It's just that simple Live>>>PSN. Live is worth every CENT!!!

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Avatar image for theheavydrinker
theheavydrinker

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 theheavydrinker
Member since 2004 • 1524 Posts
With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network.
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
Live is indeed better then PSN but worth is subjective. So in your title the first statement is true and the second an opinion.
Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts

With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. theheavydrinker

What lag:roll:

I run smooth about 99% all of the time.

Oh wait ok you must have some of that mommy and daddy's cheap 768k dsl junk

Avatar image for actionquake
actionquake

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 actionquake
Member since 2007 • 335 Posts
I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.
Avatar image for theheavydrinker
theheavydrinker

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#6 theheavydrinker
Member since 2004 • 1524 Posts

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. Fuzzy_Munch

What lag:roll:

I run smooth about 99% all of the time.

Oh wait ok you must have some of that mommy and daddy's cheap 768k dsl junk

You do realize that you aren't connecting to microsofts "servers", right? Therefore your gameplay experience relies solely on the "host" of the game. Maybe you should know what you're talking about before making comments :roll:

Avatar image for black_awpN1
black_awpN1

7863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 black_awpN1
Member since 2004 • 7863 Posts

PSN is free and jsut as good as live for Online games

/Thread

Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts

With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. theheavydrinker

Sounds to be like you've never played on Live, because I have yet to see any lag, and I've had my 360 for over a year.

Avatar image for _Pedro_
_Pedro_

6829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 _Pedro_
Member since 2004 • 6829 Posts

I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.actionquake

great post. :)

Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts

I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.actionquake

Yes and it's a ingenuis aproach becuase they new long before this is where things are headed. And MS is a software giant so they will always Destroy Sony when it comes to online.

By 2012 MS will have about 20million payed loyal customers. This mean CHECKMATE for now and future systems all but a small few will surly keep buying the new MS Xbox systems.

Avatar image for theheavydrinker
theheavydrinker

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#11 theheavydrinker
Member since 2004 • 1524 Posts

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. MortalDecay

Sounds to be like you've never played on Live, because I have yet to see any lag, and I've had my 360 for over a year.

Really depends on the games. Some of them run extremely smoothly online like NHL 08, but others are completely unplayable, such as Bomberman Live. For a service that prides itself on it's "live enabled" image, it's strange that a Third Party game runs smoother than a hosted downloadable.

Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts

PSN is free and jsut as good as live for Online games

/Thread

black_awpN1

:lol: Have you found your stats for Warhawk? Oh wait tell your buddy to shoot hmm he has no mic now your both dead:lol:

Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#13 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts
PS3, Playstation 2, PC, DS, Wii, Dreamcast, Gamecube all had free online services. Xbox and Xbox 360...not so much.
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#14 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
PS3 is getting VOD, PS3 has had MPEG 4 support forever now so aside from DivX and Xvid PS3 users aren't missing anything (what does this have to do with Live anyway?), and for the amount I pay for my connection I expect my online gaming to be great and lag free for the most part but 360's shoddy p2p system and net coding utterly makes it seem like I'm wasting me money. If I wanted lag I'd go back to 56K and and play AoE2 thank you very much.

XBL does have some things over PSN but from what I understand Home is going to make PSN on par with live. Not to mention when it comes to online gaming, PC owns all.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Live is better but I'd jusy rather have a free online.
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. theheavydrinker

What lag:roll:

I run smooth about 99% all of the time.

Oh wait ok you must have some of that mommy and daddy's cheap 768k dsl junk

You do realize that you aren't connecting to microsofts "servers", right? Therefore your gameplay experience relies solely on the "host" of the game. Maybe you should know what you're talking about before making comments :roll:

Maybe you shouldn't blindly bash something you haven't even played. Hmmm?

Avatar image for -Serpahim-
-Serpahim-

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 -Serpahim-
Member since 2007 • 1627 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Fuzzy_Munch

How expensive sumthing is is not dependant on the price alone. It is dependant on the price AND percieved value. So a $30,000 Porsche is cheap but a $50 pencil is not. So IMO, i dont think that XBL is worth the money I pay for it. Its good, but i think it should still be free...I mean it has ads for christ sake -_-

Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#18 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
[QUOTE="black_awpN1"]

PSN is free and jsut as good as live for Online games

/Thread

Fuzzy_Munch

:lol: Have you found your stats for Warhawk? Oh wait tell your buddy to shoot hmm he has no mic now your both dead:lol:



You do realize you can still hear what people are saying even if you don't have a mic in Warhawk right? O wait no you don't.
Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts

I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.actionquake

you're also missing the point. xbox live could always be free but because it's such a good service then most people don't mind paying for it. it's all about value for money and i think £40 for 12months of unlimited online gaming is very good value

it's a bit like the ps3, it's more expensive than the competitors but people who want it are prepared to pay for it

Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#20 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts

[QUOTE="actionquake"]I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.my_name_is_ron

you're also missing the point. xbox live could always be free but because it's such a good service then most people don't mind paying for it. it's all about value for money and i think £40 for 12months of unlimited online gaming is very good value

it's a bit like the ps3, it's more expensive than the competitors but people who want it are prepared to pay for it



Live is by no means a bad service, it just looks bad because its the only online service you have to pay for. If I had to pay to play PC games (except MMOs) all these years I'd be pretty broke by now.
Avatar image for theheavydrinker
theheavydrinker

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#21 theheavydrinker
Member since 2004 • 1524 Posts
[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"][QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. MortalDecay

What lag:roll:

I run smooth about 99% all of the time.

Oh wait ok you must have some of that mommy and daddy's cheap 768k dsl junk

You do realize that you aren't connecting to microsofts "servers", right? Therefore your gameplay experience relies solely on the "host" of the game. Maybe you should know what you're talking about before making comments :roll:

Maybe you shouldn't blindly bash something you haven't even played. Hmmm?

What, so now all of a sudden I don't have an Xbox? Really? Maybe you shouldn't blindly bash anyone who says something bad about your favorite console, buddy, hmm?

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
2 OUT OF 3 XBOX USERS DISAGREE. What happens is only 40% of X360 fans pay for live. That means there is basically a 2 out of 3 chance my friends even if they buy an X360 aren't going to be online. Secondly it's fine to pay now when the console is hot stuff and new, but what happens five years from now when you aren't playing it that often, but you still want a match on Halo. Oh yeah you didn't pay for it this year. That's what happens. No Halo for you. With PS3 almost everyone is online and I'm not worried about the future. I'm not worried when my friends buy a PS3 if they are going to be online or not. That's the difference $50 a year makes.
Avatar image for hip-hop-cola2
hip-hop-cola2

2454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 hip-hop-cola2
Member since 2007 • 2454 Posts

£50 a year adds up... im not dumb, i refuse to pay for something that ISN'T worth every cent (or penny where im from :P)...

LIVE is better than psn in a number of ways but there all small thing which you can actually do in an update.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Fuzzy_Munch

And we gamers should care about that why?

Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts
wow 5 dollars a month thats too much?, id rather pay for quality service, but have free horrid service like psn
Avatar image for GottiDC
GottiDC

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 GottiDC
Member since 2007 • 142 Posts

thats what i just said.

i said none of thouse things matter when it comes to playing online. the whole point of playing online, is playing the game ingame, online with no problems. just like psn allows you to do for free. and jus like how live does it, it allows you to play the games online but for a price, that is not needed at all.

sue u hva eingame voice mesging, and all that other stuff,. but does having that stuff stop you from playing a game online. NO not at all.

I mean with live, i could see if you where paying for dedicated severs, that never lagged. other than that why the hell would anyone pay for online. if your going to pay, it musrt do sowething to boost the performance of the quilty while playing online. not to see what some one was playing, 2 hours ago. or to see who is jimm343 friends are. are to brag about what game i comepleated in 2 hours. i could see if achievments actually gave you money to spend on in the marketplace. but they dont, and that to me makes them point less. sure home may have tophies and stuff, but if all they are are bragging rights, and dont give me something, so that i can do re get somthing eles in the game. im not using them.

like i said before, we can both play online and have great fun with our friends. but on psn, its free to do so, but on live have to pay a price of a game just in order to play wit your friends. why do i have to pay to pay for something in the market place? that makes no sence whats so ever.

Avatar image for mattyomo99
mattyomo99

3915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 mattyomo99
Member since 2005 • 3915 Posts

i cant even play TF2 with lag, and most online games have huge host advantages

is it worth the money for all the extras? in my opinion no because PSN lets me play my games online and thats all i really care about

Avatar image for SaintsRowSam
SaintsRowSam

2807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 SaintsRowSam
Member since 2006 • 2807 Posts

i cant even play TF2 with lag, and most online games have huge host advantages

is it worth the money for all the extras? in my opinion no because PSN lets me play my games online and thats all i really care about

mattyomo99

lol your so ignorant on live we get awsome stuff

being able to talk to our WHOLE party

we can invite friends on gh3

rarely any lag for me

marketplace is the best for buying things

we can buy gamer pictures and themes

have private chats

can send voice messages

psn cant even play online right, my cousin always plays warhawk and he said he almost all the time lags

Avatar image for mattyomo99
mattyomo99

3915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 mattyomo99
Member since 2005 • 3915 Posts
[QUOTE="mattyomo99"]

i cant even play TF2 with lag, and most online games have huge host advantages

is it worth the money for all the extras? in my opinion no because PSN lets me play my games online and thats all i really care about

SaintsRowSam

lol your so ignorant on live we get awsome stuff

being able to talk to our WHOLE party

we can invite friends on gh3

rarely any lag for me

marketplace is the best for buying things

we can buy gamer pictures and themes

have private chats

can send voice messages

psn cant even play online right, my cousin always plays warhawk and he said he almost all the time lags

idc about all the extras thats why i dont mind PSN and it will only get better, but your cousin is lying i have never experianced lag on warhawk

Avatar image for KalEl370
KalEl370

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 KalEl370
Member since 2007 • 907 Posts

2 OUT OF 3 XBOX USERS DISAGREE. What happens is only 40% of X360 fans pay for live. That means there is basically a 2 out of 3 chance my friends even if they buy an X360 aren't going to be online. Secondly it's fine to pay now when the console is hot stuff and new, but what happens five years from now when you aren't playing it that often, but you still want a match on Halo. Oh yeah you didn't pay for it this year. That's what happens. No Halo for you. With PS3 almost everyone is online and I'm not worried about the future. I'm not worried when my friends buy a PS3 if they are going to be online or not. That's the difference $50 a year makes.
EmperorSupreme

"with ps3 almost everyone is online" this is such a false statement, where is the proof of that statement?...according to this months game informer magazine, the online rate for the PS3 is also around 40 percent. And as far as playing halo 5 years from now, i'm sure people will still be able too just like you can still play xbox games on live now, and if you didn't pay for it that year so what that's why you have the option to pay monthly if you want to. I have both a PS3 and a 360, and much rather pay for live because I enjoy it far more than PSN thus making it worth the 50 dollars a year to me, if you or anybody else don't want to pay for it so be it I could care less and thats one less nimrod I run into on live anyway....

Avatar image for -PS360FTW-
-PS360FTW-

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 -PS360FTW-
Member since 2007 • 628 Posts

Thats why Im having trouble with COD4 online today.I could barely get in one match today...and yes i have great connection....the boards are laggy as hell and Ive played nba 2k8,guitar hero 3,and resiatnce online on my ps3 and not one problem unlike playing gears and cod4 on my 360.and the ps3 community is much better then 360 community since the 360 community is full of small kids with bad mouths and are recist or annoying.

so yea....

Avatar image for Vis-a-Vis
Vis-a-Vis

1977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Vis-a-Vis
Member since 2006 • 1977 Posts
Im not at liberty to say anything about PSN, but Live is a great feature for Xbox users, and at 50$ a year it is a steal, I mean seriously for all that your getting with Live 50$ is an amazing price, anyone that says otherwise is...Well I just hope you can afford your next meal because if your too cheap to pay up your 7 cents a day then who knows what type of predicament your in.
Avatar image for H8s2spooge
H8s2spooge

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 H8s2spooge
Member since 2006 • 650 Posts

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. MortalDecay

Sounds to be like you've never played on Live, because I have yet to see any lag, and I've had my 360 for over a year.



Why lie? It's a sin you know?
Avatar image for H8s2spooge
H8s2spooge

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 H8s2spooge
Member since 2006 • 650 Posts
lol your so ignorant on live we get awsome stuff

being able to talk to our WHOLE party

we can invite friends on gh3

rarely any lag for me

marketplace is the best for buying things

we can buy gamer pictures and themes

have private chats

can send voice messages

psn cant even play online right, my cousin always plays warhawk and he said he almost all the time lags

SaintsRowSam



AHHHHHHahahahahahahaaha.

The whole party? What does that even mean? You can "talk" to however many people you want on the PSN. Marketplace is the best for buying things?!?! HAAhaahahaahahaaaaaahaahaha. BUY GAMER PICTURES AND THEMES?! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhaHAHAAAAAAAAHAAHAHAHA. Those are free on the PSN. So are the private chats and voice messages.

I don't mean to be insulting, but man, that's really funny.

Warhawk never lags, ever. Resistance does tho.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

Your threads are getting boring everyday...

Eh, I enjoy the service and think it's better but it's quite a ripoff. $50 just for online with P2P servers? :?

Avatar image for rko07
rko07

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 rko07
Member since 2004 • 492 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Fuzzy_Munch


PS3 costs 600$? lol, that just marked you as another ignorant lemming.
Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts
Last I checked, you can buy a new ps3 for $400.

LIVE is around $50 per year and plan to keep it for 5 yrs. That is like spending around $250. And on top of that, you still need to buy the console too..

So, tell me, how is the ps3 more expensive?
Avatar image for arm9218
arm9218

503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 arm9218
Member since 2007 • 503 Posts

[QUOTE="actionquake"]I think the point your missing is that it shouldn't cost money. You are already paying for the interent connection, you already paid for the game. Live is not better because it costs money, it is better because MS targetted online as one of the most important things for their console.Fuzzy_Munch

Yes and it's a ingenuis aproach becuase they new long before this is where things are headed. And MS is a software giant so they will always Destroy Sony when it comes to online.

By 2012 MS will have about 20million payed loyal customers. This mean CHECKMATE for now and future systems all but a small few will surly keep buying the new MS Xbox systems.

20 million with 360's or paying for live, i assure you that either way those numbers are way off. just because you have live doesnt mean that every person with a 360 does.

Avatar image for The_Crucible
The_Crucible

3305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 The_Crucible
Member since 2007 • 3305 Posts

It's just that simple PS3>>>350. PS3 is worth every CENT!!!

See how I can do that?

First off, tell me something that Lice does that PS3 can't do, ever. Second, the fall update is nothing. No web browswer and no Divx. And then you finally get WMV, a MS product, and you're excited?

I'm not saying PSN is better, its just as capable. And we haven't seen all of what they're doing with PSN. And, IT'S FREE!!!! And all of the piddly crap lemmings keep coming up with as "teh pwnage" is weak. Again, tell me something that Live is doing that PSN could NEVER do.

Avatar image for MoldOnHold
MoldOnHold

11760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 MoldOnHold
Member since 2005 • 11760 Posts
From my own experiences, I'll have to agree....
Avatar image for MoldOnHold
MoldOnHold

11760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 MoldOnHold
Member since 2005 • 11760 Posts

It's just that simple PS3>>>350. PS3 is worth every CENT!!!

See how I can do that?

First off, tell me something that Lice does that PS3 can't do, ever. Second, the fall update is nothing. No web browswer and no Divx. And then you finally get WMV, a MS product, and you're excited?

I'm not saying PSN is better, its just as capable. And we haven't seen all of what they're doing with PSN. And, IT'S FREE!!!! And all of the piddly crap lemmings keep coming up with as "teh pwnage" is weak. Again, tell me something that Live is doing that PSN could NEVER do.

The_Crucible
Again, the "just wait" excuse does not apply in the present.
Avatar image for wmc540
wmc540

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 wmc540
Member since 2006 • 2620 Posts

With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. theheavydrinker

What lag? Everyone is required to have broadband.

Avatar image for GottiDC
GottiDC

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 GottiDC
Member since 2007 • 142 Posts

they both have there pros and cons. but the onlything that i sited when i first made this thread was that, the psn, has gottin even better for a free servers, offering things that people have to pay for on live.

psn is no where near a broken service or as bare bones as 360 fans like to put it. and when xmb is unlocked for ingame, there will be no doubt that psn will eat up more of the standers that are on live all for free of charge. and if that does not get xbox people thinking why canr our service be free, i dont know what will. all i ever say is that with psn im doing what online games are post to be doing and that playing the game online, with no problems for free.

I love using all the featureson my 60 gig ps3, i eman the system just buy its self with no ghames justifies a 500 price tag, just because of the things it does its self, free online, web browser that i can actually down load files from, and i can stream media over the wifi, which is built in the ps3. I can get free themes, to make my xmb look so good. blu ray lookks super on my 1080p tv. the ps3 is an all around kick ass system, and i love it. and in that part i didnt even talk about the games. uncjharted hs, r&c, ms,wh, all are kick ass games that are exclusive to ps3, and there all not just fps. warthawk is a blast online and i love it, no lag with 32 people playing is amazing, and when everyone has a headset, damn the games are fun as hell, and i just sit back and say to my self woooow, all this in my ps3 for free. WOOW. thats why i comined sony on what there doing, i adnit sony did get a lil cocky when the ps2 sold over 150 million, so they thought that the 600 price tag would do well, but man u got to give it to them , they have corrected them selfs, and have listened to the consumersx(even though it is taking them a while to get things out)with the ds3, price, ingame xmb, that might be a xmass gift from sony on the 25. they really are listening to us and the devs to get things straight. the ps2 succes really got into sony head and got them thinking they could do anything, but know they know they have to send out quility. psn will be the big thing come next year when home hits, u guys better hope ms takes the live charges away, its bad enuff we pay 20 dollars for cable internet know, but when we have to pay another sevice just to play games online, that ashame, really when it adds nothing to the gameplay part, like never lagging at all, no discn.

Avatar image for The_Crucible
The_Crucible

3305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 The_Crucible
Member since 2007 • 3305 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"]

It's just that simple PS3>>>350. PS3 is worth every CENT!!!

See how I can do that?

First off, tell me something that Lice does that PS3 can't do, ever. Second, the fall update is nothing. No web browswer and no Divx. And then you finally get WMV, a MS product, and you're excited?

I'm not saying PSN is better, its just as capable. And we haven't seen all of what they're doing with PSN. And, IT'S FREE!!!! And all of the piddly crap lemmings keep coming up with as "teh pwnage" is weak. Again, tell me something that Live is doing that PSN could NEVER do.

MoldOnHold

Again, the "just wait" excuse does not apply in the present.

Says the tendo-boy. Yeah, I guess Sony should have had everything all going from day one. I know MS did. Oh, wait..... we're talking about updates here. And MS has had one year on Sony to realease updates. And one more year to develop them. Don't act like it should be an even playing field. ESPECIALLY WHEN ITS FREE.

Yeah, like I cry myslef to sleep at night because I can't talk to my best friend Geraldo while I'm playing Warhawk and he's playing Super Stardust HD. Give me a break.

Avatar image for rko07
rko07

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 rko07
Member since 2004 • 492 Posts

Yeah, like I cry myslef to sleep at night because I can't talk to my best friend Geraldo while I'm playing Warhawk and he's playing Super Stardust HD. Give me a break.

The_Crucible


lmao
Avatar image for xflamedemonx
xflamedemonx

424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 xflamedemonx
Member since 2007 • 424 Posts

well y pay for live when you can only play games after homework and teests and all that stuff

and most people like to save their money$

Live is better but to pay for it $50

Avatar image for Ragashahs
Ragashahs

8785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Ragashahs
Member since 2005 • 8785 Posts
umm PS3 ain't $600 anymore. and it all depends on opinion PSN does have quite a few features for free that justify it as a good online network. live does have more features but some people might not care or need them + it does cost money to use.
Avatar image for Burnsmiesta
Burnsmiesta

1672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Burnsmiesta
Member since 2004 • 1672 Posts
Apparently according to this forums logic XBL is always laggy yet if we say PSN is laggy we are lying.
Also people are stating that its only the XBL service that has children playing on it?
Are you saying that children don't own PS3s? I had no idea they could afford $50 a year.
I reckon half the people in this thread are children or at least acting like ones.
Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]2 OUT OF 3 XBOX USERS DISAGREE. What happens is only 40% of X360 fans pay for live. That means there is basically a 2 out of 3 chance my friends even if they buy an X360 aren't going to be online. Secondly it's fine to pay now when the console is hot stuff and new, but what happens five years from now when you aren't playing it that often, but you still want a match on Halo. Oh yeah you didn't pay for it this year. That's what happens. No Halo for you. With PS3 almost everyone is online and I'm not worried about the future. I'm not worried when my friends buy a PS3 if they are going to be online or not. That's the difference $50 a year makes.
robflores370

it worth the 50 dollars a year to me, if you or anybody else don't want to pay for it so be it I could care less and thats one less nimrod I run into on live anyway....

You Xbox fans really love to call people names don't you. That's about half the reason I don't have my Xbox anymore right there. The Playstation community is a lot friendlier, helpful and cooler, I got tired of paying to listen to a bunch of swearing, foul mouthed racist kids (kids is meant to describe the mentality not the age). So you aren't offending me by wanting to stay on Live. From your post it looks like you fit right in.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#50 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Online gaming isn't worth £40.