Is it just me or is Reach not much better looking than Halo 3?

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#101 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="Vadamee"]Its just you. I've yet to see in-game shots from any PS3 game. All we've seen were photomode, replay, cutscene or saturated down-scaled off screens of PS3 games. Halo 3 players can capture their own screens as can Forza 3 players. The new slogan should be: PS3 graphics king, in photos only.

thats a joke right?

I believe people call it an opinion.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#102 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="Vadamee"]Its just you. I've yet to see in-game shots from any PS3 game. All we've seen were photomode, replay, cutscene or saturated down-scaled off screens of PS3 games. Halo 3 players can capture their own screens as can Forza 3 players. The new slogan should be: PS3 graphics king, in photos only.themyth01
thats a joke right?

I believe people call it an opinion.

an opinion is a personal preference.

saying that all ps3 screen shots are edited and 360 ones aren't isn't a opinion its just ignorant

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#103 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="toast_burner"] thats a joke right? toast_burner

I believe people call it an opinion.

an opinion is a personal preference.

saying that all ps3 screen shots are edited and 360 ones aren't isn't a opinion its just ignorant

Not necessarily. Depends on his frame of reference. If the only ss he's seen are from cutscenes, then he'd be right according to the set available to him. Read his second sentence.
Avatar image for Dycras
Dycras

1226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Dycras
Member since 2009 • 1226 Posts

We could say the same about gow2 and 3 :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]

[QUOTE="themyth01"] I believe people call it an opinion. themyth01

an opinion is a personal preference.

saying that all ps3 screen shots are edited and 360 ones aren't isn't a opinion its just ignorant

Not necessarily. Depends on his frame of reference. If the only ss he's seen are from cutscenes, then he'd be right according to the set available to him. Read his second sentence.

"I've yet to see in-game shots from any PS3 game" how is that not ignorance?
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#106 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts

[QUOTE="slvrraven9"][QUOTE="toast_burner"]he has a point but hes not very good at saying it.toast_burner

no he doesnt. the only people saying it will be a grphical marvel (granted there are now VERY few) do not represent the vast majority of "lems". hell even they can see what it is. hes talking about a topic thats been long since established. honestly, whos saying its a graphical marvel nowadays anyway? plus he IS bashing it, just in a very inconspicuous way. mabey you should grace the last few pages again...

that's what i meant by "hes not very good at saying it" hes correct that there's little indication that its going to be a graphical marvel. but he comes across as a complete fanboy and confuses the minority with the majority

i see what youre saying now and i agree.
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#107 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

while i see the only reason you bash halo is because your a ps3 fan

i hate it because it is the worst , most unoriginal ala perfect dark title ive played and im not buying odst , no way - 50 for a add-on , ,

silly microsoft

and i do not trust in halo reach does look just like halo 3 ,which halo 3 look just like 2 , ,

bungie just continues to disappoint i think we need a new first person shooter,

cause this halo trash is over played!

oh wait we got one , timesplitters 3 , ,

perfect dark

resistance

all these and more so theres no reason halo reach should be on any ones wish list unless their fanboys of the series and cant play anything else

heres how i rank the best fpses on a scale of 1-10 10 being worst

1-goldeneye

2 perfect dark

3 timesplitters 3

4 quantum of solace

5 resistance

6 kill zone

7 kill zone 2

8 timesplitters2

9 time crisis 4

10 -halo -thisi s the worst ever

Avatar image for beekayjay
beekayjay

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#109 beekayjay
Member since 2008 • 1732 Posts
Reach looks great. Its not going to be the best looking game on the market, but it will be up there, guaranteed. And if you really think its barely better than Halo 3, then really, just get out of here. That statement is just absolutely stupid. I own a PS3, and traditionally don't think much of Halo. But come on, Reach looks nice.
Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#110 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

is it me or is uncharted 2 not much better looking than uncharted?

is it just me or is SMG2 not much better looking than SMG?

is it just me or is crysis 2 not much better looking than crysis?

is it just me or do fanboys make worse arguments than politicians?

Avatar image for NightTerrorX99
NightTerrorX99

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 NightTerrorX99
Member since 2008 • 2399 Posts
Has the internet populace degraded to the point of calling each other animals extraneously? son i am not surprised
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#112 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

Its you. There is no denying the graphical improvement from Halo 3 to Reach. If it actually releases with the same visual fidelity of the videos, then I say it blows the Halo 3 version away! They also state that its looking better then the Alpha videos that we were seeing. So it must be you.But everyone is entitled to their own opinion and judgement, I myself however, think the game is going to look and be great.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#113 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
Reach looks great. Its not going to be the best looking game on the market, but it will be up there, guaranteed. And if you really think its barely better than Halo 3, then really, just get out of here. That statement is just absolutely stupid. I own a PS3, and traditionally don't think much of Halo. But come on, Reach looks nice.beekayjay
Well put!I have a PS3 also and I think Uncharted 1 and 2 look outstanding, but to say Halo Reach doesn't look any better than Halo 3, must need glasses.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="CwlHeddwyn"] just stop right there Cow.slvrraven9
he has a point but hes not very good at saying it.

no he doesnt. the only people saying it will be a grphical marvel (granted there are now VERY few) do not represent the vast majority of "lems". hell even they can see what it is. hes talking about a topic thats been long since established. honestly, whos saying its a graphical marvel nowadays anyway? plus he IS bashing it, just in a very inconspicuous way. mabey you should grace the last few pages again...

i'm going to say its going to be a graphics marvel, it might not have the best overall look, but its going to be looking just shy of the best looking games with huge battles and lots of boom going on.
Avatar image for shadow8585
shadow8585

2947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 shadow8585
Member since 2006 • 2947 Posts
for being in alpha build it looks considerably better. everything is more detailed, the explosions look way better, etc
Avatar image for damnyoyoyo
damnyoyoyo

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 damnyoyoyo
Member since 2010 • 83 Posts
halo isnt really relevant anymore.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

reach in alpha already looks better than halo 3. I think the people not seeing a visual difference between the two games haven't seen halo 3 enough to compare the two.

Avatar image for damnyoyoyo
damnyoyoyo

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 damnyoyoyo
Member since 2010 • 83 Posts
killzone2 has obvious halo influences such as melee with ur weapon. halo's time is pretty much over, been replaced by call of duty lol.
Avatar image for damnyoyoyo
damnyoyoyo

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 damnyoyoyo
Member since 2010 • 83 Posts
bungie arent really innovating anymore. things halo invented aim assist lame as hell matchmaking lame as hell horrible melee with ur weapon every one in the game. different weapons shoot each gun individually dual wielding. these day's halo is taking idea's from other devs and not making their own lol like gears of war type scripted kills in halo reach..or jetpacks from duke nukem 3d.
Avatar image for Superbored
Superbored

1187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Superbored
Member since 2008 • 1187 Posts

reach in alpha already looks better than halo 3. I think the people not seeing a visual difference between the two games haven't seen halo 3 enough to compare the two.

lawlessx

Stop with this "its only in alpha" argument. They said the exact same thing with Halo 3. The final build isn't going to be leaps and bounds better.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

reach in alpha already looks better than halo 3. I think the people not seeing a visual difference between the two games haven't seen halo 3 enough to compare the two.

Superbored

Stop with this "its only in alpha" argument. They said the exact same thing with Halo 3. The final build isn't going to be leaps and bounds better.

well then u havent been keeping up with the info the alpha stage has placeholders so how bout we stat **** when we get finished footage

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

reach in alpha already looks better than halo 3. I think the people not seeing a visual difference between the two games haven't seen halo 3 enough to compare the two.

Superbored

Stop with this "its only in alpha" argument. They said the exact same thing with Halo 3. The final build isn't going to be leaps and bounds better.

the alpha already looks leaps and bounds better vs halo 3, any one who says otherwise is probably just comparing the art direction and saying they're the same, no **** but no one complained about it in star wars/uncharted/gears/zelda/mario EVERY SEQUEL EVER MADE LOOKS LIKE ITS PREDECESSOR you just have to look at the details which is what makes the difference.
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#123 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts

while i see the only reason you bash halo is because your a ps3 fan

i hate it because it is the worst , most unoriginal ala perfect dark title ive played and im not buying odst , no way - 50 for a add-on , ,

silly microsoft

and i do not trust in halo reach does look just like halo 3 ,which halo 3 look just like 2 , ,

bungie just continues to disappoint i think we need a new first person shooter,

cause this halo trash is over played!

oh wait we got one , timesplitters 3 , ,

perfect dark

resistance

all these and more so theres no reason halo reach should be on any ones wish list unless their fanboys of the series and cant play anything else

heres how i rank the best fpses on a scale of 1-10 10 being worst

1-goldeneye

2 perfect dark

3 timesplitters 3

4 quantum of solace

5 resistance

6 kill zone

7 kill zone 2

8 timesplitters2

9 time crisis 4

10 -halo -thisi s the worst evermariokart64fan

:|shaking my head.....shaking my DAMN head. where do i begin to start on your epic FAIL.

well i guess technicaly i cant because its all just your opinion. probably one of the worst opinions ive read on here but it is what is is. Ive used a lotta "fail" pics in my time but i dont have an epic fail pic that described your level of "fail" bad enough.

BTW im pretty sure halo scoredhigher than most all in your lineup so by SW logic You....

