Is the PC considered a Console?

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
It's not a console it's a platform, the best platform :D
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Absolutely not.

IronBass

What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :P

Oh don't be silly. :P

It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Absolutely not.

What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :P

Oh don't be silly. :P

It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P

LIES! You don't like us consolites :(
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

A PC can survived without NV and ATI GPUs.

Let's look at baseline GPUs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a892couyO0M

NVIDIA Geforce 9400 IGP vs Intel IGP focuses on gaming performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50FZmffmtqg

AMD Radeon HD 3200 IGP vs Intel IGP focuses on gaming performance.

AnnoyedDragon

Let me put it bluntly, what is your point?

The PC is both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC is master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU).

According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA math specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points closer.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

It's both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU). According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points abit closer.ronvalencia

PC consists of both specialised and general purpose components, but the application of the platform as a whole is general purpose; whether that be gaming or business.

Now you said earlier that you weren't talking about platforms you were talking about devices, why then did you bring up a specialised device in response to a comment on PC as a platform as if it was a counter argument? Containing specialised components doesn't make PC a specialised platform.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Absolutely not.

What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :P

Oh don't be silly. :P

It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P

Actually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]It's both generalised and specialised i.e. performs best at general applications and performs best at gaming workloads. Usually, a generalised platform is not a master on any area, but a PC master of both out-of-order processing (on the CPU) and streaming processing (on the GPU). According to Fold@Home, CELL's SPE ISA specialisation falls between CPU and GPU (Radeon X1900). In terms of design specialisation, the PC carries the extreme design end points. CUDA GPUs tries to bring these extreme design points abit closer.AnnoyedDragon

PC consists of both specialised and general purpose components, but the application of the platform as a whole is general purpose; whether that be gaming or business.

Now you said earlier that you weren't talking about platforms you were talking about devices, why then did you bring up a specialised device in response to a comment on PC as a platform as if it was a counter argument? Containing specialised components doesn't make PC a specialised platform.

My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.ronvalencia

In other words your argument to PC being a general purpose platform is additional components can be used for specialisation?

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18251 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] What, afraid of being called "consolite"? :Pronvalencia

Oh don't be silly. :P

It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P

Actually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS.

its still a closed platform. linux is allowed on the PS3 by the grace of sony...not because its just allowed. sony, at any time, could put linux on the PS3 to the sword with a simple firmware update and there is absolutley nothing the linux community could do about it (offically anyway). access to its hardware is also controlled by sony. the PS3s game library is also controlled by sony and devs have to pay a fee to develop on it...just like any other console. no company has that kind of control over the PC. i can put linux on my laptop because its an open standard and there is no entity that can stop linux going onto it.. there are no licencing fees for the PC either and anyone and everyone can develop anything they want on it. the PS3 is very much a closed platform.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Oh don't be silly. :P

It's not a console because consoles are closed platforms while a PC is an open platform blah blah blah I don't feel like repeating what has been said already. :P

osan0

Actually, PS3 would fail "consoles are closed platforms" test since it offically supports a desktop LinuxPPC (runs under a PS3's hypervisor). PS3 doesn't give non-PS3 gaming developers access to NVIDIA's RSX (lowest level is via NVIDIA's LibCGM thin middleware**). **Like NVAPI on the PC. Also, Linux ATI Radeon drivers are programmed against Firmware thin-middleware layer i.e. AtomBIOS.

its still a closed platform. linux is allowed on the PS3 by the grace of sony...not because its just allowed. sony, at any time, could put linux on the PS3 to the sword with a simple firmware update and there is absolutley nothing the linux community could do about it (offically anyway). access to its hardware is also controlled by sony. the PS3s game library is also controlled by sony and devs have to pay a fee to develop on it...just like any other console. no company has that kind of control over the PC. i can put linux on my laptop because its an open standard and there is no entity that can stop linux going onto it.. there are no licencing fees for the PC either and anyone and everyone can develop anything they want on it. the PS3 is very much a closed platform.

If Sony advertised (the act to offer or invitation to treat) a LinuxPPC capability and customer accepts, it would be illegal for Sony revoke an advertised feature i.e. In Oz, it would breach the Section 53 (Trade Practises Act). You can not *withdraw* an advertised feature after the customer accepts the product offer.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]My post was not designed as a "counter argument" to "specialised platform", but seeks to clarify that the PC masters (depending on add-on device) certain end-user workloads.AnnoyedDragon

In other words your argument to PC being a general purpose platform is additional components can be used for specialisation?

Examples of specialised Wintel PCs,

1.some ATMs are powered by a Wintel PC,

2.Capcom's StreetFighter IV coin-op games machine is powered by Core 2 Duo 2.13GHz + NVIDIA 7900GS Wintel PC.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Examples of specialised Wintel PCs,

1.some ATMs are powered by a Wintel PC,

2.Capcom's StreetFighter IV coin-op games machine is powered by Core 2 Duo 2.13GHz + NVIDIA 7900GSW Wintel PC.

ronvalencia

Only the topic is referring to home computers in this case and discussing whether they can be considered consoles.

Of course we have gone off topic a bit and discussing whether or not a PC is specialised. Those ATM computers and consoles can be considered specialised devices, but I just don't see how a personal computer can be considered a specialised device just because it can be set up to purpose; it's applications are far too broad.

With that said I have some work that needs doing so will be dropping out of the discussion here.

Avatar image for digimonkey12
digimonkey12

1851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 digimonkey12
Member since 2009 • 1851 Posts

Its not a console but it is a gaming platform. As in developers use it as a platform to release games. DS and PSP aren't consoles but they're game platforms, same goes for PC.

Tiefster
A PSP is a console it produces a video display signal and that is the definition of a Video game console, a DS is also a console ( Handheld game console ).
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#64 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
In terms of the modern definition of console as defined by Oxford, yes it is. The old definition of console has been degraded somewhat by a focus on multimedia and an evolving role. The more broad definition of game 'console' can easily include PCs.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
deactivated-5b5d7639964d6

8225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5b5d7639964d6
Member since 2008 • 8225 Posts

It's a gaming platform, not a console.

Avatar image for digimonkey12
digimonkey12

1851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 digimonkey12
Member since 2009 • 1851 Posts
In terms of the modern definition of console as defined by Oxford, yes it is. The old definition of console has been degraded somewhat by a focus on multimedia and an evolving role. The more broad definition of game 'console' can easily include PCs.Vandalvideo
You are right because the earlier definition of a console was "to distinguish a machine designed for consumers to buy and use solely for playing video games from a personal computer" but since the PS3 is a multimedia machine, then as you say "a 'console' can easily include PCs".
Avatar image for w0lfbreeder
w0lfbreeder

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 w0lfbreeder
Member since 2007 • 426 Posts
it's a system that should be fought about on system wars yes. although it can do more than a console and is a sort of "Jailbroken" console in a way.
Avatar image for LookAnDrolL
LookAnDrolL

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#68 LookAnDrolL
Member since 2008 • 2483 Posts
No its not. Its not designed to play games.
Avatar image for kingdre
kingdre

9456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 kingdre
Member since 2005 • 9456 Posts

When I hear console I think of PS, Xbox, etc. I never thought of the PC as such even though it can also play games and then some.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

What do you mean with "So SW do you conisder the PC part of the gaming community or not?"?

I mean, PC does play games, dude. wtf?

No, it's not a gaming console. It's a gaming platform.

Avatar image for McdonaIdsGuy
McdonaIdsGuy

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 McdonaIdsGuy
Member since 2008 • 3046 Posts
I consider it a platform that plays video games and can do more than that..but is not a console.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="Tiefster"]

Its not a console but it is a gaming platform. As in developers use it as a platform to release games. DS and PSP aren't consoles but they're game platforms, same goes for PC.

digimonkey12

A PSP is a console it produces a video display signal and that is the definition of a Video game console, a DS is also a console ( Handheld game console ).

No, the PSP and DS are certainly systems and gaming platforms, not what we in the industry call consoles.To keep things simple, they are called Handhelds.

I'm glad SW can't change the real world, otherwise ever term we ever had is up for grabs in the real world.

To answer the TC : PC's are great gaming system's and gaming platforms, but they are definitely not CONSOLES.

That term doesn't apply to PC's, but they are certainly apart of SW, and definately gaming platforms to contend with here.

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#73 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
PC is a system and can be a gaming platform.
Avatar image for ocinom
ocinom

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 ocinom
Member since 2008 • 1397 Posts

You build it for gaming so technically its not