SONY has once again released a masterpiece that has given gamers a reason to keep gaming.
We see time and time again with both Microsoft and Nintendo failing to capivate anyone but die-hard fanboys. Gamers were left dissatisfied with their gaming experience.
This is just more proof that SONY loves gamers so much. Yes, they want profits, but their primary goal is to ensure customer satisfaction, so they take time carefully making their games. They spent 10+ years developing The Last Guardian, because they wanted to give a worthy game to their fans. If MS or Nintendo were running TLG development, they would have released a garbage 50-score meta game to save costs. This is what separates SONY from the competition.
I don't get it? Amazon reviews for any kind of backing? LOL
You should see the reviews some people put on there, it's all just a mess about.
@stuff238: Nah, just talking about pizza is better than this thread. And you say it like you don't like pizza. Who doesn't like pizza? I don't care, more pizza for me. Pizza and Games. I just need a rat ninja sensei, and my dream would be complete.
Another Butthurt Cow. Another Butthurt Cow alt account. Another Butthurt Insecure Cow sales thread to satisfy a growing number of new Butthurt Cows.
Cows are so extremely Butthurt not even the most experienced proctologist can find a cure.
What would cows be butthurt about? Of low scoring and mediocre looking MS games? I dunno but we just got Ratched and Clank, which scored better than Quantum Break, both on MC and here. The user score is also much higher for R&C. Then we will soon get UC4, which is going to destroy QB in sales, graphics and scores as well.
So what reason do we have to be butthurt? Having better games than youdoesn't make us butthurt and usually the guy who's crying "butthurt" is the one who's actually hurt in the butt.
Defensive much? Oh never mind, you're obviously a Cow.
So now you based your gaming experience on scores and other people's perception and opinions of certain games, how sad and pathetic really. And quite typical of Cows.
Lmao, you're very likely one of those idiots who'd probably jump off a bridge face down because people told you it was the coolest & greatest feeling in the world, right? Right!
Since when has Amazon been the be all and end all of reviews and sales figures? Why do cows like to use Amazon top 100 as a sales indicator? Its not as if there aren't hundreds of other places where people buy their games/consoles from
Another Butthurt Cow. Another Butthurt Cow alt account. Another Butthurt Insecure Cow sales thread to satisfy a growing number of new Butthurt Cows.
Cows are so extremely Butthurt not even the most experienced proctologist can find a cure.
What would cows be butthurt about? Of low scoring and mediocre looking MS games? I dunno but we just got Ratched and Clank, which scored better than Quantum Break, both on MC and here. The user score is also much higher for R&C. Then we will soon get UC4, which is going to destroy QB in sales, graphics and scores as well.
So what reason do we have to be butthurt? Having better games than youdoesn't make us butthurt and usually the guy who's crying "butthurt" is the one who's actually hurt in the butt.
Defensive much? Oh never mind, you're obviously a Cow.
So now you based your gaming experience on scores and other people's perception and opinions of certain games, how sad and pathetic really. And quite typical of Cows.
Lmao, you're very likely one of those idiots who'd probably jump off a bridge face down because people told you it was the coolest & greatest feeling in the world, right? Right!
Oh forgive me for putting common sense in my comments.
So according to you it's a good idea to ignore negative feedback from multiple reviewers because "muh own experience"? Well you're moron then.
If multiple reviewers claim that Halo: MCC was a broken mess at release, then there's a pretty high chance that I shouldn't buy that game until it's fixed. If multiple reviewers claim that The Order is a boring 5 hours experience, then again, there's a good reason that I should wait until the game is in the bargain bin.
You're right though, this is typical for cows, we research what we buy, unlike you lemmonz who buy all the garbage MS farts out, no matter what, because "muh own experience".
Anyways, you're only crying about sales, graphics and scores because you're dead last. It's sad when eve Wii U games outsell Xbox One games. Heck, even the pirated cove that is PC gaming is bringing in much more sales than the Xboner.
