[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]
whats funny is every one calling for a return of the horrible resistane 1.
resistance 1=inferior to resistance 2.
Old old ancient gameplay *who actually has an fps where you can carry about 50 tons of weapons on your person anymore* no cover system at all, very little unique forms of 2nd fire in your weapons.
crap story with uninspired acting and a main character that never speaks.
Insanely bad graphics for a ps3 game, resistance 1 actually has 2d texture bushes and tree's in it...I've actually been inside em, 2 bush textures set in a cross with a script to atuomatically turn as you look at them...ALA Mario 64.
Online=grenade matches, I never played a single match where people weren't just throwing grenades around.
resistance 2 was vastly better it was up there with what I expect ps3 graphics should be, it had a far more evolved and better story your character actually TALKS! the acting isn't bad from the other characters in the story, gameplay it is much better without the weapon wheel, and online it was vastly better specially the 8 player coop.
If resistance 3 goes back to the crappy resistance 1 format I wont be buying resistance 3.
dkjestrup
Wow. Resistance: Fall of Man was a great game, very old school in feel. Cover systems are stupid. Having crouch/prone/lean buttons is much better. You seem to be wishing for just another COD game. That's why people hated the second game, it went away from what made the first good. The whole carrying 50 tonnes of weapons thing is a joke. It's a game, not a life simulator.
Log in to comment