@tormentos said:
@FastRobby said:
The difference is, on the ISS picture everything is standing still. Ryse picture everything is in movement, nice try trollmentos
Well i don't know what screen you are looking at but on the one i posted nothing is moving..hahahahaa
@delta3074 said:
No, i always said that UC3 was better looking than gears 3 but not by a groundbreaking amount and that Killzone 3 looks better than UC3 imo, you have a really bad memory dude
i suggest you go back and check my posting history
'The 2 games should not even be compare Ryse is enclosed crap which target high quality graphics over a small area,Infamous is a big ass open world game and still Infamous look better,the only think i dare say look better in Ryse is the main characters because even the enemies are not that great.'
That means nothing when we are talking about what we 'SEE with our eyes dude' like a already stated , Infamous SS i a better game in absolutely EVERY other area.
Check you posting history have you forgot you debated it with me.? Your pal Sts106mats to..
I
i don't need to dude, i remember the thread because you posted shots showing how crap Gears 3 fire effects where when viewed close up, i KNOW i stated UC3 was 'marginally' better looking than Gears 3, gears 3 had too many jaggies.
i did however state that i felt gears 3 shooting mechanics where far superior to UC3's and i stand by that statement.
If YOU check my posting history then you would see that i am telling the truth.
The only argument we had that day is because you thought it looked 'vastly' better than gears 3 and i only thought it looked 'marginally' better ,lol
Water off a ducks back anyway dude:)
Log in to comment