[QUOTE="SambaLele"]no, it's not safe. In the beginning multiplats had better gfx on the 360 (in some cases, arguably, like FNR3). Now the case isn't the same anymore. Multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3 like Virtual Tennis and Oblivion. We can't know for sure wich system is better based on multiplats.
It's on the exclusives we'll see the difference.
donalbane
Oblivion wouldn't have even run if they hadn't decided to install 4.6 gigs on the HD. If the 360 had gone with a large install, the 360 version would load faster (faster even than the PS3... it's got more ram) and look better than the PS3 version. So how many huge installs can the 60 gig HD on the PS3 hold? In short: not as many as you'd like.Â
what??? do you work at bethesda? or read some interview with someone from the bethesda staff?? or any link to back what you said? because it's really sounding like an opinion, you're not providing any info that would explain why it would run faster in the 360, that the PS3's ram is problematic for the game (as you said, because it's not enough). Do you understand how development processes go? how do you deal with RAM, the real difference between faster but smaller RAM against slower but larger RAM, Unified against Dedicated? how the RSX in the PS3 can use the Cell to help, so, if the Cell is helping it, it uses it's own RAM or at least access RSX's RAM to provide the processing help. You know that the Blu-ray drive is a bit slower than DVD readers only if the case is when the DVD uses only 1 layer. If the DVD has 2 layers, the Blu-ray is way faster. And so on...
Man, you're post is totally biased, un-informed and ignorant.Â
Log in to comment