Infinity Ward

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ChrisSpartan117
ChrisSpartan117

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 ChrisSpartan117
Member since 2008 • 4519 Posts

The saddest thing about this is that, no matter what, the game is still going to sell like hotcakes. But at least Activision's other franchise, Guitar Hero, is finally losing steam. Now we just need COD to tank, which is likely since the next game will be set in Vietnam, and Activision will crash.

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts

you know for once i would like to see all gamers come together and come to a consensus about this issue. We have pc users that are angry (which they have the right to be). Console gamers are telling pc gamers to basically shut up.

1. If any console gamers ever even touched a pc game they would know why dedicated servers are important. Also its unacceptable to take away features and charge more for a game. no matter what platform you play on.

2. Infinity ward is becoming an arrogant developer and basically telling their pc fanbase to suck it. As a gamer i am pissed. I may not play many games on the pc but i can feel for the pc gamers that are pissed about this subject.

So as a gamer in general you should be pissed. Are we entitled to anything? Actually yes we are, we pay for the item or items that a company develops if we keep on supporting this type of BS then this will just keep on happening. If i pay more for something i expect more from what i bought. Its common sense.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

Out of all the fanboys, hermits act like they deserve everything they have gotten in the past. They don't. mgs_freak91

So like, PC gamers should actually feel great about not getting stuff they had before?

So, according to your philosophy, you buy a new car, which is more expensive than the last years' version, but it lacks a bunch of stuff which were really useful and made your driving comfort better. And you should be happy about it?

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="aldaris652"]

[QUOTE="mgs_freak91"]Downgrading from the online system for the PC to the online system of the Xbox 360 and the PS3, isn't that big. Online Systems could still be good even on the Wii. So what if you can't create your own servers? They are only doing this to fight piracy. Maybe if PC gamers didn't pirate games so much they wouldn't have done this. So really, you can go blame your friends and everyone else that plays on the PC. Don't tell me that non of your friends have never pirated a game, that would just be bull. Most PC gamers have pirated at some point in their life. mgs_freak91

It is that big, even tho i'm gonna play cod:mw2 in ps3 its just really painful to see your ignorance, matchmaking is good, dedicated servers is GREAT, i wish we could have an option to use the ps3 as a dedicated server (as i think they have it for some psp's game) but forreal man, where did they ever say they did it because of piracy, they are just being greedy **** forreal man, wake up, this gotta stop. I mean i love cod and i'm gonna pick it up, but i really feel the pain for the pc gamers, If someone told me, I had to play a counter strike match thru matchmaking with a 100ms++ ping that would just piss the **** out of me, seeing i been playing counter strike for 8 years, but anyway enough of this nonsense, they shouldn't have done that, and yes IT IS that bad.

Ok. So...do you complain when you buy any online game which doesn't have dedicated servers? I don't think so.

Their reason for doing what they have done with dedicated servers and mods...

http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2009/10/20/modern-warfare-2-dedicated-server-response.aspx

[sorry for it not being linked, I don't know how to link when quick quoting].

All IW has done is made the PC version like the console version. That is all. They are still getting the game for cheaper than the console version, in every country. I don't care about the US price, because it isn't the same as the AU price, etc. Some countries still have the same pricing as normal. Nothing to find negative. Hate your country then. I don't care. All IW did is put the "player experience above the modders and the tuners" which is ok with me. I find annoying that, at one point, SOME PC gamers complain. Cheaters here, cheaters there. Then, when a developer is trying to fix that problem, they change their mind. Pick side, and stick to it. I don't feel any "pain for the pc gamers" because I don't have to. If any of them have a console then they should be able to realise that they are still getting a lot for a lesser price.

EDIT1: Article = Linked [I wanted to say something else so I edited my post, but now I have forgotten what it was =P]

You didn't REALLY quote that garbage in Game Informer, did you?

Well then, I invite you to go to Infinity Ward's MW2 PC forum and post that, where you will be torn asunder by the same "PC fanboys" and "nerds" the GI article calls out with perfect refutations, although...

I could always give you these:

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/10/modern-warfare-2-the-case-for-the-dedicated-server.ars

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/11/pc-modern-warfare-2-its-much-worse-than-you-thought.ars

"We thought the lack of dedicated servers was bad, but now we can add the lack of console commands, the inability to have a say in who hosts the game, a lengthy pause while the game migrates to a new host if the currently selected host quits, no leaning, no option to record matches, and no way to kick or block trouble players, hackers, or cheaters.

