Is Crysis possible on PC???

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Amigwo

[QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Super-Trooper

[QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Killfox

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

OMG...................................................................................for the first time stupidity has rendered me speechless............................ 

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Amigwo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

So what, the PS3 hasnt proven anything with it, all/most are small sheltered games like the Xbox360's and even fails to run as good, this Processor... if its in the PS3 ... would be a PC standard eventually but theres no inication of that? why? because whatever it excells in is irellevant or pointless, example, its so powerful yet it cant run an Operating system properly? ... yah great technology ...

Il take a Quad core over the Cell any day, at least I know im getting overkill requirments for GAMING and operating systems.

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Amigwo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

do you really think thats the same type of cell processor the PS3 uses......... 

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

cobrax75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

do you really think thats the same type of cell processor the PS3 uses......... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLte5f34ya8

[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Amigwo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

do you really think thats the same type of cell processor the PS3 uses.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLte5f34ya8

what am I supposed to be seeing?  3 PS3's working toghether to render an image that doesnt even look that good? 

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Amigwo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

Yeah when the guy says how about against quad core he tried to make something up and you can tell by the tone of his voice. He also didnt even state how much faster it was than quad core. Yet he did for 1 core and core 2 duo. Hmm I wonder why. He also says he has no comparison sheet on any of the numbers. So it seems hes trying to just make it look good. It also doesnt do general tasks well. All it has is high floating points. Also the things he is showing its running on 8 cells. It also said it could probably run on the PS3. He doesnt actually know if it can. At first he says its 8 cells then all of a sudden at the end just to make the PS3 look good he says just one cell. So which is it. 1 or 8.

In the second video the guy asked the same question yet this guy doesnt even answer it. It went and avoided the question.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

cobrax75

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

do you really think thats the same type of cell processor the PS3 uses.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLte5f34ya8

what am I supposed to be seeing?  3 PS3's working toghether to render an image that doesnt even look that good? 

"do you really think thats the same type of cell processor the PS3 uses........."

its the same cell kido.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Super-Trooper"][QUOTE="Amigwo"]

i have yet to see any hard evidence pointng to a intel quadcore being better then a cell lol. that article pretty much said bleh? they heard so and so's proformance is equal to bleh bleh, who they hear it from? who benchmarked it?

"Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4. "

Killfox

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjZk8u-frdY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_95-rmYNo

that on a intel quad is like 2-6 fps?

Yeah when the guy says how about against quad core he tried to make something up and you can tell by the tone of his voice. He also didnt even state how much faster it was than quad core. Yet he did for 1 core and core 2 duo. Hmm I wonder why. He also says he has no comparison sheet on any of the numbers. So it seems hes trying to just make it look good. It also doesnt do general tasks well. All it has is high floating points. Also the things he is showing its running on 8 cells. It also said it could probably run on the PS3. He doesnt actually know if it can. At first he says its 8 cells then all of a sudden at the end just to make the PS3 look good he says just one cell. So which is it. 1 or 8.

In the second video the guy asked the same question yet this guy doesnt even answer it. It went and avoided the question.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2anEiVHlXI

hope you understand japanese, this pretty much explains why its superior, also intel quadcore is just 2 core2duos slapped on together.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2anEiVHlXI

hope you understand japanese, this pretty much explains why its superior, also intel quadcore is just 2 core2duos slapped on together.

Amigwo

Well i guess ill have to go waste my money on learning japanese just to see that you fail.

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

Its not possible at max settings on your PC 

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

I warned you. The truth wll hurt very badly.

Problems with the Architecture
At the heart of both the Xenon and Cell processors is IBM's custom PowerPC
based core. We've discussed this core in our previous articles, but it is
best characterized as being quite simple. The core itself is a very narrow
2-issue in-order execution core, featuring a 64KB L1 cache (32K
instruction/32K data) and either a 1MB or 512KB L2 cache (for Xenon or Cell,
respectively). Supporting SMT, the core can execute two threads
simultaneously similar to a Hyper Threading enabled Pentium 4. The Xenon
CPU is made up of three of these cores, while Cell features just one.

