Is Halo a disgraced franchise now?

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IMAHAPYHIPPO
IMAHAPYHIPPO

4213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#52 IMAHAPYHIPPO
Member since 2004 • 4213 Posts

@FastRobby said:

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@FastRobby: They totally botched the story. So many feels with the whole Cortana storyline, but it was so poorly written. Bungie's Halos weren't legendary in the storytelling department, but at least they could write with some fucking subtext and understand how to illicit a proper emotional response. 4's writing felt very straight-to-video by comparison.

Hmm, it didn't feel like that to me at all. I liked the fact that Cortana sacrificed herself for Master Chief and the emotional way, Halo is going for. In Halo 1 for example (most fresh in memory) it was just saving the human race and being a hero, everything was properly explained why we did what, but there weren't any emotions involved.

I believe that Halo 4 was a good learning experience for 343i, and they'll go all out with Halo 5. But more importantly, they gave more body to Master Chief, it's not just a super-soldier shooting and saving the world, we are getting a better insight in his emotions towards all the things he has done, and the effects it had on his surroundings (Cortana "dying" for example). And this was just the build up to a identity crisis for the Master Chief, and I'm actually looking forward to what they'll do with this

I completely agree with you, the emotional factor in 4 was greater than any of the other entries; what I take issue with is the execution of the narrative. The reason so many people care about the story of Halo, despite it being, as you rightfully highlighted, just another game where an overpowered army dude saves the world, is how skillfully Bungie executed how they delivered that story to us.

Halo 3 was a particularly strong entry, really nailing it on the head with how the Arbiter both starts and ends the game by saying, "Were it so easy?" in vastly different contexts. It's that kind of careful writing that still has me a little teary eyed at the end of 3. Bungie's storytelling was all in the subtleties, where 343 just wanted to beat you over the head with:

"CORTANA'S FUCKING DYING." ...Ten minutes later, "DUDE, DO YOU REMEMBER CORTANA'S DYING?!?!?" ...Five seconds later, "BUT SERIOUSLY, SHE'S NOT GOING TO LIVE."

343 really threw a hail Mary in how they wanted to kick off this new Halo trilogy, but sadly, as most developers fail to do, they didn't spend the proper amount of time and money to find a writer capable of tackling such an emotional subject; most likely, one of their extremely left-brained programmers.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23838 Posts

I dunno, never thought it was all that to begin with.

I enjoyed Halo 1 and had a great time Halo 2. That was enough for me, it just wasn't appealing enough to go back for more.

I'm sure it's a decent enough franchise, but much like Uncharted, I'll never understand why it's been put so high up on a pedestal.

Avatar image for EPICCOMMANDER
EPICCOMMANDER

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By EPICCOMMANDER
Member since 2013 • 1110 Posts
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

Story has always been the strong point for Halo.

Exqueeze me? The story in every one of the games is poorly explained with no background information.

It takes an intelligent mind to understand an intelligent stori.

Wait, are you talking about the actual plot of the game? That should not be debatable: the first mission of the first damn game presents approximately 0 background information on what is happening. The entire flow of the game is also horribly non-linear with huge time skips and entirely different areas. The entire thing is a mess.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries said:

Just how bad nosedive do you think the franchise took with the disastrous launch of Master Chief Collection?

Now Halo 5 is nowhere to be found among top 10 most anticipated games anywhere, which is shocking considering Bloodborne which is a staple there, is a niche title compared to it.

Do you think Microsoft and 343 blew it for good?

Well Master Chief Collection can't have been blown with over 2 million sold with a broken launch. One way you could look at it is that 343's casual friendly Halo 4 might have caught some casuals, but looking around the net, it seems Halo fans are also buying the game anyway regardless of how they messed up.

Then you have the pre-order edition of Halo 5, including the what, $300 one, being pre-ordered with no info on what the game actually is or what's really coming in those editions. I don't know what top 10 you're looking at, but to pre-order a game edition not just the game alone, with nothing, seems rather crazy to me. Halo 5 beta seems to have gotten surprisingly good reviews as well.

I suppose if Halo 5 breaks down like MCC for 2 months instead of 10 million it will have 8 million sales I guess, because it seems like Halo is break proof. I mean, I guess if it ends up like Rougue Warrior or something it may cause disaster, but like I said, would YOU pre-order a $300 special edition without knowing specifics of what's in it OR the game?