Since when has Amazon been the be all and end all of reviews and sales figures? Why do cows like to use Amazon top 100 as a sales indicator? Its not as if there aren't hundreds of other places where people buy their games/consoles from
It seems to be able to predict the NPD results pretty accurately(over 90% of the time) and it tracks how popular something may be over a period of time. As we know Amazon has failed to predict the NPD results multiple times in the past. I don't think a lot of the people using amazon to predict how well either console is selling know that the only thing it's good for is determining the general trend of how well the consoles may be doing over a period of time, but not how well they are actually selling since it only makes up a tiny portion of the video game market.
Another Butthurt Cow. Another Butthurt Cow alt account. Another Butthurt Insecure Cow sales thread to satisfy a growing number of new Butthurt Cows.
Cows are so extremely Butthurt not even the most experienced proctologist can find a cure.
What would cows be butthurt about? Of low scoring and mediocre looking MS games? I dunno but we just got Ratched and Clank, which scored better than Quantum Break, both on MC and here. The user score is also much higher for R&C. Then we will soon get UC4, which is going to destroy QB in sales, graphics and scores as well.
So what reason do we have to be butthurt? Having better games than youdoesn't make us butthurt and usually the guy who's crying "butthurt" is the one who's actually hurt in the butt.
Defensive much? Oh never mind, you're obviously a Cow.
So now you based your gaming experience on scores and other people's perception and opinions of certain games, how sad and pathetic really. And quite typical of Cows.
Lmao, you're very likely one of those idiots who'd probably jump off a bridge face down because people told you it was the coolest & greatest feeling in the world, right? Right!
Oh forgive me for putting common sense in my comments.
So according to you it's a good idea to ignore negative feedback from multiple reviewers because "muh own experience"? Well you're moron then.
If multiple reviewers claim that Halo: MCC was a broken mess at release, then there's a pretty high chance that I shouldn't buy that game until it's fixed. If multiple reviewers claim that The Order is a boring 5 hours experience, then again, there's a good reason that I should wait until the game is in the bargain bin.
You're right though, this is typical for cows, we research what we buy, unlike you lemmonz who buy all the garbage MS farts out, no matter what, because "muh own experience".
Anyways, you're only crying about sales, graphics and scores because you're dead last. It's sad when eve Wii U games outsell Xbox One games. Heck, even the pirated cove that is PC gaming is bringing in much more sales than the Xboner.
There was NO COMMON sense in your post to begin with. And trust me, I'm not crying about anything. Some of my favorite consoles have never won a console/graphics war: (Genesis, Gamecube, OG Xbox, N64, Dreamcast, Sega Master System, every Gameboy). The person crying here are most Cows (hence the TC and this topic thread) and YOU specifically, since you became too touchy and defensive by responding to my post. LOL. You guys are so overly melodramatic drama queens, it's no wonder most cows are easy targets, since the PS2 era.
There's nothing wrong about researching or using scores on certain games to decide as a buying factor. I myself use that method as well. But I usually rent them first in order to experience first hand what the hoopla is all about rather than simply passing assumptions and judgements, or in YOUR case, talking out of my ass, based solely upon other reviewers' opinions.
The problem with your idiotic post is your assuming out of your ass about everything what the Xbox One has to offer, which according to YOU, is "all the garbage MS farts out". Or "having better games than you". Not true at all. But you're passing it as fact, which makes you and most Cows who adhere to that idiotic atittude, as major morons on these boards.
A lot of them don't seem satisfied to me, they keep spending their time in Xbox bash threads. There are many of them still frustrated for some reason. Will I become "satisfied" like that if I purchase a PS4?
Another Butthurt Cow. Another Butthurt Cow alt account. Another Butthurt Insecure Cow sales thread to satisfy a growing number of new Butthurt Cows.
Cows are so extremely Butthurt not even the most experienced proctologist can find a cure.
What would cows be butthurt about? Of low scoring and mediocre looking MS games? I dunno but we just got Ratched and Clank, which scored better than Quantum Break, both on MC and here. The user score is also much higher for R&C. Then we will soon get UC4, which is going to destroy QB in sales, graphics and scores as well.
So what reason do we have to be butthurt? Having better games than youdoesn't make us butthurt and usually the guy who's crying "butthurt" is the one who's actually hurt in the butt.
