Is the PC becomming a 2nd rate games system for some game companies?

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Despite it's undeniable hardware superiority, do you think the PC is becomming more of a "2nd rate" gaming platform that mostly lives from better graphics, modding and niche titles?

It certainly seems that way to me as the game market shift is going in the console direction.

I mean many PC games don't even get reviewed, there's barely any game demos, some multi-plat games come out months after the console version, the games get released in glitchy states, ect.

Is it possible that when the next-gen consoles arrive we could be seeing former PC-centric devs making console-only releases? (Crysis 3 anyone?)

Discuss :D

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
For some sure, but the majority of publishers and developers aren't idiots.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

Of course it's a second rate system for some companies, just like consoles are for others.

The shift is to multiplatform development, rather than console-only development. Here's a good post:

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Most of the big PC companies go to consoles tho. The likes of Bungie, id, Valve, Epic, Bioware, Bethesda, Obsidian all make console games now. Civilisation made the leap to consoles (poorly, but better then Civ 5 imo) The new Stalker and Witcher games are going to consoles. Minecraft is going to consoles. I really hope Diablo 3 will as well. Do you think all these, the biggest and arguably best PC devs out there are wrong?RyuRanVII

What about console franchises such as Assassin's Creed, Ridge Racer, Mass Effect, Ridge Racer, Metal Gear, Burnout, Bad Company, Devil May Cry, Braid, Street Fighter, Sonic, Blazblue, LA Noire, Limbo, Phantasy Star and dozens of others being released on PC?

Companies aren't going to consoles. They're going multiplatform.

Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts
The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.Scumty

Mhmmm. Not being intended as a gaming system does not stop something from becoming a gaming system.

By that logic, consoles were solely designed as gaming devices. They cannot become multimedia devices. Oh, but wait, they did, dumbass.

Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"]The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.lundy86_4

Mhmmm. Not being intended as a gaming system does not stop something from becoming a gaming system.

By that logic, consoles were solely designed as gaming devices. They cannot become multimedia devices. Oh, but wait, they did, dumbass.

The thing is consoles were designed to be multimedia devices from the time they were designed, so your wrong. PC's were designed for offices, gaming was later added due to direct x.
Avatar image for DJP3000
DJP3000

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DJP3000
Member since 2010 • 293 Posts

The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.Scumty

So a PC equipped with an i5 2500K, GTX 570, and 8GB RAM was never intended for gaming purposes, just work purposes?:roll:

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

The thing is consoles were designed to be multimedia devices from the time they were designed, so your wrong. PC's were designed for offices, gaming was later added due to direct x.Scumty

Erm, how exactly?

Original consoles only played games.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

The thing is consoles were designed to be multimedia devices from the time they were designed, so your wrong. PC's were designed for offices, gaming was later added due to direct x.Scumty

How old are you anyway? PC gaming has been around looong before there was a Direct X.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

Many of the big developers that were PC first in the past are now console first. There are still plenty of PC first developers but I would argue the golden era of PC gaming was in the mid-90s to early 2000s.

Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"]The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.DJP3000

So a PC equipped with an i5 2500K, GTX 570, and 8GB RAM was never intended for gaming purposes, just work purposes?:roll:

Well those parts were never meant for gamers since the pc originally was a work horse same with the mac. Its only recently that pcs were gaming machines when direct x was added. And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.Scumty

The PS1 was not the first console. It was also, the first to introduce a multimedia functionality, thus, consoles were not multimedia before it.

Avatar image for DJP3000
DJP3000

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 DJP3000
Member since 2010 • 293 Posts

[QUOTE="DJP3000"]

[QUOTE="Scumty"]The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.Scumty

So a PC equipped with an i5 2500K, GTX 570, and 8GB RAM was never intended for gaming purposes, just work purposes?:roll:

Well those parts were never meant for gamers since the pc originally was a work horse same with the mac. Its only recently that pcs were gaming machines when direct x was added. And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.

Well, if you aren't a PC gamer then there is no reason to own a powerful graphics card like a GTX 570 or a powerful quad core CPU like the i5 2500k.

Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

Scrunty is a complete idiot. Whole companies like Nvidia exist largely due to the PC gaming market. Consoles these days are simply gimped PC's with crap specs. There is nothing special about them. A PC is an all purpose machine. It can be used to work and to game. Who said it can only be used for work? Nvidia certainly wouldn't be nearly as big as it is now if that were true.

Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"] And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.lundy86_4

The PS1 was not the first console. It was also, the first to introduce a multimedia functionality, thus, consoles were not multimedia before it.

Just like PC's. Except that PC's are obsolete when it comes to gaming. PC's introduced gaming late in the stage.
Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"][QUOTE="DJP3000"]

So a PC equipped with an i5 2500K, GTX 570, and 8GB RAM was never intended for gaming purposes, just work purposes?:roll:

DJP3000

Well those parts were never meant for gamers since the pc originally was a work horse same with the mac. Its only recently that pcs were gaming machines when direct x was added. And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.

Well, if you aren't a PC gamer then there is no reason to own a powerful graphics card like a GTX 570 or a powerful quad core CPU like the i5 2500k.

Ghost Recon is now console exclusive, your powerful graphics card are useless if theres no games to play. When was the last true pc game to come out for the system? Its already been posted that bf3 was a console title, Whats the point in owning all of that if its going to waste?
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="DJP3000"]

[QUOTE="Scumty"]The PC has always been a 3rd rate system lol, when consoles first hit the market pcs became obsolete other than for work, pcs arent a gaming system they were never intended for that. Consoles ARE tho.Scumty

So a PC equipped with an i5 2500K, GTX 570, and 8GB RAM was never intended for gaming purposes, just work purposes?:roll:

Well those parts were never meant for gamers since the pc originally was a work horse same with the mac. Its only recently that pcs were gaming machines when direct x was added. And yes the ps1 could play cd's, so technically sony intended for it to be a major multimedia device, and they really got it going when the ps2 came out when it had a dvd player.

Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

Just like PC's. Except that PC's are obsolete when it comes to gaming. PC's introduced gaming late in the stage.Scumty

Well, there you said it "Just like PC's". PC games originated in the early 1960's. The first video game console was released in the early 1970's.

I think it's suffice to say... F***ing lol.

Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

Scrunty is a complete idiot. Whole companies like Nvidia exist largely due to the PC gaming market. Consoles these days are simply gimped PC's with crap specs. There is nothing special about them. A PC is an all purpose machine. It can be used to work and to game. Who said it can only be used for work? Nvidia certainly wouldn't be nearly as big as it is now if that were true.

argetlam00
nvidia make most of their bread and butter money from sony and the tesla super computer. the pc builder market is a small market share, sales made in that market are not much, nvidia wouldnt be making a profit if it only sold its products to pc builders
Avatar image for argetlam00
argetlam00

6573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 argetlam00
Member since 2006 • 6573 Posts

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Scrunty is a complete idiot. Whole companies like Nvidia exist largely due to the PC gaming market. Consoles these days are simply gimped PC's with crap specs. There is nothing special about them. A PC is an all purpose machine. It can be used to work and to game. Who said it can only be used for work? Nvidia certainly wouldn't be nearly as big as it is now if that were true.

Scumty

nvidia make most of their bread and butter money from sony and the tesla super computer. the pc builder market is a small market share, sales made in that market are not much, nvidia wouldnt be making a profit if it only sold its products to pc builders

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-11-14/nvidia-shares-rise-as-graphics-chip-demand-lifts-revenue.html

Tada!

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#22 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Ballroompirate
What company has jumped the PC ship again?
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Ballroompirate
Name some PC developers that jumped ship
Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"] Just like PC's. Except that PC's are obsolete when it comes to gaming. PC's introduced gaming late in the stage.lundy86_4

Well, there you said it "Just like PC's". PC games originated in the early 1960's. The first video game console was released in the early 1970's.

I think it's suffice to say... F***ing lol.

well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Scumty"] Just like PC's. Except that PC's are obsolete when it comes to gaming. PC's introduced gaming late in the stage.Scumty

Well, there you said it "Just like PC's". PC games originated in the early 1960's. The first video game console was released in the early 1970's.

I think it's suffice to say... F***ing lol.

well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.

Even as someone who doesn't play much on PC (via my not very powerful laptop), I am astonished at the idiocy on display here. Show us some facts instead of presenting your horrible opinions as truth. You do know those MMOs (e.g. WoW) appeal to over 10 million active subscribers? Is that a small group?
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.Scumty

I think you mean "pre". In which case, consoles pre-PS2/Xbox era are obsolete.

PC's have more exclusives, and on this site, more exclusives than each individual console and more high-rated (8.0) exclusives than all consoles combined.

"small group of players"? MMO's such as WoW play host to over 11 million active players :lol:. You're not doing too good with your ever changing argument here. It's actually frickin' hilarious :lol:

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#27 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

lawlessx

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#28 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Ballroompirate

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Bioware? Really? As far as I know all of Bioware's games have a PC version. Bioware is also working on a PC exclusive,theirs and EA biggest project ever, TOR. They are also working on another smaller PC exclusive called Wrath of Heroes.

Skyrim is also on PC, and is undoubtedly the best version, and Bethesda is supporting it with mod tools. Got anything else?

Avatar image for Kiro0
Kiro0

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Kiro0
Member since 2009 • 1176 Posts

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

lawlessx

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

If you mean moved from only PC to only console then only Epic comes to mind. Granted they didn't entirely do it but still. Good news is they seem to be moving back. However a lot of devs now do design for consoles first, which results in rather crappy ports more often than not as any PC gamer probably knows.

Also I'm disappointed in you guys for letting scumty troll you this hard when it should be so obvious.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#30 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Ballroompirate

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Those never jumped ship,they just make games for consoles as well,and Bioware is releasing their biggest production ever less than a month from now on the PC. If making games also available on consoles is jumping ship,then all the console devs that now make PC games as well also did jump ship amirite,like Capcom for instance.
Avatar image for Scumty
Scumty

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Scumty
Member since 2011 • 48 Posts

[QUOTE="Scumty"] well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.lundy86_4

I think you mean "pre". In which case, consoles pre-PS2/Xbox era are obsolete.

PC's have more exclusives, and on this site, more exclusives than each individual console and more high-rated (8.0) exclusives than all consoles combined.

"small group of players"? MMO's such as WoW play host to over 11 million active players :lol:. You're not doing too good with your ever changing argument here. It's actually frickin' hilarious :lol:

lol if all these pc exclusives are all "high rate" 8's and all then where are the people playing it? why is it only people like you and other pc hardcore fans that play these games, lol let me tell you something, because its only you people that find these terrible games good, wow is a terrible game, mw3 sold 11 million + and counting on day 1 on consoles! theres more AAA titles on ps3 then there has ever been on PC :lol: MGS4, the game that saved sony god of war and many others that actually do get decent sales warranting for new titles, these so called "high rated" games on pc baley move weight
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Ballroompirate

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Developing for more than one platform isn't "jumping ship"...they're expanding.. Had bioware/bethesda completely ditch the PC community for consoles then i would agree with you
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Scumty"] well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.Scumty

I think you mean "pre". In which case, consoles pre-PS2/Xbox era are obsolete.

PC's have more exclusives, and on this site, more exclusives than each individual console and more high-rated (8.0) exclusives than all consoles combined.

"small group of players"? MMO's such as WoW play host to over 11 million active players :lol:. You're not doing too good with your ever changing argument here. It's actually frickin' hilarious :lol:

lol if all these pc exclusives are all "high rate" 8's and all then where are the people playing it? why is it only people like you and other pc hardcore fans that play these games, lol let me tell you something, because its only you people that find these terrible games good, wow is a terrible game, mw3 sold 11 million + and counting on day 1 on consoles! theres more AAA titles on ps3 then there has ever been on PC :lol: MGS4, the game that saved sony god of war and many others that actually do get decent sales warranting for new titles, these so called "high rated" games on pc barey move weight

oh god..this is just too much :lol:

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#35 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"] Name some PC developers that jumped shipGeneralShowzer

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Bioware? Really? As far as I know all of Bioware's games have a PC version. Bioware is also working on a PC exclusive,theirs and EA biggest project ever, TOR. They are also working on another smaller PC exclusive called Wrath of Heroes.

Skyrim is also on PC, and is undoubtedly the best version, and Bethesda is supporting it with mod tools. Got anything else?

