IGN's Review Scale Changes

  • 130 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for danishkhan
danishkhan

1162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 danishkhan
Member since 2007 • 1162 Posts

You won't see another 7.9 on IGN.

After many long discussions (and really, this has been going on for years), we've decided to alter our review scale. From today forward, we will score games on a 20-point scale (meaning games score will be 7.0 or 7.5 or 8.0, etc.).

Link

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
Ah i see. Now we can compare GS and IGN reviews properly.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

Meh, whatever, maybe if I read IGN I would care.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#4 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
Quick, Gamespot! Go back to the .1 scale!
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

good. WTF is the difference between 7.8 and 7.9?

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
Cool, I like the .5 scale better.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#7 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts

good. WTF is the difference between 7.8 and 7.9?

argetlam00
I can think of something. Say two multiplatform games are exactly the same, but on system x, it has better load times. There you go. System x gets the 7.9 where as system y gets the 7.8.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I'm glad they're changing it. I hate when IGN and GT give games an 8.9 or 7.9. I would like to see them or GS use a .25 scale though

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

Well now they can keep spamming 9.0s.

Avatar image for GrabTheYayo
GrabTheYayo

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GrabTheYayo
Member since 2010 • 1315 Posts

good. its more cleaner like this and you dont have to stress over a 0.1 score difference

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

good. WTF is the difference between 7.8 and 7.9?

Stevo_the_gamer

I can think of something. Say two multiplatform games are exactly the same, but on system x, it has better load times. There you go. System x gets the 7.9 where as system y gets the 7.8.

You're not going to know unless you read the text though. Its a meaningless point honestly. Reviews are here to inform, 7.8 vs 7.9 tells me absolutely nothing.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
OK, IGN now give San Andreas the 10.0 is deserves, 9.9 my ***.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

I'm glad they're changing it. I hate when IGN and GT give games an 8.9 or 7.9. I would like to see them or GS use a .25 scale though

BPoole96

That's my prefered scale. Honestly though even whole point scales are fine, the text should match the score, that's what I'm more interested in.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

OK, IGN now give San Andreas the 10.0 is deserves, 9.9 my ***.FIipMode

Haha, they already said they wouldn't change any of the old scores :P

Avatar image for GrabTheYayo
GrabTheYayo

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 GrabTheYayo
Member since 2010 • 1315 Posts

OK, IGN now give San Andreas the 10.0 is deserves, 9.9 my ***.FIipMode
wait what? their changing all their old review scores?

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

noooo i hate the .5 system

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

noooo i hate the .5 system

painguy1

Why? Its much more logical honestly, the old way seemed more like they played darts to pick what score a game would get.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa

11536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
Member since 2007 • 11536 Posts

darn, i like the .1 system :(

Avatar image for Renegade_Fury
Renegade_Fury

21757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Renegade_Fury
Member since 2003 • 21757 Posts

Laaaaaaammmeeeee. I like the good old days when a .1 difference could mean everything. IGN just had to go and pull a GS. :(

Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

i guess i think .1 is too many nubers though honestly

Avatar image for Parasomniac
Parasomniac

2723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Parasomniac
Member since 2007 • 2723 Posts
IGN has to copy GS to compete
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Cool thread, I've been a bit lax on IGN's scale changes, a nice update was in order.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]OK, IGN now give San Andreas the 10.0 is deserves, 9.9 my ***.ActicEdge

Haha, they already said they wouldn't change any of the old scores :P

They should, such a good game like SA .1 short of a 10 is a crime :P.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]OK, IGN now give San Andreas the 10.0 is deserves, 9.9 my ***.GrabTheYayo

wait what? their changing all their old review scores?

No, I was kidding.
Avatar image for GulliversTravel
GulliversTravel

3110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 GulliversTravel
Member since 2009 • 3110 Posts
Theyve been doing this for a while actually, when it comes to their component scores anyway.
Avatar image for shutdown_202
shutdown_202

5649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 shutdown_202
Member since 2005 • 5649 Posts

Guess that leaves Gametrailers of the big sites that still use .1

Avatar image for GrandTheftDog
GrandTheftDog

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 GrandTheftDog
Member since 2010 • 679 Posts

Ah..

9.0= Terribad

9.5= Meh

10= Master piece.

Avatar image for DaViD_99
DaViD_99

2496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 DaViD_99
Member since 2007 • 2496 Posts
They should of went with 5 stars. No halves. Thats probably the best way.
Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts

10 point scale/5 stars with halves is the way to go. 5 point scale like GB is pushing it.

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

they also changed their news threads. when you click on news their is only 4 stories:?

as long as they didnt change it like 1up did theirs im ok lol. but i still like the old review scale

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Well looks like IGN's System Wars is going to be boring as well. :P
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#32 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Well looks like IGN's System Wars is going to be boring as well. :Ptagyhag
Was thinking the same :P
Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts
Well looks like IGN's System Wars is going to be boring as well. :Ptagyhag
does IGN have a SW?
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Well looks like IGN's System Wars is going to be boring as well. :PRespawn-d
does IGN have a SW?

No idea, but if it does, it will sure have some boring review outcomes.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#35 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts

You're not going to know unless you read the text though. Its a meaningless point honestly. Reviews are here to inform, 7.8 vs 7.9 tells me absolutely nothing.

ActicEdge

That's the idea though, the score is supposed to reflect the review itself. To know the difference between two multiplatform games, you gotta' read the review. Simple, really. It tells me what I needed to know when I read the review...

Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#36 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

Lol, who cares, it's IGN. :P

Avatar image for padaporra
padaporra

3508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 padaporra
Member since 2005 • 3508 Posts

That's the right way to score a game. There is really now way to tell the difference between a 9.1 and 8.9.
.
However, this alone won't make the reviews consistent. GS for exemple, use this scale but don't have a decent score policy.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]You're not going to know unless you read the text though. Its a meaningless point honestly. Reviews are here to inform, 7.8 vs 7.9 tells me absolutely nothing.

Stevo_the_gamer

That's the idea though, the score is supposed to reflect the review itself. To know the difference between two multiplatform games, you gotta' read the review. Simple, really. It tells me what I needed to know when I read the review...

In a sense I disagree though, once you've read the review 7.8 vs 7.9 really does mean nothing. all it essentially does is tell you, "so and so vesion is minisculy better", 5 seconds before you actually read why. I don't see that as worth all tghe other problems that come with a .1 scale. Just me though.

Avatar image for felipebo
felipebo

4170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 felipebo
Member since 2009 • 4170 Posts

Great, so now the reviews I ignore will be divisible by 5.

Avatar image for paradigm68
paradigm68

5588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 paradigm68
Member since 2003 • 5588 Posts
I prefer the .1 scale. Give the reviewer the freedom to score it how they want. Simple as that.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#41 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts

In a sense I disagree though, once you've read the review 7.8 vs 7.9 really does mean nothing. all it essentially does is tell you, "so and so vesion is minisculy better", 5 seconds before you actually read why. I don't see that as worth all tghe other problems that come with a .1 scale. Just me though.

ActicEdge

Fair enough, I suppose we shall agree to disagree here. :P

Avatar image for JonJonJohnnyJon
JonJonJohnnyJon

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 JonJonJohnnyJon
Member since 2005 • 216 Posts

I agree with the following snippets 100%:

"the criticism lives within the text (which we hope you all read) as well as the discussions that occur after the review."

"A score is not the critical impression of a game. It's actually a benchmark so gamers can easily understand in one flash the overall quality of a game."

Too often gamers don't read the review, and just use the score as a basis for whether the game is good or not (usually in inane arguments). Honestly, I'd prefer review sites with no scoring system at all (number, stars, thumbs up/down, etc.). Just give us a review from 3 different people for each game, and I would be happy. I don't read reviews to find out if a game is good (or not), I read the reviews to determine if I will like the game.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]In a sense I disagree though, once you've read the review 7.8 vs 7.9 really does mean nothing. all it essentially does is tell you, "so and so vesion is minisculy better", 5 seconds before you actually read why. I don't see that as worth all tghe other problems that come with a .1 scale. Just me though.

Stevo_the_gamer

Fair enough, I suppose we shall agree to disagree here. :P

No damn it!!!!!!!!!!!!! Accept my opinion as fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :P

Avatar image for GrabTheYayo
GrabTheYayo

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 GrabTheYayo
Member since 2010 • 1315 Posts

.5 system doesnt mean nothing if you dont use it properly. ign will be giving out alot of 9s for every game now. gametrailers hav the best reviews out of every other site imo. they know how to use that .1 system properly

Avatar image for Chiddaling
Chiddaling

9106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#45 Chiddaling
Member since 2008 • 9106 Posts
Starting with SC2 with a 9.0 :x
Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
I hate this scale. .1 is my favorite, from 1-10. I also don't like the 1-5 scale. For increments I don't mind .25
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
I prefer the .5 system, but it's not going to stop IGN from sucking. I don't see them giving 8.5's to games they really like, they will continue over rating games and dishing out the 9.0's, then they will continue horribly under rating games they don't like.

.5 system doesnt mean nothing if you dont use it properly. ign will be giving out alot of 9s for every game now. gametrailers hav the best reviews out of every other site imo. they know how to use that .1 system properly

GrabTheYayo
Gametrailers focuses too much on the negatives. Though I tend to agree with their overall scores.
Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#48 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts
Lame. Now we are going to see a ton of 9.5 games.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

noooo i hate the .5 system

ActicEdge

Why? Its much more logical honestly, the old way seemed more like they played darts to pick what score a game would get.

lol i had a feeling you would reply to my post. but to answer ur question i dont know tbh. its just personal preference. i never thought about it much.

Avatar image for Raymundo_Manuel
Raymundo_Manuel

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Raymundo_Manuel
Member since 2010 • 4641 Posts

20 point scale?


Now it's a 3 point scale (9.0-9.5-10)