IGN : Why Do People Hate EA?

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

Why do people hate EA? When I say 'people,' I mean 'some people,' some of the time -- a minority. And when I say 'hate' I mean mostly the writing of mean things on the internet.

This brand, this company, this group of people, creates some of the best and biggest games in the world with an average Metacritic rating that's high and rising. It is profitable, but not outrageously so, and is under-valued by the stock market.

So how has it managed to create enough ill-will to be voted the worst company in America? And even if it wasnt, even if we put that down to a temporary 'Mass Effect ending' negative blip that everyone has already forgotten about, there's no doubt that 'EA Hate' is a thing.

sauce

IGN

I wasn't too much of an EA hater (disliked them though), but the tipping point was the moment I read blogs warning about their anti consumer Origin EULA (granting EA the ability to obtain any personal information / content from your computer and installing a web proxy client just to play their games), I started boycotting them from that moment till today (last game I bought was Crysis 2 on steam)

P.S. As usual, apologies if old.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

You can't spell ignorance without ign :roll: ...

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts

I can't believe this is a serious question. If IGN lacks at least that much critical thinking then it's no wonder their site is in that state it's in: reviews that hand out 10s like candy and troll bait articles like this one.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Seeing as IGN just likes to make shock articles with no real value, and how much they love Mass Effect, I'm not gonna bother reading that.

BTW all Origin does is scan your PC for Origin games already installed. It doesn't do anything else outside of that.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

Excellent points, I really wish whomever wrote that article at IGN and executives at EA read what you wrote.

I remember also reports of people losing their digitally purchased games if they got banned on their forums for silly reasons.

Avatar image for drakekratos
drakekratos

2311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 drakekratos
Member since 2011 • 2311 Posts
I hate EA because their yearly re-makes of Madden always suck. Infact it seems they have gotten WORSE over the years.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#8 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co
This just ends the entire thread.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

They make crappy games.

Their online games always run like ass because their servers suck.

They love day one DLC, which is something I despise.

They have juvenile marketing approaches, such as making fun of CoD (then copying it) and having those "your mom will hate it" Dead Space 2 ads. Anyone buying a game because their mom will hate it is basically too stupid to take seriously, thus any fan of EA falls into that category.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

God. They can't be that stupid can they? This is why so called gaming journalism sucks. Why the f*ck am I telling you why they suck? You should already know and be telling ME why they suck. But you can't because it would ruin your chance to be the first to review the Battlefield:"Bend over and take it hard" special edition or some other tripe they are trying to push out the door.

It's not like EA hasn't blatantly shown how much they disregard their customers or shown that they are categorically the posterchild for how corporate greed can ruin the creative process.

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

Yeah, I saw that awesome YouTube Video Too :lol: You should have posted it with this.

Avatar image for JohnnyCageMK
JohnnyCageMK

4365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 JohnnyCageMK
Member since 2012 • 4365 Posts
EA makes some of the worst games. They should be sued for false advertising BF3 PC footage and claiming it to be console footage. They ran Madden into the ground. The Syndicate reboot sucked. Need For Speed has sucked for years. They killed Burnout. They charge $60 for Tiger Woods and then sell you the courses for $40 extra. They introduced online passes. What is there to like about EA?
Avatar image for Zurrur
Zurrur

1701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Zurrur
Member since 2009 • 1701 Posts

They just ruined Dead space, now i hate them ever more

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

EA makes some of the worst games. They should be sued for false advertising BF3 PC footage and claiming it to be console footage. They ran Madden into the ground. The Syndicate reboot sucked. Need For Speed has sucked for years. They killed Burnout. They charge $60 for Tiger Woods and then sell you the courses for $40 extra. They introduced online passes. What is there to like about EA?JohnnyCageMK

I totally agree. Mass Effect 2 and 3, and Dragon Age 2 were terrible.

Avatar image for Mozuckint
Mozuckint

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 Mozuckint
Member since 2012 • 831 Posts

Brilliant journalism! I mean, what better way to get an honest answer as to why gamers hate EA than by asking EA instead of gamers?

/s

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

They just ruined Dead space, now i hate them ever more

Zurrur

Yea im very afraid for Dead space 3. Im not going to lie even though alot of people hate EA they have published stuff I enjoy.

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

[QUOTE="Zurrur"]

They just ruined Dead space, now i hate them ever more

finalfantasy94

Yea im very afraid for Dead space 3. Im not going to lie even though alot of people hate EA they have published stuff I enjoy.

Yep, me too. Loved the 1st one, the second was ok, this one looks the RE5 all over again, and I hated RE5.

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

dream431ca

Yeah, I saw that awesome YouTube Video Too :lol: You should have posted it with this.

for those who want to see a video about Ea

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-LE0ycgkBQ

Avatar image for emorainbo
emorainbo

3067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 emorainbo
Member since 2008 • 3067 Posts

Its funny how EA sucked last gen but at the start of this gen they became pretty good. They had Mass Effect, Mirrors Edge, Burnout, Crysis, Dragons Age, Brutal Legend, Dead Space, Rock Band and other games that, but soon returned to their greedy ****

Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
IGN obviously would never bite the hand that feeds
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#21 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Brilliant journalism! I mean, what better way to get an honest answer as to why gamers hate EA than by asking EA instead of gamers?

