That's a factual statement right?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
if you know this then why make a thread?[QUOTE="crusadernm"]
That's a factual statement right?
Aboogie5
Lots of opinions get thrown around but not much facts. I want to know if SW can at least agree with my topic title.
well..yes MS had the chace to wipe out Sony out of the industry a coplu of years ago howeverGiancar
There's always next gen to try for that. But that's still ways off.
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
DroidPhysX
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
The position wii is in right now. I thought Sony would have that kind of marketshare. but dang Sony messed up badly.
[QUOTE="Giancar"]well..yes MS had the chace to wipe out Sony out of the industry a coplu of years ago howevercrusadernm
There's always next gen to try for that. But that's still ways off.
if Sony gets with a expensive console with bad launch games maybe, as for now it seems that Sony is regaining market shareMarketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
crusadernm
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
If you already knew this and everyone else already knew this why make the thread?[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
crusadernm
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
I think it's even more amazing that Sony has sold over 51 million PS2s since the 360 debuted.[QUOTE="crusadernm"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
Chutebox
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
If you already knew this and everyone else already knew this why make the tread?I already answered this before. third post.
[QUOTE="crusadernm"]
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
Chutebox
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
If you already knew this and everyone else already knew this why make the thread?Flame bait?
If you already knew this and everyone else already knew this why make the tread?[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="crusadernm"]
I agree. It's amazing to see them surpassed sony this gen, which I didn't even think was possible.
crusadernm
I already answered this before. third post.
But like I said, everyone else already knew this. I'm not the thread police or anything, so I was just curious.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]there's no way anyone can deny that.No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
lawlessx
Have you been on system wars. Believe me there are those that deny it.
there's no way anyone can deny that.[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
crusadernm
Have you been on system wars. Believe me there are those that deny it.
No one denies that. Who has?there's no way anyone can deny that.[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
crusadernm
Have you been on system wars. Believe me there are those that deny it.
only a brain washed fanboy would say otherwise..and i really try not to pay much attention to those type of posters. Microsoft knew the faults of the xbox and made sure to correct those errors with the 360.[QUOTE="SakusEnvoy"]I think it's even more amazing that Sony has sold over 51 million PS2s since the 360 debuted.santoron
Really? Had no idea...
I just combined the figures on SCEI's website (going back to April-June 2006 fiscal quarter [link] ), totaling 46.8 million shipments, and then subtracted the cumulative of March 31, 2006 from November 29, 2005 (103.69 - 100.01 = 3.68 million shipments [link] ). That gives ~50.48 million, and assumedly the rest of that November should bring the PS2 over 51 million.Doesn't change the PS3's poor performance, of course; if anything, it only highlights it.
Still funny to think that the second best selling console this gen is actually a last-gen console, heh.
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
santoron
This is the best answer.
Like i said. Everyone starts the Gen off with xero marketshare. You can say mindshare, yes sony has lost a bit of that but how can you have marketshare when your console is not even out yet. We might as well say that since ps2 is still selling then technically Sony still has the majority Marketshare which is not true.
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Kashiwaba
This is the best answer.
I think I'll just go by what the media, investment firms, gaming journalists, news sites, and pretty much everyone else: I'll just call it marketshare. But I'm not stopping you for thinking whatever you want.
No. That is 100% lie. -- Factual evidence supports that Sony has nothing but GAINED marketshare since the PS3 has been released, while Microsoft has nothing but LOST marketshare since the PS3 released. -- This is factual. And if your refering to the PS2, it's still selling, and gaing MORE marketshare, if your counting it in this generation's race, then Sony is in fact, winning. -- My post is nothing but facts. iWin1337
And this si somehow true too :P as what someone said in the first page market share doesn't transfer from one generation to another but still Xbox brand name gained a lot of strength this generation.
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
santoron
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Casboof
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Casboof
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
If it transferes over Sony is KILLING MS with the PS2 alone. Truth is MS has lost like over 70% of the marketshare it had at the beginning of this gen.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]there's no way anyone can deny that.http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/No matter how this gen plays out, MS certainly gained a surreal foothold for next gen, in terms of household name (xbox)
lawlessx
[QUOTE="Casboof"]
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Kashiwaba
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
You're missing the point, which is that they lost their PS2 players to MS, in that sense is how they lost market share. I'm a PS2 gamer myself and while I have both systems, I buy way more 360 games than PS3 games.[QUOTE="Casboof"]
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Kashiwaba
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
Precisely. You don't want to go down that road, Casboof. Because if you want wanna roll over totals, then MS would never crawl outta 3rd. Heck, it has a ways to go to beat Sega.
[QUOTE="Casboof"]
[QUOTE="santoron"]
Marketshare doesn't transfer from generation to generation. All consoles start at zero sales. For Sony to have lost marketshare this gen and MS to have gained it, then you'd have to show a point in this generation where Sony had more of the market and MS had less than they each have currently. Since MS had 100% of the 7th gen market for a full year, that's gonna be hard to do...
