IGN : Naughty Bear Review - 2.5/10!

so people get on IGN's case for giving out a bunch of 9's (to awesome games i might add) and here they give a 2.5 and you people STILL complain and make up stuff?

wow....:lol:

CDUB316

I'm sure the 2.5 can be easily justified based on the game's overall critical reception, but still, that was a terribly written review. It's pretty sad that the user review I wrote on LEGO Harry Potter in about ten minutes was better than an official review.

This is a hoorible review.

I dont care about the score, Im talking about that horrible text.

The closing paragraph shouldnt just be dont buy this game. Thats stupid.

The graphics deserved a 4... seriously IGN needs to learn to write a bit like a 10 year old, not a 5 year old.

This topic needs more bear puns.Not-A-Stalker

play persona 4....you'll get about 50 of em, lmao

Confirmed, 360 superior multiplat.scottiescott238

Hmmm priorities ...

This topic needs more bear puns.Not-A-Stalker

That review was rather..unprofessional. Its not like its rocket science, but really now.

I knew this game was gonna fail, but I still don't care. It was fun to hype. :P

Wow, it's the ninja bread man of the PS3 and 360.

Based on the launch trailer the game actually caught my attention and it did seem interesting. However, once I watched a few gameplay videos I can see why the game got such a low score. The framerate is horrible, the gameplay seems dull, the camera is a mess...

The game had potential to be like Conker, but failed in it's execution and technical problems, which is a pity since the concept for the game is solid. If the game had been made by more skilled and talented developers I'm sure it would have scored much better.

Based on the launch trailer the game actually caught my attention and it did seem interesting. However, once I watched a few gameplay videos I can see why the game got such a low score. The framerate is horrible, the gameplay seems dull, the camera is a mess...

The game had potential to be like Conker, but failed in it's execution and technical problems, which is a pity since the concept for the game is solid. If the game had been made by more skilled and talented developers I'm sure it would have scored much better.

karasill

Hm, yeah. I honestly wanted this game to be good. We need some more games like this :P The multiplayer trailer actually looked half decent; it's a shame the game is a mess.

I'm surprised they were willing to give it a score under 5.0. I've barely seen any games that receive any sort of hype score under 5 this generation.

"I've only played a few hours of Naughty Bear," I stopped reading half-way through the first sentence. This review shouldn't have been posted. Period.JAB991

I'm surprised they were willing to give it a score under 5.0. I've barely seen any games that receive any sort of hype score under 5 this generation.

[QUOTE="JAB991"]"I've only played a few hours of Naughty Bear," I stopped reading half-way through the first sentence. This review shouldn't have been posted. Period.foxhound_fox

Because finding every possible way to criticize the critics is serious business.

This isnt like Deadly premonition were IGN seriously misunderstood the game.

Ths game actually does suck

This topic needs more bear puns.Not-A-Stalker

I'm surprised they were willing to give it a score under 5.0. I've barely seen any games that receive any sort of hype score under 5 this generation.

[QUOTE="JAB991"]"I've only played a few hours of Naughty Bear," I stopped reading half-way through the first sentence. This review shouldn't have been posted. Period.foxhound_fox

You never know you could find a redeeming quality in a title through extensive play; but yes your point is valid. Why should you need to do such if the game is so horrible that you don't even want to continue. However I assume anyone who is reading the Review, wants to know a in-depth view of it. Especially if he is considering purchase. Oh well.

You never know you could find a redeeming quality in a title through extensive play; but yes your point is valid. Why should you need to do such if the game is so horrible that you don't even want to continue. However I assume anyone who is reading the Review, wants to know a in-depth view of it. Especially if he is considering purchase. Oh well.

icygangsta

Thelack of quality of IGN is unbearable.

IronBass

LOL I see what you did thar!!

[QUOTE="icygangsta"]

You never know you could find a redeeming quality in a title through extensive play; but yes your point is valid. Why should you need to do such if the game is so horrible that you don't even want to continue. However I assume anyone who is reading the Review, wants to know a in-depth view of it. Especially if he is considering purchase. Oh well.

foxhound_fox

Fair enough, but he should have played enough to atleast have a valid opinion. In this case I would say he's done enough, but the review just looks....lazy.

Guys, we already had a bear pun thread...and it was locked.:(