[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]
I don't think it's a bad thing to want to be impressed by something. Being amazed by a game is a better feeling than simply enjoying a game for me. I appreciate more rewarding, fulfilling experiences in any format (games, books, movies, etc) ... more, simply put.
But maybe I have a different understanding of "epic."
ActicEdge
Not implying its bad. More of an observation I wanted to share. Frankly I've had enough Alan Wake/Leaves/SMG is stupid/amazing thread and its either do something about it or shut up.
Anyway, for myself I love a good old epic moment but I also like something that maybe isn't earth shattering but makes me smile or think. Not necessarily makes me say "that was bad ass". But define epic for me in your terms, (not a challenge I am just curious of how you are defining it) I am interested to know.
Well, the thing about the word "epic" is that it's an overused word that has practically lost all meaning. "Epic" jokes, "epic" fight, etc. I tend to avoid the word when I can because of this, but when I find a truly impressive game I find myself wanting to call it "epic."
For me, if I consider a game to be "epic" for lack of a better word I think that is impressive in terms of story and presentation. In other words, high production values with a strong story to back them up. If the story is lacking, then the game can't be "epic" despite how many fancy cutscenes it pulls off. This is why Metal Gear Solid 2 has all sorts of fancy cutsenes, great music, etc ... but the story tries so hard to be good that it ends up creating bigger problems for itself (same with Heavy Rain, Parasite Eve 2 which I recently played, etc).
I like that you mentiont he little moments that make you smile or think. I think that's all a part of what would be an "epic" experience.
Log in to comment