It's just that simple Live>>>PSN. Live is worth every CENT!!!

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MoldOnHold
MoldOnHold

11760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 MoldOnHold
Member since 2005 • 11760 Posts

Says the tendo-boy. Yeah, I guess Sony should have had everything all going from day one. I know MS did. Oh, wait..... we're talking about updates here. And MS has had one year on Sony to realease updates. And one more year to develop them. Don't act like it should be an even playing field. ESPECIALLY WHEN ITS FREE.

Yeah, like I cry myslef to sleep at night because I can't talk to my best friend Geraldo while I'm playing Warhawk and he's playing Super Stardust HD. Give me a break.

The_Crucible
You're talking about how MS didn't expand on Live when it had a year head start? Honestly, why would they need to? It's competition didn't even had a foothold on online gaming during this time. :|

And for the record, I'm not a total Nintendo fanboy. In fact, I've been playing Halo 3 more than Mario Galaxy to be honest.
Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts
$4 a month for the whole service is great. I do a lot of gaming in a month and all the exta features and DLC (especially the free stuff) such as gamer pics and themes make it very nice. I can also download demos and free trials to games/arcade games that i would consider buying. And most of the people complaining about lag don't know what they're talking about. I can only remember lagging on one game more than once and that game was GeOW (and you can actually see if the game is going to be laggy or nor but i must have done a quick game or something).
Avatar image for Bren128
Bren128

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Bren128
Member since 2003 • 2358 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Fuzzy_Munch

so live is better because you can get movies? and that makes live players true gamers? Arent you 360 fans the same ones that say ''I use my 360 for games blah blah blah''. and as far as actually playing games online psn is just as good as live. I dont use my online service for buying movies, i use it for games :) oh and its FREE

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts

uhuh keep thinking that

whatever helps you lag at night

Avatar image for Bren128
Bren128

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Bren128
Member since 2003 • 2358 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"] lol your so ignorant on live we get awsome stuff

being able to talk to our WHOLE party

we can invite friends on gh3

rarely any lag for me

marketplace is the best for buying things

we can buy gamer pictures and themes

have private chats

can send voice messages

psn cant even play online right, my cousin always plays warhawk and he said he almost all the time lags

H8s2spooge




AHHHHHHahahahahahahaaha.

The whole party? What does that even mean? You can "talk" to however many people you want on the PSN. Marketplace is the best for buying things?!?! HAAhaahahaahahaaaaaahaahaha. BUY GAMER PICTURES AND THEMES?! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhaHAHAAAAAAAAHAAHAHAHA. Those are free on the PSN. So are the private chats and voice messages.

I don't mean to be insulting, but man, that's really funny.

Warhawk never lags, ever. Resistance does tho.

LOL truth, i have a playboy theme i got for free!

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Bren128

so live is better because you can get movies? and that makes live players true gamers? Arent you 360 fans the same ones that say ''I use my 360 for games blah blah blah''. and as far as actually playing games online psn is just as good as live. I dont use my online service for buying movies, i use it for games :) oh and its FREE

That is kind've funny, but it doesn't matter anyway, because the MS store is going to be nothing when Sony unveils it's plans for download content. Remember Sony is a media company and has ties to almost every movie and music studio in the world. When the store becomes available the PS3 is going to run right over Xbox in terms of download content available. And to correct Fuzzymunch you don't get true HD on Live, you get 720. 1080p is true HD.

Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts
[QUOTE="H8s2spooge"][QUOTE="SaintsRowSam"] lol your so ignorant on live we get awsome stuff

being able to talk to our WHOLE party

we can invite friends on gh3

rarely any lag for me

marketplace is the best for buying things

we can buy gamer pictures and themes

have private chats

can send voice messages

psn cant even play online right, my cousin always plays warhawk and he said he almost all the time lags

Bren128




AHHHHHHahahahahahahaaha.