Sigh

Bioware and Bethesda started off as PC only devs then they "jumped ship" sort of speak and developed for consoles as well (which got Hermits angry for awhile), Epic was one and I believe there was a few others that were PC only, then they developed for consoles as well.

CD Projekt just came to mind since they are porting The Witcher 2 to 360 and Crytek

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

A better way to put it is many PC first developers in the past not longer are. Just off the top of my head...Bioware, Bethesda, Lucasarts had a fantastic PC first development team, Treyarch was PC first before being acquired, ditto with Infinity Ward, Black Isle was PC first and after they shut down most of the employees founded Obsidian and those developers are no longer PC first, Bungie was MAC/PC first until being acquired, ID software, Epic, Red Storm until acquired by Ubisoft, Lionhead until being acquired, DICE, and even Valve is no longer PC first.

That's just off the top of my head. I'm sure there are more. Like I said earlier the golden era of PC gaming already happened.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#37 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

This isn't something new, a few companies have jumped the PC ship years ago and it was common in SW to use the term to the Hermits "all your devs belong to us", then Hermits QQed and did the whole entire "you get the less superior ports ect ect".

Blizzard is probably one of the few PC only devs atm (no I don't count the first Diablo port to the PS1 counting)

Kiro0

Name some PC developers that jumped ship

If you mean moved from only PC to only console then only Epic comes to mind. Granted they didn't entirely do it but still. Good news is they seem to be moving back. However a lot of devs now do design for consoles first, which results in rather crappy ports more often than not as any PC gamer probably knows.

Also I'm disappointed in you guys for letting scumty troll you this hard when it should be so obvious.

They say they have a few PC centered projects lined up as well. Just because they had an exclusivity deal with MS , doesn't mean they jumped ship on PC. If they did, Bulletstorm wouldn't be on PC.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Scumty"] well pc's post ps1 era are now obsolete. pcs may have been the reigning champs of gaming but now theyre washed up pcs dont have block buster titles like consoles do, they only have games that appeal to a small group of players, people who are into mmos and strategy rpg games. when the ps1 hit the market thats when the pc became a 3rd rate system, face it, its over.Scumty

I think you mean "pre". In which case, consoles pre-PS2/Xbox era are obsolete.

PC's have more exclusives, and on this site, more exclusives than each individual console and more high-rated (8.0) exclusives than all consoles combined.

"small group of players"? MMO's such as WoW play host to over 11 million active players :lol:. You're not doing too good with your ever changing argument here. It's actually frickin' hilarious :lol:

lol if all these pc exclusives are all "high rate" 8's and all then where are the people playing it? why is it only people like you and other pc hardcore fans that play these games, lol let me tell you something, because its only you people that find these terrible games good, wow is a terrible game, mw3 sold 11 million + and counting on day 1 on consoles! theres more AAA titles on ps3 then there has ever been on PC :lol: MGS4, the game that saved sony god of war and many others that actually do get decent sales warranting for new titles, these so called "high rated" games on pc baley move weight

Wtf?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62027 Posts

lol if all these pc exclusives are all "high rate" 8's and all then where are the people playing it? why is it only people like you and other pc hardcore fans that play these games, lol let me tell you something, because its only you people that find these terrible games good, wow is a terrible game, mw3 sold 11 million + and counting on day 1 on consoles! theres more AAA titles on ps3 then there has ever been on PC :lol: MGS4, the game that saved sony god of war and many others that actually do get decent sales warranting for new titles, these so called "high rated" games on pc baley move weightScumty

Ok, a number of issues:

  1. Who says people aren't playing these games? You made the assertion, so prove it.
  2. If they are high-rated, how are they terrible? Probably because you have no other argument, so you come up with the stupidest one imaginable.
  3. "on consoles!" It was released on PC also. Furthermore, I specified MMO, and it's exclusive to the PC. MW3 is multiplat across the PC/PS3/360. Provide evidence it was the console versions alone that amounted to 11m+.
  4. No, there isn't more AAA titles on PS3 alone than ever on the PC. Unless you would like to clarify how you objectify a game as AAA.
  5. Games like Starcraft II sold 1.5 million in the first 48 hours.

I'm done with your ridiculous points. Seriously, get a f***ing clue and then come back. I don't like debating with individuals who can barely type, let alone put forth a coherent argument.