Defensive much? Oh never mind, you're obviously a Cow.
So now you based your gaming experience on scores and other people's perception and opinions of certain games, how sad and pathetic really. And quite typical of Cows.
Lmao, you're very likely one of those idiots who'd probably jump off a bridge face down because people told you it was the coolest & greatest feeling in the world, right? Right!
Oh forgive me for putting common sense in my comments.
So according to you it's a good idea to ignore negative feedback from multiple reviewers because "muh own experience"? Well you're moron then.
If multiple reviewers claim that Halo: MCC was a broken mess at release, then there's a pretty high chance that I shouldn't buy that game until it's fixed. If multiple reviewers claim that The Order is a boring 5 hours experience, then again, there's a good reason that I should wait until the game is in the bargain bin.
You're right though, this is typical for cows, we research what we buy, unlike you lemmonz who buy all the garbage MS farts out, no matter what, because "muh own experience".
Anyways, you're only crying about sales, graphics and scores because you're dead last. It's sad when eve Wii U games outsell Xbox One games. Heck, even the pirated cove that is PC gaming is bringing in much more sales than the Xboner.
There was NO COMMON sense in your post to begin with. And trust me, I'm not crying about anything. Some of my favorite consoles have never won a console/graphics war: (Genesis, Gamecube, OG Xbox, N64, Dreamcast, Sega Master System, every Gameboy). The person crying here are most Cows (hence the TC and this topic thread) and YOU specifically, since you became too touchy and defensive by responding to my post. LOL. You guys are so overly melodramatic drama queens, it's no wonder most cows are easy targets, since the PS2 era.
There's nothing wrong about researching or using scores on certain games to decide as a buying factor. I myself use that method as well. But I usually rent them first in order to experience first hand what the hoopla is all about rather than simply passing assumptions and judgements, or in YOUR case, talking out of my ass, based solely upon other reviewers' opinions.
The problem with your idiotic post is your assuming out of your ass about everything what the Xbox One has to offer, which according to YOU, is "all the garbage MS farts out". Or "having better games than you". Not true at all. But you're passing it as fact, which makes you and most Cows who adhere to that idiotic atittude, as major morons on these boards.
You make no sense whatsoever. Why would we cry? Having better games isn't really a reason to be butthurt and cry. You're the lemon who's getting shit-tier games on your cable box and then cry on these forums when people are happy with the stuff that Sony creates for us.
I wonder where all your 10/10 games, game of the year games and multiple award winning games are? Oh wait, this doesn't matter as well, right? Just like it's still fine to use AA batteries in your controllers, lmao it's 2016 FFS!
Also claiming that the OG Xbox never won a console graphics war is beyond moronic. The OG Xbox had some of the best looking games on consoles and totally crapped on the PS2 in the graphics department.
I'm sure the millions of gamers who play Xbox and Nintendo are also satisfied.
I own a Xbox One, a Wii U, and a 2DS, and I'm very happy this generation.
Does the PS4 have some games that interest me? Of course, but there is plenty to play between those three systems that it's never really an issue.
Contrary to what some fanboys would have you think, there are good games on the Xbox One and Nintendo's platforms. I have never once been unhappy with my choice of systems.
You make no sense whatsoever. Why would we cry? Having better games isn't really a reason to be butthurt and cry. You're the lemon who's getting shit-tier games on your cable box and then cry on these forums when people are happy with the stuff that Sony creates for us.
I wonder where all your 10/10 games, game of the year games and multiple award winning games are? Oh wait, this doesn't matter as well, right? Just like it's still fine to use AA batteries in your controllers, lmao it's 2016 FFS!
Also claiming that the OG Xbox never won a console graphics war is beyond moronic. The OG Xbox had some of the best looking games on consoles and totally crapped on the PS2 in the graphics department.
You ARE an IDIOT really. Especially one with reading comprehension problems.
You're still basing your gaming experience on scores. Do you not play games based on YOUR own personal experience? Can't you even think for yourself rather than relying on other reviewers telling you what games to play? LMAO
And I don't see the relevancy of AA batteries on controllers to my original post. This only solidifies your rambling stupidity. I guess you have nothing else to say.