You have to wonder if there are any actual PC gamers working at Infinity Ward, as it will be a challenge to find any member of the PC gaming community that will stand up for any of these omissions, not to mention all of them bundled together. At launch, this will be one of the most locked-down, inflexible, and gamer-unfriendly game ever created."

In brief: the removal of user-run dedicated servers collapses the mod and custom content building communities that have roosted in the PC market, it will obliterate clans, it will mark Infinity Ward as the sole content provider, it will institutionalize wasted time in matchmaking, eliminate all customization and persistence in servers, eradicate any possibility of competition online, eliminate fairness in favor of artificial matchmaking algorithms, crystallize "host advantage," "host swapping," and other connection issues, provide atrocious latencies with notoriously low commercial upstreams (worse in international markets), and force users to deal with people that cheat or otherwise misbehave online (it will be left up to VAC, which is 100% back-end with no reporting feature and notoriously unreliable).

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#56 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

The saddest thing about this is that, no matter what, the game is still going to sell like hotcakes. But at least Activision's other franchise, Guitar Hero, is finally losing steam. Now we just need COD to tank, which is likely since the next game will be set in Vietnam, and Activision will crash.

ChrisSpartan117

I'm not sure that it is. Doesn't provide specific numbers, but Guitar Hero was of some significance according to Activision's quarterly report. It's all about spinning everything to look good and ignoring the not so good though, so it's uncertain how GH5 is doing in comparison to World Tour. Are there NPD numbers to compare at least?

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
I personally think IW and Activision are trying to see fast they can get hate :PII_Seraphim_II
And how fast they can get away with it.
Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts

[QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="Danm_999"] [QUOTE="mgs_freak91"]They are only doing this to fight piracy. Danm_999

How does this fight piracy? Pirates play on cracked servers. It won't matter to them whether dedicated servers and mods are available or not. This change only affects legitimate customers. Please don't comment unless you understand what you're talking about.

No, You should take your own advice. if it were so easy to just host your own server "illegally" no PC gamer would be complaining. You can not host your own servers because the game is constantly syncing with a 3d party system for matchmaking purposes. This extra system can not be spoofed. I just love to read consolites uninformed misunderstandings of hostings and servers.

it is incredibly easy to participate on cracked servers in past Call of Duty games. Incredibly easy.

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

If it was the same as with old titles there would never be such a uproar and controversy as you cant spell PC gaming without custom settings :)

Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

you know for once i would like to see all gamers come together and come to a consensus about this issue. We have pc users that are angry (which they have the right to be). Console gamers are telling pc gamers to basically shut up.

1. If any console gamers ever even touched a pc game they would know why dedicated servers are important. Also its unacceptable to take away features and charge more for a game. no matter what platform you play on.

2. Infinity ward is becoming an arrogant developer and basically telling their pc fanbase to suck it. As a gamer i am pissed. I may not play many games on the pc but i can feel for the pc gamers that are pissed about this subject.

So as a gamer in general you should be pissed. Are we entitled to anything? Actually yes we are, we pay for the item or items that a company develops if we keep on supporting this type of BS then this will just keep on happening. If i pay more for something i expect more from what i bought. Its common sense.

njean777

Yeah this "civil" war that is happening for no logical reason is mystifying. We all have the same hobby and are consumers of the same products, yet there's this utterly baffling defense of companies' rights whilst attacking us for looking out for our rights. So bizarre.

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
There is no day one DLC. Bull**** rumor started by haters. And no they weren't really universally loved, a lot of people hated them before for MW1, they just didn't talk about it as much because there wasn't a hot topic for discussion.
Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts

All i can say is they went from being loved (when IW formed it was a bunch of people from laid off from EA) to hated because they really made some stupid mistakes regarding the PC version.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

hot114

huh...what? Don't tell me you think P2P MP makes piracy harder....come on :) The easiest to play MP with pirated copy game this year is Operation Flashpoint 2, a game without dedicated servers

Avatar image for Hickamie14
Hickamie14

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#63 Hickamie14
Member since 2007 • 1652 Posts

Wait sec, there's going to be day one DLC for MW2? WTF?

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="hot114"]

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

AdrianWerner

huh...what? Don't tell me you think P2P MP makes piracy harder....come on :) The easiest to play MP with pirated copy game this year is Operation Flashpoint 2, a game without dedicated servers

MW2 has already been pirated on the Xbox 360, it's being played prolifically and this is recognized by the 360 community, by Infinity Ward, and by Microsoft. What about P2P makes piracy more difficult than dedicated servers?
Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts

Garh. I really can't be bothered arguing this anymore.

I don't care if you don't see it the same way as me, that is perfectly fine. But most PC gamers are saying that it's even going to be a crappy game just because of those reasons. Which is just not true.

PC gamers don't want to buy because it has become to consolized, while some PS3 gamers don't want to buy it because of Activision.

PC gamers, don't buy it, this game is still going to sell a lot whether you like it or not, this game is still going to be good whether you like it or not.

To those of you who talk about prices, who here sets the value price? No one. You can't justify pricing. RRP is different in every country, different for every system and sometimes different for every store. For example. At my locak JBHIFI. COD4 AND COD5 are both $60. At my local EBGames COD4 is $99.93 and COD5 is strangely not even in stock, they aren't even selling it, other than the collectors edition. YOu can go blame retailers for giving you a high price. Whether you think the developers tell the retailers the RRP, find out what they first letter stands for.

PS3 gamers, again, cry babies. What more do I need to say.

Everyone has a problem with the companies and because they aren't going to play a good game, a great game.

MW2 comes with a single player experience, which many of you PC gamers have paid full price for, Left 4 Dead 2 is coming out to AUS at $108. People are going to buy it. I really hope every single one of you, will be here, at least those of you who live in AUS, to complain about this. Otherwise you have no point, you just keep on changing, you have no cause. FIFA 10 comes out here at $98, same as MW2, I don't see anyone complaining at that price, its the same game from previous one. With that said, their have been games without dedicated servers come out, did you all complain about them? No. Games with no online part at all, comes out at full price. Did you complain about them? No.

I'm not saying it's good that they removing features and are keeping it at the same price. But come on. You are getting a console version, with better graphics and keyboard and mouse support (as they are the better ways to play an FPS) and you are still getting it for less than the console version. Whether you think it's got lesser features than before it's cheaper that the other versions. I still see that as a good thing. Also, most of you think that gamers ALL mod and do all that stuff. They don't. Majority of them just play online, the smaller - yet quite large group - just go onto the net and download those mods, the majority of them play will play on official servers. Will this game be a heck of a lot of fun without mods? Yes. Can it do well without dedicated servers? Yes, because you have played games without them before. For some reason you are just complaining now.

Anyways. I'm not going to argue with all of you from now on, unless you say something really stupid or rude. Otherwise I have more important things to do, like study for my finals.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts
mgsfreak, do you have no clue how P2P matchmaking works and why we hate it? Maybe the issue is that you haven't been paying attention. I can sit here and talk about host advantage, commercial upload speeds, opening firewall ports, player caps....but what the hell would be the point if you don't even want to acknowledge that those reasons substantially affect the playability of multiplayer titles? Fact of the matter is your box is not meant to act as a videogame server and your internet connection isn't meant to host online games because it has crappy upload speeds. Why do you think P2P games suck so hard? Why do you think PC gamers hate them, that we're all stupid or inexperienced? I despise MGO, Uncharted 2, Rainbow Six Vegas, Call of Duty 4....I despise them precisely because of their ****ty networking.
Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts

[QUOTE="mgs_freak91"]

[QUOTE="aldaris652"]

It is that big, even tho i'm gonna play cod:mw2 in ps3 its just really painful to see your ignorance, matchmaking is good, dedicated servers is GREAT, i wish we could have an option to use the ps3 as a dedicated server (as i think they have it for some psp's game) but forreal man, where did they ever say they did it because of piracy, they are just being greedy **** forreal man, wake up, this gotta stop. I mean i love cod and i'm gonna pick it up, but i really feel the pain for the pc gamers, If someone told me, I had to play a counter strike match thru matchmaking with a 100ms++ ping that would just piss the **** out of me, seeing i been playing counter strike for 8 years, but anyway enough of this nonsense, they shouldn't have done that, and yes IT IS that bad.

Brownesque

Ok. So...do you complain when you buy any online game which doesn't have dedicated servers? I don't think so.

Their reason for doing what they have done with dedicated servers and mods...

http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2009/10/20/modern-warfare-2-dedicated-server-response.aspx

[sorry for it not being linked, I don't know how to link when quick quoting].

All IW has done is made the PC version like the console version. That is all. They are still getting the game for cheaper than the console version, in every country. I don't care about the US price, because it isn't the same as the AU price, etc. Some countries still have the same pricing as normal. Nothing to find negative. Hate your country then. I don't care. All IW did is put the "player experience above the modders and the tuners" which is ok with me. I find annoying that, at one point, SOME PC gamers complain. Cheaters here, cheaters there. Then, when a developer is trying to fix that problem, they change their mind. Pick side, and stick to it. I don't feel any "pain for the pc gamers" because I don't have to. If any of them have a console then they should be able to realise that they are still getting a lot for a lesser price.

EDIT1: Article = Linked [I wanted to say something else so I edited my post, but now I have forgotten what it was =P]

You didn't REALLY quote that garbage in Game Informer, did you?

Well then, I invite you to go to Infinity Ward's MW2 PC forum and post that, where you will be torn asunder by the same "PC fanboys" and "nerds" the GI article calls out with perfect refutations, although...

I could always give you these:

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/10/modern-warfare-2-the-case-for-the-dedicated-server.ars

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/11/pc-modern-warfare-2-its-much-worse-than-you-thought.ars

"We thought the lack of dedicated servers was bad, but now we can add the lack of console commands, the inability to have a say in who hosts the game, a lengthy pause while the game migrates to a new host if the currently selected host quits, no leaning, no option to record matches, and no way to kick or block trouble players, hackers, or cheaters.

You have to wonder if there are any actual PC gamers working at Infinity Ward, as it will be a challenge to find any member of the PC gaming community that will stand up for any of these omissions, not to mention all of them bundled together. At launch, this will be one of the most locked-down, inflexible, and gamer-unfriendly game ever created."

In brief: the removal of user-run dedicated servers collapses the mod and custom content building communities that have roosted in the PC market, it will obliterate clans, it will mark Infinity Ward as the sole content provider, it will institutionalize wasted time in matchmaking, eliminate all customization and persistence in servers, eradicate any possibility of competition online, eliminate fairness in favor of artificial matchmaking algorithms, crystallize "host advantage," "host swapping," and other connection issues, provide atrocious latencies with notoriously low commercial upstreams (worse in international markets), and force users to deal with people that cheat or otherwise misbehave online (it will be left up to VAC, which is 100% back-end with no reporting feature and notoriously unreliable).

Jason West DID say that. "We're just prioritizing the player experience above the modders and the tuners." I was giving their decision to get rid of dedicated servers and use a company run, match making system, which actually sounds a lot more pirate safe than before. I'm not saying P2P servers = more pirate proof. But I'm saying that P2P servers run by the developers and handled by them with better technology and safety checking mechanisms = less pirated players on the net. Whether you say I'm in their pockets or not, because MAYBE YOU think that pirated games should be allowed and it's only normal for some people to actually go and illegally download and play said games is acceptable, is your idea. Those links you gave me, have no signficance in proving what I was saying wrong. The only way you can do that is if you find a quote by the developers saying that fighting piracy wasn't that reason that decided to remove player run servers. I don't know why you quoted those stuff. But I think, I think, their might be a more suitable post that I gave which this could relate to. I think. Can I ask you a question? Have you played MW2 for the PC? Do you know 100% it's going to be bad, and it won't work? Do you think you are better than console gamers? That you deserve more for a lesser price, now that you are basically getting the console version. You are just a gamer. Hopefully. Not a cheater or a fanboy. I'm not saying that what IW has done is good, though, I'm not saying that PC gamers are getting less for more, because you are still get the same as console gamers, for less. You lose 4 player split-screen, but gain better graphics and better controls. They added Spec-Ops. They have a campaign. They have online. It's worth the price. Be happy, if you live in NA, that you get it for such a cheap price. I have spend $100 on a new PC game and a $120 on a PS3 game. We don't complain though. It's just how it is. I don't know. I guess I'm the only one that finds that ok. I'm not saying that IW is stupid or anything, but most people aren't even going to play it or at least purchase it because of this, at least not many people here at system wars. Which I think is foolish. It's the same as not purchasing a game because a review gave it a 7.5/10. You can't make decision from what you have heard. I guess Dragon Age Origins shouldn't be bought at all for the consoles, I mean they got rid of so much. It isn't worth the same price as any of the other console games. It should be cheaper than the PC version even! They got rid of the damn interface and put in some, mumbo jumbo crud which doesn't work at all. Just like how you assume with the new servers that IW are doing. Yet, the PS3 version, here on gamespot, got a 9.0. Wow. Must still be a great game. Nah, not going to buy it at all. Also, because Bioware did that, I don't like them anymore, they cheat us, they do stupid things. I'm not even going to buy the PC version because of them. Can you guess which two fanboys, as in gamers, I talked about at which points. Everyone complains, when sometimes you just have to accept it. Don't give me some "what if" scenario. I really don't want to hear about what if "MW3 comes out next year with no online and for $130" crap. I can do the same, with anything, their isn't any point. Anyways, you won't be seeing me on this thread again, hopefully. Good luck, either way, with what ever you want.
Avatar image for heysharpshooter
heysharpshooter

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 heysharpshooter
Member since 2009 • 6348 Posts

All this hate, and they will still make millions and millions of dollars, win all kinds of awards, and have their game played by millions of happy customers.

I think we need to put into perspective how much influence "message boards" and "forums" have in the real world. And that would be zero. Message boards are for fun, and for people who really enjoy what ever the board is about share their POV. But they have no influence on anything in the real world, so this "hate" you describe exists only on the internet, in places where most people would never look.

Avatar image for mgs_freak91
mgs_freak91

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 mgs_freak91
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]mgsfreak, do you have no clue how P2P matchmaking works and why we hate it? Maybe the issue is that you haven't been paying attention. I can sit here and talk about host advantage, commercial upload speeds, opening firewall ports, player caps....but what the hell would be the point if you don't even want to acknowledge that those reasons substantially affect the playability of multiplayer titles? Fact of the matter is your box is not meant to act as a videogame server and your internet connection isn't meant to host online games because it has crappy upload speeds. Why do you think P2P games suck so hard? Why do you think PC gamers hate them, that we're all stupid or inexperienced? I despise MGO, Uncharted 2, Rainbow Six Vegas, Call of Duty 4....I despise them precisely because of their ****ty networking.

Garh. You had to attack my knowledge, didnt you. Dedicated servers > P2P match making, I know. But seeing as we have moved away from prices, I'm going to guess, you don't have anything to say about that. Good, we can...specialize in one aspect. Wait, so COD4 had "****ty" networking, and now that MW2 is having, similar "****ty" networking you find that a negative? Again, they have a reason to do what they have done. I don't like cheaters, I would gladly give up your life, anyones life here on System Wards to get rid of cheaters. IF they are able to reduce the number of cheaters, the piraters, then I am happy. A lot of people will be happy. A lot of people don't think so negative about not have dedicated servers. Otherwise, we would have a couple of million peopel signing that petition. We don't have that though. Why. YOU despise MGO, Uncharted 2, Rainbow Six Vegas, Call of Duty 4...YOU despise them precisely because of their ****ty networking. Cool. Now. Care to prove that every other single PC gamers despises them as well? This is going to be interesting. Are you going to start some world wide survey, come on, you gotta make it interesting.
Avatar image for Mythomniac
Mythomniac

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Mythomniac
Member since 2009 • 1695 Posts
Why does everyone hate on Activision, sure it is there fault for the higher price, but the content in the PC version, and everything else in the game is all infinity ward.
Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

Players play mods, custom maps, and enjoy the broad range of customization options in COD4.

This excuse is bogus. BTW stop wall of texting me.

That you deserve more for a lesser price, now that you are basically getting the console version.

LoL, no, I think you should get some standards and stop buying a piece of **** just because it's conventional and trying to get me to eat it too.

They have a campaign.

LIEK WOW 5 AND A HALF HOURS FOR $60, SOUNDS LIKE A STEAL!

They have online

DEAR GOD THAT'S EXTRAORDINARY! Stop stealing our technology from 1999, console gamers!

have spend $100 on a new PC game and a $120 on a PS3 game. We don't complain though. It's just how it is.

You mean that's how exchange rates are? Wow, dude, that's totally bogus. I have to pay 10 million yen for a shoe, and not even a good one.

But I'm saying that P2P servers run by the developers and handled by them with better technology and safety checking mechanisms = less pirated players on the net.

P2P run servers are PEER TO PEER hence the name P2P. That means that IW doesn't have a damn thing to do with them. IW will NOT be handling cheat deflection duties, they are forwarding ALL of that responsibility to a third party called Steam, which uses a notoriously unreliable back-end cheat deflection mechanism called VAC. That's all we get. VAC. Bro.

I was giving their decision to get rid of dedicated servers and use a company run, match making system, which actually sounds a lot more pirate safe than before.

They sound that way to you? Wow, sounds airtight. If it sounds that way to you, it's probably true.

Those links you gave me, have no signficance in proving what I was saying wrong.

You claimed that they did this because of piracy. I showed you they didn't do it because of piracy. That's not just relevant, it closes the case. We're done here. Drop it.

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts
[QUOTE="mgs_freak91"][QUOTE="Brownesque"]mgsfreak, do you have no clue how P2P matchmaking works and why we hate it? Maybe the issue is that you haven't been paying attention. I can sit here and talk about host advantage, commercial upload speeds, opening firewall ports, player caps....but what the hell would be the point if you don't even want to acknowledge that those reasons substantially affect the playability of multiplayer titles? Fact of the matter is your box is not meant to act as a videogame server and your internet connection isn't meant to host online games because it has crappy upload speeds. Why do you think P2P games suck so hard? Why do you think PC gamers hate them, that we're all stupid or inexperienced? I despise MGO, Uncharted 2, Rainbow Six Vegas, Call of Duty 4....I despise them precisely because of their ****ty networking.

Garh. You had to attack my knowledge, didnt you. Dedicated servers > P2P match making, I know. But seeing as we have moved away from prices, I'm going to guess, you don't have anything to say about that. Good, we can...specialize in one aspect. Wait, so COD4 had "****ty" networking, and now that MW2 is having, similar "****ty" networking you find that a negative? Again, they have a reason to do what they have done. I don't like cheaters, I would gladly give up your life, anyones life here on System Wards to get rid of cheaters. IF they are able to reduce the number of cheaters, the piraters, then I am happy. A lot of people will be happy. A lot of people don't think so negative about not have dedicated servers. Otherwise, we would have a couple of million peopel signing that petition. We don't have that though. Why. YOU despise MGO, Uncharted 2, Rainbow Six Vegas, Call of Duty 4...YOU despise them precisely because of their ****ty networking. Cool. Now. Care to prove that every other single PC gamers despises them as well? This is going to be interesting. Are you going to start some world wide survey, come on, you gotta make it interesting.

COD4 on PS3 has ****ty networking. COD4 on PC has dedi servers, that's good. COD4 on PS3 has P2P, that sucks.
Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts

[QUOTE="hot114"]

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

AdrianWerner

huh...what? Don't tell me you think P2P MP makes piracy harder....come on :) The easiest to play MP with pirated copy game this year is Operation Flashpoint 2, a game without dedicated servers

From the anouncement article they IW/acti themselves said that the new matchmaking system was a overlapping service wich can not be worked around or spoofed because its way too elaborate so you can only play through IW's way.
Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="hot114"]

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

hot114

huh...what? Don't tell me you think P2P MP makes piracy harder....come on :) The easiest to play MP with pirated copy game this year is Operation Flashpoint 2, a game without dedicated servers

From the anouncement article they IW/acti themselves said that the new matchmaking system was a overlapping service wich can not be worked around or spoofed because its way too elaborate so you can only play through IW's way.

No, only legitimate purchasers have to play IWs way. Only people who spend their hard-earned $60 will be required to run through a carefully constructed cheese maze with traps and poor design.

IW also said nothing, absolutely nothing about piracy being the root cause of their decision behind IWnet, nor did they EVER claim that IWnet would help curb piracy. I want to see quotations and sources for your claims.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="hot114"]

I agree this was the case with previous titles but the matchmaking system that they introduced for this title will remove this "illegal" freedom.

hot114

huh...what? Don't tell me you think P2P MP makes piracy harder....come on :) The easiest to play MP with pirated copy game this year is Operation Flashpoint 2, a game without dedicated servers

From the anouncement article they IW/acti themselves said that the new matchmaking system was a overlapping service wich can not be worked around or spoofed because its way too elaborate so you can only play through IW's way.

nonsense. Every system can be bypasses, this will too. It will do nothing to hamper piracy. Not to mention that every anti-piracy measure IW.net will have could be implemented without loosing dedicated servers.

Don't let people brainwash you, IW.net has nothing to do with piracy

Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#76 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
Please use the sticky this is still a MW2 topic