Avatar image for Big_Pecks
Big_Pecks

5973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#56 Big_Pecks
Member since 2010 • 5973 Posts

It should be. It delivered a buggy mess that happened to be in a sea of buggy messes last year.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

Yep 343 ruined de series.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

everyone i know thought halo4 reinvigorated the franchise.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#59 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14491 Posts

Yep, the debacle of MCC has doomed the franchise for ever.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#60 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58693 Posts

While everyone is still piss-off on MCC launch but for me, I honestly got MCC mainly just for the Campaigns and the MP wasn't my intention to play it right away since I play the hell out of them in all Halo games. That said, I'm not too worry about Halo 5 since MS knows to keep an eye on 343 so they won't screw up again. Halo 5 was fun though.

Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

Umm... No. But I bet cows wish that was the case...

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180197 Posts

I think it took a dive when Bungie left. That is not to say a good game can't be made. But the good will from the original games doesn't carry over. Thus far, the games are of lesser value.

Avatar image for kratosyoloswag
KratosYOLOSwag

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63 KratosYOLOSwag
Member since 2013 • 1827 Posts

@Mkavanaugh77 said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

The MCC is still a broke piece of shit after 3 months and the player base abandoned it except the loyal pros. Halo 4 was the lowest rated and least popular game in the series. The Halo 5 beta played more like Advanced Warfare than a Halo game.

The series is done.

MS needs to make Gears their top priority now and hope Black Tusk does a good job.

Halo series has the AAA scores to prove its quality.

This series wont be done for a a while.

Killzone and Resistance might be done though.

Well, according to Gamespot, the Halo franchise is rated a 6/10. If that's what you consider quality then I respect that, some people (Playstation gamers) are used to greatness though.

Avatar image for blamix99
blamix99

2685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#65 blamix99
Member since 2011 • 2685 Posts

there has been a few 10 anticipated 2015 games on sites, Halo 5 is not in most of em anymore

Avatar image for kratosyoloswag
KratosYOLOSwag

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#66 KratosYOLOSwag
Member since 2013 • 1827 Posts

@Mkavanaugh77 said:

The collection of halo games

According to Gamespot

Halo1 is 9.7

Halo2 is 9.4

Halo3 is 9.5

halo4 is 9/10

Halo Reach 9.5

jelly much?

You bring up some good points, Halo has fallen quite low. To go from a 9.7 to a 6 franchise.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

@Mkavanaugh77: The MCC is such a mess that it left a stain on the entire franchise. Nobody trusts 343 anymore.

Avatar image for Puckhog04
Puckhog04

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Puckhog04
Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

Not at all. Love the MCC. Play it online a lot. Nice throwback game with fantastic multiplayer from all the main Halo titles. The Halo 5 beta was awesome as well. Halo is back.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#71 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42227 Posts

Not yet.

Let me note this to people who cite critic scores, just because something is still well praised, doesn't mean users will agree. Mortal Kombat in 3D, namely Deadly Alliance and Deception, got reviews in the 8.0 range, didn't stop them from being rebooted as if it was COMPLETELY panned. Same deal with Tomb Raider games starting with Legend and ending with Underworld. And for singular games, SSB Brawl got high regards by critics, but oh boy did the SSB "hardcore" SLAM that game for tripping and not being like Melee. The only way they would play Brawl is through a fan mod that requires a hacked Wii.

Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#72 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts

Not disgraced... but no where what it used to be. Milked to death. Still good, but not as "special" as it used to be.

Avatar image for notorious1234na
Notorious1234NA

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#74 Notorious1234NA
Member since 2014 • 1917 Posts

@RoboCopISJesus said:

@thegreatgeneral said:
@Suppaman100 said:

When was Halo NOT a disgrace.

Always been a mediocre shooter but since lemmings don't have anything better, they hyped it to the moon.

This, Halo was always a shit IP.

Correct on both.

lulz prob their first fps

halo 1 decent

halo 2 shit with all those bugs and hit detection

halo 3 only good one imo

never played halo 4, but lol ppl complaining about running in a FPS in 2015, welcome to the 21st century

Avatar image for EPICCOMMANDER
EPICCOMMANDER

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 EPICCOMMANDER
Member since 2013 • 1110 Posts
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

Story has always been the strong point for Halo.

Exqueeze me? The story in every one of the games is poorly explained with no background information.

It takes an intelligent mind to understand an intelligent stori.

Wait, are you talking about the actual plot of the game? That should not be debatable: the first mission of the first damn game presents approximately 0 background information on what is happening. The entire flow of the game is also horribly non-linear with huge time skips and entirely different areas. The entire thing is a mess.

K

You seem to be the high-and-mighty type. Everything I know about the first game I learned from the books, because the game simply did not explain anything.

Avatar image for edo-tensei_
Edo-Tensei_

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Edo-Tensei_
Member since 2015 • 173 Posts

Not really, but it was in the best hands when Bungi had it. Original game devs understand what the concept of a game series is better than any new team, just go ask old Rare, old Team Ninja, old square, old eidos, old blizzard, old bioware and you'll get the same answer.

Avatar image for deactivated-57d8401f17c55
deactivated-57d8401f17c55

7221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#78  Edited By deactivated-57d8401f17c55
Member since 2012 • 7221 Posts

It's dead. ODST was the last good one.

Gears still has potential though.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#79 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Yes, Halo 5 is now the last chance to redeem the series after the past few games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a30e101a977c
deactivated-5a30e101a977c

5970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5a30e101a977c
Member since 2006 • 5970 Posts

@IMAHAPYHIPPO said:

@FastRobby said:

Hmm, it didn't feel like that to me at all. I liked the fact that Cortana sacrificed herself for Master Chief and the emotional way, Halo is going for. In Halo 1 for example (most fresh in memory) it was just saving the human race and being a hero, everything was properly explained why we did what, but there weren't any emotions involved.

I believe that Halo 4 was a good learning experience for 343i, and they'll go all out with Halo 5. But more importantly, they gave more body to Master Chief, it's not just a super-soldier shooting and saving the world, we are getting a better insight in his emotions towards all the things he has done, and the effects it had on his surroundings (Cortana "dying" for example). And this was just the build up to a identity crisis for the Master Chief, and I'm actually looking forward to what they'll do with this

I completely agree with you, the emotional factor in 4 was greater than any of the other entries; what I take issue with is the execution of the narrative. The reason so many people care about the story of Halo, despite it being, as you rightfully highlighted, just another game where an overpowered army dude saves the world, is how skillfully Bungie executed how they delivered that story to us.

Halo 3 was a particularly strong entry, really nailing it on the head with how the Arbiter both starts and ends the game by saying, "Were it so easy?" in vastly different contexts. It's that kind of careful writing that still has me a little teary eyed at the end of 3. Bungie's storytelling was all in the subtleties, where 343 just wanted to beat you over the head with:

"CORTANA'S FUCKING DYING." ...Ten minutes later, "DUDE, DO YOU REMEMBER CORTANA'S DYING?!?!?" ...Five seconds later, "BUT SERIOUSLY, SHE'S NOT GOING TO LIVE."

343 really threw a hail Mary in how they wanted to kick off this new Halo trilogy, but sadly, as most developers fail to do, they didn't spend the proper amount of time and money to find a writer capable of tackling such an emotional subject; most likely, one of their extremely left-brained programmers.

Oh yeah I should've put it in a spoiler field for the people where Halo MCC is their first Halo.

You are correct that they could've done it better, the story is there, they just needed proper setting, style and tone. But they'll be spot on with Halo 5. It's been this long in development, and Microsoft is going all-in on it

Avatar image for EPICCOMMANDER
EPICCOMMANDER

1110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81  Edited By EPICCOMMANDER
Member since 2013 • 1110 Posts
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

@EPICCOMMANDER said:
@sheikhspeare said:

Story has always been the strong point for Halo.

Exqueeze me? The story in every one of the games is poorly explained with no background information.

It takes an intelligent mind to understand an intelligent stori.

Wait, are you talking about the actual plot of the game? That should not be debatable: the first mission of the first damn game presents approximately 0 background information on what is happening. The entire flow of the game is also horribly non-linear with huge time skips and entirely different areas. The entire thing is a mess.

K

You seem to be the high-and-mighty type. Everything I know about the first game I learned from the books, because the game simply did not explain anything.

I'm not the high-and-mighty type. I just settle for "to each his own" fairly easy.

I guess when I look at that brief cutscene intro in Halo 4, that should have been played before the start of Halo 1. Look me in the eye and tell me that wouldn't make it better, and explained things a little better. I also would have liked them to show the makeshift marine camp on the ring, like after Captain Keyes is rescued and before the Cartographer level there could be a brief respite level where John goes there (as he does in the book).

There is nothing wrong with the plot line of the first game, but the way it is told is unnecessarily confusing, and too reliant on dialogue (read: Cortana telling the Chief what to do at every moment).

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#82 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

MCc was a disaster, but it was just a collection. Not to downplay it but it's not the same as a brand new game failing.