The whole party? What does that even mean? You can "talk" to however many people you want on the PSN. Marketplace is the best for buying things?!?! HAAhaahahaahahaaaaaahaahaha. BUY GAMER PICTURES AND THEMES?! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhaHAHAAAAAAAAHAAHAHAHA. Those are free on the PSN. So are the private chats and voice messages.

I don't mean to be insulting, but man, that's really funny.

Warhawk never lags, ever. Resistance does tho.

LOL truth, i have a playboy theme i got for free!

you can upload your own themes for the 360.. and lots of others are free to download.

Avatar image for Adrian_Cloud
Adrian_Cloud

7169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Adrian_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 7169 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"]

Says the tendo-boy. Yeah, I guess Sony should have had everything all going from day one. I know MS did. Oh, wait..... we're talking about updates here. And MS has had one year on Sony to realease updates. And one more year to develop them. Don't act like it should be an even playing field. ESPECIALLY WHEN ITS FREE.

Yeah, like I cry myslef to sleep at night because I can't talk to my best friend Geraldo while I'm playing Warhawk and he's playing Super Stardust HD. Give me a break.

MoldOnHold

You're talking about how MS didn't expand on Live when it had a year head start? Honestly, why would they need to? It's competition didn't even had a foothold on online gaming during this time. :|

And for the record, I'm not a total Nintendo fanboy. In fact, I've been playing Halo 3 more than Mario Galaxy to be honest.

Either way sony wins.

"Our competition talked about the fact that they want to offer consumers a choice, but then they make it clearly apparent that if you really want to have the full gaming experience, you need to go out and invest a lot more money than you originally thought you were."

Avatar image for Mad_Rhetoric
Mad_Rhetoric

3642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Mad_Rhetoric
Member since 2005 • 3642 Posts

Do people realize you don't have to pay for the whole year, you can start and stop when ever you want, like when I big multiplayer game comes out.

I bought prepaid 3 month card just to play halo 3

Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts
[QUOTE="MoldOnHold"][QUOTE="The_Crucible"]

Says the tendo-boy. Yeah, I guess Sony should have had everything all going from day one. I know MS did. Oh, wait..... we're talking about updates here. And MS has had one year on Sony to realease updates. And one more year to develop them. Don't act like it should be an even playing field. ESPECIALLY WHEN ITS FREE.

Yeah, like I cry myslef to sleep at night because I can't talk to my best friend Geraldo while I'm playing Warhawk and he's playing Super Stardust HD. Give me a break.

Adrian_Cloud

You're talking about how MS didn't expand on Live when it had a year head start? Honestly, why would they need to? It's competition didn't even had a foothold on online gaming during this time. :|

And for the record, I'm not a total Nintendo fanboy. In fact, I've been playing Halo 3 more than Mario Galaxy to be honest.

Either way sony wins.

"Our competition talked about the fact that they want to offer consumers a choice, but then they make it clearly apparent that if you really want to have the full gaming experience, you need to go out and invest a lot more money than you originally thought you were."

Sony really doesn't have a choice. If they charged for PSN (which they might have to do eventually, they have talked about this) do you really think they would have a chance against XBL? The fact that XBL has been around a lot longer means support for a lot more games and a lot more content, and for me that alone justifies the charge for XBL imo.

Charging for PSN just wouldn't make sense, they actually need to actually start competing with XBL first.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

PS3 is getting VOD, PS3 has had MPEG 4 support forever now so aside from DivX and Xvid PS3 users aren't missing anything (what does this have to do with Live anyway?), and for the amount I pay for my connection I expect my online gaming to be great and lag free for the most part but 360's shoddy p2p system and net coding utterly makes it seem like I'm wasting me money. If I wanted lag I'd go back to 56K and and play AoE2 thank you very much.