Avatar image for Kiro0
Kiro0

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Kiro0
Member since 2009 • 1176 Posts

[QUOTE="Kiro0"]

[QUOTE="lawlessx"] Name some PC developers that jumped shipGeneralShowzer

If you mean moved from only PC to only console then only Epic comes to mind. Granted they didn't entirely do it but still. Good news is they seem to be moving back. However a lot of devs now do design for consoles first, which results in rather crappy ports more often than not as any PC gamer probably knows.

Also I'm disappointed in you guys for letting scumty troll you this hard when it should be so obvious.

They say they have a few PC centered projects lined up as well. Just because they had an exclusivity deal with MS , doesn't mean they jumped ship on PC. If they did, Bulletstorm wouldn't be on PC.

My understanding is they didn't develop Bulletstorm, they just published it. People Can Fly developed it, yes?

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#41 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="Kiro0"]If you mean moved from only PC to only console then only Epic comes to mind. Granted they didn't entirely do it but still. Good news is they seem to be moving back. However a lot of devs now do design for consoles first, which results in rather crappy ports more often than not as any PC gamer probably knows.

Also I'm disappointed in you guys for letting scumty troll you this hard when it should be so obvious.

Kiro0

They say they have a few PC centered projects lined up as well. Just because they had an exclusivity deal with MS , doesn't mean they jumped ship on PC. If they did, Bulletstorm wouldn't be on PC.

My understanding is they didn't develop Bulletstorm, they just published it. People Can Fly developed it, yes?

Epic owns them. If they jumped ship on PC, they wouldn't have their own subsidiaries making PC games.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

BPoole96
Yep, brains are frowned upon by corporations :)
Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#43 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

wis3boi

Yep, brains are frowned upon by corporations :)

Pirating is frowned upon by Coporations :)

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#44 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="wis3boi"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

Ballroompirate

Yep, brains are frowned upon by corporations :)

Pirating is frowned upon by Coporations :)

And so is the used games market. :)
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#45 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

None Recently

Two come to mind and That's Bioware and Bethesda, theres a few more that made PC exclusives then went to consoles as well as PC. Some guy a year or two ago had a sig with all the Devs that started off as PC only then "jumping ship" and going the console route as well.

Ballroompirate

Bioware? Really? As far as I know all of Bioware's games have a PC version. Bioware is also working on a PC exclusive,theirs and EA biggest project ever, TOR. They are also working on another smaller PC exclusive called Wrath of Heroes.

Skyrim is also on PC, and is undoubtedly the best version, and Bethesda is supporting it with mod tools. Got anything else?

Sigh

Bioware and Bethesda started off as PC only devs then they "jumped ship" sort of speak and developed for consoles as well (which got Hermits angry for awhile), Epic was one and I believe there was a few others that were PC only, then they developed for consoles as well.

CD Projekt just came to mind since they are porting The Witcher 2 to 360 and Crytek

Facepalm memes belong back in 2007.

You said jumped ship, how would I know what your hidden meaning is.

These companies are releasing PC games, damn good ones at that.

If that's the case many console developers jumped ship as well...

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"] Yep, brains are frowned upon by corporations :)Arach666

Pirating is frowned upon by Coporations :)

And so is the used games market. :)

And so are happy faces :(

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

BPoole96
Bull****. You'd have thought DICE was giving out free handys up until the beta came out, and all it took was some sweet talk about the PC being the lead platform. Manipulation works regardless of what platform one games on.
Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#48 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

[QUOTE="wis3boi"] Yep, brains are frowned upon by corporations :)Arach666

Pirating is frowned upon by Coporations :)

And so is the used games market. :)

Not as much as Pirating ;)

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#49 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Companies just don't like PC gamers because they aren't as easy to manipulate than the console crowd

lowe0
Bull****. You'd have thought DICE was giving out free handys up until the beta came out, and all it took was some sweet talk about the PC being the lead platform. Manipulation works regardless of what platform one games on.

PC version was the lead platform.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#50 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]

Pirating is frowned upon by Coporations :)

Ballroompirate

And so is the used games market. :)

Not as much as Pirating ;)

Not according to Lionhead. ;)