You'd probably like Tom more if he gave Infamous 2 what he felt it didn't deserve, right?[QUOTE="Genesis-X"][QUOTE="arbitor365"]
i want to say uncharted 3, but even if it gets the across the board 10/10s and GOTYs that uncharted 2 got, they still probably wont give it a 10/10. and if Tom Mc-bias reviews it, than it definitely wont score higher than an 8.5.
arbitor365
i would like Tom if he had a shred of objectivity and integrity in his reviews. his review for infamous 2 is so smarmy and full of spiteful nitpicking that it is clear he was biased against it from the beginning. it is one of the most misinforming, hate-filled, biased reviews in this site's history.
I have yet to come accross a single person who has played the game who shares his opinion. there is not a sane person who has played both infamous games who thinks that the second game is worse than the first.
He really does make the site look bad because once people read his review and play the game for themselves they will think
"gamespot gave "infamous" a 9/10 and "infamous 2" a 7.5/10? they clearly dont know what they are talking about."
You do know that the whole point of sequels is to improve from their predecessor? Just because it was better than Infamous, doesn't mean it should score the same or higher. You also do know that not every game starts as a 10 and gets knocked down for each fault, right? Tom probably thought the game felt like an 8, but knocked it down for reasons.
Log in to comment