XBL does have some things over PSN but from what I understand Home is going to make PSN on par with live. Not to mention when it comes to online gaming, PC owns all.
Tiefster

You do know all but 2 games on the ps3 have player2player

Avatar image for Adrian_Cloud
Adrian_Cloud

7169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Adrian_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 7169 Posts

Do people realize you don't have to pay for the whole year, you can start and stop when ever you want, like when I big multiplayer game comes out.

I bought prepaid 3 month card just to play halo 3

Mad_Rhetoric

thats lame.

JAck Tretton is right.
"Our competition talked about the fact that they want to offer consumers a choice, but then they make it clearly apparent that if you really want to have the full gaming experience, you need to go out and invest a lot more money than you originally thought you were."

It makes me laugh how lemmings hype episodic GTAIV content.

1. Its not coming till months after the release.
2. You have to pay additional money.
3. can you get it without live?
4. if you don't have an HDD, then you can't get it.
5. Its actually a pretty sweet deal since i have an HDD and live, and since its coming out months after the release of GTAIV i have plenty of time to complete the game.

Avatar image for Osafune24
Osafune24

242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Osafune24
Member since 2007 • 242 Posts

PSN is good enough for me. I'd rather do normal offline multiplayer than play with someone I don't know that's a million miles away.

But still... On Live you're only paying to play online. Yes you've got the servers and whatnot that routes people to each other which MS needs to support, but why do they have to charge for it when everybody else does it for free? So, you're not really getting anything new.

On top of that, the $50 a year for X amount of years would likely make the 360 more expensive than the PS3, and price is one of the major criticisms of the PS3.

So, meh. Live may be better, but I'd rather stick with PSN and Home when it comes out.

Avatar image for TheEndBoss
TheEndBoss

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#65 TheEndBoss
Member since 2007 • 856 Posts
I'd have thought that Microsoft would have let people play online games for free and have them pay for the community features. Strange that it's the other way around.
Avatar image for Mizarus
Mizarus

1379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Mizarus
Member since 2004 • 1379 Posts
well i can give you that live might be better since its your opinion, but no Live isnt worht the money they charge, payng for p2p is sad and only a blind fanboy or miss informed gamer woudnt agree with that
Avatar image for gearsoftime
gearsoftime

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 gearsoftime
Member since 2007 • 579 Posts
all im going to say that psn and xbox live are both good
Avatar image for coldsteel321
coldsteel321

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 coldsteel321
Member since 2007 • 350 Posts
M$ needs the 50$ from xbox live to pay for RROD. :lol:
Avatar image for KalEl370
KalEl370

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 KalEl370
Member since 2007 • 907 Posts
[QUOTE="robflores370"]

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]2 OUT OF 3 XBOX USERS DISAGREE. What happens is only 40% of X360 fans pay for live. That means there is basically a 2 out of 3 chance my friends even if they buy an X360 aren't going to be online. Secondly it's fine to pay now when the console is hot stuff and new, but what happens five years from now when you aren't playing it that often, but you still want a match on Halo. Oh yeah you didn't pay for it this year. That's what happens. No Halo for you. With PS3 almost everyone is online and I'm not worried about the future. I'm not worried when my friends buy a PS3 if they are going to be online or not. That's the difference $50 a year makes.
EmperorSupreme

it worth the 50 dollars a year to me, if you or anybody else don't want to pay for it so be it I could care less and thats one less nimrod I run into on live anyway....

You Xbox fans really love to call people names don't you. That's about half the reason I don't have my Xbox anymore right there. The Playstation community is a lot friendlier, helpful and cooler, I got tired of paying to listen to a bunch of swearing, foul mouthed racist kids (kids is meant to describe the mentality not the age). So you aren't offending me by wanting to stay on Live. From your post it looks like you fit right in.

funny how you stayed away from the rest of my post....facts hurt huh?...and as far as the name calling, no one does it on PSN because hardly anyone has a mic, you can keep your boring community, I'd rather not have nimrods like you on live anyway

Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts

I really want to CLEAR this up.