/s

Mozuckint

If you are responding to what I said about journalism, I meant that they should be investigating EA and informing their readers about EA's BS instead of kissing their ass.

Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

Another article made for the sole purpose of getting hits. Anyone who knows what's what can't possibly be stupid enough to not see why, even if they disagree.

Avatar image for Mozuckint
Mozuckint

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Mozuckint
Member since 2012 • 831 Posts

[QUOTE="Mozuckint"]

Brilliant journalism! I mean, what better way to get an honest answer as to why gamers hate EA than by asking EA instead of gamers?

/s

heretrix

If you are responding to what I said about journalism, I meant that they should be investigating EA and informing their readers about EA's BS instead of kissing their ass.

Ah no, I wasn't responding to you. Sorry for the confusion. Just a thrown out though it all.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Mozuckint"]

Brilliant journalism! I mean, what better way to get an honest answer as to why gamers hate EA than by asking EA instead of gamers?

/s

Mozuckint

If you are responding to what I said about journalism, I meant that they should be investigating EA and informing their readers about EA's BS instead of kissing their ass.

Ah no, I wasn't responding to you. Sorry for the confusion. Just a thrown out though it all.

Ah, it's all good. You made me go back and read what I posted and it did look like it needed a bit of clarification. You bring up a good point. EA isn't going to be exactly truthful when asked why people hate them..lol.

Avatar image for sonic1564
sonic1564

3265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 sonic1564
Member since 2008 • 3265 Posts

Ahhh IGN never fails to amuse me with their intelligence.

I hate EA for these reasons:

They made Dice and Bioware rush BF3 and ME3, resulting with lag on BF3 and a s***** ending on ME3

They killed Westwood

They made movie based games even worse by carbon copying COD

Day one DLC can go f*** itself

They invented the online pass to force people to buy the games new

They made a s*** port of the Orange Box on the PS3 (which I don't care since I have the 360 version)

Rumors say that EA pays off people to troll on the internet to bash on the competitors

All of this would make Activision tolerable.

Avatar image for 4dr1el
4dr1el

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 4dr1el
Member since 2012 • 2380 Posts

Cause they killed my mother and raped my father

bastards...

Avatar image for MrJack3690
MrJack3690

2227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 MrJack3690
Member since 2004 • 2227 Posts

God. They can't be that stupid can they? This is why so called gaming journalism sucks. Why the f*ck am I telling you why they suck? You should already know and be telling ME why they suck. But you can't because it would ruin your chance to be the first to review the Battlefield:"Bend over and take it hard" special edition or some other tripe they are trying to push out the door.

heretrix

They can have that edition, I don't think I'd want to play it anyways... :P

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

This pretty much and this and this.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#29 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co
Wow all of these look perfectly valid yet I still can't see past the large list of games they provide which I enjoy and look forward to, I don't buy their DLC or stupid additional content but I do enjoy video games, I'm not going to sit and read every single license agreement i'm just going to sign it because it's gotten me this far and i've never had an issue with doing this before. Sim City in 2013? Yes I'll buy it because I like the franchise, not because I like EA because I don't, I just don't have the same problems that all the haters seem to have.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#30 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

Here´s your answer, IGN.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

Probably the same reason people hate IGN, they suck. I bet they're just sucking up to EA because of Diana Allers one of their staff is a character in Mass Effect 3. What a pointless waste of disc space. If only they gave us the option to throw her out the airlock.

Avatar image for Masculus
Masculus

2878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Masculus
Member since 2009 • 2878 Posts

Well of course it's hard for them to understand it. How much money in advertisement and other indirect forms have they received from them?

Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts

U9

CC4

DA2

DA3

Origin

westwood

Bullfrog

pandemic

bioware

Is this reason enough to hate EA?

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#34 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

Though some of this is somewhat opinion or maybe more on a case by case basis, the bolded points are very true, and far too numerous. I understand that a company wants to make money, but EA goes off the deep end. I also want to add:

- Terrible marketing that devalues and belittles opponents or uses cheap and immature shock tactics that hold back the industry (such as the whole BF vs CoD thing that blew up in their face, or the whole Dante's Inferno fake protest and MoH Taliban controversy, both of which also blew up in their face)

- Failing to bring Battlefield 1943 to PS3 BF3 players until people made a fuss, despite their promises of doing so at E3 (though that could fit into one of your points about not delivering content I suppose)

- Poorly run servers and underpolished, quickly released titles that tend to fall under hype as a result (such as the server issues they have in, well, almost every game they put out and BF3 coming out with a brand new engine and having a host of issues on PC lacking VOIP and Battlerecorder as initially promised because of trying to get it out before the holidays and releasing on a new engine without the testing necessary, as well as Origin failing to download properly half the time when it came out)

Personally they aren't like, pure evil. More then anything I think EA is just incompetent and not organized well, which is how they can have some fantastic games get marketed terribly or have hugely inflated budgets they shouldn't need, as well as a much too greedy (but I guess, legal) DLC and DD policies that spits in the face of gamers by being a bit too aggressive or protective in some respects, but not malicious or made to spite gamers as much as they do so inadvertently.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Vesica_Prime

This pretty much and this

Great video that I'd advise everyone to watch.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Vesica_Prime

This pretty much and this and this.

wow, thanks for the links.

Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
My problem is why these developers sell themselves to EA. Surely bioware didn't need to be, just proves to me in the end money talks and bullsh*t walks. I hate EA but I dont understand why they are at fault for poor development. Everything else about ea is sh*t though.
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts
Because they are greedy bastards that don't care about gamers or developers and only care about how much money they can milk us gamers for.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#39 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

EA haters are just dumb, they arn't hurting anyone, they arn't forcing you to buy their games, if you want to get mad at a big business get mad at the banks or the investment firms, those shysters almost destroyed the world economy and costed millions of people their jobs and their homes.

I dislike many EA policies, I hate their online passes and their day 1 DLC. But on the internet people over exaggerate things and is a stage for the a very small minority. No one in real life really "hates" EA.

I think they are a pretty good company that makes good games. They just have some bad decisions like all companies do, but there are far worst. When it comes to gaming I consider MS to be the worst.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
Instead of investing more money in the development of tha madden franchise to make it a better game, they instead use that money to buy exclusive rights to nfl games
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Despite people having valid reasons for hating EA they are one of the few big publishers left willing to take a gamble. Sure they have their usual cash cows but they take risks when it comes to publishing games.

Off the top of my head -

1. Brutal legend

2. Mirror's Edge

3. CNC4

4. Syndicate

5. Kingdoms of Amalur

6. Dante's Inferno

7. Crysis

8. Spore

9. Army of Two

10. TOR

Among others..

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#42 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

I don't think they're that bad. Plenty of people hate on them for making origin, but valve did the exact same thing.

Avatar image for T_REX305
T_REX305

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 T_REX305
Member since 2010 • 11304 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

this

You can't spell ignorance without ign :roll: ...

N30F3N1X

and this.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
Lets ask EA why people hate EA?
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

i'll just leave this here

-This is for buying out some of the best game companies and turning them to mediocrity.
-This is for having some of the worst customer service in the gaming industry.
-This is for deliberately holding back game content for the sole purpose of making customers pay more for it later as DLC.
-This is for strictly enforcing copyrights on content that you did not even create.
-This is for taking the Need for Speed franchise and completely ruining it.
-This is for supporting the S.O.P.A.
-This is for overworking some of your employees with no benefeits, demolishing any creative talent they have.
-This is for making terms of use that allow you to backstab your customers any time you see fit.
-This is for releasing the same things every year, an increasingly large number being the only difference.
-This is for forcing your customers to stay online to even play several games you publish at all.
-This is for backstabbing Valve, preventing the developers you publish for from releasing their games via Steam for the sole purpose of promoting your own platform.
-This is for overhyping your games and not delivering the content you promised.
-This is for increasing the funding of media review organizations to get better reviews of your games.
-This is for monopolizing the entire gaming industry and crushing all that oppose you.

Krelian-co

yup..that pretty much covers it.

and lol@ IGN for even making this article after what happened with mass effect 3

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

Don't blame EA for lackluster games blame casual gamers who accept this crap. I mean at the end of the day EA makes good games, yes they have milked some ganes just like any other company but it is you the gamer that decides if it is good or not. If it is bad then don't buy it but if you have millions purchasing it you can't hate on EA.

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#47 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

EA makes some of the worst games. They should be sued for false advertising BF3 PC footage and claiming it to be console footage. They ran Madden into the ground. The Syndicate reboot sucked. Need For Speed has sucked for years. They killed Burnout. They charge $60 for Tiger Woods and then sell you the courses for $40 extra. They introduced online passes. What is there to like about EA?JohnnyCageMK

This they are simply greedy bastards.

Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
Why? For all the reasons already posted. Battlefield 3 has to be some of the worst $50 bucks I've ever spent. Hyped to hell and back. Looks fancy, plays like crap.
Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#49 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
I only hate EA for buying up devs and ruining them. Maxis, Bioware, Origin Systems, etc.. Just a graveyard wherever they go. That's why I can't really fault EA for ruining Dead Space. EA made the studio that developed Dead Space. It's their series to screw up.
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#50 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
All gaming companies are corporations, including MS, Sony, Nintendo, Valve etc. Their ultimate goal is money - without that goal then investors would be putting their funds elsewhere. How well a gaming company can maintain its public relation depends on how well the gaming company can disguise their inevitable goal for money from the majority of its customer base. EA has failed this utterly, and indeed I'm starting to think they aren't even trying to make the impression that money isn't everything to them. I can understand them from a business point-of-view, but that doesn't mean I will like them.