sigh............hermits are so pathetic. since when is the 360 and PS3's hardware used for anything else but gaming like pcs are?
i say again. sigh..............hermits are so pathetic.
Arch-Renegade04
I have respect for a few hermits, even though they don't play consoles they make decent points but... this is different.. "Not even in the same realm" what BS, a computer matching PS3/360 would cost alot, and you can't play the same games.. its differen't all together. Power doesn't make gaming better, it gives more option for gaming, doesn't mean PC will get the only good titles. PS3/360/REV will all have amazing titles you could NEVER play no matter how powerful your PC is.
1. There is already another thread about this. 2. This "article" is full of misinformation. 3. This "article" is based off of a Anandtech tech article that was pulled down just hours after it was posted. Anandtech has since all but denied it's existance.
[QUOTE="imtjnotu"]so the cell basically sucks Results from Folding@Home Project after the addition of PS3 CPU's absolutely prove that ridiculous statement false. So, no. The PS3 destroys the contemporary PC.
[QUOTE="the1stmoonfly"]Good find, an article from 05', nothings changed since then. DOH!VoodooHak
Seriously. When I saw that Nov 16, 2005 date on the article, I didn't even bother to read it.
Nope, me niether, lets find something from the N64 launch, maybe the TC will be dumbfounded that nobody has realised the N64 is going to be the most powerful console this gen. :lol:
Log in to comment