As for the OG Xbox, no shit dummy. If you bother reading carefully, I said "CONSOLE/GRAPHICS WAR". I Grouped all the consoles all together (both powerful and weaker consoles) in one sentence, conveniently.
And LOL at 10/10 games. That just came out of your ass.
You make no sense whatsoever. Why would we cry? Having better games isn't really a reason to be butthurt and cry. You're the lemon who's getting shit-tier games on your cable box and then cry on these forums when people are happy with the stuff that Sony creates for us.
I wonder where all your 10/10 games, game of the year games and multiple award winning games are? Oh wait, this doesn't matter as well, right? Just like it's still fine to use AA batteries in your controllers, lmao it's 2016 FFS!
Also claiming that the OG Xbox never won a console graphics war is beyond moronic. The OG Xbox had some of the best looking games on consoles and totally crapped on the PS2 in the graphics department.
You ARE an IDIOT really. Especially one with reading comprehension problems.
You're still basing your gaming experience on scores. Do you not play games based on YOUR own personal experience? Can't you even think for yourself rather than relying on other reviewers telling you what games to play? LMAO
And I don't see the relevancy of AA batteries on controllers to my original post. This only solidifies your rambling stupidity. I guess you have nothing else to say.
As for the OG Xbox, no shit dummy. If you bother reading carefully, I said "CONSOLE/GRAPHICS WAR". I Grouped all the consoles all together (both powerful and weaker consoles) in one sentence, conveniently.
And LOL at 10/10 games. That just came out of your ass.
So many ad-hominem, are you upset? You claim I have reading comprehension problems , yet you're the one who's too dumb to read what I'm writing.
I'll make this easier for you since you're an illiterate cabbage eater.
Scores are a metric to measure a game's quality. These metrics are greatly in favor for Sony though, which makes you mad as a bag of shizzlebrizzles. If games flopping left and right makes you go apeshit, then why even bother with MS? Just stop crying about it. You're almost as delusional as dynamitecop. All you need are some crazy conspiracy theories and you're set to walk in his flopsteps.
You ARE an IDIOT really. Especially one with reading comprehension problems.
You're still basing your gaming experience on scores. Do you not play games based on YOUR own personal experience? Can't you even think for yourself rather than relying on other reviewers telling you what games to play? LMAO
And I don't see the relevancy of AA batteries on controllers to my original post. This only solidifies your rambling stupidity. I guess you have nothing else to say.
As for the OG Xbox, no shit dummy. If you bother reading carefully, I said "CONSOLE/GRAPHICS WAR". I Grouped all the consoles all together (both powerful and weaker consoles) in one sentence, conveniently.
And LOL at 10/10 games. That just came out of your ass.
So many ad-hominem, are you upset? You claim I have reading comprehension problems , yet you're the one who's too dumb to read what I'm writing.
I'll make this easier for you since you're an illiterate cabbage eater.
Scores are a metric to measure a game's quality. These metrics are greatly in favor for Sony though, which makes you mad as a bag of shizzlebrizzles. If games flopping left and right makes you go apeshit, then why even bother with MS? Just stop crying about it. You're almost as delusional as dynamitecop. All you need are some crazy conspiracy theories and you're set to walk in his flopsteps.
LOL, again and again, you're rambling on about Metecritic scores. Yeah I get it.
I'm not mad, trust me, lol. Again, I wasn't the one getting all EMO sensitive because I called out Cowturds getting all butthurt. I know the truth savagely hurts you since you keep bringing that up.
Scores don't mean anything to me. It doesn't even matter how higher quality they are either. As I mentioned, get this through your skull, they serve as a guide, not some mandatory rule I'd have to obey by.....something you seem to have trouble grasping into your skull. Bloodeborne, for example, is a highly rated quality game, even many of the GTA games, but those are my least favorite genres. Why would I bother buying them? Because Meta Scores says so? GTFO you deluded Robotic brainwashed melon. Another is Fallout 3, critically acclaimed game, but to me, that was garbage.