Each individual core is extremely small, making the 3-core Xenon CPU in the
Xbox 360 smaller than a single core 90nm Pentium 4. While we don't have
exact die sizes, we've heard that the number is around 1/2 the size of the
90nm Prescott die.

IBM's pitch to Microsoft was based on the peak theoretical floating point
performance-per-dollar that the Xenon CPU would offer, and given Microsoft's
focus on cost savings with the Xbox 360, they took the bait.

While Microsoft and Sony have been childishly playing this flops-war,
comparing the 1 TFLOPs processing power of the Xenon CPU to the 2 TFLOPs
processing power of the Cell, the real-world performance war has already
been lost.

Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing. To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4.

Originally from anandtech.com. A very reliable site. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.games.video.sony-playstation2/msg/62ff83d96ea78ea9?hl=en

comparing a console CPU to a PC CPU is retarded....both are in two different situations 

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

primetime2121

Its not possible at max settings on your PC 

Heres a hint buddy. My Pc is old. Ill have over 6 grand in the summer. I not going to spend all of it but most it. Q6600, P35, 8800GTX/HD2900XT, already have 2 gigs of XMS2 ram, and a 22in chimei lcd. Ill be playing it at max. Dont worry.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

umm cell does pwn the cpus of today even ur quad, go do some research and prove me wrong lol

I warned you. The truth wll hurt very badly.

Problems with the Architecture
At the heart of both the Xenon and Cell processors is IBM's custom PowerPC
based core.  We've discussed this core in our previous articles, but it is
best characterized as being quite simple.  The core itself is a very narrow
2-issue in-order execution core, featuring a 64KB L1 cache (32K
instruction/32K data) and either a 1MB or 512KB L2 cache (for Xenon or Cell,
respectively).  Supporting SMT, the core can execute two threads
simultaneously similar to a Hyper Threading enabled Pentium 4.  The Xenon
CPU is made up of three of these cores, while Cell features just one.

Each individual core is extremely small, making the 3-core Xenon CPU in the
Xbox 360 smaller than a single core 90nm Pentium 4.  While we don't have
exact die sizes, we've heard that the number is around 1/2 the size of the
90nm Prescott die.

IBM's pitch to Microsoft was based on the peak theoretical floating point
performance-per-dollar that the Xenon CPU would offer, and given Microsoft's
focus on cost savings with the Xbox 360, they took the bait.

While Microsoft and Sony have been childishly playing this flops-war,
comparing the 1 TFLOPs processing power of the Xenon CPU to the 2 TFLOPs
processing power of the Cell, the real-world performance war has already
been lost.

Right now, from what we've heard, the real-world performance of the Xenon
CPU is about twice that of the 733MHz processor in the first Xbox.
Considering that this CPU is supposed to power the Xbox 360 for the next 4 -
5 years, it's nothing short of disappointing.  To put it in perspective,
floating point multiplies are apparently 1/3 as fast on Xenon as on a
Pentium 4.

Originally from anandtech.com. A very reliable site. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.games.video.sony-playstation2/msg/62ff83d96ea78ea9?hl=en

the core size is ownage.  there was an artical on megagames back in 05 that said if either console had gone with a p4 athlon 64 they would have had a huge andvantage.

ummm. ok. shouldnt the question be can crysis run on consoles. and the answer to that would be yes, not a direct port but crytek could tweak the engine to work on 360/ps3. hope you where being sarcastic.greeneyedmonsta

I was thinking the same thing :).

[QUOTE="primetime2121"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

Its not possible at max settings on your PC 

Heres a hint buddy. My Pc is old. Ill have over 6 grand in the summer. I not going to spend all of it but most it. Q6600, P35, 8800GTX/HD2900XT, already have 2 gigs of XMS2 ram, and a 22in chimei lcd. Ill be playing it at max. Dont worry.

thats what console fans don't get, you upgrade when you need to not when new stuff comes out.  A 8800gtx would go great in  my system to max out crysis

Here is all you need to know

Crysis can run on PC.

