Is the next Xbox Microsofts last chance?

  • 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for roadkill88
roadkill88

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 roadkill88
Member since 2005 • 2313 Posts

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation. So is the 720 (If thats what its called) Microsofts last chance?

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation.

roadkill88

They outdid the PlayStation this gen.. believe it or not, the reason these companies release consoles is to make money.

Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts
If only people who post on this forum had any idea what they are talking about. MS blew Sony this gen. MS gained market share (large %) and became very profitable Sony lost market share (large %) and struggled with profitability And you are saying that MS is the one who is on their last straw? Logic isn't your strong suit huh?
Avatar image for roadkill88
roadkill88

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 roadkill88
Member since 2005 • 2313 Posts

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation.

waltefmoney

They outdid the PlayStation this gen.. believe it or not, the reason these companies release consoles is to make money.

By the time the PS4 is released the PS3 will have outsold the 360. So, another failure.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation.

roadkill88

They outdid the PlayStation this gen.. believe it or not, the reason these companies release consoles is to make money.

By the time the PS4 is released the PS3 will have outsold the 360. So, another failure.

But who made more profit from their console I wonder, just 'cause they sell more, doesn't mean they made more. Also, who cares? MS certainly doesn't, they care more about their money, and they're making that regardless of the consoles, which are just a bit of profit and advertisement for them anyway.

I highly doubt the chief executives are sitting 'round a table saying "WE HAVE TO BEAT SONY THIS GEN" I'm sure it's more like "Second Quarter profits?, excellent."

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation.

roadkill88

They outdid the PlayStation this gen.. believe it or not, the reason these companies release consoles is to make money.

By the time the PS4 is released the PS3 will have outsold the 360. So, another failure.

Does that mean it would have generated more profits for Sony than the 360 has for Microsoft? No, it doesn't.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#7 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

MS outdid Sony thid gen. 360 sold more than Xbox, is the console with the biggest library, most popular online service, more third party support and kinect is more successfull than Move. Next gen anything can happen, who would imagine that the Wii would have the success it has.

Avatar image for slipknot0129
slipknot0129

5832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 slipknot0129
Member since 2008 • 5832 Posts

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation. So is the 720 (If thats what its called) Microsofts last chance?

roadkill88

360 aint neck and neck with ps3. 360 has won this gen.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#9 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

Believe it or not, MS did pretty well this generation. Even if/when they do become 3rd, they'd still have sold over 40 million by the end of this generation. They probably don't care about what place they are and they could be 6th place or whatever in the next gen and keep on making more as long as their next console still sold like hotcakes.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="seabiscuit8686"]If only people who post on this forum had any idea what they are talking about. MS blew Sony this gen. MS gained market share (large %) and became very profitable Sony lost market share (large %) and struggled with profitability And you are saying that MS is the one who is on their last straw? Logic isn't your strong suit huh?

It wasn't that MS blew sony this gen,it was that Sony blew it which is different,$600 for a PS3 no matter how great the value was do to Blu-Ray hurt sony big time,is not so much that MS went and release first that theory is dead now,since the wii already leave the 360 in the dust,and the PS3 is basically neck and neck with it,the PS3 was to expensive,it was sony fault their down fall. If you look at the 360 it has sell 50 million double the original xbox user base,but the 360 has been alive for almost 2 years longer already,while the xbox was canned on 2005,with the high fail rate and some million of units been re-buy consoles,they win market share but not as big as some people think,the real winner was Nintendo the wii did won allot of market share of the PS2. Also becoming very profitable mean that they are taking huge profits from us,xbox live is one of the biggest money hole for us,so is mirco transactions which many times just sell stripped content from games,this is also true for the PS3 now. Who will win next one who know,it may very well be MS at last,in 2005 i am sure no one was thinking the Wii would be the market leader and that sony would loss such a big part of its market,the gen is up for grabs.
Avatar image for roadkill88
roadkill88

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 roadkill88
Member since 2005 • 2313 Posts

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

Microsoft's last chance for what exactly?

Avatar image for roadkill88
roadkill88

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 roadkill88
Member since 2005 • 2313 Posts

I'd like to make another point, the 'Cafe' will be a 'next gen' contender. So, an opponent to MS, not an irrelevant toy that doesn't steal exclusives like the Wii. They can't afford a third failure.

Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts
[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

None of what you say matters in the end, sony lost market share ,microsoft and nintendo gained marketshare. As long as microsoft make a profit they will keep making consoles
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

I'd like to make another point, the 'Cafe' will be a 'next gen' contender. So, an opponent to MS, not an irrelevant toy that doesn't steal exclusives like the Wii. They can't afford a third failure.

roadkill88

Actually, they can. As long as those failures keep generating money while Sony keeps bleeding money, it's fine.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

MS outdid Sony thid gen. 360 sold more than Xbox, is the console with the biggest library, most popular online service, more third party support and kinect is more successfull than Move. Next gen anything can happen, who would imagine that the Wii would have the success it has.

PAL360
They release first vs a $600 console so surely they have a bigger library that is natural,and they have sold more as well is natural because the PS3 debut was at $600 a year after the 360. Most popular online service i don't know last time i check MS had 12.5 million gold users,that number can be far eclipse by the PS3 free service,is not like in the old time where games on PS3 were ghost towns,now you go even on older games and there is people playing.Comparison is hard since PSN doesn't track users as xbox live does and doesn't have top 20 either. Kinect is something that sold mostly to hardcore the same hardcore that flamed the thing actually bough it,is easy to see when sales for Kinect resemble those of games like MW2 and black ops huge sales at first them a huge drop in sales,the Wii did no stop experimented a huge drop in sales just 7 months after launch,but i give you that it sold better than move,but both are gimics that don't hurt the main competition for which they were release the Wii which is the leader by far.
Avatar image for Xtatic324
Xtatic324

1340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Xtatic324
Member since 2003 • 1340 Posts

Ps3 out doing 360? Huh? When did THIS happen?

Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

roadkill88
you're the one who said "last chance", a company doesn't stop creating a product unless it becomes unproffitable and last time I checked the 360 is well ahead of the PS3 in that area so really, it seems to me you created this topic without actually thinking things trough
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

ohthemanatee
you're the one who said "last chance", a company doesn't stop creating a product unless it becomes unproffitable and last time I checked the 360 is well ahead of the PS3 in that area so really, it seems to me you created this topic without actually thinking things trough

The xbox was born in a unprofitably environment,it bleed 4 billions that would have send any other company running out of the market,been profitable or not would not stop MS they have money to burn. Which ensure the 360 successors will continue to come even if MS has nothing but losses next gen and loss the 1st spot again.
Avatar image for John_Read
John_Read

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 John_Read
Member since 2009 • 1214 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation.

roadkill88

They outdid the PlayStation this gen.. believe it or not, the reason these companies release consoles is to make money.

By the time the PS4 is released the PS3 will have outsold the 360. So, another failure.

and Wii outsold both MS and Sony has failed :P
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

Believe it or not, MS did pretty well this generation. Even if/when they do become 3rd, they'd still have sold over 40 million by the end of this generation. They probably don't care about what place they are and they could be 6th place or whatever in the next gen and keep on making more as long as their next console still sold like hotcakes.

SPYDER0416
This! People need to stop looking at the numbers and actually look at the overall context. MS have gained market share, forged strong relations with third parties and sold bucketloads. They are not on their last chance. If anything this gen has allowed them to become the massive player in the industry that they aimed for.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"][QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

tormentos

you're the one who said "last chance", a company doesn't stop creating a product unless it becomes unproffitable and last time I checked the 360 is well ahead of the PS3 in that area so really, it seems to me you created this topic without actually thinking things trough

The xbox was born in a unprofitably environment,it bleed 4 billions that would have send any other company running out of the market,been profitable or not would not stop MS they have money to burn. Which ensure the 360 successors will continue to come even if MS has nothing but losses next gen and loss the 1st spot again.

if the 360 hadn't started turning a proffit i'd say there would be serious doubts concerning the brand's future

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Considering how much market share Xbox has gained since the original Xbox Microsoft have done an AMAZING job. If that trend continues then Xbox will dominate the next generation of consoles (for core gamers at least).

Avatar image for daledoback
daledoback

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 daledoback
Member since 2011 • 148 Posts

I think the tc really meant to put Sony instead of Microsoft. Xbox Live alone is earning Microsoft HUGE profits. How is PSN doing for Sony these days?

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation. So is the 720 (If thats what its called) Microsofts last chance?

roadkill88

I think so. MS sort of lost me this gen with the 360. I bought it because of the way the original xbox was treated. I wouldn't be surprised if the next xbox arrives around the same time as Project Cafe, 6 months later at the latest. Just the whole idea of the Live Marketplace doesn't site well with me. When I look at the list of games coming out, and then even SEE the option to browse AVATAR CLOTHING? Seriously, MS has it a$$ backwards. How people defend this is beyond me.

