Well, they're both great shooters and these comparisons are getting old. I wouldn't call them boring or overrated, I mean, they aren't Final Fantasy games.
*Waits for Aljosa23*
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well, they're both great shooters and these comparisons are getting old. I wouldn't call them boring or overrated, I mean, they aren't Final Fantasy games.
*Waits for Aljosa23*
Well no matter what Halo 3 scored better and KZ2 will not even come close to Halo 3 sales. Lets see KZ2 pass 1 billion online games like Halo 3 has. Halo is so much better then KZ2 is so many ways. Halo has a better story- A story for Halo that was able to inspire novels and comic books even. If KZ2 had a bad story it would be a improvement since there was no story. I played through the entire KZ2 game and never once knew why I was attacking their planet. Halo has better Setting in the game- Halo has multiple different areas through out the game from forest, alien , broken down building, and more. KZ2 has pretty much the same look through out the entire game. Halo has better main guy. Master Chief is memorable and has become a game icon. Sev is beyond forgettable. Sev is boring. Halo has better bad guys- There is the flood and the convenant. With those two factions there is multiple models for each. KZ2 is copy and past the same black out fit with red eyes again and again (yawn). Halo has better vehicles- There is so many different vehicles in Halo. Not only that you can car jack them. KZ2 has only one vehicle and it is a tank and even then it has bad controls. Halo has better online- Halo has so much detail and data and stat tracking. Also so much user friendly. I think the online part was KZ2 best part but still not Halo lvl. Graphics technology wise KZ2 wins- KZ2 does win in the graphics area. I could really go one but you get the point. To compare Killzone to Halo is laughable though.rybe1025To take anything you said as fact is laughable... One word folks, SUBJECTIVE. It's all opinion and preference. FACT is, both are great, successful titles that millions will enjoy. :)
No I don't. That totally deflates the purpose of a message board.[QUOTE="killerfist"] No it wasn't implied. How the **** should I know? And yes, you need to put IMO after every ****ing statement. Especially if it's about Halo 3.Aljosa23
If people are that offended by my opinion, why don't they prove me wrong?
I don't need to prove you wrong. It's HALO 3![QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]I second that. *Waits for Aljosa23 after he gets done with Floppy_Jim* Just because I'm already here...I third that:oWell, they're both great shooters and these comparisons are getting old. I wouldn't call them boring or overrated, I mean, they aren't Final Fantasy games.
*Waits for Aljosa23*
Keltoid
[QUOTE="Keltoid"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]I second that. *Waits for Aljosa23 after he gets done with Floppy_Jim* Just because I'm already here...I third that:oFinal Fantasy is the pinnacle of gaming. It trumps your casualized games like KZ2 and Halo 3. FFXIII will have true next-gen textures, lighting, and non-linear enviornments like your silly lawlz-worthy shooters.Well, they're both great shooters and these comparisons are getting old. I wouldn't call them boring or overrated, I mean, they aren't Final Fantasy games.
*Waits for Aljosa23*
killerfist
:twisted:
Just because I'm already here...I third that:oFinal Fantasy is the pinnacle of gaming. It trumps your casualized games like KZ2 and Halo 3. FFXIII will have true next-gen textures, lighting, and non-linear enviornments like your silly lawlz-worthy shooters.[QUOTE="killerfist"][QUOTE="Keltoid"] I second that. *Waits for Aljosa23 after he gets done with Floppy_Jim*Aljosa23
:twisted:
...you forgot "IMO" :lol:[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Final Fantasy is the pinnacle of gaming. It trumps your casualized games like KZ2 and Halo 3. FFXIII will have true next-gen textures, lighting, and non-linear enviornments like your silly lawlz-worthy shooters.[QUOTE="killerfist"] Just because I'm already here...I third that:oKeltoid
:twisted:
...you forgot "IMO" :lol: Bah, beat me to it:P...you forgot "IMO" :lol:KeltoidPshh, opinions are for n00bz.
My opinion is fact! :twisted:
Everything I say is my opinion darn it! I don't feel the need to type out "IMO" after every statement. :(
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"][QUOTE="djsifer01"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
Both are overrated and boring games.
*Gets Flame Shield*
I'm ready for ya!
Nah KZ2 is really fun IMO and Halos are all the same so i agree with you on that. There is nothing similar between Halo 1, Halo 2, and Halo 3..Are you serious??!?!!!:| On the gameplay side, there's little evolution between the three Halos[/QUOT Are you serious? Halo 1 basic shooter stuff. Halo 2: Dual wield, Energy sword so many differnet weapons, customisable armoe, play as an elite, two seperate storylines, boss battles, better graphics improved vehicles, different enemy, (Brute) longer story mode, extensive banshee use, multiplayer integraed as a vital piece, in game secrets to find and many others. Halo 3, too lazy to listWhere did he say that those were facts? Nice job stating the obvious.[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
rorskarch
he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable."... :|
And where is the word fact? :| Im not seeing it. Soo comparing Killzone to halo is laughable to him. End of story. IMO is not needed at the end of every ****ing statement.[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="Immortalzxx"]
Halo 3 is the superior game,
Cows need to get over it and move on now and just be glad that KZ2 didnt flop
Biotic2099
And lems need to get over the fact that not everyone thinks the same.
we realize that the nay sayers are a vocal minority and that the pro halo 3 crowd is in the millions. hhhhhhsssss, no. no, sorry, that doesnt make any sense. :( sales=quality, my brain hurts :cry:[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] Where did he say that those were facts? Nice job stating the obvious.
AAllxxjjnn
he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable."... :|
And where is the word fact? :| Im not seeing it. Soo comparing Killzone to halo is laughable to him. End of story. IMO is not needed at the end of every ****ing statement. no, you are just pointlessly trying to defend him. he is telling other people that to compare the two is laughable. and you shouldnt assume that he it is his opinion. ;) honestly :roll: ....[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="rorskarch"]And where is the word fact? :| Im not seeing it. Soo comparing Killzone to halo is laughable to him. End of story. IMO is not needed at the end of every ****ing statement. no, you are just pointlessly trying to defend him. he is telling other people that to compare the two is laughable. and you shouldnt assume that he it is his opinion. ;) honestly :roll: .... You shouldn't assume he feels that what he is saying is "fact". Honestly. :roll: The whole putting "IMO" at the end of everything is stupid.he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable."... :|
rorskarch
Both are overrated and boring games.
*Gets Flame Shield*
I'm ready for ya!
Readys rocket lauchair (what now?) :P. On-topic, I really think it's amazing how we're still able to compare an FPS that heading toward two years old and still able to debate which one is king and I still give the crown to Halo 3, not because I'm not a huge fan of the Killzone series to begin with (lol it is good though don't get me wrong) but the fun that Halo 3 offers after hours upon hours. I do like the amount of heart-pounding moments K2 offer though, it's almost like it never stops until the credits roll or in the lobby of multiplayer.[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="Immortalzxx"]
Halo 3 is the superior game,
Cows need to get over it and move on now and just be glad that KZ2 didnt flop
Biotic2099
And lems need to get over the fact that not everyone thinks the same.
we realize that the nay sayers are a vocal minority and that the pro halo 3 crowd is in the millions.Uh what? Are you using sales to state the quality of a game.
[QUOTE="rybe1025"]
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
Animal-Mother
Story-I should not have to go to outside sources to find something as simple as why I am attacking the alien world. That is just stupid imo to need to read a website or play another game to know what is going on in KZ2. I am not saying the story needs to be the next catcher in the rye but at least a little something would have been nice.
Setting- For me in KZ2 it just all looked the same pretty much. There was no real contrast from one area to the next.
Eniemes- Fine Halo enemies bore you. You have to admit at least Bungie has a variety. There is no variety at all in KZ2.
Main guy- Fine then explain to me w3hat is going to make Sev a icon in gaming like Master Chief. What is so appeling about him then?? I found him dull.
Veihicles- That is not opinion. There is far more vehicles in Halo and offer you more abilites such as car jacking.
Online- Can be opinion which is more fun for a person. It is fact though Halo has far more info for online that KZ2 does not offer and Halo is more user friendly.
To your story point your right in a sense. But Playing the other two games doesnt hurt. Enemies. Well I saw variety In Killzone 2. Sub machine gunners. Snipers, tactitians, Grenadiers. Main guy. Well Master cheif was awesome because he wore a suit of armor. Right? I like sev, because he's not going through the war without anything effecting him. He's feeling the stress of it. Vehicles- Are an opinion it's what you like more. and online your right.ur going to love Halo ODST then
That was probably one of the worst fanboy flame battles ive ever witnessed... The Halo 3 fanboy has nothing to say about anything and the KZ2 fanboy says everything is better than H3...
IMO. Honestly, it isnt even an opinion, Halo 3's story is leagues ahead of KZ2's and KZ2 shoudnt even be said in the same sentence as H3 in terms of multiplayer. But of course KZ2's graphics are better.
The Halo franchise, time and time again, has proven that it can stand the test of time, and Bungie, time and time again, has proven that they are one of the greatest game developers ever.
That was probably one of the worst fanboy flame battles ive ever witnessed... The Halo 3 fanboy has nothing to say about anything and the KZ2 fanboy says everything is better than H3...
IMO. Honestly, it isnt even an opinion, Halo 3's story is leagues ahead of KZ2's and KZ2 shoudnt even be said in the same sentence as H3 in terms of multiplayer. But of course KZ2's graphics are better.
The Halo franchise, time and time again, has proven that it can stand the test of time, and Bungie, time and time again, has proven that they are one of the greatest game developers ever.
krp008
Saying Halos 3 story is better then KZ2 isint saying much. Since nethier is all that good in the story department. Also both MP for the games are fun. Halo is more arcady and you can make maps. KZ2 is more grounded and has a deep class system. SO yea you can mention both in the MP department. IN the end both MP are good mainly since both have a different feel to them.
no, you are just pointlessly trying to defend him. he is telling other people that to compare the two is laughable. and you shouldnt assume that he it is his opinion. ;) honestly :roll: .... You shouldn't assume he feels that what he is saying is "fact". Honestly. :roll: The whole putting "IMO" at the end of everything is stupid. the fact that, again, he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable." is an obvious indication that he is talking to everyone one else and telling them that they should not be compared because of the sheer difference in quality.[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] And where is the word fact? :| Im not seeing it. Soo comparing Killzone to halo is laughable to him. End of story. IMO is not needed at the end of every ****ing statement.AAllxxjjnn
They change if anything comes along to up those standards. What upped the standards and how? No FPS on consoles since Halo has managed to even match it's score.Halo 3 Released in 2007 - 9.5
Killzone 2 Released in 2009 - 9.0
Remember, standards change with time. You simply can not compare the scores directly like that. It's a horrible argument.
Rikusaki
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]You shouldn't assume he feels that what he is saying is "fact". Honestly. :roll: The whole putting "IMO" at the end of everything is stupid. the fact that, again, he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable." is an obvious indication that he is talking to everyone one else and telling them that they should not be compared because of the sheer difference in quality. So, to HIM people comparing Killzone to Halo is laughable.[QUOTE="rorskarch"] no, you are just pointlessly trying to defend him. he is telling other people that to compare the two is laughable. and you shouldnt assume that he it is his opinion. ;) honestly :roll: ....rorskarch
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]They change if anything comes along to up those standards. What upped the standards and how? No FPS on consoles since Halo has managed to even match it's score. Games don't get high scores like that if they don't bring something new or different to the table. Many great games were released in that time period. They don't have to be just FPS games to be influential to the FPS genre.Halo 3 Released in 2007 - 9.5
Killzone 2 Released in 2009 - 9.0
Remember, standards change with time. You simply can not compare the scores directly like that. It's a horrible argument.
