Is Resistance 3 really really sub-hd?

[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]I think it looks great, the art style is fantastic.Stevo_the_gamer

Yeah, this looks great... on PS2. :P lol

i'm seen original xbox games that look better :lol:

First off stop beieving internet fanboy rumors, anyways I don't care either way. I mean I hear ALOT of talk about so called "sub HD" on games and I don't even notice it. Like people say Halo Reach was in sub HD but I sure as hell could't tell, same thing with Red Dead Redemption on PS3, all these fanboys were yelling about it being sub HD because it's like 10% lower resolution (the human eye can't detect that small of a difference mind you, computers can but not the naked eye).

Either way I enjoyed both games and thought the graphics were fine. I'm not interested in Resistance 3 at all but I doubt the graphic resolution will be bad oranything, of course the fanboys will say otherwise. But who really takes them seriously?

First off stop beieving internet fanboy rumors, anyways I don't care either way. I mean I hear ALOT of talk about so called "sub HD" on games and I don't even notice it. Like people say Halo Reach was in sub HD but I sure as hell could't tell, same thing with Red Dead Redemption on PS3, all these fanboys were yelling about it being sub HD because it's like 10% lower resolution (the human eye can't detect that small of a difference mind you, computers can but not the naked eye).

Either way I enjoyed both games and thought the graphics were fine. I'm not interested in Resistance 3 at all but I doubt the graphic resolution will be bad oranything, of course the fanboys will say otherwise. But who really takes them seriously?

ShadowMoses900