[QUOTE="chinoceron"]Things should be gauged relative to the current environment upon their release. The original Virtua Fighter was astounding at the time but isn't as great today and the same is true of OoT. Theres no reason for games with such age and differences in commentary to both receive the same score after all this time (although I personally think Crash was a solid AA game at launch).
every time i tipe klazikz it apears as forbiden in the post and i apeared as a level 1...at least in my monitor(odd):?. yes i know what you mean this games have obviously got some age on them. but this shouldnt take the merit out of them. i mean ocarina was a master piece back then why soul it be diferent if i play it 10 years later? the pyramids of egypt are still seen as a wonders of architecture, even when now we can do even bigger and better things
Runningflame570
theres is some truth in what you say, but at the end its your apinion. for example i never played crash if i were to review it ill probably give a 5 or a 6 dont know(couse i didnt appreciate the game when it was out). but if i had to review ocarina i would probably still give it a 10 just because when i played the game it amazed me sooo much, heck!! i would probably enjoy more playing oot and mm than tp just because nostalgic. and as you said crash was to you a solid AA...its your opinion what it counts
Log in to comment