Metascores may favor sony, but again why would I care? I'm suppose to jump on the PS4 wagon because Meta says so? LOL, yeah ok. Even Halo 3 for example, was one of the best games on 360, yet it in my opinion, it had some of the worst campaigns in the series.
You ARE an IDIOT really. Especially one with reading comprehension problems.
You're still basing your gaming experience on scores. Do you not play games based on YOUR own personal experience? Can't you even think for yourself rather than relying on other reviewers telling you what games to play? LMAO
And I don't see the relevancy of AA batteries on controllers to my original post. This only solidifies your rambling stupidity. I guess you have nothing else to say.
As for the OG Xbox, no shit dummy. If you bother reading carefully, I said "CONSOLE/GRAPHICS WAR". I Grouped all the consoles all together (both powerful and weaker consoles) in one sentence, conveniently.
And LOL at 10/10 games. That just came out of your ass.
So many ad-hominem, are you upset? You claim I have reading comprehension problems , yet you're the one who's too dumb to read what I'm writing.
I'll make this easier for you since you're an illiterate cabbage eater.
Scores are a metric to measure a game's quality. These metrics are greatly in favor for Sony though, which makes you mad as a bag of shizzlebrizzles. If games flopping left and right makes you go apeshit, then why even bother with MS? Just stop crying about it. You're almost as delusional as dynamitecop. All you need are some crazy conspiracy theories and you're set to walk in his flopsteps.
LOL, again and again, you're rambling on about Metecritic scores. Yeah I get it.
I'm not mad, trust me, lol. Again, I wasn't the one getting all EMO sensitive because I called out Cowturds getting all butthurt. I know the truth savagely hurts you since you keep bringing that up.
Scores don't mean anything to me. It doesn't even matter how higher quality they are either. As I mentioned, get this through your skull, they serve as a guide, not some mandatory rule I'd have to obey by.....something you seem to have trouble grasping into your skull. Bloodeborne, for example, is a highly rated quality game, even many of the GTA games, but those are my least favorite genres. Why would I bother buying them? Because Meta Scores says so? GTFO you deluded Robotic brainwashed melon. Another is Fallout 3, critically acclaimed game, but to me, that was garbage.
Metascores may favor sony, but again why would I care? I'm suppose to jump on the PS4 wagon because Meta says so? LOL, yeah ok. Even Halo 3 for example, was one of the best games on 360, yet it in my opinion, it had some of the worst campaigns in the series.
Dyna....who?
Nice story, it's called "I lost the argument so now I am desperately deflecting", correct?
If Sony was the only one that can satisfy gamers, then you would think that all the cows on here would spend more time gaming and less time shitposting on a forum.
Ratchet & Flop and satisfy gamers in the same sentence? LOL no.
Well guys you've heard it here first, a 86 on MC is a flop. That means that every single Xbox One exclusive has flopped since there's no exclusive higher than a 86.
Ratchet & Flop and satisfy gamers in the same sentence? LOL no.
Well guys you've heard it here first, a 86 on MC is a flop. That means that every single Xbox One exclusive has flopped since there's no exclusive higher than a 86.
We heard it awhile ago. Can you believe those cows setting the standards so high? Who would have thunk it? But it makes sense I guess. We should expect nothing less than perfection. All hail the cows. We will never doubt them again.
So, we are using Amazon game reviews to show which company is satisfying gamers the most? Ok, let's see Sony match this in exclusives...
Most of these are kids games and we all know that children are easier to satisfy.
I didn't realize 4/16 = most. TIL
You might wanna think before you write a comment. 11/16 are clearly kids games, if we count Zelda as a kids game then it's 14/16 even.
11/16 / 14/16 is "most".
It's like you write a comment before actually using your brain, do you wipe your ass too before you take a dump?
I take the greatest etiquette when wiping my butthole.
But to the post above, you only quote 4 games..... Make your arguments clear, please.
Yes I only quoted one of the four pictures, because it's against the forum rules to quote half a page worth of images. You already saw the original 4 images since you've counted 16 games total though.
Log in to comment