I don't get any of this MYTHICAL LAG stuff on Live like all these COWS claim happens nor do any of my 360 buddies.

I most always 99% of the time have super fast downloads and superfast lag free online gaming.

Where this BS comes from IDNO.

Oh by the way PSN download times with filmware and game demos and videos is god alful TURTLE speed slow comapred to Live updates and such. Why don't you guys start telling the truth atleast the ones who have played on Live and not just making these bogus claims. Becuase i have both PSN and Live An Live DESTROYS PSN.

Avatar image for caseypayne69
caseypayne69

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#71 caseypayne69
Member since 2002 • 5396 Posts

ONLY thing good about live is listening to buddy voice messages while in another game then them.

The rest is PSN > live

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#72 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
What does live give that PSN doesn't that's significant to online play besides ingame invites? Nothing!!! All for $50 bucks a year!! :roll:
Avatar image for Art_424
Art_424

1745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Art_424
Member since 2004 • 1745 Posts

With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. theheavydrinker

Must be your connection or area, cause my XBL live works just fine after 2 years!

Avatar image for Shadow2k6
Shadow2k6

2283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#74 Shadow2k6
Member since 2005 • 2283 Posts

I really want to CLEAR this up.

I don't get any of this MYTHICAL LAG stuff on Live like all these COWS claim happens nor do any of my 360 buddies.

I most always 99% of the time have super fast downloads and superfast lag free online gaming.

Where this BS comes from IDNO.

Oh by the way PSN download times with filmware and game demos and videos is god alful TURTLE speed slow comapred to Live updates and such. Why don't you guys start telling the truth atleast the ones who have played on Live and not just making these bogus claims. Becuase i have both PSN and Live An Live DESTROYS PSN.

Fuzzy_Munch

:|

Updates wise yes 360 does it faster but demos no.

I did a test and had both my 360 and PS3 on and downloaded the Tony Hawk's Proving Ground demo on both. I started the downloads at the same time. The PS3 demo took 15 minutes to download and install while the 360 demo took 25 minutes to download.

I guess all those people with DSL thats border line dial-up is the reason my downloads on XBL take 25 minutes and even the 15 minutes the PS3 is slow considering I have a 10 MPBS download.

Avatar image for dkhw
dkhw

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 dkhw
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

What does live give that PSN doesn't that's significant to online play besides ingame invites? Nothing!!! All for $50 bucks a year!! :roll:munu9

I can get that money working 3 or 4 hours....wow...it's absolutely HUGE amount of money...:roll:

Avatar image for Art_424
Art_424

1745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Art_424
Member since 2004 • 1745 Posts

What does live give that PSN doesn't that's significant to online play besides ingame invites? Nothing!!! All for $50 bucks a year!! :roll:munu9

So, what does PS3 have over 360 in gamingthats makes it worth $200 more?.... and paying the diffrence not in one year but upfront!:roll: :lol:

Avatar image for Vis-a-Vis
Vis-a-Vis

1977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Vis-a-Vis
Member since 2006 • 1977 Posts

I don't quite understand it, 50$ a year is chump change, hell I probably throw 50$ a year away in small change, literally throw it away, who needs those pennies in your pocket anyways?

Needless to say I pay the 50$ a year because It gets me on live and I can play all the games I want to play with my friends, if it were free all the better, but it's not, and i'll continue to pay because I believe everything I get is worth the 50$.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10931 Posts

[QUOTE="theheavydrinker"]With all its lag, Xbox is about as live as the game show network. MortalDecay

Sounds to be like you've never played on Live, because I have yet to see any lag, and I've had my 360 for over a year.

now that right there is total bs!!!!!!!!! Even though it's not as bad as some of us cows make it out to be (most of the time) you did see lag on xbl somewhere in that year that you have owned a 360 (unless you are running t1 connection or the highest speed in fiber optic in which you will still see lag in some/most games because the lag depends on the host)i have even seen lag in resistance before (though not nowhere near bad) and that game is one of the best online handling games (if not the best) out of the CURRENT ps3/360 library. In cod4, lag is VERY apparent and in most of the times it gets so bad that it completely boots people from the room (and don't say that it's me because i have a linksys WRT150-N wireless router with a road runner modem). So i highly doubt that you haven't seen lag on xbl before
Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts
[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

I really want to CLEAR this up.