Still, Halo will provably never be as popular as it was during Halo 3 era. Enthusiasm for the fps genre as a whole is going down and at this point just what's left to do? What can be done to make it fresh, exciting and new? Putting the number 5 at the end of the Halo name isn't going to do it, that's for sure.

To me it looks like 343 made the right choices with 5 in correcting some of the missteps with Reach and 4 but I'm not seeing anything else et that indicates that the series will return to the center of attention. They need to lead the way and do something exciting and new

Avatar image for legendofsense
legendofsense

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 legendofsense
Member since 2013 • 320 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries: disastrous? according to xbot Ryan Mccaffrey it is worthy of a 9gn LOL

Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
ShoTTyMcNaDeS

2784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Member since 2011 • 2784 Posts

The campaign should be amazing. I have enjoyed all of the Halo series campaigns. I am too far gone on Halo MP now though. It just feels slow and archaic compared to games like CoD and Titanfall now. Halo MP has no mercy for the casual player. The difference in skill between the best CoD players and the best Halo players is massive. If you think you can run and gun your way through a Halo match, you will quickly find yourself going 5-15 in any given match. Halo is not a game that you can just pick up and play here and there and expect success. Whereas in CoD, you can fake/luck your way into 12-6 even if you are total crap!!

I see Halo 5 as either a revitization of the franchise or the nail in the coffin for Master Chief and 343i! They need to come strong!!

Avatar image for misterpmedia
misterpmedia

6209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#85  Edited By misterpmedia
Member since 2013 • 6209 Posts

Most definitely. We'll see the full effects come Halo 5 launch.

Halo 4's population drop off and now, a crown jewelled anthology of all the past acclaimed games that brought about its significance, tarnished by shoddy outsourcing and 343i incompetence. Hell it even surpassed Drivebomb in being broken, to present.

I bet if jadedlem has posted in this thread he's mentioned and singled out cows for no real reason. What a lem.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a30e101a977c
deactivated-5a30e101a977c

5970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-5a30e101a977c
Member since 2006 • 5970 Posts

Damn, a lot of cows here trying to downplay the Halo epicness

Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#87 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13719 Posts

no, not based on one badly launched game.

Avatar image for cantloginnow
cantloginnow

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#88 cantloginnow
Member since 2013 • 381 Posts

Because an HD remake collection had MP problems Halo is disgraced?Cows try too hard.

Avatar image for cantloginnow
cantloginnow

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#89 cantloginnow
Member since 2013 • 381 Posts

@gago-gago said:

What the hell is a disgraced franchise? Lol. I think you're describing Haze, MAG, Killzone and Resistance, all Sony FPS games that never really took off into anything like Halo and I don't think Sony will ever have a shooter franchise that will reach Halo status. Sony has disgraced the shooter genre. As for the Master Chief collection, the issues were just technical issues. 343 pretty much patched them and hats off to them for trying to update classics. Just like with any remake, gameplay mechanics might not be up to par to what current gamers are use to. Remakes pretty much are aimed for those who are already fans more than trying to get new fans. I'm still waiting to see more from Halo 5 so I can't really say much. But one thing for sure, Bungie handed Halo into good hands after all the hate Destiny received.

This guy just put a frown on every Cows face.Truth hurts.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:

Not yet.

Let me note this to people who cite critic scores, just because something is still well praised, doesn't mean users will agree. Mortal Kombat in 3D, namely Deadly Alliance and Deception, got reviews in the 8.0 range, didn't stop them from being rebooted as if it was COMPLETELY panned. Same deal with Tomb Raider games starting with Legend and ending with Underworld. And for singular games, SSB Brawl got high regards by critics, but oh boy did the SSB "hardcore" SLAM that game for tripping and not being like Melee. The only way they would play Brawl is through a fan mod that requires a hacked Wii.

They weren't panned at all, They had tourneys and had legs selling really well. Both of them sold over 3 million (I think DA sold toward 5) So if they were panned that bad they would have ended up Like MK4 and Gold.

If you want to see critic scores not working look at Street fighter from 1995 till 2007.

I will say Armageddon did a little fumble, still sold million though, not much legs. So that V.s DC before the Reboot was a good way to get the Reboot to gain a boost.

Also a lot of core SSB fans just played the game you are talking about a horrid minority good lord.


Anyway Halo MCC still sold over 2 million units so I mean if Halo 5 works at least 50% better out the gate I believe people will give it legs. Longer than Halo 4? We'll see.