This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :POh don't be silly. :PAbsolutely not.
IronBass
It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
Absolutely not.
What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :POh don't be silly. :PIt's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P
LIES! You don't like us consolites :([QUOTE="ronvalencia"]
A PC can survived without NV and ATI GPUs.
Let's look at baseline GPUs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a892couyO0M
NVIDIA Geforce 9400 IGP vs Intel IGP focuses on gaming performance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50FZmffmtqg
AMD Radeon HD 3200 IGP vs Intel IGP focuses on gaming performance.
AnnoyedDragon
Let me put it bluntly, what is your point?
The PC is both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC is master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU).
According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA math specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points closer.
It's both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU). According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points abit closer.ronvalencia
PC consists of both specialised and general purpose components, but the application of the platform as a whole is general purpose; whether that be gaming or business.
Now you said earlier that you weren't talking about platforms you were talking about devices, why then did you bring up a specialised device in response to a comment on PC as a platform as if it was a counter argument? Containing specialised components doesn't make PC a specialised platform.
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
Absolutely not.
What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :POh don't be silly. :PIt's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P
Actually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS.[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]It's both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU). According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points abit closer.AnnoyedDragon
PC consists of both specialised and general purpose components, but the application of the platform as a whole is general purpose; whether that be gaming or business.
Now you said earlier that you weren't talking about platforms you were talking about devices, why then did you bring up a specialised device in response to a comment on PC as a platform as if it was a counter argument? Containing specialised components doesn't make PC a specialised platform.
My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.ronvalencia
In other words your argument to PC being a general purpose platform is additional components can be used for specialisation?
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Oh don't be silly. :P[QUOTE="IronBass"] What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :Pronvalencia
It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P
Actually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS. its still a closed platform. linux is allowed on the PS3 by the grace of sony...not because its just allowed. sony, at any time, could put linux on the PS3 to the sword with a simple firmware update and there is absolutley nothing the linux community could do about it (offically anyway). access to its hardware is also controlled by sony. the PS3s game library is also controlled by sony and devs have to pay a fee to develop on it...just like any other console. no company has that kind of control over the PC. i can put linux on my laptop because its an open standard and there is no entity that can stop linux going onto it.. there are no licencing fees for the PC either and anyone and everyone can develop anything they want on it. the PS3 is very much a closed platform.[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Oh don't be silly. :PActually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS. its still a closed platform. linux is allowed on the PS3 by the grace of sony...not because its just allowed. sony, at any time, could put linux on the PS3 to the sword with a simple firmware update and there is absolutley nothing the linux community could do about it (offically anyway). access to its hardware is also controlled by sony. the PS3s game library is also controlled by sony and devs have to pay a fee to develop on it...just like any other console. no company has that kind of control over the PC. i can put linux on my laptop because its an open standard and there is no entity that can stop linux going onto it.. there are no licencing fees for the PC either and anyone and everyone can develop anything they want on it. the PS3 is very much a closed platform.It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P
osan0
If Sony advertised (the act to offer or invitation to treat) a LinuxPPC capability and customer accepts, it would be illegal for Sony revoke an advertised feature i.e. In Oz, it would breach the Section 53 (Trade Practises Act). You can not *withdraw* an advertised feature after the customer accepts the product offer.
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.AnnoyedDragon
In other words your argument to PC being a general purpose platform is additional components can be used for specialisation?
Examples of specialised Wintel PCs,
1.some ATMs are powered by a Wintel PC,
2.Capcom's StreetFighter IV coin-op games machine is powered by Core 2 Duo 2.13GHz + NVIDIA 7900GS Wintel PC.
Examples of specialised Wintel PCs,
1.some ATMs are powered by a Wintel PC,
2.Capcom's StreetFighter IV coin-op games machine is powered by Core 2 Duo 2.13GHz + NVIDIA 7900GSW Wintel PC.
ronvalencia
Only the topic is referring to home computers in this case and discussing whether they can be considered consoles.
Of course we have gone off topic a bit and discussing whether or not a PC is specialised. Those ATM computers and consoles can be considered specialised devices, but I just don't see how a personal computer can be considered a specialised device just because it can be set up to purpose; it's applications are far too broad.
With that said I have some work that needs doing so will be dropping out of the discussion here.
A PSP is a console it produces a video display signal and that is the definition of a Video game console, a DS is also a console ( Handheld game console ).Its not a console but it is a gaming platform. As in developers use it as a platform to release games. DS and PSP aren't consoles but they're game platforms, same goes for PC.
Tiefster
In terms of the modern definition of console as defined by Oxford, yes it is. The old definition of console has been degraded somewhat by a focus on multimedia and an evolving role. The more broad definition of game 'console' can easily include PCs.VandalvideoYou are right because the earlier definition of a console was "to distinguish a machine designed for consumers to buy and use solely for playing video games from a personal computer" but since the PS3 is a multimedia machine, then as you say "a 'console' can easily include PCs".
What do you mean with "So SW do you conisder the PC part of the gaming community or not?"?
I mean, PC does play games, dude. wtf?
No, it's not a gaming console. It's a gaming platform.
[QUOTE="Tiefster"]A PSP is a console it produces a video display signal and that is the definition of a Video game console, a DS is also a console ( Handheld game console ).Its not a console but it is a gaming platform. As in developers use it as a platform to release games. DS and PSP aren't consoles but they're game platforms, same goes for PC.
digimonkey12
No, the PSP and DS are certainly systems and gaming platforms, not what we in the industry call consoles.To keep things simple, they are called Handhelds.
I'm glad SW can't change the real world, otherwise ever term we ever had is up for grabs in the real world.
To answer the TC : PC's are great gaming system's and gaming platforms, but they are definitely not CONSOLES.
That term doesn't apply to PC's, but they are certainly apart of SW, and definately gaming platforms to contend with here.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment