Is Crysis possible on PC???

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

You're kidding.

EDIT: Yeah the sig gives it away. 

It might have been funier if you didn't do the silly hermit thing and post your gaming rig specs in your sig. :roll:Hoobinator

I said the same thing to myself when i posted this. O well. Im just trying to make fun of the super uber console fanboys that think crysis would look the same on a console.

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

army-of_one

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

bleh double post

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Amigwo

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

I chuckled. >_>PannicAtack

I like your sig.

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]It might have been funier if you didn't do the silly hermit thing and post your gaming rig specs in your sig. :roll:Killfox

I said the same thing to myself when i posted this. O well. Im just trying to make fun of the super uber console fanboys that think crysis would look the same on a console.

but the ps3 has that super res of 1080p..................:shock:

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]I chuckled. >_>Killfox

I like your sig.

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]It might have been funier if you didn't do the silly hermit thing and post your gaming rig specs in your sig. :roll:daveg1

I said the same thing to myself when i posted this. O well. Im just trying to make fun of the super uber console fanboys that think crysis would look the same on a console.

but the ps3 has that super res of 1080p..................:shock:

Consoles resolutions are pathetic compared to PC resolutions. I know your joking.

[QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

I agree TC it just doesn't make sense. Who do these "hermit" fellows think they are? Just because they use big confusing terms like 'quad core' and 'ram' doesn't mean they can catch up to the powers of the Cell.

(bolded for fact)

(the cell lives on babies)

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Amigwo

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Amigwo

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

cell is more powerful but is not nearly as optimized

[QUOTE="daveg1"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]It might have been funier if you didn't do the silly hermit thing and post your gaming rig specs in your sig. :roll:Killfox

I said the same thing to myself when i posted this. O well. Im just trying to make fun of the super uber console fanboys that think crysis would look the same on a console.

but the ps3 has that super res of 1080p..................:shock:

Consoles resolutions are pathetic compared to PC resolutions. I know your joking.

yeah i know my gpu can go as high as 2560 x 1600 :D ( BFG 8800GTS oc ) :D

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

Your rig is a pentium 4. Only things that make console CPUs less powerful is their Cache and lack of execution among other things.

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Pro_wrestler

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

its not 8 core stop confusing the people oO

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Amigwo

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

No the Cell does not, clock speeds are not the most important aspect for games, anything high only helps with load times, and the cahche on the cell ... rofl.

Higher Duo's beat it, Quad Cores annihilate it. 

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

explains that the xenon and cell are both out of order cpus where as pc cpu as in order and perform much better!

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Amigwo

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

its not 8 core stop confusing the people oO

SPEs are like cores, they are able to handle instructions like the PPE at the same frequency & they have access to the memory without communicating with the PPE.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Meu2k7

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

No the Cell does not, clock speeds are not the most important aspect for games, anything high only helps with load times, and the cahche on the cell ... rofl.

Higher Duo's beat it, Quad Cores annihilate it. 

cache? intel cpus like cache you something neat? amds dont, CPUS ARE MADE DIFFERENTLY JUST CUS IT HAS MORE CACHE DOESNT MEAN ITS BETTER lol. tell me how much is a blade server vs ur xeon woodcrest or kentsfield?

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Amigwo

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

I warned you. The truth wll hurt very badly.

Problems with the Architecture
At the heart of both the Xenon and Cell processors is IBM's custom PowerPC
based core.  We've discussed this core in our previous articles, but it is
best characterized as being quite simple.  The core itself is a very narrow
2-issue in-order execution core, featuring a 64KB L1 cache (32K
instruction/32K data) and either a 1MB or 512KB L2 cache (for Xenon or Cell,
respectively).  Supporting SMT, the core can execute two threads
simultaneously similar to a Hyper Threading enabled Pentium 4.  The Xenon
CPU is made up of three of these cores, while Cell features just one.

Each individual core is extremely small, making the 3-core Xenon CPU in the
Xbox 360 smaller than a single core 90nm Pentium 4.  While we don't have
exact die sizes, we've heard that the number is around 1/2 the size of the
90nm Prescott die.

IBM's pitch to Microsoft was based on the peak theoretical floating point
performance-per-dollar that the Xenon CPU would offer, and given Microsoft's
focus on cost savings with the Xbox 360, they took the bait.