Avatar image for Poostation
Poostation

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Poostation
Member since 2010 • 46 Posts

Looks like a game that will sell unlike PS3 games

Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#125 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts

halo isnt really relevant anymore.damnyoyoyo

:roll: when ANY expansion that sony owns can sell almost 5 mil copies as a standalone unit at full price.....you let me know

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="damnyoyoyo"]halo isnt really relevant anymore.slvrraven9

:roll: when ANY expansion that sony owns can sell almost 5 mil copies as a standalone unit at full price.....you let me know

One could argue odst watered down the brand. I don't know anyone outside of system wars who was happy with that purchase.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
cows are really scared of halo reach, they have to make a million threads like this, what do they think they are achieving? do they think they can convince us all not to buy halo reach because it looks no better than halo 3? do they think that reviewers are going to give the game a lower score because of these threads? get over it cows,Halo reach will outsell every ps3 exclusive this year, and will get excellent scores across the board, and it's a vast improvement in graphics over halo 3, only a blind person wouldn't see that, just compare the marines from reach to the marines from halo 3, you can clearly see the difference
Avatar image for devilsoultaker2
devilsoultaker2

904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 devilsoultaker2
Member since 2009 • 904 Posts
i smell the fear...halo reach is coming RUN, COWS...RUN
Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

/Thread. Happy??

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#130 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

/Thread. Happy??

siddhu33
watch the cows jump in here and say there is no difference between the marine in halo 3 and reach,lol
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

/Thread. Happy??

siddhu33

Hopefully they make the marines more intelligent than a can of sardines this time.

Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

[QUOTE="slvrraven9"]

[QUOTE="damnyoyoyo"]halo isnt really relevant anymore.topgunmv

:roll: when ANY expansion that sony owns can sell almost 5 mil copies as a standalone unit at full price.....you let me know

One could argue odst watered down the brand. I don't know anyone outside of system wars who was happy with that purchase.

I know I'm also using system wars, & I am a massive Halo fan, but I really did enjoy ODST. I had Halo 3, but didn't have many of the map packs, so getting the map packs as well as the ODST portion was great for me. The ODST campaign was fun, but it was firefight that disappointed me. It was by no means bad, but I love Horde mode in Gears & couldn't help but compare the two. Also, the skulls being compulsory annoyed me. I thought it was a great game.

It also gives me access to the Reach beta, & being a Halo tragic, I would have paid just for that.

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts
My 360 just RROD what do I do? I had gaylo 3 in it someone help...... Nevermind I'm goona buy a Ps3 like I should of done in the first place.iLiekSquirrels
you fail on so many levels
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

/Thread. Happy??

siddhu33

Never understand why show Keyes in there when they could have shown a regular marine. Unless.....:shock:

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#136 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts
dont get hopes up but if he returns in reach my God epic will prevail
Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#137 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="KittenWishes"]Cows are so ridiculous. Obviously haven't bothered looking at any of the tech demos or Reach Alpha footage, so why should they be able to judge what the game looks like? Master_ShakeXXX

I have watched them. Why would I start a debate like this without doing any research? Please point out these giant graphical leaps between Halo 3 and Reach. I'm dieing to see them.

Seeing how they obviously aren't jumping out at you, there's little to nothing anyone could do to change your mind. You've already made it up and there's no point in us wasting our time with you anymore. From the sounds of it, it seems as if you're merely going off of the beta multiplayer trailer and that's a big no no. Videos and screen shots from months before prove that Reach is a massive step forward in the graphics and you're just letting your blind devotion to one company determine what you see. Take off your blinders.
Avatar image for Nedemis
Nedemis

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#138 Nedemis
Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="slvrraven9"]

[QUOTE="damnyoyoyo"]halo isnt really relevant anymore.topgunmv

:roll: when ANY expansion that sony owns can sell almost 5 mil copies as a standalone unit at full price.....you let me know

One could argue odst watered down the brand. I don't know anyone outside of system wars who was happy with that purchase.

I enjoyed the single player and firefight more then anything in Halo3. Having the Halo3 MP as an added side bonus was just one more bit of goodness to the ODST package.
Avatar image for Esnedon
Esnedon

332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Esnedon
Member since 2009 • 332 Posts

Why is the Reach marine cross-eyed?

Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Reach looks like halo3 just like GoW3 looks like GoW2.

Arbiterisl33t69

Overstatment of the year. GoW3 looks almost infinitly better than GoW2, while Reach looks minimally better than Halo 3. Only the biggest lems would deny that.

So a cow's opinion is correct but a lem's opinion is blatantly wrong... :| If you're talking about graphics, Reach will look much better than Halo 3, no one's calling it a "graphical marvel" but compared to Halo 3 it's a big improvement so far. If we're talking about gameplay, Reach looks REALLY different and better than Halo 3

Every lemming in System Wars is saying it looks better then Heavy Rain and Uncharted 2. I would think that means it's a graphical marvel in their books. At least on a console.

While I don't get all the hype about Reach's graphics I certainly do see the upgrade over Halo 3...Well as much difference as you can see in a few internet vids. Games ALWAYS look different on our tv's then on our moniters...

Another thing I dont understand is all this hype over it's graphics when statistics show a large number of these lemmings don't even have an HDTV to enjoy them. Whatever though as far as I can tell when it comes to graphics GOW3>Uncharted 2>Killzone 2>GeOW2>Uncharted>GeOW>MGS4. Until new games release this is the current order...

Avatar image for siddhu33
siddhu33

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 siddhu33
Member since 2008 • 3264 Posts

More Marines from Halo:Reach

Now tell me that reach does not look better than Halo 3....

Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

More Marines from Halo:Reach

Now tell me that reach does not look better than Halo 3....

siddhu33

It's pretty easy to see that the Marines are better. But why not compare environments and everything else? No need to focus on any one thing. Anybody saying that Reach doesn't look better then Halo 3 is simply in denial.

Avatar image for marcos27pr
marcos27pr

490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 marcos27pr
Member since 2010 • 490 Posts

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

More Marines from Halo:Reach

Now tell me that reach does not look better than Halo 3....

xX-Incubus-Xx

It's pretty easy to see that the Marines are better. But why not compare environments and everything else? No need to focus on any one thing. Anybody saying that Reach doesn't look better then Halo 3 is simply in denial.

Eviriment

h3

hr

Topic Fail

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#146 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
To base my opinion from trailers that aren't best of quality would be contradicting on my behalf. Screenshots show to me that Halo Reach does look better, but not so much as to be blown away. You can compare the slight improvement to that of Gears of War and Gears of War 2. There are noticeable differences, but nothing like a jump in graphics from one generation to the other. Further note, Halo 3 was a pretty good looking game, except for some levels using next to none anti-aliasing. Aside from that, Halo 3 was a good looking game. All in all, Halo Reach does look better. Watch the ViDoc trailer and they'll mention somewhere along the lines of having a lot more polygon counts for characters, etc.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#147 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="xX-Incubus-Xx"]

[QUOTE="Arbiterisl33t69"]

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

Overstatment of the year. GoW3 looks almost infinitly better than GoW2, while Reach looks minimally better than Halo 3. Only the biggest lems would deny that.

So a cow's opinion is correct but a lem's opinion is blatantly wrong... :| If you're talking about graphics, Reach will look much better than Halo 3, no one's calling it a "graphical marvel" but compared to Halo 3 it's a big improvement so far. If we're talking about gameplay, Reach looks REALLY different and better than Halo 3

Every lemming in System Wars is saying it looks better then Heavy Rain and Uncharted 2. I would think that means it's a graphical marvel in their books. At least on a console.

While I don't get all the hype about Reach's graphics I certainly do see the upgrade over Halo 3...Well as much difference as you can see in a few internet vids. Games ALWAYS look different on our tv's then on our moniters...

Another thing I dont understand is all this hype over it's graphics when statistics show a large number of these lemmings don't even have an HDTV to enjoy them. Whatever though as far as I can tell when it comes to graphics GOW3>Uncharted 2>Killzone 2>GeOW2>Uncharted>GeOW>MGS4. Until new games release this is the current order...

put banjo ahead of gears 2, very overlooked game.
Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#148 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
[QUOTE="marcos27pr"]

[QUOTE="xX-Incubus-Xx"]

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

More Marines from Halo:Reach

Now tell me that reach does not look better than Halo 3....

It's pretty easy to see that the Marines are better. But why not compare environments and everything else? No need to focus on any one thing. Anybody saying that Reach doesn't look better then Halo 3 is simply in denial.

Eviriment

h3

hr

Topic Fail

come on HALO 3 doesn't look that bad use a better screen. I whole heartedly agree that Reach is loads better than 3 in graphics and enviroment but that screen (halo 3) is unfair to halo 3. but its nice to see the improvment in the drains
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

Not to say GOW3 looks bad but the ground textures look horrid. The detail on the rest of the terrain look good but low poly(look at the rocks), but being that they are rocks it suits it. SM was smart with the PS3, I mean how often do you see a close up of the ground? They know how to hide bad looking things, more power too them.

MC3887

i agree. its all a matter of folks here looking at things through fanboy glasses. at the end of the day, there's really not a vast difference in the 360 and PS3 capabilities.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]1. pebbles are flat when you aren't looking at them close up. 2.thats moss not grass, and when you aren't looking close up moss looks flat.... Its the side of a sheer cliff how good is it supposed to look? its the ground as in dirt...how good is it supposed too look?roddollente

this good.

and to the people who'll say these are bullshots, "hahahahah!". i sorry, this is all running in 40fps.

Reach will definitely look better than Halo 3. but not this good.

Going by what people have been saying, I was under the impression that it looked better. :?