its not going to happen, oh unless there is aim assist.
Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#61 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

heysharpshooter
I love how MW2 fans refuse to admit that the MP is terribly designed and unbalanced.
Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

IGN is crap. Just look at what they said about Call of Duty 7...

"With the Call of Duty series due an off year (apologies to Treyarch, but that's just the way it is) it seems highly likely that there's going to be a changing of the order in first-person shooters in 2010."

So IGN is now buying into that IW is better than Treyarch BS now... pretty sad in my opinion. Oh well, there's a reason I use Gamespot and not IGN.

ozzdog123

They believe in facts sir..... IW is so much better than Treyarch....FACT

ON TOPIC:I didnt like MAG beta,but thats me

GTFO iw is better than trey arch fact? COD4 and W@W r the same. What's the difference between W@W and cod4? Different guns? STFU

IGN SUCKS/ and you FAIL.

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

[QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

mo0ksi

I love how MW2 fans refuse to admit that the MP is terribly designed and unbalanced.

TELL ME ABOUT IT. How in the world is Mw2 even that popular?

They talk about how great the game is but when they get pwned by someone else they talk about how the game is bull crap and stuff. Ex: Getting Cammandoed.

Avatar image for p2250
p2250

1520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 p2250
Member since 2003 • 1520 Posts

I can't see how any serious gamer or FPS fan can hold MW2 in such high regard, it's such a mainstream and casual game meant for people that have no experience with FPS. I'm sure MAG will require much more skill than MW2.

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

IGN is crap. Just look at what they said about Call of Duty 7...

"With the Call of Duty series due an off year (apologies to Treyarch, but that's just the way it is) it seems highly likely that there's going to be a changing of the order in first-person shooters in 2010."

So IGN is now buying into that IW is better than Treyarch BS now... pretty sad in my opinion. Oh well, there's a reason I use Gamespot and not IGN.

DarthBilf

How is IW not better than treyarch? All of treyarch's games have been solid, but kind of meh. All of IW's games have been fantastic. People played COD4 more than COD WAW for basically its entire lifespan, and now MW2 crushes both.

That makes cod4 better than w@w...? -_-"

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

Meh, I don't take them seriously as they're the idiots who gave the PC port of Modern Warfare 2 a 9.5.

Avatar image for CannedWorms
CannedWorms

3381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#67 CannedWorms
Member since 2009 • 3381 Posts

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

heysharpshooter

Hello casual gamer I was waiting for you. Let the hardcore gamers talk please. Go sit down at the noob table with the other kids.

I wasn't aware being a "hardcore gamer" meant throwing out ridiculous insults and trying very, very hard to talk down to someone.

Face it: MW2 owns you. You sit around all day and whine and complain about how "casual" it is. You attack those who enjoy it. You think it has no power over you. But in reality, you spend time on the interent obsessing about it.

MW2 owns you.

Agreed with everything except for the last part, no need to stoop to childish behaviour like him.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#68 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

MAG sounds boring and I am a PS3 owner.

Avatar image for RAGINGxPONY
RAGINGxPONY

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 RAGINGxPONY
Member since 2009 • 1452 Posts

[QUOTE="ozzdog123"]

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

IGN is crap. Just look at what they said about Call of Duty 7...

"With the Call of Duty series due an off year (apologies to Treyarch, but that's just the way it is) it seems highly likely that there's going to be a changing of the order in first-person shooters in 2010."

So IGN is now buying into that IW is better than Treyarch BS now... pretty sad in my opinion. Oh well, there's a reason I use Gamespot and not IGN.

Aboogie5

They believe in facts sir..... IW is so much better than Treyarch....FACT

ON TOPIC:I didnt like MAG beta,but thats me

GTFO iw is better than trey arch fact? COD4 and W@W r the same. What's the difference between W@W and cod4? Different guns? STFU

IGN SUCKS/ and you FAIL.

No you actually fail.

Sure CoD4 andWAW we're similar games guess which one came out first. CoD4 did,and all Treyarch did was put WW2 back into the game, which made most people angry. Than they copied everything about CoD4 online and put it in their game.

It is a fact IW>Treyarch sorry buddy.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

MAG is very different to MW2, and that's a good thing. From my experiance COD games are very casual and often have annoying players. Sure, not everyone in MAG was playing properly and using teamwork, but lots of people do. And the command structure is amazing! I just love being platoon leader and leading 30 odd men is great fun.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

every fps is going to be compared to mw2.

Avatar image for shane_orija
shane_orija

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 shane_orija
Member since 2008 • 910 Posts
[QUOTE="xXDante666Xx"]

*fanboy armor on*

Yeah don't worry about it, the comparisons to MW2 will stop by the end of the year when Halo: Reach slaps everyone in the face and makes them wake up from this ridiculous dreamworld they have going on.

*fanboy armor off*

I have to hop on the hype train, any loyal spartan would.

clubsammich91
Sad part is all the people playing Halo:Reach will probably stop when the next big MP game comes along(My bet it will be the next COD game)

Well, Halo 3 is still the most played mp game on Live even after the CoD games came out, if that says something about gamers' preference.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="gamefan67"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"]OK but what where you expecting that this game did not fulfill? Do not even talk about the 256 battles cause you can't play them till level 10. And if you played it in your friend's house you probably only played it for 10 minutes... Got owned and complained of how its not like MW2 where you can run and gun.GreyFoXX4
I love how you try to put people down in defense of this game. Does this somehow make you feel better about yourself? And no I played the game at My house on My PS3.........I never really had high expectations for this game to begin with....sure there is a lot of teamwork involved, but the gunplay feels very last gen. I have stated before that the gunplay feels like I'm playing a free MMOFPS (Combat Arms comes to my mind), sniping is not that great, firing from the hip is just about as accurate as firing down the sights in my experience....as a matter of fact it is more accurate because when you aim down the sights your aim is effected by extreme recoil.The game did deliver on 256 players but the game just is not fun in my experience. I actually love team-based gameplay but M.A.G. just feels like it is missing something to me. Truthfully I would rather play Modern Warfare 2, BFBC2 (that beta owned), Battlefield 1943, KZ2, and God dare I say.....Halo 3:o games I have actually had fun playing:o

Firing down the sights, at a 20 yard range like in mw2 is suppose to be realistic? Have you ever tried to keep something in the scope that was moving at a close range lol. Its not going to happen, oh unless there is aim assist.

exactly how many real battlefields have you been on?, we soldiers are trained to hit moving targets at over 300m, i can tell you that hitting a target at 20 yards with a 5,56mm weapon is a doddle, if you can't hit a target at a mere 20 yards you have no place being in ANY army, crikey, even african rebels can hit a target at 20 yards,lol
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/105/1058793p1.html

And many things mentioned are just idiotic and anyone that has played the game for more than an hour knows this.

Some of the editors wrote that is frustrating when he dies since if he kills someone their teamates will attack him and destroy him. No **** that is the point of this game teamwork. You can't go rambo and expect to survive. If you do go commando you have to realize that your only usefulness to the team is to divert attension not nessesarly to get kills. For commando gameplay you have to hide. Place booby traps. Shoot with silensed guns and retreat when they notice you and hopefully not get killed.

I don't think that's what he meant per say, I believe he was simply stating you couldn't kill someone without getting killed immediately after, which is true for what I've played of it.

Another one wrote this game i is perfect for those that like team killing I was killing my team members like crazy and no one voted me out. This will probably piss people off. What can I say, why would you do that? Is this a reviewer or a 5 year old kid. Seriously why would anyone start killing their own teamates and then complain about team killing? Its not modern warfare we get it. And I'm glad its not cause Modern Warfare is too nob friendly. I want a game that does not hold my hand.

He didn't complain about TKing, he simply said no one was voting him out, so it could be a potential problem.

And the last one was pretty hillarious and anyone that has played the game knows this.

The guy wrote. My concern is that this game is going to be full of campers. Sniper in this game are almost useless unless you use them as scouts so we wont have sniper campers. Firing gives out your position even if you have a silenser because of the tracer rounds. Even if you kill some the teamates will know your position and destroy you with numbers. Its hard to camp since people that camp have no one near to revive them. If you find a good position to kill peopel with it only works for about 2 kills then you need to find another one so you wont get knifed in the back.

No the last guy is actually correct, depending on the map decent snipers can dominate especially the jungle level where you have to go into the pyramid, the beginning objectives leave you extremely exposed to sniper fire, and the point he was making was that there's no way to really tell where the person is (which is incorrect) but his other comments on the issue are legitimate concerns.

And the most common complaint is that it does not feel like MW2.

Well if you like noob friendly games where one player can run and gun everyone then by all means play MW2 if you want a game that requires team work and communication as well as tactics and strategy to survive then MAG is your game.

illegalimigrant

Avatar image for shane_orija
shane_orija

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 shane_orija
Member since 2008 • 910 Posts
[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="gamefan67"] I love how you try to put people down in defense of this game. Does this somehow make you feel better about yourself? And no I played the game at My house on My PS3.........I never really had high expectations for this game to begin with....sure there is a lot of teamwork involved, but the gunplay feels very last gen. I have stated before that the gunplay feels like I'm playing a free MMOFPS (Combat Arms comes to my mind), sniping is not that great, firing from the hip is just about as accurate as firing down the sights in my experience....as a matter of fact it is more accurate because when you aim down the sights your aim is effected by extreme recoil.The game did deliver on 256 players but the game just is not fun in my experience. I actually love team-based gameplay but M.A.G. just feels like it is missing something to me. Truthfully I would rather play Modern Warfare 2, BFBC2 (that beta owned), Battlefield 1943, KZ2, and God dare I say.....Halo 3:o games I have actually had fun playing:odelta3074
Firing down the sights, at a 20 yard range like in mw2 is suppose to be realistic? Have you ever tried to keep something in the scope that was moving at a close range lol. Its not going to happen, oh unless there is aim assist.

exactly how many real battlefields have you been on?, we soldiers are trained to hit moving targets at over 300m, i can tell you that hitting a target at 20 yards with a 5,56mm weapon is a doddle, if you can't hit a target at a mere 20 yards you have no place being in ANY army, crikey, even african rebels can hit a target at 20 yards,lol

pwned
Avatar image for Kurdish-Gamer
Kurdish-Gamer

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Kurdish-Gamer
Member since 2008 • 802 Posts
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]

The part that made me laugh was the complant about campers and how it seems MW2 doesint suffer from this problem which is straight up bs. I have nothing against MW2.

Anywho those wondering what fixes MAG team made after the recent beta here is the list

Gameplay
· Added ability for player to use knife during a reload animation.
· Applied significant tuning adjustments for all weapons and armor.
· Increased sprint duration before tiring by 30%.
· Lowered XP requirements for levels 2 thru 4.
· Lowered level-entry restrictions for Sabotage from Level 3 to Level 2.
· Lowered level-entry restrictions for Acquisition from Level 5 to Level 4.
· Lowered level-entry restrictions for Domination from Level 10 to Level 8.
· Enabled proper level requirements for unlocking headgear, facegear, and uniforms.
· Fixed problem with recoil/firing animation that kept playing for a few seconds after the player fires an automatic gun and uses knife swipe simultaneously.

Interface
· Fixed bug where incapacitated players' nametags would occasionally disappear.
· Repositioned onscreen weapons for improved field of view.
· Armory items (facegear/ headgear/ uniforms) reordered.
· Removed helmets from "Loadout 3" for all factions.

Graphics
· Made significant increase in framerate during player-heavy games.
· Changed light settings for all environments.
· Polished recoil effect for better realism.
· Fixed offset muzzle flash effect.
· Tuned camera to shake more realistically when hit by bullets.
· Adjusted "blur" effect for both normal sights and iron sights.
· Added alternate reload animation.
· New "light scatter" treatment for all skies.
· Repaired various "weapon clipping" issues.
· Enacted several particle fogging adjustments.

Audio
· Switched first-person weapon sounds to true stereo.
· Moved first-person character interactions and weapon switches to true stereo.
· Tweaked sounds effects relating to landing on surfaces.

Technical
· Added error display and queue panel updates to notify player when they've encountered a "join game" failure.
· Made various server stability fixes and tweaks.

That is pretty impressive Zipper
Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts
[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="heysharpshooter"]

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

Hello casual gamer I was waiting for you. Let the hardcore gamers talk please. Go sit down at the noob table with the other kids.

o.O it's called opinion.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#78 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

At least Modern Warfare had a campaign this game doesn't and I do think some people like games like Halo,Gears of War and Call of Duty not only for multiplayer but the campaign too. MAG is just one big multiplayer game thats all.

Avatar image for Modern_Unit
Modern_Unit

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Modern_Unit
Member since 2010 • 1511 Posts

[QUOTE="ozzdog123"]

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

IGN is crap. Just look at what they said about Call of Duty 7...

"With the Call of Duty series due an off year (apologies to Treyarch, but that's just the way it is) it seems highly likely that there's going to be a changing of the order in first-person shooters in 2010."

So IGN is now buying into that IW is better than Treyarch BS now... pretty sad in my opinion. Oh well, there's a reason I use Gamespot and not IGN.

Aboogie5

They believe in facts sir..... IW is so much better than Treyarch....FACT

ON TOPIC:I didnt like MAG beta,but thats me

GTFO iw is better than trey arch fact? COD4 and W@W r the same. What's the difference between W@W and cod4? Different guns? STFU

IGN SUCKS/ and you FAIL.

Different maps, different storyline, different characters...you know

Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

Even though I really didnt like the game (the beta, at least), how can the editor and chief of IGN say that he really appreciates his beloved MW2 more, but then criticized this game for "campers"?????

peaceoutmedusa
Because maybe MAGs level design doesn't allow multiple paths to access locations? You can complain about camping all you want in MW2, but the one thing IW was smart enough to do was know what areas are going to be camped the heaviest and to make sure that those areas (outside of Claymores) have multiple access points. MW2 is one of the few games that actually was designed around the concept. (I won't deny that I complain about camping in MW2 also, but you know what I do? I kill him on the next life because he was too stupid to move and i went through another way to get to him). People are constantly complaining about maps like Wasteland (camping in the cave) or Estate (camping in the house) but clearly they fail to realize that THERE ARE MORE THAN 1 WAY TO ACCESS THESE AREAS!)
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#82 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
When playing any game of a given genre, it's natural to compare it to the best of said genre. I think a lot of people would prefer MW2 to MAG. Polish and being realistic about how your community is going to actually use your game on a regular basis seems to trump match size for most people. MAG is OK. MW2 is a phenomenon. (Though not one I am particuarly thrilled about.)
Avatar image for thebaronmoo
thebaronmoo

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#83 thebaronmoo
Member since 2007 • 246 Posts

*wall of text*

illegalimigrant

what the hell were you reading?

Avatar image for batman_is_aweso
batman_is_aweso

2762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 batman_is_aweso
Member since 2009 • 2762 Posts

I love how haters refuse to acknowledge MW2's utter dominance over online competittive FPS.

heysharpshooter

me 2 and like th above poster sai no crap that the teammate is gonna beat u up its a team game

Avatar image for BigJerm1
BigJerm1

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 BigJerm1
Member since 2004 • 938 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="illegalimigrant"] Hello casual gamer I was waiting for you. Let the hardcore gamers talk please. Go sit down at the noob table with the other kids.illegalimigrant
and yet I'm sure you're one of those who considers Team Fortress 2 hardcore, don't you. I've been gaming for 27 years now and I personally think that IW did an incredible job with MW2 and only a fool would say otherwise.

No battlefield 2 is. I don't like any run and gun games. And I think most hardcore gamers agree that Modern Warfare 2 is as casual as a FPS game gets. Not saying its bad. It taylors to the casual market. But to say that it owns everything else is just retarded. Different games are created for different audiences. You can't complain about an RTS because it does not have enough action. MAG is a game that is about teamwork and tactics. If you are not the sort of person that enjoys those games then MAG is not for you. Does not mean the game is bad.

So, in one sentence, you claim that different games are created for different audiences, but in another, you slam IGN and "casual" gamers for liking MW2 and not liking MAG as much as you do? I think maybe you've answered your own question. Opinions are like A-holes, and yours isn't any more correct than anyone else's. Even the "casuals" who you look down on so much. I've been playing video games for 25+ years, and I prefer MW2 over what I played of MAG in the beta. Sorry if that makes me "casual." Guess you'll have to get over it.

Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts

[QUOTE="illegalimigrant"][QUOTE="Nedemis"] and yet I'm sure you're one of those who considers Team Fortress 2 hardcore, don't you. I've been gaming for 27 years now and I personally think that IW did an incredible job with MW2 and only a fool would say otherwise. BigJerm1

No battlefield 2 is. I don't like any run and gun games. And I think most hardcore gamers agree that Modern Warfare 2 is as casual as a FPS game gets. Not saying its bad. It taylors to the casual market. But to say that it owns everything else is just retarded. Different games are created for different audiences. You can't complain about an RTS because it does not have enough action. MAG is a game that is about teamwork and tactics. If you are not the sort of person that enjoys those games then MAG is not for you. Does not mean the game is bad.

So, in one sentence, you claim that different games are created for different audiences, but in another, you slam IGN and "casual" gamers for liking MW2 and not liking MAG as much as you do? I think maybe you've answered your own question. Opinions are like A-holes, and yours isn't any more correct than anyone else's. Even the "casuals" who you look down on so much. I've been playing video games for 25+ years, and I prefer MW2 over what I played of MAG in the beta. Sorry if that makes me "casual." Guess you'll have to get over it.

You like MW2 that's ok. You want quick and fast action without much need to plan. Nothing wrong with that. Just the same that not everyone likes RTS. Like I said not looking down on anyone but when people start saying sentenses like MW2 owns you then I have to respond.