While Microsoft and Sony have been childishly playing this flops-war,
comparing the 1 TFLOPs processing power of the Xenon CPU to the 2 TFLOPs
processing power of the Cell, the real-world performance war has already
been lost.

Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4.

Originally from anandtech.com. A very reliable site. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.games.video.sony-playstation2/msg/62ff83d96ea78ea9?hl=en

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

can i see this article  lol

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

daveg1

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

explains that the xenon and cell are both out of order cpus where as pc cpu as in order and perform much better!

You mean PCs are out of order & consoles have in order operation cores.

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Amigwo

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

can i see this article  lol

I did. Its above you.

Yeah and maybe next up youll prove that the Nes can handle Wii games...Koolsen

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Amigwo

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

No the Cell does not, clock speeds are not the most important aspect for games, anything high only helps with load times, and the cahche on the cell ... rofl.

Higher Duo's beat it, Quad Cores annihilate it.

cache? intel cpus like cache you something neat? amds dont, CPUS ARE MADE DIFFERENTLY JUST CUS IT HAS MORE CACHE DOESNT MEAN ITS BETTER lol. tell me how much is a blade server vs ur xeon woodcrest or kentsfield?

Now in english please? Cache is more important than overkill clock speeds for gaming applications, by a long shot. 

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

I warned you. The truth wll hurt very badly.

Problems with the Architecture
At the heart of both the Xenon and Cell processors is IBM's custom PowerPC
based core.  We've discussed this core in our previous articles, but it is
best characterized as being quite simple.  The core itself is a very narrow
2-issue in-order execution core, featuring a 64KB L1 cache (32K
instruction/32K data) and either a 1MB or 512KB L2 cache (for Xenon or Cell,
respectively).  Supporting SMT, the core can execute two threads
simultaneously similar to a Hyper Threading enabled Pentium 4.  The Xenon
CPU is made up of three of these cores, while Cell features just one.

Each individual core is extremely small, making the 3-core Xenon CPU in the
Xbox 360 smaller than a single core 90nm Pentium 4.  While we don't have
exact die sizes, we've heard that the number is around 1/2 the size of the
90nm Prescott die.

IBM's pitch to Microsoft was based on the peak theoretical floating point
performance-per-dollar that the Xenon CPU would offer, and given Microsoft's
focus on cost savings with the Xbox 360, they took the bait.

While Microsoft and Sony have been childishly playing this flops-war,
comparing the 1 TFLOPs processing power of the Xenon CPU to the 2 TFLOPs
processing power of the Cell, the real-world performance war has already
been lost.

Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4.

Originally from anandtech.com. A very reliable site. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.games.video.sony-playstation2/msg/62ff83d96ea78ea9?hl=en

Ill post them again for you.

http://dpad.gotfrag.com/portal/story/35372/?spage=3,

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.games.video.sony-playstation2/msg/62ff83d96ea78ea9?hl=en

Problems with the Architecture
At the heart of both the Xenon and Cell processors is IBM's custom PowerPC
based core.  We've discussed this core in our previous articles, but it is
best characterized as being quite simple.  The core itself is a very narrow
2-issue in-order execution core, featuring a 64KB L1 cache (32K
instruction/32K data) and either a 1MB or 512KB L2 cache (for Xenon or Cell,
respectively).  Supporting SMT, the core can execute two threads
simultaneously similar to a Hyper Threading enabled Pentium 4.  The Xenon
CPU is made up of three of these cores, while Cell features just one.

Each individual core is extremely small, making the 3-core Xenon CPU in the
Xbox 360 smaller than a single core 90nm Pentium 4.  While we don't have
exact die sizes, we've heard that the number is around 1/2 the size of the
90nm Prescott die.

IBM's pitch to Microsoft was based on the peak theoretical floating point
performance-per-dollar that the Xenon CPU would offer, and given Microsoft's
focus on cost savings with the Xbox 360, they took the bait.

While Microsoft and Sony have been childishly playing this flops-war,
comparing the 1 TFLOPs processing power of the Xenon CPU to the 2 TFLOPs
processing power of the Cell, the real-world performance war has already
been lost.

Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4.

[QUOTE="daveg1"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Pro_wrestler

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

explains that the xenon and cell are both out of order cpus where as pc cpu as in order and perform much better!

You mean PCs are out of order & consoles have in order operation cores.

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Amigwo

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Cell > quad core.

laughs away.... 

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

Crysis is actually made for PC's not consoles

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

The thread title made me chuckle, but the content didn't.