Crysis cant run on consoles in its current sate (Deveopler statement) IE it would require a downgrade.

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

amagad u r teh ritez111

peeceez r soooo week LOL consols r wai mor powrfil111

i meen leik peeceez cant du HD1111 ROFL 0wned peeceez ROFLROFL 

Hi, this is too killfox. What planet are you from ,i have a high end pc and it absolutly blows that mini pc (360) outa the water,my specs are (QX6700 quad core , 2x 8800gtx sli , 2 gigs 1066 mhz ram , 680I SLI mainboard , 2 raptor hard drives in raid , and "24" monitor @ 1920 by 1200 res...) So maybe on mars the consoles beat those specs but here on earth pc out classes any console and will for ever !!!

                                               nayrb !!!

                                                                  p.s crysis will be awsome on my pc!!!

 One more thing console fanboys, how do you think they make crysis ,sure isn`t on no measly console !!!

                                   nayrb!!!

                                                  (LONG LIVE THE PC ) 

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

Haze is the consoles answer to Crysis.

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

Of your course your console is cheaper, its isn't that great. 

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

xscrapzx

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

 sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

Of your course your console is cheaper, its isn't that great. 

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

xscrapzx

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

sadly only the graphics pwn consoles lol in cpu section the cell leaves ur core2duo in the dust.

ps3/360 leaves ur gaming rig in the dust :P lol

My gaming rig also cost way less than your console. Dude get it right. Quad core>Cell. Its just that simple. Their is an article that really shows how powerful console CPUs are compared to PC CPUs and they are not even close. They said that the 360s tri-core cpu is equivalent to a Pentium 4.

Of your course your console is cheaper, its isn't that great.

The pc i had two years ago was as fast as your cheapo 360 ,and the pc i own now is three times faster than my old pc !!!!

You do the math !!!

(nayrb)

How old are you 5, just read my pc`s spec`s and cower before true power !!!!!

nayrb !!

[QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Pro_wrestler

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

its not 8 core stop confusing the people oO

SPEs are like cores, they are able to handle instructions like the PPE at the same frequency & they have access to the memory without communicating with the PPE.

A core is essentially a complete CPU, an spe in the cell is like calling an ALU a core... I mean, yeah, you've got some cache in there and you can do some math, great for parralel processing, but to try and pretend that "teh cell" competes with a Core 2 Duo Quad-Core, give me a break. All those PS3 Yellow Dog builds are sure doing great on the performance benchmarks...oh...wait.

[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Pro_wrestler

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

Stop pretending like you know what you're talking about. The cell has one core and seven SPEs.

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Amigwo"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Hot_Potato

lol i know ur jking around but XDR > DDR2 ok? DDR3 > DDR2 OK? CELL does pwn QUADCORE ok? but yea 8800gtx is faster then all lol

Yeah um cell does not pwn quad core. If a simple core 2 duo can kill 360s triple core CPU. Then a quad core can completely annihilate cell.

The real Cell is much greater than Quad-core especially when they have Cell runing at 5 & 6Ghz already. Its an 8-core processor.

Stop pretending like you know what you're talking about. The cell has one core and seven SPEs.

Um there are 8 spe's..

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

Killfox

HAHA ya keep dreaming. You clearly haven't followed the game at all and you clearly don't know squat about computer hardware

Crysis looks really really awesome but i think the problem with a game like that is not alot of people have a PC that is powerful enough. Like when half-life 2 came out my pc couldnt handle it and I think half-life 2 when it came out will be like crysis when it comes outmattyomo99

The Source engine for HL2 is probably the best optimized to date, and can run very well on old hardware. It's not anyone's fault but your's that your PC was really old and crappy, or you bought a Dell or pre-built PC and expected it to run new games. Crysis is playable on 3 year old hardware, and it is using a VERY well optimized engine (especially for being in pre-alpha still), which can be maxxed out in DX9 on the higher 7 series cards amd maxxed out in DX10 on an 8800GTS. Crysis actually runs better than many games out today on aging hardware. I could say the exact same thing about the Xbox and Xbox 360 actually. I can't even RUN Halo 3 on my Xbox, WTF!

[QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC. Xenos>8800GTX. Cell>Quad core. 512mb RAM> 2Gb of XMS2 RAM. I just dont see crysis working for PC. I see all these games for 360 and PS3 that look just way to good and better looking than crysis. Which makes we wonder if its even possible on a PC. I bet its not even coming to PC but consoles. Then PC will get the port down the road. Which I know will be completely downgraded.

karmageddon2k4

HAHA ya keep dreaming. You clearly haven't followed the game at all and you clearly don't know squat about computer hardware

I guess you missed his sarcasm.......

quad core? pfft, V8 IS WHERE IT'S AT :p (8 cores, unless it wasn't already given awaya bit :P)

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/521/1/

Hi, this is too killfox. What planet are you from ,i have a high end pc and it absolutly blows that mini pc (360) outa the water,my specs are (QX6700 quad core , 2x 8800gtx sli , 2 gigs 1066 mhz ram , 680I SLI mainboard , 2 raptor hard drives in raid , and "24" monitor @ 1920 by 1200 res...) So maybe on mars the consoles beat those specs but here on earth pc out classes any console and will for ever !!!

nayrb !!!

p.s crysis will be awsome on my pc!!!

bryanpomerleau

It's called flamebait. He's only kidding, it's supposed to be funny. Lighten up.

[QUOTE="army-of_one"][QUOTE="Killfox"]

I know consoles are far superior than PC.

Killfox

LAWL!

I needed to add that in their because all people did was say how are PC going to catch up to next gen consoles. PC didnt even bother matching console specs. It went straight for the kill with 8800GTX/GTS and HD2900XT/XTX. Not to mention that Core 2 duos kill console CPUs.

CHENMING CMUI-601AEB-W Black 1.0mm SECC Server Computer Case - $50.99
BIOSTAR TForce965PT LGA 775 Intel P965 Express ATX Intel Motherboard- $51.99
Leadtek PX8800 GTS TDH 320MB Extreme GeForce 8800GTS 320MB 320-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 HDCP Video Card - $259.99*
Topower/Epower ZUMAX ZU-500W X2 500W 20/24pin ATX V2.0 Power Supply - $35.95 -
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4300 1.8GHz 800MHz 2MB LGA775 CPU, OEM - $104.00 (ResellerRatings)
ASUS Silent Square 92mm Sleeve CPU Cooler - $13.99
PNY 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 667 (PC2 5300) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory - $49.99*

SAMSUNG Black 2M Cache IDE DVD Burner With LightScribe Technology - $26.99
Maxtor DiamondMax 21 STM3320820AS 320GB 7200 RPM 8MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - $69.99
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium - $64.99
Ideazon MERC Gaming Keyboard - $17.90 (ResellerRatings)
Logitech G5 Laser Mouse PC Gaming w/ Adjustable Weights - $39.20*


Total Price: $730.02

• Chenming AE-601 full tower case (Chenming AE-601 Review)
• Intel P965: The Double Mint Twins Gone Wild
• NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS (The GeForce 8800 GTS with 320 MB memory)
• 500W power supply with +12V rails combined @ 38A (eXtreme Power Supply Calculator Lite v2.5)
  • ||More
• OC friendly E4300 processor (Intel Core 2 Duo E4300: Affordable and Highly Overclockable)
• ASUS Silent Square CPU cooler (ASUS Silent Square CPU Cooler: New Candidate for Super Cooler Title?)
• 2GB PC2 5300 memory (Intel Core 2: Is high speed memory worth its price?)
• DVD burner
• 320GB SATA II hard drive (Benchmark Results of 17 Hard Drives)
• Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium (Vista Upgrade Limitations Workaround)
• Ideazon MERC keyboard (ZBoard MERC Gaming Keyboard Review)
• Logitech G5 mouse (Logitech G5 Laser Mouse Review)