I don't get any of this MYTHICAL LAG stuff on Live like all these COWS claim happens nor do any of my 360 buddies.

I most always 99% of the time have super fast downloads and superfast lag free online gaming.

Where this BS comes from IDNO.

Oh by the way PSN download times with filmware and game demos and videos is god alful TURTLE speed slow comapred to Live updates and such. Why don't you guys start telling the truth atleast the ones who have played on Live and not just making these bogus claims. Becuase i have both PSN and Live An Live DESTROYS PSN.

Shadow2k6

:|

Updates wise yes 360 does it faster but demos no.

I did a test and had both my 360 and PS3 on and downloaded the Tony Hawk's Proving Ground demo on both. I started the downloads at the same time. The PS3 demo took 15 minutes to download and install while the 360 demo took 25 minutes to download.

I guess all those people with DSL thats border line dial-up is the reason my downloads on XBL take 25 minutes and even the 15 minutes the PS3 is slow considering I have a 10 MPBS download.

25 min. to dl a demo? That doesn't seem right. I just downloaded the demo for Culdcept Saga and it didn't take any more than 5 min. to download. It's a different game, but still... maybe you had other downloads going. Or that could just mean more people were downloading it at the same time you were.

Avatar image for shazanarkand
shazanarkand

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#80 shazanarkand
Member since 2003 • 406 Posts

It lags a lot in halo especially since there are all these kids (13-16) somehow getting host every game. Its awful. There isn't as much lag as many make it out to be but there is lag.

PSN is though a much more stable service and a much better atmosphere. Also its free. Generally, you experience one nut every 10 games or so of resistance or cod4 on the PSN. But its much more frequent to the point every game or every other game on XBL.

$50 for Peer2Peer is bs though. I hate how my $50 is being spent to have little kids host my games. And their high pitched voices *shivers* :D.

In the end PSN is better than XBL for the value and this is standing back at a non fan of any system. XBL might have extra features but it has been out 4 years longer.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Ugh,an XBL $$$ thread.

Just give up man, it looks too crazy from the outside, you'll never convince anyone.

It may be a rip-off but in the scheme of things it's pretty small potatos compared witrh the rest of the rip-offs I put up with and I can swing the 14 cents a day for what I get out of XBL.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Fuzzy_Munch

So it's ok to pay $50 just to browse Marketplace and only to pay even more money to the d/l movies and videos? Let me break it down.

Gold Membership:
- Online play (no dedicated servers)
- Full marketplace access

Silver Membership:
- Access to friends
- Access to messaging and chat
- Limited marketplace access

Live Marketplace a great service and the friend structure is great, but to try and justify the $50 price is nearly impossible. Why pay anything when it should be free? Yes I pay for it, but only because I can't do without online. It's one of the 360's selling points thjat should be free.

Playstation Network Details:
- Lag free (dedicated servers)
- Access to demos and content
- No movies and tv (coming soon)
- No universal friend's list (coming soon)
- No in game provate chat (coming soon)
- Music service also in the works :)
- HOME!

Right now the 360 does have the upper hand, but to charge for it is just retarded. It's only been a year and Sony has done a huge amount of work with PSN. Once their vision is realized it will be better than XBL.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

I don't quite understand it, 50$ a year is chump change, hell I probably throw 50$ a year away in small change, literally throw it away, who needs those pennies in your pocket anyways?

Needless to say I pay the 50$ a year because It gets me on live and I can play all the games I want to play with my friends, if it were free all the better, but it's not, and i'll continue to pay because I believe everything I get is worth the 50$.

Vis-a-Vis
Funny you say that because I picked up enough change out of the street to pay for xbox live last year. I must be your neighbor or something. :shock:
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts
[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Episode_Eve

So it's ok to pay $50 just to browse Marketplace and only to pay even more money to the d/l movies and videos? Let me break it down.

Gold Membership:
- Online play (no dedicated servers)
- Full marketplace access

Silver Membership:
- Access to friends
- Access to messaging and chat
- Limited marketplace access

Live Marketplace a great service and the friend structure is great, but to try and justify the $50 price is nearly impossible. Why pay anything when it should be free? Yes I pay for it, but only because I can't do without online. It's one of the 360's selling points thjat should be free.

Playstation Network Details:
- Lag free (dedicated servers)
- Access to demos and content
- No movies and tv (coming soon)
- No universal friend's list (coming soon)
- No in game provate chat (coming soon)
- Music service also in the works :)
- HOME!

Right now the 360 does have the upper hand, but to charge for it is just retarded. It's only been a year and Sony has done a huge amount of work with PSN. Once their vision is realized it will be better than XBL.

Great post. Live is great, but should be free. Yes, there are currenlty more features than PSN, but there's no way anyone can convince me it's worth $50. Steam is also a great service with all of XBL's features (except for movies) and it's free.

Avatar image for Fuzzy_Munch
Fuzzy_Munch

1018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Fuzzy_Munch
Member since 2007 • 1018 Posts
[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

The lame AM CRY:cry: Live cost $$$ is TOTAL BS. No one seems to have a problem paying $600 bones for a system and $60 a game. But it's oh no AM CRY:cry: when it come to Live.

When in truth not only does Live completely DESTROY PSN. It's in a whole nother league PSN does not even compare.

Live gives a full fledged Movies service TV Show and so on all in HD. Take that to the bank Blu-ray machine.

The Fall update just further plants it's foot right up PSN's ASS saying step of who's your DADDY!!!

Anyone who truly claims they can not or does not want to pay about .13cents a day for an online service that will knock your socks off. Then please give up gaming because your not being true to yourself as a gamer.

Episode_Eve

So it's ok to pay $50 just to browse Marketplace and only to pay even more money to the d/l movies and videos? Let me break it down.

Gold Membership:
- Online play (no dedicated servers)
- Full marketplace access

Silver Membership:
- Access to friends
- Access to messaging and chat
- Limited marketplace access

Live Marketplace a great service and the friend structure is great, but to try and justify the $50 price is nearly impossible. Why pay anything when it should be free? Yes I pay for it, but only because I can't do without online. It's one of the 360's selling points thjat should be free.

Playstation Network Details:
- Lag free (dedicated servers)
- Access to demos and content
- No movies and tv (coming soon)
- No universal friend's list (coming soon)
- No in game provate chat (coming soon)
- Music service also in the works :)
- HOME!

Right now the 360 does have the upper hand, but to charge for it is just retarded. It's only been a year and Sony has done a huge amount of work with PSN. Once their vision is realized it will be better than XBL.

LMAO:lol: PSN will NEVER EVER be better then Live PSN will only get better but not better then Live.

You cleary need to realize that Sony can not ever do better then the Software King MS MS specializes in this stuff. Why do you think Sony has a more reliable hardware unit. Becuase Sony is HARDWARE specialist. And MS has the best online becuase MS is SOFTWARE specialst.

Avatar image for alberth123123
alberth123123

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 alberth123123
Member since 2005 • 787 Posts
I have both Live and PSN...and Live is just way better in every single way....
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10931 Posts
I have both Live and PSN...and Live is just way better in every single way....alberth123123
i highly disagree!!!!!!!!!!! xbl have more variety, but if the ps3 had in-game friends list and in-game messaging (to send and receive game invites) i would,ve gotten COD4 for the ps3 because of the dedicated servers advantage over the peer to peer that live host