Avatar image for Recarnator
Recarnator

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Recarnator
Member since 2008 • 229 Posts

In the biggest gaming market in the world "North America", the xbox 360 still has an healthy lead over the PS3 of almost 10 million units.

Avatar image for BigBoss255
BigBoss255

3539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 BigBoss255
Member since 2010 • 3539 Posts

In the biggest gaming market in the world "North America", the xbox 360 still has an healty lead over the PS3 of almost 10 million units.

Recarnator
That doesn't mean anything, worldwide they're almost equal and I doubt anyone is willing to bet that PS3 won't overtake 360 within the next few years. Even with Kinect's success the PS3 has been outselling the 360 worldwide.
Avatar image for BigBoss255
BigBoss255

3539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 BigBoss255
Member since 2010 • 3539 Posts

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation. So is the 720 (If thats what its called) Microsofts last chance?

slipknot0129

360 aint neck and neck with ps3. 360 has won this gen.

PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]

[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Since the PS3 and 360 are now neck and neck at a point where the PS3 has fuel/exclusives left and the 360 does not, it means this is the second time MS has failed to outdo the Playstation. So is the 720 (If thats what its called) Microsofts last chance?

BigBoss255

360 aint neck and neck with ps3. 360 has won this gen.

PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.

better exclusives is an opinion

and the 360 is still ahead.

for all intents and purposes sony is in last place, anything else is just speculation

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

I think the tc really meant to put Sony instead of Microsoft. Xbox Live alone is earning Microsoft HUGE profits. How is PSN doing for Sony these days?

daledoback
Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that. They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiasco,telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

Last chance for what? I think you've been watching the wrong generation unfold, as MS have increased their marketshare over last gen, increased their profit, created a plethora of third-party support, created an incredibly well known unified online game service and have had a large number of high-rated games released on their console.

Avatar image for Recarnator
Recarnator

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Recarnator
Member since 2008 • 229 Posts

[QUOTE="Recarnator"]

In the biggest gaming market in the world "North America", the xbox 360 still has an healty lead over the PS3 of almost 10 million units.

BigBoss255

That doesn't mean anything, worldwide they're almost equal and I doubt anyone is willing to bet that PS3 won't overtake 360 within the next few years. Even with Kinect's success the PS3 has been outselling the 360 worldwide.

Look at the games sales, the biggest multiplatform games always sells better on the xbox 360. So far LA Noire, brink and Portal are selling better on the x360, even thought they perform better on the ps3. So it's clearly means A LOT leading in the biggest market in world.

Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that.tormentos

so did sony

They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiascotormentos

again the same applies for sony

telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.tormentos

again sony did similar things, like selling you a 600 dollar console for no other reason then to shove blu-ray down your throat and then downright removing features from their consoles like backwards compatibility

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="slipknot0129"]360 aint neck and neck with ps3. 360 has won this gen.

ohthemanatee

PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.

better exclusives is an opinion

and the 360 is still ahead.

for all intents and purposes sony is in last place, anything else is just speculation

The 360 has more games no one should debate that,more quality now is debatable since is preference.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.tormentos

better exclusives is an opinion

and the 360 is still ahead.

for all intents and purposes sony is in last place, anything else is just speculation

The 360 has more games no one should debate that,more quality now is debatable since is preference.

I agree

Avatar image for daledoback
daledoback

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 daledoback
Member since 2011 • 148 Posts

[QUOTE="daledoback"]

I think the tc really meant to put Sony instead of Microsoft. Xbox Live alone is earning Microsoft HUGE profits. How is PSN doing for Sony these days?

tormentos

Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that. They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiasco,telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.

Typical response. First off, my pocket doesn't bleed paying for Xbox Live. If YOURS does then maybe you should consider finding a less expensive hobby. Second, spoken like a politician, you are avoiding the real question here...HOW IS PSN DOING FOR SONY FINANCIALLY?

I find it hilarious you are complaining about Microsoft overcharging when the PS3 launched at $600 and people were told "find a second job" from Sony themselves. But I digress, and again ask, what has PSN done for Sony financially?

Avatar image for Recarnator
Recarnator

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Recarnator
Member since 2008 • 229 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="daledoback"]

I think the tc really meant to put Sony instead of Microsoft. Xbox Live alone is earning Microsoft HUGE profits. How is PSN doing for Sony these days?

daledoback

Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that. They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiasco,telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.

Typical response. First off, my pocket doesn't bleed paying for Xbox Live. If YOURS does then maybe you should consider finding a less expensive hobby. Second, spoken like a politician, you are avoiding the real question here...HOW IS PSN DOING FOR SONY FINANCIALLY?

I find it hilarious you are complaining about Microsoft overcharging when the PS3 launched at $600 and people were told "find a second job" from Sony themselves. But I digress, and again ask, what has PSN done for Sony financially?

Let me answer that for you, PSN HAS DONE NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING financially for Sony. Oh it has cost them pretty penny though after the hack fiasco.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts

The OP's logic seems to be based off of ignoring reality. Fail by default.

If only people who post on this forum had any idea what they are talking about. MS blew Sony this gen. MS gained market share (large %) and became very profitable Sony lost market share (large %) and struggled with profitability And you are saying that MS is the one who is on their last straw? Logic isn't your strong suit huh?seabiscuit8686
Lol

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]so did sony again the same applies for sony again sony did similar things, like selling you a 600 dollar console for no other reason then to shove blu-ray down your throat

The PS3 use a more expensive and superior format is call blu-ray,raising the price without justification is not the same,but who knows if sony would have let games at $50 and not $60 it was MS who did it first without justification,since on 2005 most of the games on 360 were just ports,that on PC looked almost as good and cost $10 less. And again who started the whole milking mirco transaction thing.? Not to mention that there is better value on PSN than on live market,and you buy with real dollar not points to mask prices. Wait you accuse sony of releasing the PS3 at $600 to shove down blu-ray down your throat,that would be close to be true is Sony on 2000 haven't release the PS2 with the latest format for movies DVD. But how is giving me blu-ray for $200 dollar more on 2006 when Blu-ray players were from $800 to $1000,the same as over pricing peripherals that on PC are cheap. PS3 =$600 blu-ray free online play. Stand alone Blu-Ray player on 2006 = $800 to $1,000. Xbox 360 HDD- $100 20GB PC HDD = like $40 20GB now with $40 you buy a 300 or more GB one. xbox 360 wireless adapter = $100 PC wireless adapter from $15 to $20. So how sony giving your more for less,compare to MS giving you less for more.?
Avatar image for 2pac_makaveli
2pac_makaveli

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 2pac_makaveli
Member since 2008 • 1681 Posts
last chance to destroy sony again before sony goes bankrupt?
Avatar image for daledoback
daledoback

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 daledoback
Member since 2011 • 148 Posts

[QUOTE="daledoback"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that. They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiasco,telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.Recarnator

Typical response. First off, my pocket doesn't bleed paying for Xbox Live. If YOURS does then maybe you should consider finding a less expensive hobby. Second, spoken like a politician, you are avoiding the real question here...HOW IS PSN DOING FOR SONY FINANCIALLY?

I find it hilarious you are complaining about Microsoft overcharging when the PS3 launched at $600 and people were told "find a second job" from Sony themselves. But I digress, and again ask, what has PSN done for Sony financially?

Let me answer that for you, PSN HAS DONE NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING financially for Sony. Oh it has cost them pretty penny though after the hack fiasco.

And I agree. The whole point of PSN being free was to gain marketshare and it failed. They dumped a crap load of money into it trying to keep up with the features Xbox Live offered, and with massive failed projects such as Home which cows dare not speak of these days it's hard to take what Sony did with PSN seriously. And when Sony finally tried to implement a paid service to rake in profits like Microsoft, it turned out to be a serious joke. And now with all the huge security problems Sony is having I think it's safe to say PSN is a complete failure.

But don't worry PS3 fans, you still don't have to swap discs like Xbox 360 owners.

Edit: I said Move when I meant to say Home.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="daledoback"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] Huge profits that come out of your pockets,the more MS make the more your pocket bleed,they are not making a profit because they are selling a ton,they make a profit because first xbox live cost them pretty much nothing,and they charge you $60 for it,they raise the price of games $10 dollar since 2005 on their console,when it was $50 last gen and the gen before that. They have micro transaction that are designed to get as much as possible from gamers,this is the gen of the rip off,now content is been strip to sell apart which mean we get less game but at the same time have been paying $10 more per games since 2005,the there is the core 360 fiasco,telling people buy this if you don't have the $100 more for a premium model,but people who did that ended up paying high prices for over priced things,like $100 for a 20GB HDD,amount other high price peripherals like then wireless adapter which was $100 can you believe that $100 something you can get on PC for $15 dollars,not only that something that was out of the box on PS3 and even the outdated hardware wise wii. Celebrating MS high profitability make me feel very bad,because is like celebrating high oil prices,hurray for the oil companies hurray they are profitable.Recarnator

Typical response. First off, my pocket doesn't bleed paying for Xbox Live. If YOURS does then maybe you should consider finding a less expensive hobby. Second, spoken like a politician, you are avoiding the real question here...HOW IS PSN DOING FOR SONY FINANCIALLY?

I find it hilarious you are complaining about Microsoft overcharging when the PS3 launched at $600 and people were told "find a second job" from Sony themselves. But I digress, and again ask, what has PSN done for Sony financially?

Let me answer that for you, PSN HAS DONE NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING financially for Sony. Oh it has cost them pretty penny though after the hack fiasco.

Imo that point only favors the sony side. I don't care how much money the companies are bringing in. What I care about is the product I buy. You buy a PS3 for $300 and that's it. You buy an xbox for $300 and there's a monthly fee that is more or less REQUIRED, considering the bulk of games these days require online multiplayer. It isn't about money, either--$60/year is not that much. It is the principle that bothers me. I see MS losing major marketshare next gen, in the same way Sony did after the ps2.

I wasn't a fan of the ps2--I owned one, but I remember seeing shelf upon shelf of crappy games. It's like they dropped the quality standard. Then they thought they could pull off releasing a $600 console, going off of the success of the ps2. It's only within the last year or so that they are catching up.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="roadkill88"]

Sour grapes, men. Sour grapes with a healthy dose of denial. By the time the PS4 is released, the PS3 will have outsold the 360. In fact, with Uncharted, Resistance etc, that'll probably happen this year. Its also quite funny that console wars change to 'profit wars' (Even though in the long run, the PS3 will make more profit as well).

Also it seems, Microsoft didn't learn their lesson with tapping out early and rushing out another attempt.

Don't think you're being serious, but the PS3 lost 50% of its marketshare, will probably never be profitable (the gaming division was losing about a billion dollars for about half this gen, even with the PS2 and PSP softening the losses of the PS3), unless its starts making 3 or 4 billion a year for the next 4 or 5 years. As for your second point, how have MS tapped out early? They released a year earlier than everyone else and the 360 has already gone longer than the average console without a new one being announced/released.
Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#44 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

MS is making a huge profit off of their gaming division now. If anything this gen was "MS's last chance" seeing as how the original xbox didn't do so well. I expect next gen to see the same results as long as MS keeps doing what their doing now.

Avatar image for omenodebander
omenodebander

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 omenodebander
Member since 2004 • 1401 Posts

yeah well, but you know how the ps3 mentality works around here: it's always "the ps3 has better exclusives" . First party exclusives people. That's all to it. Sony is not winning anything.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#46 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Last chance for what exactly? Being profitable for Microsoft? I think they've done that already. Being a fantastic platform with tons if great games? Done. Be a platform with a solid online experience? Done. Keep Microsoft in the gaming hardware business? Done. Fulfill some un-reality that only exists in System Wars where a platform is only judged by how many exclusive titles it has? Well, last time I checked, the 360 had a solid lineup of exclusive games that only cows seem reluctant to praise.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

yeah well, but you know how the ps3 mentality works around here: it's always "the ps3 has better exclusives" . First party exclusives people. That's all to it. Sony is not winning anything.

omenodebander
In sales (Wii doesn't count, PC doesn't count, 360 year head start & about to overtaken) PS3 wins! In exclusives (Wii doesn't count, PC doesn't count!) PS3 wins! In library (360 no exclusives, PC doesn't count!) PS3 wins! Only the PS3 can be considering winning while not being close to first in any category. :P
Avatar image for BigBoss255
BigBoss255

3539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 BigBoss255
Member since 2010 • 3539 Posts

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="slipknot0129"]360 aint neck and neck with ps3. 360 has won this gen.

ohthemanatee

PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.

better exclusives is an opinion

and the 360 is still ahead.

for all intents and purposes sony is in last place, anything else is just speculation

On paper (the spreadsheet) PS3 is ahead, yea it will come down to preferences though. Anyway I wasn't saying PS3 is first, just pointing out that 360 isn't. Which I'm sure you'll agree.

Avatar image for lazerface216
lazerface216

7564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 lazerface216
Member since 2008 • 7564 Posts

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"] PS3 has better exclusives and is only a few million behind in sales. How exactly has MS won?. Nintendo won and 360 will come last.BigBoss255

better exclusives is an opinion

and the 360 is still ahead.

for all intents and purposes sony is in last place, anything else is just speculation

Have you seen the spreadsheet?. Anyway I wasn't saying PS3 is first, just pointing out that 360 isn't. Which I'm sure you'll agree.

what does the speadsheet have to do with "better" exclusives? it's still opinion.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
Probably not, they have all those casuals to catch.