I'd say it's a fair statement that MS has been much more successful this gen than they were last gen, and Sony not nearly as successful as last gen.
Kashiwaba
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
i dont think you undertsand what market share is. Maybe on SW it resets with new console generations... but in business... market share doesnt reset. Its also measured in terms of dollars and cents and not units sold.
[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"][QUOTE="Casboof"]
No it definitely does transfer over. MS had much less of the console marketshare and they have snatched a large slice of it away from Sony who were King last gen.
themyth01
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
You're missing the point, which is that they lost their PS2 players to MS, in that sense is how they lost market share. I'm a PS2 gamer myself and while I have both systems, I buy way more 360 games than PS3 games. If Sonly lost their PS2 players to MS than MS would have 110,000 consoles sold. Just becauseSony lost achunk of their marketshare, and Xbox gained marketshare, doesn't mean they took it directly from Sony. I guarantee Sony lost the majority of its marketshare to the Wii since last gen the PS2 was the casual's console and this gen the wii is.You're missing the point, which is that they lost their PS2 players to MS, in that sense is how they lost market share. I'm a PS2 gamer myself and while I have both systems, I buy way more 360 games than PS3 games. If Sonly lost their PS2 players to MS than MS would have 110,000 consoles sold. Just becauseSony lost achunk of their marketshare, and Xbox gained marketshare, doesn't mean they took it directly from Sony. I guarantee Sony lost the majority of its marketshare to the Wii since last gen the PS2 was the casual's console and this gen the wii is. No, that would be if Sony had lost all their other PS2 players. They've lost a lot of them to both Wii and 360, point is they've lost a lot of their market. Sony screwed up big time and lost their market share with PS3 -> point.[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]
No it doesn't if it does PS3 should be at 300 mils console sold and Wii should be at about 500 mls or more.
brennan7777
I think it's safe to say that Lems are scrambling to look for silver lining after spending the entire generation talking about how well consoles and game sell rather than the quality of said consoles and games... Only to start being overtaken in the coveted sales game after all.
[QUOTE="brennan7777"]If Sonly lost their PS2 players to MS than MS would have 110,000 consoles sold. Just becauseSony lost achunk of their marketshare, and Xbox gained marketshare, doesn't mean they took it directly from Sony. I guarantee Sony lost the majority of its marketshare to the Wii since last gen the PS2 was the casual's console and this gen the wii is. No, that would be if Sony had lost all their other PS2 players. They've lost a lot of them to both Wii and 360, point is they've lost a lot of their market. Sony screwed up big time and lost their market share with PS3 -> point. See now that's not what you said at first. You were purposefully excluding the wii to promote the xbox as more relevant than it actually is. Wii won this gen. 360 performed admirably, but fell short, very short.[QUOTE="themyth01"] You're missing the point, which is that they lost their PS2 players to MS, in that sense is how they lost market share. I'm a PS2 gamer myself and while I have both systems, I buy way more 360 games than PS3 games. themyth01
[QUOTE="brennan7777"]If Sonly lost their PS2 players to MS than MS would have 110,000 consoles sold. Just becauseSony lost achunk of their marketshare, and Xbox gained marketshare, doesn't mean they took it directly from Sony. I guarantee Sony lost the majority of its marketshare to the Wii since last gen the PS2 was the casual's console and this gen the wii is. No, that would be if Sony had lost all their other PS2 players. They've lost a lot of them to both Wii and 360, point is they've lost a lot of their market. Sony screwed up big time and lost their market share with PS3 -> point. The thing is if Sony, the company, lost a lot of its PS2 audience over the last 4 years to other consoles, they also gained a lot of new ones because the PS2 has sold at least 51 million new units since this generation began.[QUOTE="themyth01"] You're missing the point, which is that they lost their PS2 players to MS, in that sense is how they lost market share. I'm a PS2 gamer myself and while I have both systems, I buy way more 360 games than PS3 games. themyth01
I realize the PS2 isn't considered a "current-gen" system, but if we're making arguments around the PS2, it's strange to act like it's been discontinued and that Sony has been relying exclusively on the PS3 in the home console market since 2006.
----
I think the best way to tell whether or not Sony failed with the PS3 is to compare it to where its predecessors were at similar points of their lifetime.
And for the PS2, about 3 years and 9 months into its lifespan, it had shipped 69.46 million units.
At about 3 years and 9 months into the PS1's lifecycle, the PS1 had shipped 43.14 million units.
The PS3 is currently sitting at 41.6 million units.
So it's quite clear the PS3 is not doing as well as the PS2 did. They have backtracked. It is doing a good job of matching up with the PS1's performance. This is rather impressive considering the PS3 has sold for twice as much throughout most of its lifetime.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment