I'm tired of people saying "Wait a year"

When the 360 released it was amazing right off the back. How come all the sony-ans say "wait a year"? I have a 360, and I want a PS3. But why should we have to wait a year for a system to get good. It should be like the 360, amazing at the start. Do they just mean "wait a year" and thats when the good games will come out? or what?

I wouldn't say the 360 was amazing from the start.  It had better launch titles than the ps3, but it wasn't spectacular.sonicare

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I wouldn't say the 360 was amazing from the start.  It had better launch titles than the ps3, but it wasn't spectacular.wmc540

Because all the PS3 games come out in a year.nyoroism

thats why i like to call it the wait station 3.air0123

PS3 probably had a better launch than the 360's (coming from 360 owner) I mean they didn't have many not next gen looking games at launch. Take NBA live 06, NHL 2k6, Quake 4, NBA 2k6, FIFA 06 GUN, Collage Hoops 2k6, While Madden 06 looked good it had missed so many game modes.  Same as all of the other sports games. PS3 had a lot of good looking Multi-plats games that were Ports of the nearly full 360 verisons.StarFoxCOM

When the 360 released it was amazing right off the back.

vidiofreak

[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]

When the 360 released it was amazing right off the back.

purplemidgets

When the 360 released it was amazing right off the back. How come all the sony-ans say "wait a year"? I have a 360, and I want a PS3. But why should we have to wait a year for a system to get good. It should be like the 360, amazing at the start. Do they just mean "wait a year" and thats when the good games will come out? or what?

vidiofreak

The 360 was pretty lame at the beginning. It has good games now but not from the start.Manchildshafes

[QUOTE="nyoroism"]Because all the PS3 games come out in a year.Dekuxutu

right from the start the 360 had Kameo, NFS Most wanted, Call of Duty 2, condemned and PGR3. All pretty good games. So thats why I said the 360 was good right from the start.

Tu es mas impaciente.FancyKetchup25

The 360's launch sucked.purplemidgets

The 360's launch sucked.purplemidgets

Lemmings and fanboys (to get owned) had to wait a year for the xbox360 to get gears(or dead rising). Because before that game, the xbox360 was only considered an okay console with a somewhat good library munu9

[QUOTE="Dekuxutu"][QUOTE="nyoroism"]Because all the PS3 games come out in a year.nyoroism

[QUOTE="Manchildshafes"]The 360 was pretty lame at the beginning. It has good games now but not from the start.Kayrod29

[QUOTE="nyoroism"][QUOTE="Dekuxutu"][QUOTE="nyoroism"]Because all the PS3 games come out in a year.Dekuxutu

Why wait? I'm enjoying my PS3 right now.Ibacai

I am as well, so think before ya'll post!

[QUOTE="munu9"]Lemmings and fanboys (to get owned) had to wait a year for the xbox360 to get gears(or dead rising). Because before that game, the xbox360 was only considered an okay console with a somewhat good library Mancow_wrestler

[QUOTE="purplemidgets"]The 360's launch sucked.vidiofreak

"the 360 was only considered an okay console with a somewhat good library"... why did you put it like it was a fact and not an opinion?vidiofreak

[QUOTE="wmc540"][QUOTE="sonicare"]I wouldn't say the 360 was amazing from the start.  It had better launch titles than the ps3, but it wasn't spectacular.vidiofreak

To anyone that claims the 360 did not have to wait?  WTF?  The only game that everyone talked about was COD2--which is just another WWII FPS (personally I grew tired of that genre after Medal of Honor Frontlines).  The other two that were decent was Kameo--which was way to short to warrant a puchase, and PDZ--which was decent but way overrated IMO.

Yes the 360 had to wait just like the PS3, PS2, Gamecube, Xbox, PSone, etc.  All systems start slow with a few games here and there and by its year anniversary they really start to take off. 

Look at the 360--you had to wait until March to get two games that were IMO the first ones that were actually must buys.  Which was GRAW and Oblivion.  Then months and months went by with nothing.  Then in early fall they started picking up some decent games--late fall we finally started getting some really good games-Geow, Rainbow six, Fear, etc.

Now lets look at PS3--a few decent games at launch (Resitance was superb, but I think all in all 360 had a slightly better launch with a little more of variety), now VF came out, and in March we are getting Motorstorm, Oblivion, Rainbow Six, Fear, etc.  Then look at the games coming out down the line--Lair, Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, MGS, DMC, etc.

You must wait at least a year to gauge a system.  Anyone bashing the PS3 for lack of good games will be looking awfully foolish this Fall.  Then what will they find to hate about it....but but but months and months ago there were not many games.  Give me a break!

[QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="purplemidgets"]The 360's launch sucked.purplemidgets

[QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="purplemidgets"]The 360's launch sucked.purplemidgets

[QUOTE="Dekuxutu"][QUOTE="nyoroism"][QUOTE="Dekuxutu"][QUOTE="nyoroism"]Because all the PS3 games come out in a year.Mancow_wrestler

Im confused... Why cant Call of Duty 2 and Condemned count? Both had really good reviews on the 360, and both were really good games. Just because it was on the PC doesnt mean it shouldnt be counted.vidiofreak

[QUOTE="sonicare"]I wouldn't say the 360 was amazing from the start.  It had better launch titles than the ps3, but it wasn't spectacular.wmc540

[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]Im confused... Why cant Call of Duty 2 and Condemned count? Both had really good reviews on the 360, and both were really good games. Just because it was on the PC doesnt mean it shouldnt be counted.purplemidgets