AAllxxjjnn
There is nothing similar between Halo 1, Halo 2, and Halo 3..Are you serious??!?!!!:| On the gameplay side, there's little evolution between the three HalosThere are many subtle changes that make each game unique.[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"][QUOTE="djsifer01"] Nah KZ2 is really fun IMO and Halos are all the same so i agree with you on that.ermacness
wait, you say this is the worst fanboy argument ever and then you contribute to it with more fanboyism :?That was probably one of the worst fanboy flame battles ive ever witnessed... The Halo 3 fanboy has nothing to say about anything and the KZ2 fanboy says everything is better than H3...
IMO. Honestly, it isnt even an opinion, Halo 3's story is leagues ahead of KZ2's and KZ2 shoudnt even be said in the same sentence as H3 in terms of multiplayer. But of course KZ2's graphics are better.
The Halo franchise, time and time again, has proven that it can stand the test of time, and Bungie, time and time again, has proven that they are one of the greatest game developers ever.
krp008
[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] You shouldn't assume he feels that what he is saying is "fact". Honestly. :roll: The whole putting "IMO" at the end of everything is stupid.the fact that, again, he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable." is an obvious indication that he is talking to everyone one else and telling them that they should not be compared because of the sheer difference in quality. So, to HIM people comparing Killzone to Halo is laughable.AAllxxjjnn
dude, what you are arguing for is so pointless. yes obviously in his mind, to him. i mean, to who else could it be. for HIM to believe other people who compare killzone 2 to halo 3 is laughable and then to say it to everyone means that he sees it as a fact that everyone should accept. i dont even know why youre defending him...
So, to HIM people comparing Killzone to Halo is laughable.[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="rorskarch"] the fact that, again, he said "to compare killzone to halo is laughable." is an obvious indication that he is talking to everyone one else and telling them that they should not be compared because of the sheer difference in quality.rorskarch
dude, what you are arguing for is so pointless. yes obviously in his mind, to him. i mean, to who else could it be. for HIM to believe other people who compare killzone 2 to halo 3 is laughable and then to say it to everyone means that he sees it as a fact that everyone should accept. i dont even know why youre defending him...
I'm just saying, pointing out that what he wrote is opinion is pointless because it is completely and utterly obvious. He never claimed anything in his post was fact. It's assumed that he was stating his personal preference. I'm not even defending anything he wrote....[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]
WOW you think a 360 shooter is better then a PS3 shooter what a shocker.
obamanian
I actually think Killzone 2 is one of the worst and most unimaginative shooters i have played in general, on any system
Seems like they should hire some better artists and level designers, than just make a better engine
that title goes to cod4, cod2 with a new paint job. halo3 is like cod4 a short sp game which offers nothing over the previous games and then a great mp game which makes the game worthless to people who don't care for online.[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]
WOW you think a 360 shooter is better then a PS3 shooter what a shocker.
obamanian
I actually think Killzone 2 is one of the worst and most unimaginative shooters i have played in general, on any system
Seems like they should hire some better artists and level designers, than just make a better engine
Hm i doubt you have ever played Killzone 2, try finishin the game and play its online mode first before talkin smack about an amazing game. :roll:
many dislikes Killzone 2 because of not noob friendly controls and its hard to aim unlike resistance 2 and COD. But its very good though. It is very challenging and fun.
[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] So, to HIM people comparing Killzone to Halo is laughable.AAllxxjjnn
dude, what you are arguing for is so pointless. yes obviously in his mind, to him. i mean, to who else could it be. for HIM to believe other people who compare killzone 2 to halo 3 is laughable and then to say it to everyone means that he sees it as a fact that everyone should accept. i dont even know why youre defending him...
I'm just saying, pointing out that what he wrote is opinion is pointless because it is completely and utterly obvious. He never claimed anything in his post was fact. It's assumed that he was stating his personal preference. I'm not even defending anything he wrote.... how is it obvious?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment