IGN: Ninety-Nine Nights 2 Review - 4/10

[QUOTE="TehNubTuber"] THat's not what I consider a good game. And don't bother linking me a pic to the gamespot scale and how 7.0 = good. Nobody follows the gs scale as a way to use those words. 7.0 is mega weak. AA is a good game, AAA is a great game. Nobody says MGS4 is "prime" lol. If Crackdown 2 is the best the 360 can do it's a sad sad day for gamers.Stevo_the_gamer

[QUOTE="TehNubTuber"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Crackdown 2 literally just came out.

ohthemanatee

You can also enjoy Too Human, doesn't mean a 7.0 is not mega weak. Its barely passable AE.

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"][QUOTE="TehNubTuber"] THat's not what I consider a good game. And don't bother linking me a pic to the gamespot scale and how 7.0 = good. Nobody follows the gs scale as a way to use those words. 7.0 is mega weak. AA is a good game, AAA is a great game. Nobody says MGS4 is "prime" lol. If Crackdown 2 is the best the 360 can do it's a sad sad day for gamers.argetlam00

You can also enjoy Too Human, doesn't mean a 7.0 is not mega weak. Its barely passable AE.

"good" games are now mega weak? no wonder devs are switching to casuals

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"] k then, i'll be enjoying crackdown 2 when I get it, have funohthemanatee

You can also enjoy Too Human, doesn't mean a 7.0 is not mega weak. Its barely passable AE.

"good" games are now mega weak? no wonder devs are switching to casuals

Yeah they are. Have been for a very long time. Don't know where you have been. We don't even consider AE games in most debates because of their general lack in quality. "Good" is a very shallow description of the game.

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

You can also enjoy Too Human, doesn't mean a 7.0 is not mega weak. Its barely passable AE.

argetlam00

"good" games are now mega weak? no wonder devs are switching to casuals

Yeah they are. Have been for a very long time. Don't know where you have been. We don't even consider AE games in most debates because of their general lack in quality.

Apporpiately Made...

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

You can also enjoy Too Human, doesn't mean a 7.0 is not mega weak. Its barely passable AE.

argetlam00

"good" games are now mega weak? no wonder devs are switching to casuals

Yeah they are. Have been for a very long time. Don't know where you have been. We don't even consider AE games in most debates because of their general lack in quality. "Good" is a very shallow description of the game.

that's a great opinion.

unless there's been a general consensus, then one person can't dictate the meaning of a 7.0. if you want to downplay it, then 'average' is your best bet. not 'mega weak?'

mega weak just might apply to NN3's score.

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

"good" games are now mega weak? no wonder devs are switching to casuals

faithnomor3

Yeah they are. Have been for a very long time. Don't know where you have been. We don't even consider AE games in most debates because of their general lack in quality. "Good" is a very shallow description of the game.

that's a great opinion.

unless there's been a general consensus, then one person can't dictate the meaning of a 7.0. if you want to downplay it, then 'average' is your best bet. not 'mega weak?'

mega weak just might apply to NN3's score.

[QUOTE="faithnomor3"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Yeah they are. Have been for a very long time. Don't know where you have been. We don't even consider AE games in most debates because of their general lack in quality. "Good" is a very shallow description of the game.

Ravensmash

that's a great opinion.

unless there's been a general consensus, then one person can't dictate the meaning of a 7.0. if you want to downplay it, then 'average' is your best bet. not 'mega weak?'

mega weak just might apply to NN3's score.

bah, don't see why you would spend money on an AE game when there are so many better titles... Don't think I've ever played a single good AE game that had an AE as general consensus (metacritic/gameranking score).

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="faithnomor3"]

that's a great opinion.

unless there's been a general consensus, then one person can't dictate the meaning of a 7.0. if you want to downplay it, then 'average' is your best bet. not 'mega weak?'

mega weak just might apply to NN3's score.

argetlam00

bah, don't see why you would spend money on an AE game when there are so many better titles... Don't think I've ever played a single good AE game that had an AE as general consensus (metacritic/gameranking score).

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] Do you know what's really funny....I just posted the same thing about Trinity Universe (the JRPG thing) and how it's not worth mentioning, I got laughed at :P So arget, seems others don't share your opinion, eh?Arach666

bah, don't see why you would spend money on an AE game when there are so many better titles... Don't think I've ever played a single good AE game that had an AE as general consensus (metacritic/gameranking score).

Nah I'm not. I'm struggling to pick up even the AA games im interested in, forget the A ones.

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

bah, don't see why you would spend money on an AE game when there are so many better titles... Don't think I've ever played a single good AE game that had an AE as general consensus (metacritic/gameranking score).

argetlam00

Nah I'm not. I'm struggling to pick up even the AA games im interested in, forget the A ones.

That reveiw was so "extreeeeeeme" LOL i couldn't help but laugh.Shuraijuro

Honestly that E3 Konami presentation was far better than Ubisofts. At least I laughed :| When those Ubisoft guys with lasertag guns came out I was just speechless. Oh and the breathing game...Can't forget the breathing game...

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="Ross_the_Boss6"]

:? It's July.

Ross_the_Boss6

No, first Mass Effect 2 scored a 9.0, then Splinter Cell: Conviction got an 8.0, then Alan Wake got an 8.5, THEN their E3 conference was a joke. If you're going to bash the X360, at least be honest about it.

[QUOTE="Ross_the_Boss6"]

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] and quality like this is already coming out. 1st their E3 conference was a joke now the sub par summer releases are coming out. I hope after reach comes out the 360 can pick up some steam because right now its relying on it back catalog of games. Sp4rtan_3

No, first Mass Effect 2 scored a 9.0, then Splinter Cell: Conviction got an 8.0, then Alan Wake got an 8.5, THEN their E3 conference was a joke. If you're going to bash the X360, at least be honest about it.

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="Ross_the_Boss6"]

No, first Mass Effect 2 scored a 9.0, then Splinter Cell: Conviction got an 8.0, then Alan Wake got an 8.5, THEN their E3 conference was a joke. If you're going to bash the X360, at least be honest about it.

Ravensmash

It also means the game was a disappointment. If Halo Reach gets an 8.5 its certainly not a bad game, but a HUGE disappointment.

When those Ubisoft guys with lasertag guns came out I was just speechless.

argetlam00

Actually, these are women, not men.

LOL! Wow....unexpected....indeed.